ML20126D615

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 4 to QA Instruction Qai 23, Review of Ebasco Const Quality Records
ML20126D615
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Waterford
Issue date: 02/29/1984
From:
EBASCO SERVICES, INC.
To:
Shared Package
ML20125A430 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-84-449, FOIA-84-A-55, FOIA-84-A-65 QAI-23, NUDOCS 8506150157
Download: ML20126D615 (30)
v • d • e


Text

_

4 "p.

Ou A1.lTY ASSUR ANCE ENGINEERING

'E 4 Eff6 SITE OPERAT10NS

(~

QAl NO.

23 QUALITY ASSURANCE INSTRUCTION

.....e, LP&L UATr?'ORD S*EAM ELECTRIC STATION UNIT NO. 3 PREPARED SY REVIEWED SY sEN OR QA 7E

,,$3,g g

  1. "0
  1. "0 s TE m,P isom R uARKs ssus g47g g47g n

DATE G. Bourgeois C. D12 utrona Oraft 8/29/83 8/29/83

, 3/,E9 M

-h%ma r

.b

,) laid t J.

yr s t

)

4 a.,.g1 mx 1 -

.n. m@

t r.n R... i n.

, i bn Min 1 13 4,WL% V% %; o\\Wo 5,C -..

c neen==

d'"T/Ner -

n. r Re,s, 2

S../6b information only f

wm T W\\

/ATM C.

R. M V g. aas gt/

in /// $d/75 Re,,.

3-cen. rat a m iston Qui rxD "A*@

gM

/

d Page 5 of 6 revised.

I Para. 6.2.4 and 6.2.4.3.

Revision 4 R. DeDam 3/

A[

t;rona 2/29/84 W2W94 JJ9 fY I.

tN l

vt~

Revisim 5 8"*"8 i

ESA SCO l

CtUALITY Ares uneer CONTROi. LEO DOCUMENT Revision 1 COP) NUMBER b

i Revision g 61 7 850301 OARDE84-A-55 PDR CODE:

i fopp-g4g/g9 na - n.,>,,n.u.

NOTE:

a Innroots and core by re,*sewes or, resw i.

hf}{

l

133a.43/s.76 ouAun AssumAnet EsclNEERIN pcO3 1 gr 6 M

QUALITY ASSURANCE INSTRUCTION e

QAl NO. 23

.sr r...,. o 2.rs I2rJ., Waterford Steam Electric Station Unit. #3 l " - 'f$C,"J,*,8

,, s.

...m...

i.........

Paview of Ebasco Construction Osality Pad l Nov. 7,1983

/.4) Ndy 3

1.0 PURPCSE 1.1 na purpose of this procedure is to deliraate the requirements and guideldras fcr the receipt, review and processing by Ebasco Constrr'-4m 3

G Pecords Paview Grcup cf quality reccrds generated bv Ebasco COnst~rtion and Site Centracters as defirad by applicaole EPRI's.

2.0 SCOPE 2.1

'Ihis share applies tc quality rec =rds pertaining to Ebasco Construc*im 3

activities relati:q to permanent plant egaignent safety-related, tai-1, and fire protection quality related.

3.0 REFERE?CES 3.1 CP-793 - Documentation Handling.and Processing for Ebasco Construction 3.2 WQC-167 - Review and tansmittal of Quality Relatai Peccrds O

3.3

%I Review and Handling of Construction-Installation Recomis 3.4 QAI Supplanant, %IBGS No.122 3.5 Sham QA Progran Manual

~

i 3.6 ANSI N45.2.9 - Draft Jan- " ;-19L jog OWt'M on!y i

~

4.0 DEFINITICNS 4.1 m - Phasm Can,gtruC" t

4.2 CIWA - Condition Identification Werk Authorization 4.3 NCR - Nonmnhnce Repcrt.

~~.

4.4 DCN - Design Change Notice 4.5 ftR - Field Charge Request 4 ti WPCC - Work Package Control Centar

.7 Quality A. surance Macrds - QA Records are tMse records which provide dm==ntary evidence of the quality of items and activities affecting quality. Quality Assurance Pecords may be either the criginal or a reproduced copy.

,6 g'

,.,-w

,7

.7 w

133e=49/6 79 GUALITY A13UR &NCE ENGINEEON.

psta 2 o'

6 E AS~O QuAuTY ASSURANCE INSTRUCTION QAl NO. 23

(.w

,a.rs l......".._'" 04C,Agas l iP&L Waterford Stean Elec=ic Station #3 g

Review of Ebasco Construction Quality as:=rds l Nov. 7,1983

  • * ^ ' "

.....,Q BDj y NC'y 3

4.8 Safety-Related Itsa - Any itan designatsi by Ebasco Engineering, in accordance with the gnidalines es"h14=hed by the Ebasco Licensing Depart:nent, to be Safety Class 1, 2, 3, Seis:.ic Categcry 1 or Electrical Class IE and any other'itsns as designated by the Lice.sirg Depart:nent ad indicated as safety-related in the PSAR a xi FSAR.

4.9 Safety-Palated Service - Any service perfc=ned that directly affects the quality of a safety-related itan.

4.10 Work Package - A package consisting of a Wcrk Package Control Sheet plus I

those quality related for:ns required by the governing ASP, CP, WQC and

}

designated Site Contractors w:rk pre te(s). When indicatad, the controlled design d m - nt will be included. The intent is to achieve a total work package for construction but it is not mandatory that centrollai procedure (s) cr design documents be assenbled into a work package.

(See Attachneht "B" also).

4.11 QAIRG - Quality Assurance Installation Paccrds Grcup - The dapa h nt O-within the Waterford III Quality Program responsible for the status and

  • j final review of w = = 4 - i.. _ m, e m og m.m i

Construction and Ebal co QC acp'ivitieT0fm8t*t0T) Cfh,/

1 Or ID 4.12 Start-up Systen Trans fet Schacule - The systaratic schedulim_ ferd the transfer of start-up av N W e

-up t;o LP&L Plant J

Operation Staff in support of plant fuel loading schedule.

4.13 ECRRI - FtEmm Construction Records Paview Instructions - Preposed by the m QA Records' Supervisor to better define review _r activities for specific work itans. Each KRRI shall be uniquely nu:nbered and approved by the EC-QA Manager.

l 5.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 5.1 The EC Quality Assurance Manager is responsible for monitoring and assuring the inplanentation of this re iure.

5.2 The EC QA Records, Supervisor is responsible for assuring that E work l

packages and related QA Records received are logged, reviewed and l

processed in accordance with this p. dure.

l 5.3 EC QA Pecords Peviewers are responsible for the review and resolutien of 3'

l QA Records in accordance with this procsiure and applicable ir:plementing ASP, CP, NQC and designated Site Contractors procedure (s).

l i

i l

..:... -. a -

=

a.-.-. < ~ ::.

=

-. v-

83 M /4-?G cuAuTY AssuR ANcr enc Negat, j

oasa 3 v

6 NO QUALITY ASIURANCE INSTRUCTION QAl NO. 23 vse f.sssa* -'fff#e',", la rs LPc wate-fd Steen Elec rie station a3 vs g..y c..a i.

5.

as. u a o.

neiew ef cS=m cens ruc~ ion Cuality WJ l

I Ncnr. 7, l'983

.s p,h Mdf 3 I PD 5.4

'he Sonic: Resident Engineer, K, is responsible for assuring tMt all safety related construction ccr plete work packages, generated in accordance with CP-793, are sutmitted to the K Quality Department.

5.4.1 h E Quality Control Superviser is responsible for assuring that all appl h ahle CC generated inspec. ion checklist and repcr*.s are included into the construction ctr.pleted work packages. The work packages shall be returned to WPCC for sulrittal to the EC@ Pecceds Review Group.

6.0 PROCFDURE 6.1 Work packages received by the EC-CA Records Review Group shall be entered into the K-QA W=ntation Package Icg (Attachnent 7.1 Pav.1) by start-up system (SUS). ' Safety-related work packages w3.11 be assigned a CFA number at the time they are entered into the leg. The CFA rurber will serve to identify and track the work package and associated deficiency reports, if generated, through the review cycle of K-OA Records and tran m ittal to OAIBG. Also entered at the time of receipt will be the Mark Package Control Re*w as Aa#4neri in CP-793_ mi th= Mteof receipt.

I 6.1.1' After intotp g

ckages will be l3 i

Review of safety rb2 - pr.uges shall be Mewsi to' the require-6.2 ments of ASP, CP, WQC and designated Site Conw..;ms p.wdare(s). The 3

Activity Matrix and its instructions shall be used as gnidalines for crrnpleteness of the work package. The review of the work package shall be h=nted on Form QAI-23-1 Rev.1 "E Installation OA Records Paview and Acceptance Checklist".

(See Attachment "A" for instru::tions on the use of Form OAI-23-1 Fev.1).

6.2.1 Additionally, the work package arxi applicable & rants therein shall be reviewed for the following:

6.2.1.1 Ccrnpleteness - Assure the infonnation ani data required by approved r.w deres has been properly recorded on the documents presented for review.

6.2.1.2 Accuracy of Cente.nt - Assure that quantitative and qualitative data meet established crite.ria. This information shAl reflect satisfactory accerplishment and cernpletion of the sc:pe of the documentai activity.

1 i

f336.as/ w t GUAUTY ASSUR ANCE ENGINEERIN cats 4 car 6 N

QUALITY ASSURANCE INSTRUCTION QAl NO. 23

.u....,

r.....

LPEL Waterford Steam F.lectric Sta % Unit #3 l"-7,*dC#',88

,, s.

...m...

....s...~..

Teview of Fha m Construction Quality Roccrds l Nov. 7, 1983,

  • * ^ ' '

3 RD $ M C (( L 6.2.1.3 Proper Fem - Assure that the drmnts/fc:r..s are c

c:2npleted as required by the applicable procedure.

revision at.the time of ac::omolishuent of the activity, and that the infc=ation and data suhitted are entered in the proper crder if specifically regd. red by specifi-cations, procedure, c::de or centract.

6.2.1.4 Mcaah414+y - Assure that demnts provide unique and sufficient infomation to relate the documents to the activity pa d W and cross reference other documents (i.e., drawings, NCR's, etc.) required to ccuplete the package. 'Ihe docanent package shall also provide traceability sufficierre to identify the material, or item part nunber, serial number or other identification requi. red as hpplirah1e.

6.2.1.9 Iagibility - Assure that requir,mi.infonnaEfen and data g

A can be logically d4 E--intihout questions. Marginal qualit;y d=Mshall -

le by rimans of V

W M,with.a r'esolution maintained on

.the reteg L

/p,.

., Documents.of-queit!E5nable legibility shall be brcught tc the attention of the EC CA Records Supertiscr for evaluation prior to submittal to the de-nt generater s

for resolution. Records with poor legibility but which can be read (inferrnation is discernable) may be duplicated k

arti enhanced by the reviewers. 'Ihe record duplicated and the duplicate shall be maintained together. The reviewer shall sign and date the duplicatal record certifyirs the authenticity of the duplication. Infor-mation and/or corrections of mince errors which can be readily and accurately verified may be provided by the reviewers. All such added infctmation cr ertanced infor-mation shall be initialed and dated.

6.2.1.6

.Mithenticity - Assure that required signatures and dates are affixed as required by the implenenting procedures.

6.2.1.7 Changes / Supplements - Assure that emections, changes or supplements to documentation have been made followirg i

the guidelines listed below:

b A.

Charges or corrections shall inciude the date and identification of the autMrized persen makiry the n'..'

'.. ~

' ~ ~.

' ~ ~ * '

s+

s us.w s.n 5

6 CU ALITY A13UR ANCE ENGINEERING pac 3 er

'NO QUALITY ASSURANG INSTRUCTION QAl NO. 23

...w,

I.P&L Water' erd Steam Elec=ic Sta*4~1 Unit #3

" " 'Inv7sie'u"*

Fel:: uar/ 29, 1984 re us

...WCASb&

R Cp6AC E3 IMW E O F Paview of Ebasco Ccnstru.~:icn Cuality Pecords l***

i Nov. 30, 1983J.

, g aso.,.g as 4 lFDD AMCiI!

r.

change or ccrrection. Changes sM11 he si.gle lined thrcr.gh and ini-da'ed aM dated by the individual changing c: ccrrectirg the ent::/.

B.

Supplemental doc =enta~d~1 centainsi in cr added to a w:rk package shall receive the reviews and a Wr required by the procedure revisien in effect at the time the supplernental documentation was generated.

6.2.2 DCI's, KR's, NCR's, d.Ws and sketches inc1"Aad, or referenced, in the work package will not be subjected to a reiiew under this s w.icre.

These doc =nents will be used as an aid in the definition and sccpe of the constructicn activity being doc =nented.

6.2.3 CIWA's shall be reviewed in ac::crdance with CAI-9 Supplement, CA.UGS No.122, with the exception that Fa QAI-23-1 Pri.1, EC Installa*4"n 3 '

GA. Bec=rds Peview and Act:sptance Checklist, and CAI-2 -2 Fev.1, j

IC QA Records W4e4ency W, are to 6.2.4 nmun.ntation d 4 4

review of werk w - if]on Form:- L = p a s.icns this ft.g packages as E.u. M ure art to be

, E GA Pecords f

M4"4=ncy Pdpcrt (DR) ex-

"I d"- -ataticn for which

't a Discrepanci 4

initatai by the K-CAPC reriewer usirs ECRRI-4. (DN's are generally generated against hardware i+Jms.)

6.2.4.1 Areas of concern not within the secpe of the documentation review described by this sw eiure shall be brought to the attentien of the EC CA Pecords Supervisor.

6.2.4.2 If a DR is generated to identify a deficiency against any reference doc rnant(s) on FC::m GAI-23-1 Fev.1, the item no. of that document (s) shall be lis*ad en fc=m QAI-23-2 Fev. 1, under the column and EDN the item no.s listed en Form CAI-23-2 Fev. 1 would be 8 and 11.

6.2.4.3 The package will be considered coglete when all items shown on DR(or DN in case of Mercef doc =entatier)have been resolved satisfactorily and verified by the EC-CA 4

Pecords Peview Lead Discipline / Designee.

b 6.2.5 Upon ccmoletion of the work p'ackage review, the work packsee along with ccmpleted forms GAI-23-1 Fev.1 and CAI-23-2 Fev.1 shall be returned to the EC Iogging/Irackirs Clerk (s) for loggirq and prcper disposition of the re/iewed package.

6.2.5.1 Accepted packages shall be transmit *ad to CAIRG.

!234 48/4 76 OU AU*Y AssuR ANCE ENGINE"T.lN pegg 6 Op 6

M QUALITY ASSURANCE INSTRUCTION QAl NO. 23 T

( SC

  • w & a g e.Q 3.YE R =INQlCATES Le_ rJ h*eM S*am "M a Station #3 aevision I rivss i...u.ca.us i.

.u.cs.

w o,

Retiew of Ebasco Ccnstruction Quality Reccrds l** ^'

  • l Ncv.

7.,

1983

. c m..h.... q GAT ((/

3 lRD 4 6.3 A log of deficient work packages shall be maintained by start-up system (SUS) rurber and CEA n:raber, l

I 6.3.1 The E -CA Reccrds Paview Grcup shall utilize the Ebasco Start-up Systen Transfer Schedule in establishing pricrities in their efferts to close deficiency report items.

6.3.2 When supplemental documents are secured as a result of the.

ram,1ntion effort, these doc.xnents will be subjec*JYl to the sans review required by this sw aiure of the work package with which it is associated. Paragraph 6.2.1.7 of this r d ure shall also apply to the resolution effert.

6.3.2.1. Mditional deficiency itens generated durirg the resolution effort shall be MAar* to the existing fom %I-23-2 Rev.1.

6.3.3 Upon closure of all deficient itens, the work package will be returned to the E Iogging/Tracki:q Clerk (s) for logging arxi transmittal to QAIBG.

'N

\\

6.4 Wm=ntation-defic 1EnEes dipcov ^ " d @h CAI-9 g transmitted

's revi p of EC work W wit packages shall be de,Blu, TO to a: m ancords for re n.

~~

s 6.4.1 Upon E--4M74r 4=nt work packages, the Iogging/ Tracking Clerk (s) shall note the receipt of'the work package under the l

original entry for that TA zurber and assign *Jw work package to the Discipline E-G Review Group for resolution.

l 6.4.2 Besolution of %IBG generated deficiency repor*a shall be in acx:crdance with Section 6.3 of this procedure.

7.0 ATDCINENTS 7.1 "E @ Documentation Packages" log Sheet 7.2

%I-23-1 "EC m Installation Recards Review arxi Acceptance Checklist" 7.2.1 Attachnent "A" 7.2.2 Conticuation Sheet to Form GI-23-1 3

b-I 7.3 SI-23-2 "E % Pe:ords Deficiency Rep:rt" 7.4 Attachment "B"

r e

a Av 8

25 f.T m

S-5

.8 2d d<

6 a-S.2 u

s8 3%

^

(

O s.

e s a 2

0 85 I

Y.UI [!IO OY, EI.!OD '

I

r 6

g a

=_

=

.Ea

~.

'S I.

j L

e qe C

a e

At C.ad 7.188F/*3

=

~..,.

m I

EC INSTALLATION QA RECORDS C

REVIEW & ACCEPTANCE CHECXI.!ST p g.

of SAFETY REL TED QFA NO.

b b

NON SAFETY RELATED '

,)

WORK PACKAGE CONTROL NO.

h SE!SMIC 1 I-g I ^

~

FIRE PROTECTION ASME SEC. til CLASS SECONDARY SUS NO.

b l

DISCIPLINE: MECH.

ELECT. O CIVIL HVAC D iaC ACTIVITY b

NO ORIGINAL REVliW FINAL REVIEW litM REFERENCE DOCUMENT N0 TITLE AND RESULTS ACCEPT FOR@@

OF ggggggg NO.

DOCUNINT

/ OR FORM NO.

$NTS @ @ l@ l @

If DATE I

CP793 A 72 C,#ib, i!!#RSEELW4M 2

4 3

..q 4

DCN

$[NhbbM. #ce,$NNN m

e mymw.

PUNCH LIST

g 5%m.. ve m mw.mmy I

p Da l

4 MTS 5

h j

^'

@n Y

DWG

-- "mmgm n

a CIWA 9

NCR 10 DN 11 EDN O @ @ @

O O

e

+

/~~

j LEGENO: hNOT APPLICA8LE hACCEPT h DEFICIENCY hMCLO Attactanent 7.2 PO#ts 4M

  • 33 *l Aty.1 77-7

-_,-m-e.e-.

smmmggwm-e.-..-mwwg,

_e m ye m m ww~pe

mmv, w-4 v-+,-,--s-

--e,,---

-,-,-n-,++--e n -

m w ee e mwn.

-m

A"""AOD.:..

  • A' 02-23
  • N5""T'0"'!ON "'O 00:'?!.:._. FC??? C A -2 3-1 Fev. 1 1 - Enter the applicable CIA nu=ber per para. 6.1.

2, 3 & '- - Note the IJork Package Control cu=her, Pri=ref Si;5 No. and Secondary cu=ber frc= the ~ Jerk Package Centrol Sheet.

f 3 - Check the typropriate bicch fer Safety Related, *!cn-Sa.fety Related, Fire ? Otectica i Seis=ic ! activity and enter the Class 1, 2 er 3, as applicahle, if acti ity is ASME I ~.

6 - Discipline shall be deter =ined and appropriate bleek checked.

7 - Activity under the above discipline shall be deter =ined and described.

SA - Trc= Ite: l to 11, the reference docu=ents (.8Al listed =ay be applicable for a particular acti--ity.

THe additional procedures which are required or the Activity Matrix for the QA Review for that r

particular activity shall be listed as Ite=s 12

'.3, D...etc.

1~

83 - The Title /No. of the Docu=ents/For=s required tf the reference documents cr procedures in 8A shall be listed.

O 8C - If any reference doc.:=ent in SA is not applicable, block N/A shall be checked. Check the applicable block (Al, (D) er (E) per :=. view procedure

.d.

QAI-23 Rev.1 for those docu=ents which. are applicable.

9 - original Reviewer's signature and date is required.

10 - If any Deficiency Report i,Ja c _o - as a resul.t of EO

Review,
he t

1 deficiency report nu=b M hs.ll gkC a et SD - If in the i=itial review the package is accea+

/a in this block. If the activi er

. s deficient or put on hold and the package is returne

.or final review, the reviewer shall sign his name and enter the date when the package is acceptable.

8E - The reviewer =ay put any re= ark during the initial or,the final review.

NOTE: If the package is not acceptable as a result of the second review, a nev For= QAI-23-1 Rev.1 shall be used for further processing.

11 - The total nu=ber of sheets in the work package shall be entered in this bloch when the EC-QA review is ce=plete and the package is ready to go to QAIRG.

t Attacb=ent 7.2.1

POR86 QM -13

  • CONT]NUATION SHEET r, EC INSTALLATION 0A RECORDS Pop of

' REVIEW & ACCEPTANCE CHECXLIST CFA NO.

t WORK PACKAGE CONTROL NO.

ULh ITIM RETU D CI 00CUMOT NO TITl! ANO AC f

OF.

REMARXS MO.

DOCUMUT

/ OR FORM No.

SNTS6 @l@l@

3Y l

DATI l

I l

l l

t O

I l

I.

- Q(

(I$

L i_ _

~

s REVIEWED SY CATE h: DEFICIENCY REPORT NO. (if oriy)

TOTAL NO. OF SHEETS LEGEND @ Noi APPL!CA8LE hACCEPT hCEFICENCY hMOLD o'

e.

=

c-a.e i J.C

. 1, Mar O R,

=

?"

. r = w=.g ), 4

'o I.N

~*

-w e

MTI? CORD SES UNIT =3 a

Page cf C n DTU CATI CF REPOr SCS8 (CRK P!.G7GI cm m, m-...

.eu.

%.- m --w

-~

Au iencv

-.f 2,

c i

I t

I i

l t

i l

i l

l i

i S

i I

I.

d I

i l

I t

l n

s.............

n.. y

. u,

,., ~.

I VD.IFICATION & CORRETIVE ACTION e

4 g

CAI-23-2 Rev.

1 JL"."2ACEMENT 7.3 L

.,_..,_..-,.c.

.m%y---

-_.-.-..._-y_

,m y,

-,,..my.-m-._,y.-

e-

~

~

g 2%

B"

ctivit'/ Macix L

The Activity Matrix is a gr4dalha for CC Insp h/Superrhs and l

CA Reviewers for empletion of a Work Package for Documenta* ion. It specifies that Documents /Foces to be includai in the Work Package for an activity pa.-L.csi under a particular discipline. It is not the mandatory recuir ment that all l

the Ammants/foms listed be included in the Work Package each time an activity is perfctmed, as the marix includes also those fer=s which are required to be seen at least once by a CC Inspector / Supervisor but may not be requirai to be included in the Work Package. If in the judgment of any of the above personnel, doc,rnents/fc=ns not listed in the matrix are required to cmplete the Werk Package, those documents /fc=rs can also be included in the werk.

2 Thie following points clarify the a::ntents of the Activity Matrix.

i

1) The Discipline under which the activity is perfemmi j

(i.e., M=chanica1, Civil, HVAC, Electrical or I.mtation).

~

  • 2) The activity perfnrmi under a particular discipline.

i i

3) These procedures (Admhietrative Site r d ures Construction se ures and Quality Control re ures) govern the par-4 m1=v activity. 2 e governing procedures specify the documents / forms h

that are required in ceder to perform the activity and to be i

included in the Work Package.,.,,, _ _ _ _ _

,.., _....... ~....

4)

Refererice/IrJ - -- =; Docnments - Beside.,' gv=dng re ares for a par *4mlar stivity i2nder a par *h av d4 ="4pline there are gh which have to be followed,fggg:;focning a part of-that activity:'The31ii'pfocedures may have been referenced in the governing reures and may have their own Am==ntation requirements. The Am==m/ forms = pac 4 *4=d by these refsg. I r -- twas shall also be included in the Work Package, l

5) The description of the governing er referenced re ure listed
  1. ct an activity.

4

6) Dese Amimants/ forms are required to be included in the Work Package for an activity. The activity may be performed in more than one step or wey. Se steps required to perform the same type of activity may differ, for example the activity ins +=11a*4m of supports / hangers under==chan4n=1 discipline may have a sugxzrt attached to anchor plates where QC inspection for anchor bolt torque is required. On the other hand the support can be attached to embedded plates where welds have to be inspected. Therefore the documents / forms required by any step for any activity may not be required for the step not perferned. This is noted by Asteriks (*,
    • , Note 1, 2 - etc.) and clarified at the tcp O

or ta activity a trix rc==-

At+=r%t 7.4 Page 1 cf 2

e B

t 111 O

H h

2 2

r u

fo lP 2

y my l

e t.

l J

M W.

s i i e

l v

H I

p i l

i t

l c

c UQ s

A l

i U

4 p

I 7

'S r

t f

n 2

H m

e tC lc O

a

)

t t

A

~

X l

t i

T

.i

.l-e i P AH g

, ~

,,!y w

tksg Y

=

E C,fC, t T

m I

T t1I.

V

.I k.

i l\\.

,i.

s

.e I

TCA IC C e A

Q F

W tu r

P e N

C I

S

/.

'O P

P e H

E S

A t

I E

4 l

)

C e X

Q D

H is U

E i

l W

i P e l

v P

C a

N r

O P.M G o

, i

! l 1 !

.,il l

j.!

(

e 6

~

k,+

f j g,.$

_w-*

J s sdascy.18

- ~ ~ ~

2 4

-y 1

CUAL!TY AssuR ANCE ENGINEERING ififfh SITE OPERATIONS QUALITY ASSURANCE INSTRUCTION QAl NO.

23 LP&L b'ATTRrORD STEA'4 ELECTRIC ST ATION UNIT NO. 3 PREPARED BY REVIEWED BY sEN Q

1s' sue o,"[g o,"[g sire sulN0 o[f[E

^

^

E RvisoR REuARxs uc DATE i

,0 G. Sourgeois C. Diz utrona Draft 8/29/83 8/29/83

/ '.3.Gm k h d M D,7g h 9, $~

h s

h q$

Mlet1aN j

Revision 1 M.Badget na l0 I

l....M. fnqi.ga4%

Kyj.s

..n al General Revision Revision 2 R. DeD=--

d2uaw h dN-f 7V 3

1'

///7/96 Ah f

b eneral Revision r u l v

//

d Revision 3 R. DeDanTn 1.;.7. Kt:ds G

trona i

"/W's M

a. 6 4.3.

j Revision 4 R. DeDam S..

rt A

2k&*

sb0d uk?~2/29/84 w

i l

Revision 5 I

l for. foql mat. ion onjy l

Revision 6 in i

' Revision 7 I

i Revisien 8 NA N., Applic.ble b'

gg$C4 e d)

NOTE:

g.gy./44.--

..... n :..-..,.

s.

g4 4x

o n..,

OUALf?Y AssVR ANCf ENGINEERING IbN' SITE OPERATIONS CUALITY ASSURANCE INSTRUCTION QAl NO.

n

....u.

" m:: <Tr.W ELECTRIC STATION L' NIT NO. 3 Appmovtc ev emepAnto av arviewec ey sENIQm QA E

  1. D aNo stTE su'ERVisCR mEM W s g,"7 g g,

gg sw g g,yg oATE

^

A/ N A. M.!p%

G. Bourgeois C. Diz utrona craft S/29/83 8/29/83

, j 8 /,%9

-Lh6/

m

, !! I N W l O i

8 s 1YJ,

[f (ft f j '

j glp]j $

S W l a 7t 1 ad:ed Revision 1 Pt.Sadgett.

I.

. jQ'f q ]

G c/fg 1 T

Y}. y,'k%'

,,l g 0 b\\fp R. DeD=-

Mc Au na General Revision

%R%[.W.s Revision 2 b

/

- b eneral Revisicn Revision 3 R. DeDa::n Sih J. Ktd:is trona // Od G

(j(

D W#

li T1 l

l

  • 4"rk b,

' '7.[ sl

),

Page 5 cf 6 revised.

7 l

Para. 6.2.4 and 6.2.4.3.

. ' rte.

A.#

atrona 2/29/84 Revision 4 R. DeDa:mi S

hf Sh A9 [(I J.

I L

l Revision 5 l

Revision 6 l

Revision 7 l

l l

l 9evision 3 a

CCDE.

NA - Not Apolicable NOTE:

Ineruels and date by revrewers are required.

.\\

m__

_ _. _~

1334 23/4 76 N

CU ALITY ASSURANCE ENGINEERIN pt.c c 1 or 6 EMSCO QUAUTY ASSURANCE INSTRUCTION QAl NO. 23

-QJECT

!.gggNo* - 'l,j,^J,E8 O.TE LP&L Waterford Steam Electric Station Unit #3 vrT6:

i...uca.ua tas.s. css is u c o.

Review of Ebasco Construction Quality Records l* * * ' "

l tbv. 7,1983

.cv

......go....

2 3

RD[J) AKf 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The pun:ose of this procedure is to delineate the recuirenents aM

~

guidelines for the receipt, review and processing by Ebasco Construction 3

QA Records Review Group of cus.lity records generated by Ebasco Construction and Site Contractors as defined by applicable EP?l's.

2.0 SCOPE 2.1 This N to quality records pertaining to Ebrsco Construction 3

activities relating to N' 1, 3.0 REFERE M 3.1

,CP-793 - Wwntation Handling aM Processing for Ebasco Construction 3.2 WQC-167 - Review and Transmittal of Quality Pelated Records 3.3 QAI Review aM HaMling of Construction-Installation Records j

3.4 QAI Supplanent, QAIRGS tb.122 j

3.5 Ebasco CA Program Manual 3.6 ANSI N45.2.9 - Draft Jan. 17, 1973 4.0 DEFINrrIONS

~

4.1 1 - Ebasco Construction

(

CINA - Cond' tion Identification Work Authorization i

l 4.2 j

4.3 1CR - Nonconformance Report s

4.4 DCN - Design Change Notice 4.5 KR - Field Charge Request 4.6 WPCC - Work Package Control Center 4.7 Quality Assurance ncords - QA Records are those records which provide documentary evidence of the quality of iters and activities affecting quality. Quality Assurance Records may be either the original cr a l

reproduced copy.

9

2. ?.~' N

-^

?

~

.. - 'N* 55

L:. ~= -.

..L - -.-. N -. ' ~

~

e t334 23/6 74 CU ALITY A$$UR At4CE ENGINEE RIN.

amoc 2 o'

6 NO '

QUALITY ASSURANCE INSTRUCTION QAl NO. 23 b.OJECT gwgEENO D.*E LP&L Waterford Steam Electric Station #3 l * - 'f,j,^J,58 l..s.c ss is.su s O.Nov. 7, rirus

...ue..

    • ^'"

Review of Ebasco Construction Quality Pads 3

RD$$ Ib l{ /

4.8 Safety-Palated Iten - Any ite. designated by Ebasco Engineering,. in accordance with the guidelines established by the Ebasco Licensing Depart:nent, to be Safety Class 1, 2, 3, Seis:nic Category 1 cr. Electrical Class IE aM any other 'itens as designated by the Licensing Depart:nent and iMicated as safety-related in the PSAR and FSAR.

4.9 Safety-Pelated Service - Any service performed that directly affects the quality of a safety-related item.

4.10 Work Package - A package consisting of a Work Package Control Sheet plus those quality related forms required by the governing ASP, CP, WQC aM designated Site Contractors work procedure (s). Mien indicated, the controlled design dec=nent will be included. The intent is to achieve a total work package for construction but it is not maMatory that controlled procedure (s) or design documents be asserbled inte a work package.

(See Attachment "B" also).

'4

~

~

- The departnent l

4.11 p the Katerford III Quality Program responsible for this status and

  • within

~

final review of centractor installation records, including 1basco Construction and Ebasco CC activities.

l 4.12 Start-up Systen Transfer Schedule - The systenatic schedulire for the transfer of start-up systen hardware frczn LP&L Start-up *o LP&L Plant Operation Staff in support of plant fuel loading schedule.

4.13 6 -

- Proposed by the E QA Peccrds Supisor to better define reviewer activities for specific work itens. Each ERRI shall be unigaely nu:rbered and approved by,the EC-QA Manager.

1 5.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 1

5.1 The E Quality Assurance Manager is responsible for monitoring and l

assuring the implementation of this procedure.

l 5.2 The E QA Records.Supisor is responsible for assuring that EC work packages and related QA Pecords received are logged, reviewed and processed in accordance with this procedure.

_.. v e oac.

~

"- -~~

+-

5.3 O:

m.

th this procedure app aca:Ae :splementing w *rl designated Site Cont-actors p ocedure(s).

l l

l 1

\\

l l

l

' f' N.

Y' ' _ _*

_f e'.j R * ~ ~ '., K} I '

.Y'

  • ' ',,,) } _ _

~

~

l

I I334 2.9/6 76 m

m OUALITY ASSUR ANCE ENGINEERIN omar 3 or 6

EBASCO QUAUTY ASSURANCE INSTRUCTION QAl NO. 23 6.QJEC*

.gggNC Da'E R. INCICATES

'.P&L Waterford Steam Electric Staticn #3 Revisiew YtP6E ap*6BCAE6E

.Ep6 ACES 133W E OF

  • ^~

Peview of Ebasco Constm etion Quality Pecords Nov. 7, l'983

  • ,..p E

.Ev e.E...E lRD h AMC h 3

w 5.4 E, 6 assuring that all

- c +..

c,ws

~, c.-,- ; ~.

generated in accordance an ec to :ne EC Quality Department.

wl:n u - m,

a_ =.

5.4.1 The E Quality Control Supervisor is responsible for assuring that all applicable QC generated irwien checklist and reports are included into the construction ccepleted work packages. The work packages shall be returned to NPCC for sulnit*11 to the E-QA Records Review Group.

6.0 PROCEDURE 6.1 W rk packages received by the E-QA Records Review Group shall be entered into the EC-QA Doc =nentation Package I.cg (Attachment 7.1 Rev.1) by start-up system (SUS). Safety-related work packages will be assigned a OFA number at the time they are entered into the log. The OFA number will serve to identify and track the work package and associated deficiency reports, if generated, through the review cycle of EC-QA Records and l

transmittal to QAIRG. Also entered at the tire of receipt will be the Work Package Control Number as defined in CP-793 ard the date of receipt.

i 6.1.1 After entry into the log, safety-related work packages will be issued to the EC-QA Records Reviewers.

l3 6.2 Review of safety related work packages shall be performed to' the require-ments of ASP, CP, NQC and designated Site Contractors procedure (s). The 3

Activity Matrix and its instructions shall be

~4 d ines for work package. %

' ~~

cc:ple

. 1 "E..ns lew

~. '-

and Acceptance 1st (See Attachment "A" for instructions on the use of Form QAI-23-1 Rev. 1).

6.2.1 M y, M and applicable documents therein 6.2.1.1 M - Assure the infomation and data required by approved procedures has been properly recorded on the documents presented for review.

6.2.1.2

- Ass'ure that quantitative and qualitative data meet established criteria. This information shall reflect satisfactory ace:rplishment and carpletion of the secpe of the doc =cented activity.

. - ~ "

-o 5

o L _-- ;; _

s_,-

< m.an.n

U AUTY ASSUR ANCE ENGINESKIN geagg 4 or 6 NO '

ouALITY ASSURANCE INSTRUCTION QAl NO. 23 L e CJ E C T

.gGEnc DaTE LP&L Waterford Steam Electric Station Unit #3

",",, ' C ^l,8 8 m r.

...u c. w i.e.u c ss issw a o.

Review of Ebasco Construction Quality Pecords l Nov. 7,1983,

as.

....aso...,

3 RD438 Md 6.2.1.3 M Assure that the doc =ents/fc ms are coupleted as required by the applicable procedure revision at the time of awlishnent of the activity, and that the information and data subnitted are entered in the proper order if specifically recuired by specifi-cations, procedure, code or contract.

6.2.1.4 6 - Assure that documents provide unicue and sufficient infomation to relate the documents to the activity performal and cross reference other docunents (i.e., drawings, NCR's, etc.) reqaired to couplete the package. The document package shall also provide traceability sufficient to identify the raterial, or iten part number, serial number or other identification required as ' applicable.

i i

6.2.1.5 h - Assure that recuired irforration and data can be logically discerned without questions. 'Maginal quality documents shall be reproducible by means of xeroxing with a high degree of resolution maintained on the reproduced copy.

Documents of' questionable legibility shall be brought to the attention of the EC QA Records Supervisor for evaluation prior to subnittal to the document generator for resolution. Records with poor legibility but which can be read (information is discernable) may be duplicated and enhanced by the reviewers. The record duplicated and the duplicate shall be mantained together. The reviewer shall sign and date the duplicated record certifying the authenticity of the duplica-don. Irlor-mation and/or corrections of minor errors which can be i

l rWily and accurately verified may be provided by the reviewers. All such added information or enhanced infor-mation shall be initialed and dated.

6.2.1.6 N - Assure that recuired signatures and dates are affixed as required by the impleaen+ lng procedures.

l 6.2.1.7 6 - Assure that corrections, changes or supple ents to documentation hrve been rade followim I

the guidelines listed below:

A.

Chamesorcorrectionsshallinciudethedateand identification of the authorized person rakig the

-~

~..,,

g

~-

y.

M*

~~

_s..

~-

ma-as/s.7s 6

CUALITY ASSUR ANCE ENGIN2 ERIN esag 5 or MO QUALITY ASSURANCE INSTRUCTION QAl NO. 23 I

-.asse-

..s~c o.rs

" - 'lejste',**

LP&L Waterford Steam Electric Station Unit 63 i

I SS W E OF Tf?6E a8*biCAS6E lNEP6 ACE 3 3

Review of Ebasco Construction Quality Records l*

l Nov. 7, 1983 n., -

....p yo

.E,

.....c=

RD d AMChi b 3

change or correction. Changes shall be single lined through and initialed and dated by the iMividual chag ing er correcting the entry.

B.

Supplemental docLuentation contained in or added to a work package shall receive the reviews and approvals required by the procedure revision in effect at the time the supplemental documentation was generated.

6.2.2 6, M and ammunmimos

-'" - -afea-~'

A 3

the work eackace These ciocuments will be used as an aid in the definition and scope of the construction activity beim documented.

l3 6.2.3 CIKA's shall be reviewed in 'accordance with Qu-9 Supplenent, OAIRGS No.122, with the exception that Forms OAI-23-1 Rev.1, E Ltstallation OA Records Review and Acceptance Checklist, and QAI-23-2 Rev.1, i

EC OA Recx:rds Deficiency Report, are to be utilized.

6.2.4 Lw wntation deficiencies discovered during the review of work packages as described within the appropriate sections of this procedure are to be documented on Form OAI-23-2 Rev.1, E OA Records Deficiency Report (DR).

6.2.4.1 l

M scribed by this procedure shall be brcught to the attention of the EC OA Records Suppisor.

6.2.4.2 If a DR is generated to identify a deficiency against any reference document (s) on Form QAI-23-1 Rev.1, the iten no. of that document (s) shall be listed on form OAI-23-2 Fev. 1, under the column and EDN the iten In.s listed on Form QAI-23-2 Rev. 1 would be 8 and 11.

6.2.4.3 The package will be considered ccx plete when all iters shown on DR have been resolved satisfactorily and verifi4d by the E-QA Records Review Isad Discipline / Designee.

6.2.5 Upon cxsupletien of the wrk package review, the work package along i

with ccrnpleted forms OAI-23-1 Rev.1 and QAI-23-2 Rev.1 shall be returned to the E Icgging/ Tracking Clerk (s) fer logging and proper j

dispositicn of the reviewef package.

6.2.5.1 Accepted packages shall be transmitted to QAIRG.

.c m

3

__-,_._.._______7__--. _.

I

4 f33 33/4 74 m

pacc 5 o,

6 OUALITY AssuR ANCE ENGINEER!NC NO QUALITY ASSURANCE INSTRUCTIQN QAl NO. 23 w_iwact wassNO Q.?s R. INDICATES LP&L Waterford Steam Electric Staticn Chit #3 navisica February 29, 1984 v.-.s

..u.c ss inu a o-l"...u c.. u. c Review of Ebasco Construction Quality Records Nov. 30, 198Fi

. g.<Q.. g sc nev 4

RDD AMC/ /

jf '

change or correction. Changes shall be single lined.

through aM initialed and dated by the individual changing or correcting the entry.

B.

Supplemental documentation centained in er added to a work package shall receive the reviews and approvals required by the procedure revision in effect at the time the supplemental decanentation was generated.

6.2.2 DCN's, ER's, NCR's, drawings and sketches included, or referenced, in the work package will not be subjec*ad to a review under this procedure.

These documents will be used as an aid in the definition and scope of the construction activity being decanented.

6.2.3 CIMA's shall be reviewed in accordance with QAI-9 Supplement, QAIRGS-No.122, with the exception that Forms QAI-23-1 Rev.1, K Installation QA Records Review aM Acceptance Checklist, and QAI-23-2 Rev.1, E QA Records Deficiency Report, are to,be utilized.

6.2.4 Documentation defi:iencies discovered during the review of work packages as described within the ayyw y1.ia*a sections of tPls procedure are to be documented on Form QAI-23-2 Rev. 1, E QA Records j

Deficiency Report (DR) except for Mercury documentation for which 4

a Discrepancy Notice may be initated by the EC-QARC reviewer using ERRI-4. (DN's are generally generated against hardware itens.)

6.2.4.1 Areas of concern not within the secpe of the documentation review described by this procedure shall be brought to the attention of the EC QA Records Supervisor.

6.2.4.2 If a DR is generated to identify a deficiency against any reference document (s) on Form QAI-23-1 Rev.1, the item no. of that document (s) shall be lis*ad on farm QAI-23-2 Rev. 1, under the column and EDN the item no.s listed en Form QAI-23-2 Rev. I would be 8 and 11.

6.2.4.3 The package will be censidered ccreolete when all items shown on DR(or DN in case of Marcdy docenencaticr)have been resolved satisfacterily and verified by the EC-CA 4

Records Paview Lead Discipline / Designee.

6.2.5 Upon co.pletien of the werk p'ackage review, the werk package along with canpleted forms QAI-23-1 Fev.1 and QAI-23-2 Rev.1 shall be returned to the EC Irgging/ Tracking Clerk (s) for loggi:q aM prcper disposition of the reviewed pac. age.

k 6.2.5.1 Accepted yackages shall be tra suitted to CA1%..

.m.--

-m.---

, -. - - - - ~ _ -.

-~

1334 23/s.74 6

6 wUALITY ASSUR ANCE ENGINEER!N pagg or M

OUALITY ASSURANCE INSTRUCTION QAl NO. 23

~~ os s c e 6ssc~s p.rs a.imoicates l It&L Wea-ferd Steam Elect *ic Station 63 arvisiew

  • ' T 6 E t..e6sCAE6E I.E.6 A C ES is3 J E OF Review of Ebasco Construction Quality Fecords l**^'"

l Nov. 7,1983,

....e p!

l...p.s...g Mdff 3

PD A.,,

j p-6.3 em L,..

_._ m ~ g n.2._c,

6.3.1 The K-CA Records Review Group shall utilize the Ebasco Start-up Systs Transfer Schedule in establishing priorities in their efforts to close deficiency report iters.

6.3.2 When supplenental documents are secured as a result of the resolution effort, these documents will be subjected to the same review required by this procedure of the work package with which it is associated. Paragraph 6.2.1.7 of this procedure shall also apply to the resolution effort.

6.3.2.1 Mditional deficiency itens generated duri:q the resolution effort srcu be added to the existire forn OAI-23-2 Rev.1.

6.3.3 the w rk package will j

be returned to the EC Icgging/1 racking Clerk (s) for logging and transmittal to CAIEG.

6.4 Documentation deficiencies discovered during OAIRG's review of E work packages shall be documented in accordance with QAI-9 and transmitted to EC OA Records for resolution.

6.4.1 Upon receipt of deficient work packages, the Icgging/ Tracking Clerk (s) shall note the receipt of the work package urrier the original entry for that OFA number and assign the work package to the Discipline EC-QA Review Group for resolution.

6.4.2 Resolution of OAIRG generated deficiency reports shall be in accordance with Section 6.3 of this procedure.

7.0 ATIACHMENTS 7.1 "E QA Docu:nentation Packages" Icg Sheet 7.2 OAI-23-1 "EC OA Installation Records Review and Acceptance Checklist" 7.2.1 Attac. h t "A" 7.2.2 Continuation Sheet to Form QAI-23-1 7.'3 OAI-23-2 "E QA Records Deficiency Fe;rrt" 7.4 Attachnent "B" m.*

4 e m - = = =

e*

-e ga

,b t

I k

,I

+

.i e

I l

)

.)

(

s' t

nenn o

C n

o i

Ct u

  • e.

I Il o

@e s

s oR u

t s

r ee tt af DA

@y cn Ce Bi I

c oi Tf e

eD taf s

DI ega k

l c

9' a

P n

b o

I' G

j t

eI a

tI DS e

t a

nena tco D

I b

C I

'e@

B t

e aC DE s

, t " -

s*

e.

. f.

go e

a N, kcl ao Pr t kn ro oC W

~

.oN A

FO g w.W

.W 3og.

  • !il i11I I '

I.

e i

4

. i

.I; i

t 1

i

/

EC INSTALLATION QA RECORDS REVIEW & ACCEPTANCE CHECKLIST Page of SAFETY RELATED 0

OFA NO.

G NON SAFETY RELATED D

WORK PACKAGE CONTROL NO.

h SEISMIC i FIRE PROTECTION ASME SEC.111. CLASS SECONDARY SUS NO.

b DISCIPLINE: MECH.

ELECT.

CIVIL HVAC 0 iaC ACTIVITY b

NO ORIGINAL REVIEW FINAL REVIEW ITEM REFERENCE DOCUMENT NO, TITLE AND RESULTS ACCEPT FOR@@

F gggggg3 NO.

DOCUMENT

/ OR FORM NO.

SHTS @ @ l@

BY DATE I

CP7 3 A.72 4M 2

CP7 ATT.7.3 i

3 FCR Ifhh

.f, h

4 m

h!h fh 5

PUNCH LIST WWW!aTGERW2 6

ars EMME5BBBWM 7

owa 8

CIWA 9

NCR 10 DN j

11 EDN e

LEGEND: h NOT APPLICABLE hACCEPT h CEFICIENCY hMOLO i

FORW QAl.23 1 Rty.'l

..L.. :..

.~.

i

n.. n..=. y,

n

.. -a.

w e v..,.~......,,.. =.. - n..,,. _; n =.,.,

1 - Enter the applicable QFA =ber per ? ara. 6.1.

2, 3 & 1 - Note the ' Jerk Package -- ~~'

-d er, Pri=ar/ Si'S :. and See da:/==ber frc= the ' Jerk Package 00 tr:1 Sheet.

5 - Check the appropriate block for Safety Related, 3:n-Safety Related, Fire Fr0:ecti:n L Seis=1: I a:tivity asi enter the Class 1, 2 er 3, as appli:able, if activity is ASME !!!.

6 - Discipline shall te dete=ined and appropriate bleek checked.

7 - Activity under the above discipline shall be deter =ined and described.

SA - Fro: Item 1 to 11, the reference doc =ents (SA) listed =ay be applicable for a particular activity. THe additional procedu es 4

which are required by the Activity Matrix for the QA Review for that particular activity shall be listed as Ite=s 12, 13, IL...etc.

SS

"'he Title /No. of the Documents /Fer=s required by the reference doe =ents or precedures in SA shall be listed.,

i SC - If any reference doc =ent in SA u not applicable, block N/A shall be checked. Check the applicable block (A), (D) or (E) per review precedure QAI-23 Rev.1 for these doc =ents which. are applicable.

i 9 - Original Reviewer's signature and date is required.

10 - If any Deficiency Report is generated as a result of EO QA Review, the deficiency report =ber shall b.e noted in this. block.

SD '- If in the initial review the package is acceptable, put N/A in this block. If the activity or pacRage is found deficient er put c: hold and the package is, returned for final-reviev, the reviewer shall sign his name and enter the date when the package is acceptable.

SE - The reviever may put any re= ark during the initial or the final reviev.

i NC"'I:

If the package is =0t a::eptable as a result cf the second reviev, a new For: QAI-23-1 Rev.1 shall be used for further processi=g.

11 - The total nu=ber of sheets in the work package shall be entered in this block when the EC-QA review is c0=plete and the package is ready to go to QAIRG.

J Atta:b=ent ~.2.1

===,em

....e

-.e.==

......+eem>-.--

4 w'n

-w--

-n

-m,,e-,--,-,,---m

+

-- =.

. =. - -....

']

DO C CAi=83 8 CONTINUATION SHEET

~

EC INSTALLATION QA RECORDS Page of REVIEW & ACCEPTANCE CHECKl.lST QFA NO.

WORK PACKAGE CONTROL NO.

I go ORIGINAL REylEvi FINAL REVIEW ITEM REFERENCE !:0C'JMENT NO.,TITLI AND h' RESULT 5 AC0!PT FORf DM REMARXS DOC' MENT

/ OR FORM NO.

J N O.

lg g

l l

I l

e I

l l

REVIEWED SY DATE EC DEFICIENCY REPCRT NO. (if any)

TOTAL NO. OF SHEETS l

LEGEND h NCT APPLICABLE hACCEPT h CEFICIENCY hMOLD Ars o I

,cw

. r * *

  • r. '.'. s' '.'
0. 7 0 0.2.'^

e e.

e\\. p.r.a D.~.

D T.e u..

3,

'dATERF0FD SIS UNIT =3 Page c:

C:n.

- w Or. c.w_.F"'

w e.

w s._.

m.

SUS #

NORK PACD:GE COT"AOI., NO.

\\

~~

. m i _,...,eS-. -~..

l

%-.:. : -u l

-.u..

~ ' " ' ~

C.

l Deficier.cy 3Y t

i 1

i i

i l-I.

l l

l l

i:

i i

i t

l l

4 L<

^

t I

i l

I I

i i

I I

l VERIFICATION OF CORlh N. ETION s-

/

/ ACCEPT /

/ FFJETT REVII'.3 jDATE CAI-23-2 Rev.

1 ATrr a m 7.3 e-e.e.

=*

- -.m

-e.

e..w m=4e =

w we-e I

s Attachnent "B" Activity Matrix The Activity Matrix is a guideline for CC Inspector / Supervisors and QA Reviemrs for ccEpletion of a Work Package for Dccumentation. It specifies that Documents /Foms to be included in the Work Package for an activity perfor:ned under a particular discipline. It is not the :radatory regairenent that all the doc =nents/fors listed be included in the Work Package each dme an activity is perfo=ed, as the ratrix includes also those foms which are reqaired to be seen at least once by a CC Inspector / Supervisor but may not be regaired to be included in the Work Package.

If in the judgenent of any of the above personnel, docu:nents/for:rs not listed in the ratrix are required to ccrnplete the Work Package, those docunents/for:rs can also be included in the work.

The following points clarify the contents of the Activity Matrix.

1) The Discipline under which the activity is perfonned (i.e., Mechanical, Civil, HVAC, Electrical or Instrunentation).
2) The activity perfocned under a particular discipline.
3) These procedures (Af:ninistrative Site procedures, Construction procedures arri Quality Control procedures) govern tha ei-alar r. _..-..e r --

y__.-2

-c m-mnts/foms activity.

l

  • e.
4) Reference / Interface Documents - Beside the governing procedures for a particular activity under a particular discipline there are procedures which have to be followed for perfor: ring a part of that activity. These procedures may have been referenced in the governing procefures and : ray have their own doca::entation reqJirenents. The doct.w_nts/foms specified by these referenced procedures shall also be included in the Work Package.
5) The description of the governing or referenced procedure listed for an activity.
6) These dccaments/fors are required to be included in the Work Package for an activity. The activity nay be perfomed in :rcre than one step or way. The steps required to perform the same type of activity may differ, for example the activity ins +allation of supports / hangers under mechanical discipline may have a support attached to anchor plates where CC inspection for anchor bolt torque is regaired. On the other hand the su= port can be attached to atteddei plates where welds have to be inspected. Therefore the documents / forms recuirsi by any step fer any activity ray not be regaired for the step not perfom ed. This is noted by Note 1, 2 -- etc.) and clarified at the top Asteriks (*,

of the Activity Matrix FO=.

l Attachnent 7.4 i

Page 1 of 2

7 e

4

=

4s ce a

m m

w c

c m

D E

3-E 3

w

,i w

=

c

..a

=

e a

e e

N

.N J

~

~~a 5

~

u M<

e e

b r=

1, t

5 t*

I i=

O i

m w

m U4.

ca OT I.

D) 2 U

w m s.

3 Q

e w

b h h w

7 U

ese e

M*

m w

a t) 6 4

4

.e.w,,

g,em.'

m esm *** * **

            • "D**

e owee

. p we -

- e as=

  • +=

9 m.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20126D615&oldid=4276352"