ML20126D629
| ML20126D629 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000000, Waterford |
| Issue date: | 01/07/1983 |
| From: | LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20125A430 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-84-426, FOIA-84-449, FOIA-84-499, FOIA-84-A-55, FOIA-84-A-65 PROC-830107, NUDOCS 8506150163 | |
| Download: ML20126D629 (7) | |
Text
.
f L
LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY l
WATERFORD SES UNIT 3 TASK FORCE ACTION PLAN AND PROCEDURES FOR INSTALLATION VERIFICATION q
Prepared By:
[
M
/ 9 J QA Engineer Date Approved By: dd
//7h7 l
Project QA Engineer
'0 ate Approved By:
.- a dtf
/ 8.3 QA Manager
'Da te
, //I '.
/ 7 3 Approved By:
_o Sr. Vice-President, Operations Date l
T Action Plan Page 1 of 7 01/07/83 For A 42 6/"i 8506150163 850301 g iE3 hARDE8 A-55 PDR
i TABLE OF CONTENTS A.
Action Plan B.
Organization Chart (Figure 1)
C.
Procedure: QSP19.1 Task Force Installation Verification D.
Appendices: Procedures and/or Checklist By Discipline 01 Electrical D2 Mechanical
)
D3 Civil D4 Structural D5 Testing a
i 1
4
(
Action Plan Page.'2 of 7 01/07/83
F ACTION PLAN FOR TASK FORCE REVIEW 0F INSTALLED STRUCTURES / COMP 0NENTS Introduction As a result of the USNPC Enforcement Action EA 82-109, a management decision was initiated by LP&L to develop an aggressive plan to establish methods for quality records review and applicable physical verification for selected activities performed by contractors who performed safety related activities prior to June 1,1982.
The schedule for completion of the Action Plan is as follows:
January 7,1983 Complete walkdown and records review, procedures and checklist January 10, 1983 Commence records review and walkdowns March 15, 1983 Complete records reviews and walkdowns; l
compile results l
The Task Force assigned the implementation of the Action Plan will be 1
comprised of personnel of normally independent groups, Quality Assurance and Engineering.
(Reference Figure 1, Organizational Chart.) As such, the Task l
l Force Action Plan will be approved by the Senior Vice President, Operations.
Action Plan Page 3 of 7 01/07/83 l
F Development In developing the Action Plan to be used in reviewing the installed structures and/or components to assure the compliance to requirements, the following factors were considered to be pertinent.
A.
Contractors currently involved in the installation of structures and components are:
Gulf Engineering NISCO Ebasco Force Account Tompkins-Beckwith Mercury Waldinger/Ebasco HVAC B & B Insulators These contractors, by procedural requirements, document the inspection of the installed structures and/or components prior to submitting the Startup System to Ebasco.
Prior to acceptance by LP&L, a records review is performed by Ebasco. Concurrently with the Ebasco Review, the LP&L Startup Group and LP&L Construction QA review the SUS package.
The LP&L Construction QA review is comprised of a documentation review and I
installation verification performed on randomly selected documentation of the structures and components, contained within the S/U System, as part of the status review prior to turnover.
All safety-related startup.
systems require this status review prior to preoperational testing.
Action Plan Page 4 of 7 01/07/83
Due to this on-going review of structures and components, the Task Force will not review the installations and documentation being reviewed by the LP&L Construction QA and LP&L S/U Group.
B.
The type of activity performed by J. A. Jones (Soils / Cement) and Fegles (Shield Wall and Dome) limits the availability of installed areas which could be examined.
Selected documentation will be reviewed to verify adequacy of these installations.
C.
Significant Construction Deficiency No. 56 was reported to NRC on October 1, 1982. The SCD addressed coatings in the Reactor Containment Building, as. installed by Sline.
The final report on this SCD has not been submitted.
The task force will review Sline activities performed outside of the RCB.
D.
Peabody Civil and Peabody NDE performed no activities directly related to the installation of components, as both perform testing functions. Task Force will review documentation supporting qualifications of personnel, l
quality records, etc., to assure adequacy of activities performed.
l l
E.
La. Industries was responsible for supply of concrete, other contractors "placed" concrete.
Concrete was tested to assure compliance to specifications. Task Force will review test results obtained for concrete as supplied by La. Industries.
Based on conditions examined above, items A through E, the Task Force will examine the following contractors for compliance to installation requirements:
1.
Combustion Engineering - Reactor internals and alignment 2.
American Bridge - Structural steel erection 3.
Nooter, Inc. - Pools / liners 4.
Chicago Bridge & Iron - Containment Action Plan Page 5 of 7 01/07/83
5.
Sline - Coatings outside of RCB l
6.
F&M - Supports and separation 7.
La. Industries - Concrete supplier 8.
Peabody Civil and Peabody NDE - Testing l
l l
l
[
Action Plan Page 6 of 7 01/07/83
- - - -