ML20126D752
Text
_
,i f
(
[
e
=g,M+.
UNITED STATES fQ ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION 4
't
{
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20543
,.[
DEC 11273 inn s Docket No. 50-382
~
1.
R. C. DeYotmg, Assistant Director for Pressurized' Water Reactors, L
,7 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORM \\ TION: WATERFORD STEA4 ELECTRIC STATION
- f I
UNIT 3 I'-7 Plant Name:
Waterford Steam Electric Station, I;;J Unit 3 Licensing Stage:
CP j$
Responsible Branch 6 Pr3 ject Manager:
PWR Branch #2, R. Benedict 78-Requested Completion Date:
ASAP y
Applicants Response Date:
ASAP Description of Response:
Answers to Questions Review Status:
Awaiting Information 2
A recuest for additional information relative to Quality Assurance for ~
~
r the design and construction of the Waterford Steam Electric Station,
(~'
Unit 3, is enclosed.
'Ihis request is based on our review of the
(
description of the Quality Assurance Program presented in Section 1.8 i
of the PSAR.
g y
A response to this request is required in accordance with agreements reached in conference with your Project Manager and Cotmsel, which concluded that a response from Louisiana Power and Light Company (LPSL) was necessary to complete the SER. To expedite the~ process, we request a. meeting with LPSL, shortly following their receipt of
'?
this request, to fully explain our requirements.
.p FA6.3 c-v Robert L. Tedesco, Assistant Director for Containment Safety f
Directorate of Licensing
Enclosure:
(-
As stated cc: See Page
/h' eae 8506150196 850301 f
- - - ~
t
~
.~
R. C. DeYoung b g_g y. gp3 d
f cc: w/o enclosure A. Giarbusso W. Mcdonald i
cc: w/ enclosure I,:
h R. Benedict A. Garland l.T J. Glynn
[.
S. H. Hansuer
.J. M. Hendrie I
K. Kniel i
6 e
e,* ene t
l 6
5 m s.
....o a
9
.4 f-ig
[_
t I
t i
a
'e si b
i c.
t i
~
~
(,
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL QUALITY ASSURANCE INFORMATION k
WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNIT 3
~
DOCKIT NO. 50-382 1.8 Quality Assurance Program l.
The.PSAR does not contain a description of the Ccastructor er his quality assurance organization, except for paragraph f-
- t...~
1.8.5.18 "In the field, the Ebasco Quality Compliance Repre-sentatives monitor the functioning of the Constructor Quality Control Organization". What program controls are to be 3
applied to the Constructcr which are designed to implement 10 CFR 50 Appendix B' criteria? Include the ozganization re3ationship and interface 'with the Construction Manager
'i r-(Ebasco).
,/
{,.,,
L.
2.
Identify the position responsible for canaging the Quality
[,
k '-
Assurance Program. Although paragrapb; 1.8.3 describes the Qua icy Surveillance Committee functions, it does not include.
or assign the managerial responsibility.
This individual should have authority and independence to direct and resolve 1
the day-to-day problems in che Quality Assurance Program.
3..
What provisions require management to regularly assess the i
scope, implementation, and effectiveness of the QA program i,
to assure that they are meaningful and effectively complying with the corporate policy and 10 CFR 50, Appendix B criteria?
emb G *emb
7.
2-3x 4.
Identify the positions or groups responsible for defining the QA program content and changes thereto, and the~r.anage-ment level responsible for the final review and approval of I
t the QA program.
~
t.
5.
Identify the quality related activities, such as design and I.,
1 t
procurement actions or safety related plant features that I
vere iri.tiated prior to the submittal of the PSAR.
The QA program which controls these activities and satisfies the i
[. T-requirements 'of 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix B and the Guidance i
{
on QA Requirements During Design and Procurement (Grey.3ook)
(,,
sitould'also be ' described.
6.
Describe the controls which assure proper selection and h. '.
accomplishment of design verification or checking method such as design reviews, alternate calculations, or qualification r.
testing. Applicable to Ebasco.
7.
Describe the provisions which assure that the instructions,
- I' tJ,'
proce'dures, and drawings for activities affecting quality include appropriate quantitative (such as dimensions, tolerances, and operating limits) and qualitative (such as
.-i.
workmanship samples) acceptance criteria for determining that important activities.have been satisfactorily accomplished.
i l
g, Applicable to Ebasco.
8.
Describe those measures which assure the control of the issue of documents, such as instructions, procedures and drawings and the review.of the documents and changes thereto, prior to 0
l l
i e
6 3
g-,--,
,w
,.,7
---e v,
,we-m.,,,m,..
,,-n.-.,,,m,,---,-
w,,.,,,,- - -, - -,,, -
-,-,.m,
--,,, ~ ~ - -.., - -
w
s-
.f
(-
- i s
t' l
release, to assure that they are adequate and the quality
[
requirements are clearly and accurately stated and authorized. Applicable to CE.
9.
Provide a description of those measures which assure
[
receiving ins'pection is performed for materials add equipment received from suppliers. Applicable to CE.
L-n'~
L
' Provide measures which assure that the verification of correct 10.
L
.,,3 h'..
identification of materials, parts, and components is required
,-(.9 r,
prior to release for assembling, shipping, and installation.
Applicable to CE.
I i-11.
Describe measures which assure that an active file li"kept y
current on qualification records of all special processes, procedures, equipment and personnel performing,special
^
processes. Applicable to Ebasco.
~
12.
Describe those measures which assure that test results are 1
documented, evaluated, and acceptance status identified by a qual 1fied, responsible individual or group. Applicable to t
{
CE and Ebasco.
- 6...
Describe measures which assure that records are maintained-2 13.
which indicate the status of all itens under the calibration system. Applicable to CE.
14.
Describe measures which assure reference and transfer standards L,. e are traceable to nationally recognized standards or where national standards do not exist provisions are established i
to document the basis for calibration.
Applicable to Ebasco.
6
f.
f
(
~
q.(.
- 15. Describe measures which assure control of the use of inspection and welding stamps and status indicators-1 I
including the authority for application and removal of tags, markings, labels, and stamps. Applicable to Ebasco.
16.
Describe measures which assure control of the identification, documentation, segregatica, review, disposition, and i;
notification of affected organization of nonconformance of
- f,..
materials, parts, components, or services. Applicable to N~
CE and Ebasco.
I 17.
Describe measures viiich assure identification of the respon-e.-
sibility and authority for determining and approving the disposition of nonconforming items. Applicable to CE and
,Jl',
(
/
Ebasco.
.18.
Describe controls which assure nonconfornances of critical r..
items concerning departures from design specifications and
[Y#
~
drawing requirements,'which are dispositioned "use as is"
[^.
f; and " repair" are formally reported to the utility management.
fs, 19.
Describe controls which assure nonconformance reports y:
ji -
dispositioned " accept as is" and " repair" are made part of the inspection records and forwarded with the hardware to
[..
the utility's file. Applicable to CE and Ebasco.
- f. <
- 20. Describe the contents of the inspection and test records.
and if these contain the following:
I
_ _ ~.
s.
-a...
i V
(~.
l
. (,' x.
(1) a description of the type of operation, (23 idence of completing and/or verifying a manufacturing, spection or test operation, (3) the results of the inspection or test, (4) infornation related to nonconformances,
-d
~.4 (5) inspector or data recorder,
t
. a;.
(6) acceptability f'O'J.
i..: a Applicable to Ebasco.
's"
- 21. Describe those measures which assure that the LP&L Quality l
Surveillance Committee responsibility for monitoring, suppliers (CE and Ebasco, etc.) includes an objective evaluation of conformance to LP&L Quality Assurance policy difectives.
22.
Describe those measures which assure that external audits are perforced by Ebasco on suppliers perfor=ing activities on
~
safety related structures, systems, and components. These audits must include verification and evaluation of their QA program, procedures, and activities to assure that they are meaningful
?~
and are effectively complying with all aspects of the QA 2
program and procurement requirements.
'[
23.
De' scribe those measures which assure that audits are regularly
^
scheduled on the basis of the status and safety importance of l
the activities being performed, and that these are initiated early
,(*
enough to assure effective quality assurance during the design, i
f procurenant, and contracting activities. Applicable to CE and s..
.1 Ebasco.
I I
m.
---m_.
-"MF
~
b
.x l
UNITED STATES Q i/ '
ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION A
WASHINGTON. D.C.
20545 e /[
DEC 1.1.1973
~
min Docket No. 50-382 R. C. DeYoung, Assistant Director for Pressurized Water Reactors, L REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INF0PM\\ TION: WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNIT 3 Plant Name:
Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 Licensing Stage:
CP Responsible Branch 5 Project Manager:
PWR Branch #2, R. Benedict Requested Completion Date:
ASAP Applicants Response Date:
ASAP Description of Response:
Answers to Questions Review Status:
Awaiting Information A request for additional information relative to Qualih Assurance for the design and construction of the Waterford Steam Electric Station, Q
Unit 3, is enclosed. This request is based on our review of the description of the Quality Assurance Program presented in Section 1.8 of the PSAR.
A response to this request is required in accordance with agreements reached in conference with your Project Manager and Counsel, which concluded that a response from Louisiana Power and Light Comnany (LPSL) was necessary to complete the SER. To expedite the process, we request a. meeting with LPSL, shortly following their receipt of this request, to fully explain our requirements.
3 FN&)'u Robert L. Tedesco, Assistant Director for Containment Safety Directorate'of Licensing
Enclosure:
As stated i
cc: See Page 2 f
l E
'u_.
-~.m._
./
a.
e
- N R. C. DeYoung '
_ _ C,.
q73 u:.
i cc: w/o enclosure A. Gia:r.busso W. 5fcDonald cc: w/ enclosure R. Benedict A. Garland
. Glynn S. H. Hanauer J. h!. Hendrie K. Kniel h
\\'
m i
l l
l
)
6 e
N
=
g
_x 7g p" "ggy l
J RQlh.~3.gi fify Q m h7 F
...e3M f$f
)_
n m @. g, M $ M M I @ d -m*u n p.
h
=
n.n &,,, p.s@.>.
~ h iesQ c;uw L.:; m.
J.-M.c m m',m.. &n# 8..47.
~ M.-:. S.,;:
- n. --
......p. :.-6^
"EB A. S C O ' ?
_me
%vr.@.
4t
.gCADMW4+.n-;
e.eWW yrj..
w
% Cpg 4.tg&',,GUAL@w:aASSURANCE MANUALm-m 2 &. M;My$g Y
%.8 p.wwpw rkt:wwu=. -
%ms
.. M;Q.'QO'M
,ASNIE.~ S ECT.lO N III
.x"eAM@i:.6 "'m.WfM
-~ :A> " n
..d6 iM9 y -.
,r.
i
%.p' %=- >g'55;"Mkg.c'+9% +;.r..-m wu.y - J c
u n4 &%g.r rQ. a yd%M' wM " ~:,*~.u e m. ; a w ze W* M- @=.:k
-4 W-
~"
%*##V:a wi
-T p.
sg..
x4W wht5i
_.Mn%g.;.w wxW4p%ww.'i%ym b w.9y n
.Ep.. gy' [S.m.&'*W~L'.v:inwn-Aw&w,n
.-if n
- t MagW n
9 ' W S' y h.w ~ d**g*
'Le@??'~"; 2 p s.
f,%Gi@':r e,us. *h
.~
's
- w ~;
c.a
~6.J h*b,'-4 Y. '
AT p
- gT *"
- a ~r R[.,.
. ~,rt
.'.w w w.
^t n mm n
..n..n.n n n.-
~
q%"-- e:%. >-4 ; r.t a %.
p g &. x-f< mnw v ~
.?.d e %m;; 6 m
~
APW
.a y
mWST W
n, n.
=
.m
, M c e 7.,. s.....~
- r. %w a s v..y..
u_.... m.
z
.s.w
-S::u
+ w=e p e cer.p,b.
.i U I V t T T 3 N [q% $g J..Y.igEV+!iWATE R FO R D V;;S.ETS.'W f k %
1-
.e... $ &... &...
$$.e"...n.n U
-2.$Q:.w 2.
'Ay*r*Q.,k.-
aas
,~.d. m<My,-,
n.y w%c. B.,..',.y...:. 4~;;~.w.e" ' :. x'l-\\C M
..- f =.; r'N,.
- Qglg.,,<. m.
g.<
_s
,;n&,~C' trc11ed
.+ mG,- W:'m.
- .$%vgy
,a : ^
7:
, :7 ggy s
s.
l rd [f.
p n.
'k'h
_ y
^
1
~].
"}&
?..
w.
m
. nyp Q3.
R h %. W % G.,.L,R..e,
+ %ih 2: 9,,
s.
w
<, W,. v.'t ~* y &.,, s % '
As
.m
.p;m y
a
. h.,l4. '..o
.e p;4'~ $
- 40%-f*.i. " '
.3 V.
t * *W
^
f'g Q
~s.l, A*.
W l
' ?.,'*?y;'
He
~~
. f* 52 ' '
f.
g.
,, a y
.h g
m.
4.
.# Q
~,'% y'M3 ~ < *
.p ADDDDAh.:-
c_-,
m.-g m_.v,,, L 3.p"'y. Qf.> 8
.n u_
3
^4^d, 5
@ Td W TE D N i w $sryriP,j;7p %T :(
Ety.W i
I bis.
t 4-v l
3w
.. =:g '
g *-
d',
5--
~~'- 'R
,c c-mm g,
- '[.s.4.t w
-C':
'd W
'*lg.g
~
' ' ~ " '
.#..+p.,rh yf $1'ME3.1'&
, eg.; : r
' ]20c
- .:gM '
su
&" % e 5 4 % L w g :"Eti"'~ vanqqmsuc.y;styn. Mw WW 4:s gv
.c
.e
-4
~ " '
G.' w.%#,6Ky&w?.*.n
+
- th'6 W q q;
?
cy u
e
? mw.w.m -.-c.:n n
~
<.:.sp.r.
cn
! 8$.
& %lE $ E*fs % E a==i '
x.,
.7.n.N.,.g;,e L ~ m p g ; g.:.D. nJ-W CD SEI.M
$..CES.IN. CORPORATE.
4y,gc:w e
i y
m w
h.o U ra 6 Cefiter g, i
New YorkiNY10048M"g'j
- ";igh ieF.;:'"
'f j
3-wi;-M., 3;,
3 ',.~
r.-
c
.y -
.y
--._- -__ __.,_,, ~ -,
_ - _ _ _ _., - ~
- -