ML20126D441
Text
NII - E6 1.{
UNITED STATES
/,,
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION h
REGloN IV a
[
811 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE. SUfTE 1000 ARLINGTON. TEXAS 78011 MEMORANDUM T0: W. A. Crossman, Chief, Reactor Project Section B THROUGH:
G. L.
n table, Senior Resident Inspector, Waterford 3 FROM:
T. A. Flippo, Resident Inspector, Waterford 3
SUBJECT:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING THE ALLEGATION INVOLVING EBASCO'S QA REVIEW 0F FISCHBACH AND MOORE (F&M) RECORDS FOR SEISMIC SUPPORT INSTALLATIONS o ok ie informed the NRC inspectors that he has been terminated by Ebasco.
He supplied the NRC inspectors with an interoffice memo (attached) concerning the interpretation of ANSI N45.2.6 which he does not believe is correct. He said that in his experience a Level I inspector's work is always directly observed by a Level II. He also said that the procedures dealing with testing of anchor bolts have been routinely violated.
If an anchor bolt fails a test, they fix it and go on rather j
than expanding their sample size as required. He left this new address:
d b-T. A. Flippo TAF:rl
- A:5 #o M *'b i
~
/o r e v.< w l
[og [p%[/g g
61 7 850301
- ^
Y
,fMOb GARDE 84-A-55 PDR
Interoffice Correspondence OATE July 15, 1983 FILE REF W3-QAIRG-0647 To M. Greave OFFsCE LOCATION F6M Coordinator V.
gard FRO,y OFFICE LOCATION QAIRG Supervisor SUBJEC E: W3-QAIRG-0642: interpretation of ANSI N45.2.6 The Ebasco Site Quality Control Program is based on the same interpretation of subject standard as Fischbach 6 Moore.
In essence a Level II or III must review the results as reported and documented by a Level I inspector. This is in the form of a signature by a Level II or III on the inspection documentation. ANSI N45.2.6 Goes not require reinspection of a Level I's work by a Level II or III.
Please convey to the QAIRG reviewers this information.
WB/ paw cc: W3-QAIRC Files
.