ML20126D718
Text
_
N May 12,1984 MEMORANDUM FOR:
Jesse L. Funches, Director Planning and Program Analysis Staff FRCM:
Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing
SUBJECT:
REVISED PIDS FOR FIN A-6819, " RESOLUTION OF WATEP. FORD 3 QUALITY CONTROL ALLEGATIONS", TO TRANSFER FUNDS TO FIN A-6821,
" EVALUATION OF SELECTED OPEN NRC ACTIVITIES AT WATERFORD UNIT 3 SITE NEEDING ACTION BEFORE PLAtlT FUEL LOAD" Enclosed are Project Identification Summary sheets (PIDS).for the above subject projects at or to be at Idaho National Engineering Laboratory.
In my memorandum to you dated May 11, 1984, on FIN A-6819, additional funds in the amount of $255K were identified to be needed for the work at Waterford 3
~.
under the Overall Management Coordination (Mr. D. Crutchfield) which was to be contracted by DL. Of the $255K identified, 5100K was needed for the project,
" Resolution of Waterford 3 Quality Control Allegations", and $155K was needed for a new project, " Evaluation of Selected Open NRC Activities at Waterford 3 Site Needing Action Before Plant Fuel Load." These two projects were to be Project i and Project 2, respectively, under the DL FIN A-6319.
I. has now been decided to fund the work in the above second project under a separate FIN Number, FIN A-6821.
We request that you transfer the $155K for the second project in FIN A-6819 to FIN A-6821. These funds are needed to authorize and fund work which is urgently needed in this month, May 1984 If you have any questions concerning this request, please contact Mark 'Jilliams on extension 28451.
I Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
DISTRIBUTION:
MWilliams TDiGaloma Revised PIDS for FIN A-6819 and central Files FMiraglia b%hdgI New PIDS for FIN A-6821 TAPMG Files JLeonard JDonohew DEisenhut/RFurple SBajwa LSolander Y
MG MLdAPMG DL:
1X.:AD DL D
s
ew SBajwa MW ams
)Crute field FM glia Jtenn,ard 'QEhseghtit j
f2/84 t,J/ /s84 5/fy/ 4 5/12/8 5
/8A 5(' '/84 pg( 'tf84
\\'
ped foie WM W 8506150'187 850301
[ l7N PDR FOIA GARDE 84-A-55 PDR s
s.
g..
/
k UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g
j WASHINGTON, D. C. 20656
%,,*****/
1AAY 121984 MEMORANDUM FOR:
Jesse L. Funches, Director Planning and Program Analysis Staff FROM:
Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing
SUBJECT:
REVISED PIDS FOR FIN A-6819 " RESOLUTION Oi WATERFORD 3 QUALITY CONTROL ALLEGATIONS", TO TRANSFER FUNCS TO FIN A-6821,
" EVALUATION OF SELECTED OPEN NRC ACTIVITIES AT WATERFORD UNIT 3 SITE NEEDING. ACTION BEFORE PLANT FUEL LOAD" Enclosed are Project Identification Summaey sheets (PIDS) for the above subject projects at or to be at Idaho National Engineering Laboratory.
In my memorandum to you dated Mgy 11, 1984, on FIN A-6819, additional funds in the amount of $255K were identified to be needed for the work at Waterford 3 under the Overall Management Coordination (Mr. D.' Crutchfield) which was to be contracted by DL. Of the $255K identifted, $100K was needed for the project,
" Resolution of Waterford 3 Quality Control Allegattons", and $155K was needed for a new project, " Evaluation of Selected Open NRC Activities at Waterford 3 Site Needing Action-Before Plant' Fuel Load." These two projects were to be Project 1 and Project 2, respectively, under the DL FIN A-6819. It has now been decided to fund the work in the above second project under a ' separate FIN Number, FIN A-6821.
We request that you transfer the $155K for the second project in FIN A-6819 to FIN A-6821. These funds are needed to authorize and fund work which is urgently needed in this month, May 1984. If you have any questions concerning this request, please contact Mark Williams on extension 28461.
C t.
(l c....
Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director OfvisionofLicensing
Enclosure:
Revised PIDS for FIN A-6819 and New PIDS for FIN A-6821 a
Dated: May 12,1984 0FFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION PROJECT IDENTIFICATION
SUMMARY
(PIDS)
Evaluation of Selected NRC Open items Before Plant Fuel Load ///
h-6819 CONTRACTNUMBER(Non-DOE):
B&R NUMBER:
NRR OPERATING, PLAN 20-19-40=41 -1 DI/ISION:
BRANCH:.
. PROJECT MANAGER:-
DL TAPMG Ja.ck N. Donchew, Jr.
CONTRACTOR: Idaho National Engineering Lab CONTRACT METHOD: 00E Work Order CITY, STATE (Non-DOE):
SMALL BUSINESS / MINORITY CONTRACT (Non-00E):
SUB-CONTRACTOR (S):
None YE5 / /
NO /X /
AMOUNT $
PROJEuw PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE START: 4/2/84 END: 7/30/84 PROJECTED FINANCIAL DATA (000's)
PROJECT FY 198I4 IUTAL TOTAL TOTAL CARRY FY 8I4 FY 855 FY 96(6 VALUE OBLIG COSTED OVER BUDG BUDG BUDG 179 n
n n-1,9 o
n APPLICATION (RELATE THE PROJECT TO A-SPECIFIC PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENT)
NRR FY84 Operating Plan: Case werk Decision Unit, Planned Accomplishment Power Reactor Reviews Construction of several plants is nearing completion.
At some plants there are a number of issues that need to be evaluated in a timely manner before the NRC staff can make its low power licensing decision for the plant. This contract is to provide assistance to NRR to evaluate se;ected open' NRC issues for the plant before the plant fuel load.
G
?
m
. WORK REQUIREMENTS (DESCRIBE WHAT IS TO 8E PERFORMED)
The contractor will evaluate how the applicant has met the NRC requirements for the discussing his findings and conclusions. selected NRC open items for the plan Reso'lution of Waterford 3 Quality Co*ntrol Allegations Project 1:
FY84 Contractor Beiiverables' 2
NRC Licensing Actions 1
~.
MODIFICATIONS (DESCRIBE MAJOR CHANGES TO THE PROJECT)
COMPLETE AS APPLICABLE -
Recommended:
Endorsed:
Endorsed:
Endorsed:
Approved:
PRQJECT MANAGER SECTION LDR BRANCH CHF ASST DIR.
DIV. DIR
' Non.w
.D.'5.isekhuY Initials)
F. Miraalia kk IUY (Date) 6
. A. t a c.~..cn } l
- 0FFICE Of NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION '
~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
PRDJECT. IDENTIFICATION Sur.".ARY (PIDS)
-- {g ; e } y -
M, P.ay ll,1984 Rev.2
.n s, 19_.
10pa Dov 1
I Resolution of Waterford Unit 3 Quality Control Allega'tions
.e '
FIH:Pg0g 1 CONTRACT NU.".5ER (Non-DOE):
$aRNU.".3ER:
' NRR GFERATING ?LAN 20-19-40-4.1-1 INDEX MO :
DIY1510N:
3 RANCH:.
PROJECT.".ANAGER:-
DL TAPMG Jack Donohew, Jr.
CONTRACTOR: IDEL(ES&G)
CONTRACT F.ETHOD: DOE Mc~rt Order CITY, STATE (Non-DOE):
SP.ALL 3U51NE53/.".IND.ITY CONTRACT (Non-D E):
4 SUE-CONT 7;CTOR(5): no YES / /
NO /X/
A"OUNT 5
- O.iECTED :E7..'0D OF ?ER.000.".1; ICE START: 4/2/34 END: 5/ 3 0/ 3 ".
- -'i-~
h h ?-
a /.
..,..... ~
.c eat
' O.. k
.n.
.,....a.
8 :.
- -.
- 2 LO S_i :.D O b.--
- , m'"-
i'.--
2
- ?.E4 2 0
0 0-XEN O
O
_r
,.,: uni 1C.,..-.,n.-
._inc. eno.;- 4 t x:
4 :.
e-ce t. I r I C PLn......,
iw n
. a :.3
.s. ~.s..u.3,, e a.
n,, )
c 4
- .
- ..:. :Y34 Operation Plan: Casework Decisicn Unit, ?lannec Acc::.olist Powe.- Reac or Reviews E
l control practices during the construction of Waterford Unit 3 plant.This co These allegations
~ must be resolved in the near future..to ac?foid a ::otential delay in the low ; ower licensing cecision by HRC for this clant.
6.
1
- N.
p v ts j
__m-e e
h en.e m
I
-2
/
WORT REOUIRetENTS (DESCRIBE WHAT IS TO SE PERFOR".ED)
The contractor wiiT evaluate the alieged imoroper cuality control practice during the cons..uction of Waterfcrd Unit 3, by a review of associated QA/0C document:riort and will docreent his evaluation which will give the signifi-cance of his findings and the generic it::piications of his findings as they~
relate to the facility.
[.- -
.. _ Tne contractor will provide an interim Technical Evaluation Report (TER') and
.1, final TEFe Tne interim TER will be an ir=ediate repor:
to be.used by the NRC. Staff to address the alleged improper cuality c:ntrol practices in the low power licensing decision for the plant. The final TER will be provided within four weeks of the interit:r TER.
Contractor Deliverables E.84
~
Interim TER 1.
.rinal TER 1
<gc. s.
J MODIFICATIONS (DESCRI3E MAJOR CHANGES TO TiiE.:ROJECT)
Mod. No. I: Increase the estimatec value of the ;roje:: f-c II:0K :o 5232n he in:rcasa :s a nigner evel of effor neece:
- ::c:;ete One evaluations of the cuality con:roi ' allegations a: ',aterfor-3 in a timei v manner to acvoid :otential delays in the low :ower I:cens:rg ecision for tne pian:.
..cd No. 2:
Additior.ai increase in the estimated value of the project cecause a higher level of effort from the contractor is now estimxed to be needed to complete the evaluations in a timely manner./ This increases O
.he estimated value of the project frp:.. a ggg
- f-',
' Mod No. 3: Transfer $155K to FIN A-6821. Transfer project on the evaluation of how I the applicant for Waterford 3.has met selected-$ arts of the_ NRC. r.equir_ements__
in NRC General Inspection Procedures Manual Chapters 2512, 2513 and 2514; q of IE Bulletin 79-14 and of the Independent Design yerification Program
)
(IDVP) which is estimated to be the $155K.to FIN A.6821 with the funds.
COMPLETE AS APPLICA3LE -
1 9
- leco:r, ended:
Endorsed:
Endorsed:
Endorsed:
Aaproved: [.~ 3 pc0 JECT 3ANAGER SECTION !.OR BRANCH CHF ASST DIR.
DIV. 0IR O'1,\\ \\ f ew ag F. Miraalia
?
E4;s enhut (I'ni tia l s )
DLA.
(Date) d'
-u o
e Dated: flay 12,1984 CFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION PROJECT IDENTIFICATION
SUMMARY
(PIDS)
TITLE:Evaivation of Selected Open NRC Activities at Waterford Unit 3 Site FIN: A-6821 Plaadin n Actinn Refere Plant Fuel Load CONTRACT NUMBER (Non-DOE):
BAR NUMBER:
NRR OPERATING PLAN INDD M.:
20-19-70-00-1 DIVISION:
DL BRANCH: 7Ap3g PROJECT MANAGER: Jack N. Do'nchew, Jr.
CONTRACTOR: Idaho National Engineering Laboratorf0NTRACT METHOD:
DOE Work Order CITY, STATE (Non-DOE):
SMALLBUSINESS/MINORITYCONTRACT(Non-00E):
SUB-CONTRACTOR (S): fione YES / /
NO / X/
AMOUNT $
PROJECTED PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE START: 5/13/84 END: 7/31/84 PROJECTED FINANCIAL DATA (000's)
PROJECT FY 198$4 TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL CARRY FY 834 FY 845 FY 856 VALUE OBLIG COSTED OVER BUDG BUDG BUDG 155 0
0 0
155 0
0 APPLICATION (RELATE THE PROJECT TO A SPECIFIC PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENT)
NRR FY84 Operating Plan: Management Direction and Support This technical assistance contract is to provide assistance to f;RC to resolve selected open NRC Inspection activities at Waterford Unit 3 site which need action before the plant fuel load.
This contract is to evaluate how the applicant has met the NRC requirements in NRC General Inspection Procedures Manual Chap.ters 2512, 2513 and 2514; in IE Bulletin 79-14 and in the Independent Design Verification Program (IDVP).
. WORK REQUIREMENTS (DESCRIBE WHAT IS 70 BE PERFORMED) requirements in selected parts of the NRC General Insp Chapters Verification Program (IDVP).2512, 2513 and 2514; of'.IE Bulletin 79-14 and of the The contractor will report his findings and conclusion in a Technical Evaluation
~
Report.
FYO4 Contractor Deliverable 1
~
Licensing Action 1
MODIFICATIONS (DESCRIBE MAJOR CHANGEE TO THE PROJECT)
\\
1
{
COMPLETE AS APPLICABLE -
l Reconsnended:
Endorsed:
Endorsed:
Endorsed:
Approyed:
'Q -
PROJECT M_ANAGER SECTION LDR BRANCH CHF ASST DIR.
DIV. DIb g J.
w -
rd aim?
F. Miraalia 0 iPise
't (Initials) 6/h
- ^
E'
.1 4*
(Date) ty I
.we e
v.m