ML20126D605

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 0 to QA Instruction Qai 25, QA Instruction for Auditing at Waterford 3
ML20126D605
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Waterford
Issue date: 08/22/1983
From:
EBASCO SERVICES, INC.
To:
Shared Package
ML20125A430 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-84-426, FOIA-84-449, FOIA-84-A-55, FOIA-84-A-65 QAI-25, NUDOCS 8506150154
Download: ML20126D605 (11)
v • d • e


Text

.-..

N '

.33't.76

'O

'334

ui.t v Assua ANcs s%c;NesniNe E kCTIG SITE OFERATICNS CUALITY ASSURANCE INSTRUCTICN QAl NO.

25

....u-

'4ATERFOP3 SES - l' NIT NO. 3 A*84CVE: Ev i

8 89EPARE: SY 4EviEwCO SY stNICA QA

,g g, ANC ANC

$1TE,sU PE RVisC A g,"g.,,fg

  1. EMARKS g g CATE DATE j ANw.

I

/,C A T E!

. lv&

C, &fo

, )#/(f i

S. Winters C.Bishh I yut' f

l aj vy Rev. 0 l

S-22-83 8-22-83 83/

j i

i l

l Fevisien !

t i

l i

j po i

[

6,f l

Revisien 2 i

i l

i %g i

I.

g Revisica 3

= s, /,,

t, v a r. p Revision 4 l

Revisien !

>9 f 44 2 I

i

  • J.: y k,k Revisicn 6 1

f.r'.

i I

(,.4rM'.

ff.*;',?*;,9 )o b+

a Revision 7

{

/,.yg l

evisi:n !

8506150154 850301 PDR FOIA i

l GARDE 84-A-55 t'DR l

j

00E:

NA - N.r Anotie.ble NOTE:-

g( /p y_. gg, y q

,1,.,..u........,....

B 609

e 1334-JS/6 76 tuALITY A15URANCE ENGINE 2rJNG sace 1 on 10 0

QUALITY ASSURANCE INSTRUCTION QAl NO.

25

.osa:-

.s..~2

,a..

WATERFORD SES - UNIT NO. 3

" ~ ',"[jfs c'.

I 0~22-33

.m.,

. u..
:. :... : :-

QUAI,ITY ASSURANCE INS ~'RUCTION FOR AUDITING AT WATERFORD 3

8 * ^ ' "

l

~

,.n.

p us n:

y

s. _

l0 i SW

IAc,

1.0 SCOPE

The subject of this procedure is to establish guidelines in accordance with project requirements and applicable references to be used when auditing a particular phase of construction that is not covered by a specific Quality Assurance Audit Procedure.

2.0 PURPOSE

To be used as a supplement to QAS-2 for Quality Assurance Audits at Waterf d SES Unit No. 3.

'(

ias

, 40%

3.0 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS:

hMM** '

3.1 Ebasco Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Manual - ETR-1001.

3.2 Ebasco Quality Assurance Manual - ASME Section III.

(d 3.3 10CFR50 Appendix B.

w-r.

R$)l%

d 3.4 Quality Control Procedures.

.tTW 3.5 ANSI N45.2 and Daughter Documents.

g.,

.h 3.6 Applicable Purchase Orders, Engineering Specification and Codes.

G4.%

U 3.7 Quality Assurance Site Procedures QAS-1 and QAS-3.

. gg N

4.0 ATTACHMENTS

I. -

4.1 Audit Report Form 1334-35.

Q.ersn*:.,',

4.2 General Audit Report Checklist Form 1334-2.

?h 4.3 Audit Report Rejection Continuation Sheet Form 1334-3.

Quality Finding Report Form 1334-4 page 1 and Form 1334-4A continuation h, "a

4.4 page.

gg.r.<

g,:.; a 4.5 Quality Assurance Audit Plan.

.p T'",

's O

G2 N.S '

s 4.6 Pre-Audit / Exit Conference Attendance Form.

.me--

=>-e

e 1334 39/6.?$

2 c 10 QU AL]TY A$$URANC2 ENGINEERING pagg M

QUALITY ASSURANCE INSTRUCTION QAl NO.

25 nac-

.... ~o g.r.

wATERFORD SES - crit No. 3

a-;ojeg;,ss; a-22-83 QNALITYASSt*PW:CEINSTRUCTIONFORAUDITINGATWATERFORD3js'oa$ ^

[' ' "

l SW==s.namig(aC

-as

.nsv l

l0

5.0 RESPONSI3ILITIES

5.1 The Quality Program Site Manager is responsible for the overall quality assurance audit function.

5.2 The Quality Assurance Site Supervisor is responsible for supervising and coordinating the activities of the various fite Quality Assurance Engineer /

Representatives.

5.3 The Site Quality Assurance Engineer / Representative is responsible for per-forning the audit in accordance with this procedure.

6.0 PREPARING FOR THE AUDIT:

6.1 Prior to the performance of the audit, the responsible Site Quality Assurance Engineer / Representative will assure that he is f amiliar with the applicable procedures, specifications, codes PSAR or FSAR requirements related to the specific function that he will audit.

6.2 Prior to the performance of the audit, the responsible Site Quality Assurance Engineer / Representative will generate a Quality Assurance Audit Plan. This form also documents pre-audit notification to the audited organ-ization.

6.3 The Site Quality Assurance Engineer / Representative shall prepara the General Audit Report Checklist form specifying the, audit checkpoints. After com-plation, tha form is forwarded to the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee for review prior to performing the audit.

6.4 The Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee shall initial the original form indicating concurrence and approval.

7.0 PERFORMING THE AUDIT:

7.1 For performance of audit activities under this procedure, checkpoints, as applicable, shall be utilized by the Site Quality Assurance Engineer / Represent-ative performing the function.

7.2 The responsible Site Quality Assurance Engineer / Representative should generate a pre-audit / exit conference form if these meetings have more than two (2) representatives in attendance from the audited organization.

  • smaum m-ee J

e 1334=aD/6.?S QUAUTY A$$URANC2 ENGIN2ERING paeg 3 on 10 E

QUALITY ASSURANG INSTRUCTION QAl NO.

25 caso*

co a p y, l.s s s e.a

~4ATERFORD SES - UNIT NO. 3

" ~ ',",$ *,73,

S-22-83 7

- --.s

......c4.

as..

ass.ss.s QUALITY ASSURANCE INS R"CTION FOR AUDITING AT WATERFORD 3 l8 8 '

j

..s.

==a

. smi su l0 l SW f[

8.0 DOCUMENTING THE AUDIT:

8.1 The Site Quality Assurance Engineer / Representative shall document on the General Audit Report Checklist for= Accept or Reject as applicable for each function audited.

8.2 The Site Quality Assurance Engineer / Representative shall document in detail each discrepant activity / item that is found to be in nonconfor:ance during -

the audit.

S.3 The Site Quality Assurance Engineer / Representative shall docu=ent on the Audit Report form the personnel contacted, the extent and the description of audit scope, and an evaluation statement regarding the effectiveness of the QA program elements audited.

8.4 The Site Quality Assurance Engineer / Representative shall document the recommended corrective action.. Corrective action to corrett discrepancy and action to preclude repetition shall be documented by the audited party.

(

8.5 The Quality Finding Report shall be used to document the following: The audit finding, the recommended corrective action, the corrective action taken or proposed, the action taken or proposed to preclude repetition, the Quality Assurance evaluation of corrective ac*ive response, and the Quality Assurance verification of accepted response implementation.

9.0 PROCESSING, DISTRIBUTION AND RESOLUTION OF AUDIT REPORTS:

9.1 Processing, distribution and resolution of Quality Assurance Audit Reports shall be accomplished in accordance with Quality Assurance Procedure QAS-3.

9.2 A weekly informal review of the open audit files will be made by the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designes. If an audit has not been responded to in a period of twenty (20) working days, an investigation will be made to determine if corrective action is in progress. If corrective action is not yet in progress, a memorandum will be issued to the Cognizant Manager / Super-intendent for his ' action in initiating corrective action. If no action is evident within ten (10) working days, thereaf ter, the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor shall issue a memorandum to Project Management for their action with a copy to the Manager Site Quality Assurance in New York, the Project Quality Assurance Engineer, and the Quality Program Site Manager.

9

., - e.amane

.em...-

t asa-asts-M GUALITY A$$UCANC2 ENGINEERING pagg 4 c'

10 M

QUALITY ASSURANG INSTRUCTION 25 QAl NO.

....e-

.. m.o 21 k'ATERFORD SES - UNIT NO. 3

" ~ '."r$*s on 3-22-o3 i

w-..

OCAI.ITY ASSUFJd CE INS ~RUCTION FOR AUDITING AT 'n'ATERFORD 3

[s a a i-i an.<

na.==a.s or p.

O ;

S*=*

"(AC 9.3 At the discretion of the Quality Assurance Site, Supervisor or his designee, discrepant items of a critical nature shall require a response in less than twenty (20) working days. Those items shall be noted on the Quality Assurance Audit Report.

9.4 Determination as to which critical items are to be considered significant deficiencies requiring imediate corporate action shall be nade in accordance with Company Procedure N-23 as necessary.

f.

N, 6

memes e me

--=en=.

m J

l a

Page 5 of 10 g

.....-.m ESASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED J.,..

l PRI-AUDIT / EXIT CONTERE?CI Pre-Audit Date Post Audit Date Audit #

Auditor (s)

Name Title Comcanv Signature

(:.~

s

  • Pre-Audit
  1. Post Audit t

ATTACle m 3 Pags 6 of 10

e. b' ESASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED AUDIT NUM3ER AUDIT DAU CUALITY ASSU?aNCE AUDIT PLAN

\\

ORGANIZATION TO BE AW ITED:

AUDIT SCOPE:

PROCEDLAES AND/OR CHECKLISTS:

ACTIVITIES TO BE AUDITED:

PRE-AUDIT NOTITICATION:

PERSON CONTACTED TITLE DATE AUDIT REPORT DISTRI3LTION:

R. L. Hymes J. R. Ice T. F. Garrets L. L. 3 ass AUDITOR B. Mazo Ebasco Site Engr. File W3QA File QAS File W. Yaeger S. Winters C. Roberts R. J. Milhiser L. Heiser R. Marshall A. M. Cutrona J. Wills f

so

.o

inum. a ACACEMr:T C Pass 7 of 10 s

Cuauty 4$suR ANcE ENGINEERING AUDIT REPORT a...~2.

. :. r s

.4%- a a = = ss t
-

,.a c...o z:

i nac.

C SCOPE

. $UhWARY

  • AUDITORS DATE!$) AUDIT PERFORMED CONTROLLING DOCUMENTS
  • ER$0NNEL CONTACTED FINDINGS:

Yes No Numeer CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED:

Yes No RESPON$E DUE DATE

5re Mene,.c Quality Control Sure Superviser

% geer Manager Prereer Quality Assurance Engineer Quellry Program Itte Menoper

__._a

e ATTAC10iENT D Pag 2 8 of 10 CU ALITY ASSUR ANCE ENGINE!Et!NG b(TG GENERAL AUDIT REPORT CHECXIJST O.,E OF

.E.O.,

I e.,..

E P E. ENC E COCwutM f 8 Auct?

REFERENCE

,g, FUNCTION lm jMA DOCUMEMTS A

l I

I I

I i

i i

l i

i i

I I

i l

i i

i i

l I

i l

l l

(""

l l

l I

II I" l I

I I

I I

I I

i i

l I

I I

i I

'T,y

.Ea F..

a E =,,o-

... an

1 Pas 2 9 of M i m.u:.u AnAcafEn E esce ' or

)

4 CU ALITY ASSUR ANCE ENGIN EERING QUALITY FINDING R EPORT

.~;~2~a 2ar.

2......:-

~.. : ~ m s...

...s:t

.c.

a : a~ :. :~

...s:~::~

.: as -

.s FINQiNG

    • 't atl8CNSE OvE av' won RECOWAENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION

?.,,

Oafg mEsponsE Sus avruce

'iECORD OF CORRECTIVE ACTION TAMEN< PROPOSED TO CORRECT DISCREPANCY I

JATE OF FULL COMPL!ANCE RECORO OF ACTION TAMEN PROPOSED TO PRECLUDE REPLTITION DATE OF FULL COMPLIANCE a tssonsiews one a~iz a rion wa= assusa r mars EVALUATION:

Q^cc=

a*>=c' vEac^Tio":

O^cc'ar Da=><c' COMMENTS COMMENTS avauvaroa oars assassam r ativ a sa's

l i na.we.a r A,ACHMENT F Pego 10 of 10 gQ cu Attiv AssuR ANc! ENGIN EERING OUALITY FINDING REPORT

.~;.~;~c.

2..

2....:-

o~-..:c.

..:..,........;.so.

t I

{

o.

. J l

i 1

i i

I l

l i

i l

l l

i l

_

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20126D605&oldid=4276359"