ML20126D670
Text
.
i., ?. n i D S T :.' E s NUO.E O. REGULATORY COMM!bsiON kl.
REGION tv g
g l
( '- " -/, -
sii F v Ar. pt( t on:vt. surit iocr 1,
,e ARLit.GT oN. TE X AS 701 77 July 27,19S2 h#
ME% TC:
1:. A. Crcssr.an, Chief, Reactor Project Section E T '.. 5 Snstable, Senior Resident. Inspector, llaterford 3 V
T:0";
- 1. A. Flipoo. Resident irspector, !?aterford ?
S'JL;E Li : ALLEGATION REVIEli CASE NUMBER I
Tne fir: inspector observec that s an IAC employee 3
(J AC is o ned bv Ebasco) workina Tor the OA Review Group Contractors e
Mr. M was associated with a sub-group of that organization)
Records.
that revieves Mercury tubing records.
He was not a OA canager. Mr.(
was tercinated by Ebasco on June 17, 1983, because his work load was Wot consistent with the other members of the group.
3
'Tne
,2 : instector learned that Larry Stinsor., Ebast 's anage e Daa li t,s Frograr.s, had received infont.atior, that Mr ha
-[
.- nis resun+ at the 7;.rrnc lant.
Two areas in the resume ad een 7,}
, falsified.
Mr.
esuse showed a college degree which he did L nct actuallv have anc he claimed to have more nuclear experience than
{ne re'lly t'ac.
Mr. Stinson promptly reviewed the resume that Mr.M]
O ad subr.itted to Ebasco; however, these discrepancies did r.ot appear.
s The !!R: insoector also reviewed Ebasco's trainir; and qualifi
'ons pro;rar for cuality assurance personnel and found that Mr.
had 7
successfully coroleted tr.e Etasce training that was recuire for his j ot,
hctes ar.d cecies o' some of the docu er. s used ir, the investicatier.
a e ir.clu:ed ir the fcicer.
Ar, artreviatec and saritized ve*sicr. c' inis infor.ation will be included in !!R; Inspection Repor+%nless 3 cthencise directed.
I recor. rend this allegation be closed. *
- b. G Y
.3 T. A. Flippo Resident inspector TAF:rl cc - To, lies terr.an 5506150173 850301 h M - [ E ' N I V f 7 :i PDR FOIA CARDE84-A-55 PDR l
g I
. - -