ML20126D651
| ML20126D651 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000000, Waterford |
| Issue date: | 02/08/1978 |
| From: | LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20125A430 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-84-426, FOIA-84-449, FOIA-84-A-55, FOIA-84-A-65 QP-18.3, NUDOCS 8506150169 | |
| Download: ML20126D651 (24) | |
Text
_
A QUALITY ASSURANCE m m> t o REV.
1 CONDUCT OF r-DATE Feb
- 8. 1978 QUALITY ASSURANCE MlCoLE Scum Es SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION SITE AUDITS PAGE 1
of 11 f
t i
l1.0 Approval l
Approved by:
dM4W M-/~7I QUALITY ASSURANC GAGER DATE i
'2.0 Purpose This procedure provides instructions for conducting site audits and reaudits of safety related aspects of nuclear power plant construction.
Site audits shall be conducted primarily by LP&L Site Quality Assurance
- l Engineers.
, 3.0 Scoce l
This procedure applies to the auditing of construction activities affecting safety related functions on LP&L Nuclear Projects. The i
construction activities referred to shall include such activities as l
controlling design changes, purchasing, fabricating, handling, shipping, i
storing, cleaning, erecting, installing, inspecting, testing, operating, maintaining, repairing, and modifying safety related equipment, struc-l
[
tures, systems and material.
[4.0 Responsibilities
}
4.1 Quality Assurance Engineers and Technicians are responsible for conducting site audits, for preparing a report of their audit findings and for follow-up in the form of reaudits on corrective action cournitments.
R
[Q[k-34-N2(sp s
b 2-I k
b
\\ 2, \\
g5061 9 850301 GARDE 84-A-55 PDR
LPL-QA SITE AUDIT REPORT I."
Date of Audit:
Report No.
spany Audiced:
Company Escort:
Location of Audit:
Persons Interviewed:
General Requirement (s):
2.
Description of Subject of Audit:
- 3.. Specific Requirement (s), Finding (s) and Recou::nendation(s):
1 i
4.
Evaluation of QA Program or Activity Audited Based on Element (s) Audited:
gr v.
Acceptable Corrective Action & Follow-Up Required
==
Conclusion:==
Auditor (s) Signature:
Date:
Discussed With:
Title:
Date:
Project QA Engineer Signature:
Date:
5.
Corrective Action Reply:
t:
Corrective Action:
Action To Preclude Repetition:
Date When Full Corrective Action Will Be Achieved:
l Reply made by:
Title:
Date:
LPL Q-21 G-73)
{
""*3 QUALITY ASSURANCE no.
3 g
REV.
j CONDUCT OF l
QUALITY ASSURANCE DATE Feb. 8, 1978 l
M cole south CONSTRUCTION SITE AUDITS uTUT:ES SYSTEM 2
11 PAGE of 1
4.2 The LP&L Project Quality Assurance Engineer is responsible for review of site audit reports to maintain awareness of site activi-i ties and of site problem areas.
4.3 Specialists, consultants, or other knowledgeable personnel shall be utilized for technical support in audits where deemed necessary by the Quality Assurance Manager and/or the Project Quality Assurance Engineer.
I5.0 Procedures 5.1 General l
l Site audits shall verify that safety related activities associateJ
,..b with LP&L Nuclear Power Plants are performed in accordance with i
applicable regulatory requirements, specifications, instructions, I
l procedures and drawings. These audits are necessary to assess the
\\
effectiveness of the Quality Assurance programs of the Architect /
Engineer, Construction Manager and co itractors at the construction
'j l
site. Site audits vill be scheduled in accordance with QP 18.4.
i 5.2 Preparation 1
5.2.1 Scheduled Audits i
The Quality Assurance Engineers and Technicians listed on l
I
],
the site audit schedule, shall plan and execute audits assigned to them in accordance with the information on the s
\\
L Pt'o -ie' ~ (9-N b
QUALITY ASSURANCE to QP 18.3 _
l E
3 CONDUCT OF DATE v.b.
A.
197R QUALITY ASSURANCE l
uTEsi:te sokEM us is ES SYS CONSTRUCTION SITE AUDITS FAGE 3 of 11 I
i f
_ schedule. The designated Quality Assurance Engineer /
l Technician shall use a checklist or audit procedure during the audit to identify specific items to be checked. The j
i I
engineers / technicians who perform the audits shall familiarize l
themselves with reference material within the scope of the audits.
5.2.2 Unscheduled Audits i
i In addition to scheduled audits, the LP&L Project Quality l
Assurance Engineer may designate a Quality Assurance Engineer to conduct an unscheduled audit. He will brief
(
i l
the Quality Assurance Engineer / Technician. on the subject
~
i of the audit, reason (s) for the audit, and any items of special interest. As in the case of scheduled audits, l
the designated Quality Assurance Engineer / Technician shall l
i familiarize himself with reference material and the subject i
r of the audit.
i i 6.0 Performance i
i The following shall apply to audit performance:
a.
Checklists or audit plans shall be used to ensure depth and continuity of the audit. The checklist shall be used as a guide and shall not restrict the audit investigation when I
findings raise further questions that are not specifically included in the checklist.
I a r m w,,. m l
S# 18*
m QUALITY ASSURANCE Na REV.
~
CONDUCT OF QUALITY ASSURANCE DATE Feb. 8, 1978 ggg sEsQ CONSTRUCTION SITE AUDITS 4
n j
PAGE of I
b.
Nonconformances or program deficiencies shall be identified and investigated further to identify the cause and effect and i
to determine the extent of corrective action required.
I l
c.
Nonconformances or def!.ciencies shall be related to the require-ments which have been violated.
d.
Elements fotmd to be nonconforming shall be discussed with a member of the audited organization. He shall be requested I
to sign the report indicating that the nonconformance was i
discussed during the exit interview.
e.
Conditions requiring immediate corrective action shall be I
reported (verbally) insnediately to management of the audited organization. A written report in accordance with Section 7.0 below shall be prepared following the verbal contact.
7.0 Reporting l
l l
7.1 Preparation of the Audit Report I
i The assigned auditing Quality Assurance Engineer / Technician shall prepare the audit report. The report shall be made using the
" Site Audit Report" form LPL Q-21 (See Figure 18.3-1.).
t Instructions.for use of this form are printed on the back (See
~
Figure 18.3-2).
The checklist or plan used to perform the audit shall be attached only to the LP&L file copies of the " Site Audit l
s_.
I
\\
7 (9 /4 LPt o-44 4
QUALITY ^SSURANCE QE 18.3 no.
3 REV.
~
CONDUCT OF Feb. 8, 1978 em DATE QUALITY ASSUPANCE L.
wooLE scurs u w e sys m CONSTRUCTION SITE AUDITS 5
11 FAGE i
i
't Report" form. The checklist shall not be distributed with other i
copies of the audit. report. The audit report shall be reviewed and i
signed by the Quality Assurance Engineer / Technician and the Project j
I Quality Assurance Engineer.
i 7.2 The Project Quality Assurance Engineer will issue the audit report
.f to the appropriate supervisor of the organization audited within twenty working days of the ending date of the audit. If the
" Acceptable" block is checked off on the audit report, no res-ponse shall be required from the audited organization. If the
" Corrective Action & Follow-up Required" block is checked off, the t
(q report shall request the audited organization to respond within twenty working days to indicate 1) actions which they plan to take to correct the deficiencies reported, 2) action to preclude l
l repetition of reported deficiencies and 3) dates for whe.n full l
l corrective action will be achieved. The response may be completed i
l j
by the audited organizati6n during the exit interview. A shorter l
response time may be specified if urgent corrective action is i
i required. Copies of the audit report will be distributed to the Manager of Power Production, Quality Assurance Manager, Nuclear Project Manager and others as deemed necessary by the Quality Assurance Manager or Project Quality Assurance Engineer.
i I
(
i i
I I
l 4
r tK Q:fr(9 n3 I
QP 18.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE no 3
REV.
'~
f'.
CONDUCT OF QUALITY ASSURANCE DATE Feb. 8, 1978 Miccts scuTH uriuriss system CONSTRUCTION SITE AUDITS 6
11 PAGE of I
1 l
i Report numbers shall be assigned in the following format:
i I
W 3
S 76 1
f Sequence t
Year i
Site Unit Number t
i Plant Code (Waterford)
. 8.0 Follow-Up I
(v' The Quality Assurance Engineer / Technician who conducted the audit shall 4
perform the necessary follow-up to insure that timely and satisfactory f
responses are received from the respopsible supervisor of the audited organization. He shall keep the Project QA Engineer advised of those i
instances where the audit response is late and/or not satisfactory.
~
In the event a deficiency is not cleared or resolved during the initial l
reaudit, a Continuation Sheet of the Site Aud.t Report shall be used.
I l
The Continuation Sheet (LPL Q-22) shall indicate the status of the item established during subsequent audits along with any further recemenda-tions by the auditor and provide a maana of response by the audited or-ganization. (See Figure 18.3-3).
Instructions for use of form LPL Q-22 l
are printed on the back of the form. (See Figure 18.3-4).
i, i
e l
LPr Q' 14~ (fa74)
I QUALITY ASSURANCE No QP 18.3 REV.
3 f
~
CONDUCT OF Feb. 8, M l
Q S
DATE Micots soutw uriuriEs sysrau CONSTRUCTION SITE AUDITS PAGE 7 of 11 I
i9.0 Significant construction Deficiencies i
i l
Refer to QP 15.3 " Handling of Significant Construction Deficiencies" for instructions in this area.
i 10.0 Records Site audit reports are quality assurance records and shall be retained for the period specified in the record retention schedule.
I
('
I t
I t
l l
I i
< ~
w 0
9 trca.,r-tv.m 1
QUALITY ASSURANCE no. QP 18.3
.m REV.
3
~
CONDUCT OF
."^.
QUALITY ASSURANCE DATE Feb. 8, 1978
\\ -
I UNdEYSSE CONSTRUCTION SITE AUDITS PAGE 8 of 11 l
I i
1 L7L-QA l
SITE AUDIT 11PDRT 1..
Date of Audits Report No.
Company Audited:
Company Escort:
I I
tacation of Audits Persons Inte: viewed:
i l
General Require m at(s):
2.'
Description of subject of Audit:
l i
I l
l 3.
Specific 3aquirement(s). Finding (s) and Recommenda' tion (s):
4
/3 L.
4.
Evaination of QA Frogram or Activity Audited Bised on Elements Audited r==a1== ion:
O A.ce,tante O Correceive Actio.
rotto -c, mes tre4 Auditor (s) Signature:
Dates Discueeed Vith:
Title:
Dates Project QA Engineer Signature:
Date:
- 5. Corrective Action Reply:
I Corrective Action l
A4 ties To Freclude Repetition:
Date Whee Tell Carrective Actica Vill Be Achieved:
I i
A-Reply sade by:
Title:
Dates 1
I brL Q-il (2=H)
Figure 18.3-1 LPt'Q:14 tf-74)
QF 18.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE na
.._2 3
i m.
CO N OF Feb. 8' 1978
(%
i QUALITY ASSURANCE DATE
$0d$bsys CONSTRUCTION SITE AUDITS PAGE 9 of 11 i
i l
DSTRUCTIDMS FOR Co*7LETION OF SITE AUDIT RIPORT
. (IPL Q 21) l 1.
Section 1 - nis section includes the basic infornation about the audit:
Date, Company, Location, Report Nunber, Escort, Persons In-i tarviewed and General Esquirement(s).
2.
Section 2 - his section shall be used to give a brief description of the i
ecope of the audit.
3.
Section 3 - his section.shall be used to 1) state the specific require-ment (s), 2) describe the finding (s), and 3) state the recommenda-tion (s).
(
Se two basic type findings to be listed in this section are
- 1) nonconformances and 2) observations. Ic is not necessary to state a requirenant in the case of observations since c6 l
requirement is actually violated.
15En auditor shall sign the report in this section.
A representative of the audited organisation shall sign and data the report in this section. nis signature indicates i
i that the finding was discussed during the suit interview.
t ne LP&L Froject QA Engineer shall also sign and date the report in this section.
I 4.
Section 4 - ne auditor should naka a brief evaluation statement regarding i
the affectiveness of the quality assurance program elements which were audited.
3.
Sectica 3 - his section is to be completed by the audited organisation l
and returned to LP1L. n is section includes 1) corrective action taken or planned on each iten. 2) action taken or planned by the audited organization to preclude repetition,
- 3) the date when full corrective action will be achieved and
- 4) the signature, title, and date of the individual supplying the response.
EDTE3 A Site Audit Continuation sheet (LPL Q-22) shall be used in reporting the results of reaudits and la sleeing items out af ter verification of satisfactory corrective action.
I i
tt Figure 18.3-2 i
i (Pt Q.te (9 74)
P e
e
~ '
QUALITY ASSURANCE rio. QP 18.3 _
Iw.e p
3 REV.
CONDUCT OF
'O..
QUALITY ASSURANCE DATE
$?iOEs EvsSE CONSTRUCTION SITE AUDITS U
10 11 PAGE
- LPLaqA SITE AUDIT REPCRT (COMTINLIATION Sitt.CT) s 1.
Date of Re-Audit:
R'epor t No.
Re-Audit No, e
Company Audited:
Company Escott:
tacation of Audit:
Persons Interviewed:
i Requirement (s):
i 2. Re-Audit Finding:
Q ltem Reasins Open l
C teen Closed l
1 i
e i
i
/m
%e i
I 1 Auditor (s) Stenseure?
Date:
Discussed titeh?
Dates 3.
Response
l I
}
I i
l I
Reply Made ay Dates V
t l
l V L y.a (4-D ).
i 1
I Figure 18.3-3 trivre7,.m h
~
w-ew ww,-
.w-
~---
s.
P QUALITY ASSURANCE no. QP 18.3 l
3 REV.
l' W
i CONDUCT OF Feb. 8* 1978
/-s i
QUALITY ASSUE35CE OATE i
M400LE sourH unuTIES SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION SITE AUDITS II 11 PAGE d
I l
l i
e l
l l
1 f
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETION OF SITE AUDIT REPORT 6
(CONT 1WAT10?1 SCIT)
(LFL Q-22) l l
1.
Section 1 - This section includes the basic informatio'n about the Re-audit:
Dete, Company, Location, Escort, Persa ns Intervieued, Require.
esot(s). For " Report No.
", the number of the original audit should be entered. For "Re-audit No.
", the number j
of the "Re-audit" should be entered. For example, if an itet.
I
(
is being re-audited for the first time, enter "1", the second i
time "2",
etc.
I 2.
Seetton 2 - This section is used to record the findings of the re-audit.
ircluding whether the item rersains open or is closed. The auditor shall sign and dato this section. If the item remains s
open, a representative of tie audited orgsnization shall sign b'
and date the form. This signature indicates that the finding was discussed with him. If the item is closed, it is not sh essary that this line be completed. However, "N/A" should be entered here.
l 3.
Section 3 - If the ites remains open, this section is to be completed by
(
the audited organization and ' returned to LP&L. If the item is elosed "No Response Required" or "N/A" should be entered here.
l j
1 f
l l
I i
I l
l l
l t
l l
Figure 18.3-4 4.,_
\\
L Pt Q.14 g f.14)
I
n QUALITY ASSURANCE NO. op 1R 1 REV.
1 CONDUCT OF SEE EU wootE SouTM
?
unutES SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION SITE AUDITS I
l 3
l1.0 Approval Approved by:
v/M4W S " /- 7I QUALITY ASSURANC GAGER DATE 1 2.0 Purpose This procedure provides instructions for conducting site audits and reaudits of safety related aspects of nuclear power plant construction.
Site audits shall be conducted primarily by LP&L Site Quality Assurance Engineers.
i l 3.0 Scope l
This procedure applies to the auditing of construction activities affecting safety related functions on LP&L Nuclear Projects. The I
construction activities referred to shall include such activities as controlling design changes, purchasing, fabricating, handling, shipping, i
storing, cleaning, erecting, installing, inspecting, testing, operating, maintaining, repairing, and modifying safety related equipment, s truc-I tures, systems and material.
1
[4.0 Responsibilities l
4.1 Quality Assurance Engineers and Technicians are responsible for conducting sito audits, for preparing a report of their audit
\\
findings and for follow-up in the form of reaudits on ccrrective action connitments.
t of
\\
5
\\
l S \\2.\\
R?%<~ S. L I
~
tW O (9 74)
LPL-QA SITE AUDIT REPORT 1.'
Date of Audit:
bport Ne, vany Audited:
Cr.mpany Escort:
Location of Audit:
Tersons Interviewed:
C1neral Requirement (s):
2.
Description of Subject of Audit:
o 3.
Specific Requirement (s), Finding (s) and Recommendation (s):
4.
Evaluation of QA P$ogram or Activity Audited Based on Element (s) Audited:
(
s t
Acceptable Corrective Action & Follow-Up Required
==
Conclusion:==
Auditor (s) Signature:
Date:
Discussed With:
Title:
Date:
Project QA Engineer Signature:
Date:
5 Corrective Action Reply:
t' Corrective Action:
Action To Preclude Repetition:
Data When Full Corrective Action Will Be Achieved:
Reply made by:
Title:
Dato:
LPL Q-21 (.:-7 3)
QUALITY ASSURANCE NO.
m.
i CONDUcr OF
,.q 1
QUALITY ASSURANCE DATE Feb. 8, 1978 l
u: cots sours CONSTRUCTION SITE AUDITS ununEs SYSTEM 2
11 PAGE of 4.2 The LP&L Project Quality Assurance Engineer is responsible for i
. review of site audit reports to maintain awareness of site activi-ties and of site problem areas.
4.3 Specialists, consultants, or other knowledgeable personnel shall be utilized for technical support in audits where deemed necessary by the Quality Assurance Manager and/or the Project Quality Assurance Engineer.
l5.0 Procedures 5.1 ceneral Site audits shall verify that safety :: elated activities associated
,..L f
with LP&L Nuclear Power Plants are performed in accordance with
___ applicable regulatory requirements, specifications, instructions, i
procedures and drawings. These audits are necessary to assess the effectiveness of the Quality Assurance programs of the Architect /
Engineer, Construction Manager and contractors at the construction
']
site. Site audits will be scheduled in accordance with QF 18.4.
f 5.2 Preparation 5.2.1 Scheduled Audits l
The Quality Assurance Engineers and Technicians listed on the site audit schedule, shall plan and execute audits assigned to them in accordance with the information on the i
L i
\\
trio.i~~t,.m h
QUALITY ASSURANCE na QP 18.3,
REV.
3 l
CONDUCT OF DATE 5'ah - A-197A QUALITY ASSURANCE l
Miaotk SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION SITE AUDITS sours ununs FAGE 3 of 11 l
l
_ schedule. The designated Quality Assurance Engineer /
l i
Technician shall use a checklist or audit procedure during i
the Ladit to identify specific items to be checked. The i
engineers / technicians who perform the audits shall familiarize themselves with reference material within the scope of the audits.
5.2.2 Unscheduled Audits f
f l
In addition to scheduled audits, the LP&I. Project Quality l
Assurance Engineer may designate a Quality Assurance Engineer to conduct an unscheduled audit. He will brief
(
l the Quality Assurance Engineer / Technician. on the subject
~
i of the audit, reason (s) for the audit, and any items of special interest. As in the case of scheduled audits, I
I the designated Quality Assurance Engineer / Technician shall l
familiarize himself with reference material and the subject of the audit.
l l
l 6.0 Performance The following shall apply to audit performance:
a.
Checklists or audit plans shall be used to ensure depth and continuity of the audit. The checklist shall be used as a guide and shall not restrict the audit investigation when j
i 4
findings raise further questions that are not specifically included in the checklist, t
LPCQ%is~(9 74)
y QUALITY ASSURANCE no. QP 18.3 _
i 3
m
~~
CONDUCT OF QUALITY ASSURANCE DATE Feb. 8, 1978 U$uE$EsQ CONSTRUCTION SITE AUDITS 4
PAGE of I
b.
Nonconformances or program deficiencies shall be identified i
and investigated further to identify the cause and effect and to determine the extent of corrective action required, c.
Nonconformances or deficiencies shall be related to the require-l ments which have been violated.
d.
Elements.found to be nonconforming shall be discussed with a member of the audited organization. He shall be requested I
i to sign the report indicating that the nonconformance was discussed during the exit interview, l
e.
Conditions requiring immediate corrective action shall be reported (verbally) immediately to management of the audited organization. A written report in accordance with Section 7.0 below shall be prepared following the verbal concact.
7.0 Reporting 7.1 Preparation of the Audit Report l
The assigned auditing Quality Assurance Engineer / Technician shall l
j prepare the audit report. The report shall be made using the
" Site Audit Report" form LPL Q-21 (See Figure 18.3-1.).
Instructions. for use of this form are printed on the back (See Tigure 18.3-2).
The checklist or plan used to perform the audit shall be attached only to the LP&L file copies of the " Site Audit i
b
\\
LPt o *le (994
- 1
QUALITY dSSURANCE QF 18.3,,'
na 3
REY.
CONDUCT OF Teb. 8, 1978 iN DATE QUALITY ASSURANCE
\\
woot.e sours uTiunES SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION SITE AUDITS 5
11 PAGE d
i Report" form. The checklist shall not be distributed with other i
copies of the audit. report. The audit report shall be reviewed and i
signed by the Quality Assurance Engineer / Technician and the Project j
f Quality Assurance Engineer.
l l
7.2 The Project Quality Assurance Engineer will issue the audit report to the appropriate supervisor of the organization audited within i
f twenty working days of the ending date of the audit. If the
" Acceptable" block is checked off on the audit report, no res-If the ponse shall be required from the audited organization.
" Corrective Action & Follow-up Required" block is checked off, the f
3k.
report shall request the audited organization to respond within twenty working days to indicate 1) actions which they plan to take i
to cor act the deficiencias reported, 2) action to preclude I
j l
repetition of reported deficiencies and 3) dates for when full i
t l
corrective action will be achieved. The response may be completed I
l by the audited organizati6n during the exit interview. A shorter I
response time may be specified if urgent corrective action is i
required. Copies of the audit report will be distributed to the Manager of Power Production, Quality Assurance Manager, Nuclear Project Manager and others as deemed necessary by the Quality Assurance Manager or Project quality Assurance Engineer.
l i
I
\\
1 i
x o u c,,. m f
QP 18.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE NO 3
REV.
'~
CONDUCT OF f'
QUALITY ASSURANCE DATE Feb. 8, 1978 uioote scurs UDUDES SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION SITE AUDITS 0
11 PAGE of i
i Report numbers shall be assigned in the following format:
i l
W 3
S 76 1
Sequence Year i
Site i
Unit Number i
l Plant Code (Waterford)
. 8.0 Follow-Up (a^.
The Quality Assurance Engineer / Technician who conducted the audit shall a
perform the necessary follow-up to insure that timely and satisfactory responses are received from the respopsible supervisor of the audited organization. He shall keep the Project QA Engineer advised of those instances where the audit response is late and/or not satisfactory.
I In the event a deficiency is not cleared or resolved during the initial reaudit, a Continuation Sheet of the Site Audit Report shall be used.
The Continuation Sheet (LPL Q-22) shall indi.: ate the status of the item established during subsequent audits along t.ith any further recommenda-tions by the auditor and provide a meana of response by the audited or-ganization. (See Figure 18.3-3).
Instructions for use of form LPL Q-22 l
are printed on the back of the form. (See Figure 18.3-4).
I t
l scor,r m m
QP 18.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE g
rey 3
CONDUCT OF Feb. 8, 1978 QUALITY ASSURANCE DATE
' ~'
nun!ssysY$
CONSTRUCTION SITE AUDITS PAGE 7
of 11 I
- 9.0 Significant construction Deficiencies
.I Refer to QP 15.3 " Handling of Significant construction Deficiencies" for instructions in this area.
i 10,0 Records Site audit reports are quality assurance records and shall be retained for the period specified in the record retention schedule.
l i
h t
$(
t l
I I
e l
d'
- w 0
t LPr Q-tr-tF-74)
L.
QP 18.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE NO f
REV.
3 i
l^.
CONDUCT OF QUALITY ASSURANCE DATE Feb. 8, 1978
( -
M100L SOUTH unuti SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION SITE AUDITS PAGE 8 of 11 I
i i
LFL-QA y
SITE ACDiT RIPORT I
1..
Date of Audits Report No.
Company Audited:
Ccapeny Escorts l
l
!acard.on of Audit:
Persons interviewed l
l General Require = eat (s):
l 2.
Description of Subject of Audit:
t l
t t
I 3.
Specific taquirement(s). Findisg(s) and Recomendation(s):
l i
/3 4.
Evaluation of QA Progras or Activity Audited Based on Elements Auditedt Comelasions b Acceptable Correcti,ve Action f. Follow-Up lequired Auditar(s) Signature _
Deter l
I' Discussed L'ith u tle:
Seter 1
2 l
Project QA Engineer Signature Deter i
- 3. Corrective Action Reply:
Corrective Action Action Ta Freclude Repetition Date khan Full Cstractive Actica vill Be Achieved; i
i
\\-- '
Reply sede by:
Title:
Date I
l l
3 LFL Q-21 (2-Ji) i Figure 18.3-1 oro:nmp-m
e QP 18.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE no l
3 nEv.
~
CONDUCT OF Feb. 8, 1978 r
QUALITY ASSURANCE DATE m
$uSN rsys CONSTRUCTION SITE AUDITS PAGE.
9 of I
}
1 DSTRUCTIONS FOR Co m ETION CT SITE AUDIT REFORT
. (U L Q-21) i 1.
Section 1 - his section includes the basic information about the audit:
Dete Company, Location, Report Number, Escort, Persons In-i tarviewed and Cameral Requirenant(s).
2.
Section 2 - his section shall be used to give a brief description of the ecope of the audit.
3.
Section 3 - his section shall be used to 1) state the specific require-ment (s), 2) describe the finding (s), and 3) state the reconnenda-tion (s).
1 Se two basic type findings to be listed in this section are
- 1) nonconformances and 2) observations. It is not necessary
+
^
i to state a requirenant in the case of observations since 56 l
requirement is actually violated.
1$a auditor shall sign the report in this section.
A representative of the audited organization shall sign and date the report in this section. nia signature indicates j
that the finding was discussed during the muit interview.
Se USL Project QA Ingineer shall also sign and date the report in this section.
I 4.
Section 4 - ne auditor should nake a brief evaluation statement regarding the affectiveness of the quality assurance program elements e
which were audited.
3.
Section 3 - nis section is to be completed by the audited organization l
l and returned to LPSL. n is section includes 1) corrective l
j action taken or planned on each iten, 2) action taken or l
plaened by the audited organization to preclude repetition,
- 3) the date when full corrective action will be achieved and 4
- 4) the signature, title, and date of the individual supplying the response.
MTE2 A Site Audit Continuation shest (IJL Q-22) shall be used la reporting the results of reaudits and in I,
slosing itens out af ter verification of satisfactory l
eerrective action.
I I
t L
Figure 18.3-2 I
i LPt Q te (9-74)
~
s
~ ' '
l QUALITY ASSURANCE r;o. QP 18.3.,
-_ 7 x.
3 REV CONDUCT OF
-h I
QUALITY ASSURANCE DATE Q%djYS E CONSTRUCTION SITE AUDITS 10 11 PAGE
- LFL-4A SITE AUDIT REI' ORT (CONTINUATION SitEET) i l.
R' por t No.
Re-Audit No.
Date of Re-Audit:
e 6
Company Audited:
Company Escott:
location of Audit:
Persons Interviewed:
Requirer. cat (s):
i 2. Re-Audit findang:
Q ltem Remains Open j
O Item Closed i
i I'
l t
I i
I l
l e..
t I
?
I Auditor (s) Stensture?
Date:
Discussed titth?
Date:
3.
Response
l i
I i
i
}
l i
t r
i Reply Nade Ey:
Date:
3 i
(..
l 9L y.a i4-n),
I Figure 18.3-3 i
LPEG-le 19 74) f b
1 l
1 m
QUALITY ASSURANCE no. QP 18.3 3
REV.
I
,- -J CONDUCT OF Feb. 8, 1978 l
QUALITY ASSUR.CCE DATE woots scuTH UTIUTiES SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION SITE AUDITS 11 11 PAGE d
i I
I f
4 11tSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETICN OF SITE AUDIT REPO!tt (CONTINUATION SH".ZT) 6 (LPL Q-22) 1.
Section 1 - This section includes the basic informatio'n about the Re-audit:
Date, Company, Location Escort, Persans Interviewed, Require-ment (s). For " Report No.
, the number of the original i
audit should be entered. For "Re-audit No.
", the number j
of the "Re-audit" should be entered. For example, if an item I
(
is being re-eudited for the first time, enter "1", the second i
time "2", etc.
I I
2.
Seetton 2 - This section is used to record the findings of the re-audit, 1M1uding whether the item rersains open or is closed. The suditor shall sign and date this section. If the item remains open, a representative of th e audited orgsnization shall sign b'
and date the form. This signature indicates that the finding was discussed with him. If the item is closed, it is not necessary that this line be completed. However, "N/A" should be entered here.
l
=
}
J.
Section 3 - If the ites remains open, this section is to be completed by l
the audited organization and returned to LP&L. If the item is alosed "No Response Required" or "N/A" should be entered here.
l Figure 18.3-4 t
i n
i LPt Q*le (9 74}
o
- \\_. _
P Proc. No. QF 18.4 NE s
f S.'
hev.
2 PCNJ PROCEDL*RE CHANGE NOTICE (PCN) l r
Effective Dacq 2/17/83 i
ugg
- Procedure l
Title:
Scheduling of Site Quality g
Assurance Audits
,Page 1
of a
l i
Current 39
\\Y Description of Change
~
Page
, Page c S'@CY l
i j No.
Rev. No.
l 3 of 6 2
6.0 Remove
At least five working days l
6.3.1.1 i
i i
I~
See P~ygh c. 1. <
Ay-LP(L Y m 4i d o(
e
- u. G e m 4 4 l. " g/lc a M l
l e l-a m- %4s of tk d2+ po p ;
- N A'k.0 WA t.
i
+
1 h $ -D "D U
l b IN Reason For Changer Provide additional time for Project QA Engineer to prepare up-coming audit / surveillance schedule.
s.
fraparad By:
Approved 37:
Approved 37:
Approved By:
Approved By:
s:(',
-r
..h: :...s, f/.,.,,
'7' \\'l/ r, t <* t.
- M.
- s QA. Manager D t:,:..>T f,'
Oate:.~. 9 - i')
l Cate:
l Date:
Date:
e d -
- e-. n, 4 -
= ---.
b V WI g/ V &
e
E No. QP 18.4 QUALITY ASSURANCE
}
g Rev. 2 SCHEDULING OF
,S
(,
Ece SITE QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDITS Date 3/23/79 E
MIDDLE south k
UT1UTIES SYSTEM Page 1 of 6
tj i;
5 F
E h
(S 1.0 Approval Approved by:
de A - O h e7./ #/f ManagerofQualityAsspace p:.
c 2.0 Purpose V:
f.j' This procedure provides instructions for establishing in advance the timing,
[
staffing'and subject matter of site Quality Assurance audits conducted by h,-
the Site Quality Assurance Engineers.
[;
3.0 Scope
(*'
This procedure applies to all LP&L Nuclear Projects.
E 4.0 Responsibilities l
4.1 The Project QA Engineer shall evaluate the need for audit activity at h,
t j
the site to provide assurance that quality requirements are being i
adequately implemented. As a result of such evaluation, the Project ti b
QA Engineer shall prepare monthly audit schedules, i;
C 4.2 The Manager of Quality Assurance shall review and approve all proposed
{.~
and completed audit schedules.
ff h
E 5.0 References
[,
1 U
i 5.1 10CFR50, Appendix B Criterion XVIII g,.
t 5.2 TSAR 17.2.18 audits Y
\\
~
i k
N.
QP 18.4 QUALITY - ASSURANCE E
Rav. 2 i
SCHEDULING OF s
SITE QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDITS Date 3/23/79 "sMN dvsI$
u Page 3 of 6
affected.
6.3 Surveillance schedule 6.3.1 Precaration TheProjectQAEngineershallprepareAnAuditSchedulefor the next one month period, listing the subject of each audit to be performed. The Audit Schedule, Figure 18.4-1, shall be used to tabulate the audit activity details. The Project QA Engineer shall periodically review the audit schedule and revise as necessary to assure that coverage and schedule reflect current activities or unusual conditions. The following
(
'~
guidelines for the Audit Schedule preparation shall apply. ~
l 6.3.1.1 Frequency l
AnAuditScheduleshallbepreparedandissued@
[C ive working prior to the month covered 1
by the schedule.
l 6.3.1.2 Audit Dates The dates of the audit shall be specified and shall i
be listed on the Audit Schedule.
6.3.1.3 Report No.
The Report No. shall be assigned in the following format: Plant Code-Unit-Location-Year-Sequence Code:
i.
s.,
. y QUALITY ASSURANCE f r.=
7
- 1 j Rev. 2 SCHEDULING OF
(
SITE QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDITS Date 3/23/79
~
c.saamma ygg[jggj Page 5 of 6
6.4.1 Updating Within 15 days after completion of the scheduled period, the Project QA Engineer shall update the audit schedule by. noting j
the actual date of the audit and the date of the issuance of the Audit. Report. When the response to the audit has been received, this shall be noted on the audit schedule. When
. corrective action has been confirmed, this shall also be noted on the schedule. The " Remarks" section can be used to note any n'ecessary special considerations. The updated Audit Schedule
()
shall become a summary history of the audit activity during the schedule period.
7.0 Records l
I The originals of the Audit Schedule documents shall be retained as required by the Record Retention Schedule.
8.0' Attachments 8.1 Figure 18.'4 Scheduling of Site QA Audits 1
+
l 1
(,
i e
,.-,._.,,n-
-m.--
-