ML20126D592
| ML20126D592 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000000, Waterford |
| Issue date: | 02/21/1984 |
| From: | EBASCO SERVICES, INC. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20125A430 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-84-426, FOIA-84-449, FOIA-84-A-55, FOIA-84-A-65 QAI-7, NUDOCS 8506150148 | |
| Download: ML20126D592 (12) | |
Text
4
%she.fts.ss i
^
9 OU ALITY AS$UR ANCE ENGINEERINC. /
@ EOR SITE OPERATIONS QUALITY ASSURANCE INSTRUCTION QAl NO.
7 mmo.EC7 WARTERFORD SES UNIT NO. 3 APPRCVED SY PREPARED BY REVIEWED BY SENIOR Q A WRE OF gg, AND AND SITE SUPERVISOR OF issbE REMARKS issue DATE DATE ANO CATE pF jf W~
Oraft JG rah CVD 6-30-78 6-30-78 6-30-78 6-30-78 a
JG / 'F 7-2-82
'^
Revision 1 JG 7-2-82 7-2-82 7-2-82 NRS A.
- rona Revision 2 2_;1-84 2-21-84 2-21-84
^
ne p
w..
Revision 3 i
Re'ision 4 v
l Revision 5 ESASCO l
QUAUTYf ASSURANCE CCNTROLLED DfCUMENT Revision 6 COPY NUMSER h)
Revision 7 8506150148 850301 PDR FOIA GARDEB4-A-55 PDR Revision B N
NA - Not Applicable
~~
~
NOTE:
Initials and dare by reviewers are required.
fk
~
1334 23/6 76 OU ALITY A$$URANCE CNGINESDNG paer 1 or 7
EASCO cUAL!TY ASSURANCE INSTRUCTION QAl NO.
-ossse-
..mssuo mars
'n'ATERFORD SES UNIT NO. 3
! " ~ ' r[sie,**
2-21-84
'r 8 QUALITY ASSURANCE INSTRUCTION FOR lag,"jc'*'8
!" " C 88 ' 88 ' ' *"
SURVEILLANCE AND CORREC'"IVE ACTION I
l 7-2-82
=sv r s.gzo. =p=pv6:
2IN$S' Y
1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this instruction is to delineate one of the systems by which Site Quality Assurance Engineering will verify compliance to pro-ject Quality Assurance requirements by construction forces. And also the method by which it will identify document and obtain corrective action for activities which do not comply with requirements and areas of concern detected during routine surveillance of safety-related activ-ities.
2.0 SCOPE 2.1 This instruction applies to all Ebasco and subcontractor activities af-fecting the safety-related func ns of structures, systems, and compon-ents; these activities include 4@esigning, purchasing, fabricating, handling, shipping, storing /c'leani% erecting, installing, inspecting.
testing, operating, maint nimit,Yepairing, and modification of those
(,-
structures, systems, and c- 'f - ts, as well as ASME Section III activities.
W.
3.0 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
/
q/ 79 3.1 10CFR50, Appendix B 4
3.2 ANSI N45.2 3.3 Ebasco Quality Assurance Program Manual
~
3.4 Ebasco Quality Assurance Manual ASME Sac
'k 4.0 ATTACHMENTS
. ;.hr 4.1 Quality Assurance Surveillance Report Form QAI-7.'
4.2 Attachment A - Surveillance Report Log 4.3 Accachment B - Tickler Card
. g,;
4.4 Attachment C. Surveillance Report Flow Chart "d
d 5.0 DEFINITIONS
- 'IA
- "q 5.1 Safety Related - Those structures, systems, and c ponents id M\\
fied as being designed to prevent or mitigate directly or indir fM the consequences of postulated accidents.
e 5.2 Surveillance - An observation, examination and/or review of w
safety-related activites and associated documentation for the purpose of verifying that project requirements are complied with.
4 1334 43/6 76 OUALITY A13URANC2 SNGINESRING
,acs 2
or 7 NO CUALITY ASSURANCE INSTRUCTION QAl NO.
Ydo s s -
. ssaus 2.rs
~JATERFORD SES UNIT NO. 3 l " " ' t$$ on 2-21-84
"'" 0UALITY ASSURANCE INSTRUCTION FOR
[f,T * * *
l'" * *7-2 -8 2 I,
emyrve,sure sy, cowerc rvr Ac Toy
- =sv y=say saga y,s
l2 i NRS t sH 5.3 Discrepancy - A deviation from specified requirements (including procedures).that can be readily corrected in accordance with stan-dard approved operating procedures or specifications based on good engineering practice. Discrepancies do not required an elaborate engineering evaluation or disposition for correction.
5.4 Nonconfor=ance - A condition in characteristic, docu=entation or procedure which renders the quality of an item or service un-acceptable or indeterminate. Exa=ples of nonconfor=ance include:
pyhsical defects, test failures, incorrect or inadequate documen-tation, or deviation fr.om prescribed inspection or test procedures.
6.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 6.1 The Quality Assurance Site Supervisor, who reports to the Site Quality Assurance Program Manager is responsible to assure that g
safety-related activities are acc~omplished in accordance with' pro-4 ject contractual QA commitments, standards, specifications, pro-cedures, and the established site QA programs.
6.2 The Quality Assurance Site Sopervisor is responsible for supervising g
and coordinating the activities of the Ouality Assurance Engineers.
6.3 The Quality Assurance Auditors /Q;A.-Engineers are responsi-ble for performing random surveillances of safety related activities to verify conformance to QA requirements; to evaluate the effectiveness of implemented QA programs, and report deviations in accordance with i
Instruction.
l L
7.0 PREPARATION AND PLANNING FOR THE SURVEILLANCE l
i I
7.1 Prior to the performance of a surveillance, the Quality Assurance l
Auditor /QA Engineers shall familiar _ize themselves with the applicable project regulatory mandates, contractual QA commitments, g$(
drawings, specifications, procedures, codes, PSAR or FSAR requirements related to the specific activities.which will be surveyed. Additionally he i
shall be cognizant of; research, and refer to project correspondence related to:
- 1) Nuclear Regulatory Inspection Reports
- 2) LP&L (Client) Audit Reports
- 3) Ebasco Quality Assurance Audit Reports
- 4) Other project correspondence coveying concerns or relating to problem areas associated with safety-related activities.
- 5) ANI Monitoring Reports
4 1334-23/4 76 OU ALl*Y A$$U@ANCE ENGINE 2KtNG pA42 3
oF 7 NO cVALITY ASSURANCE INSTRUCTICN QAl NO.
7 bac-
- .s a s,.c
""'."((sio7
,a.
s 2-21-84 WA*ERFORD SES UNIT No. 3 i
-m s QUALI-'Y ASSURANCE G51ALv. A :v e-4==uicaaws assumers isms or SURVE!LLANCE AND CORRECTIVE ACTION
{**^'"
l 7-2-82
- ..... y.n. 7 1 2 i NRS I en 7.2 The Quality Assurance Engineer shall interface with the Ebasco Contract Administrators and Construction Coordinators and maintain d
close liaison with the respective contracter's quality assurance departments for the purpose of being cognizant of:
- 1) The progress of construction activities with particular em-phasis on activities of a critical nature.
- 2) Contractual com=1tments and changes thereto which impact on safety-related activities and quality assurance programs.
- 3) Changes within the contractors' QA/QC organizations.
8.0 PERFORMING THE SURVEILLANCE 8.1 It is the intent that construction activities affecting quality be
~
monitored continuously throughout the stages of construction so as
..(.,
to identify problem areas and initiate solutions prior to start-up of construction activities, and in advance of construction needs, and completion of activities. Therefore, it is incumbent on the Quality Assurance Auditors and Quality Assurance Engineers to monitor the site contractors' activities affecting quality for the purpose of:
8.1.1 Verifying compliance by construction forces to project regulatory mandates, contractual QA commitments, drawings, specifications.
l ASME Section III code, PSAR or FSAR requirements and other i
directives as may be applicable to safety-related activities and l
changes therto, j
8.1.2 Verifying adherence'to project procedures.
L 8.1.3 Verifying implementation of corrective action for the following:
a) Nonconformance Reports b) Nuclear Regulatory Inspection Findings l
c) The Client's (LP&L) Audit Findings l
d) Work Stop Orders l
e) Ebasco QA Audits l
f) Surveillance Reports as per Section 10.3 of this Instruction i
g) ANI Monitoring Reports 8.1.4 Identifying conditions and trends adverse to quality.
l 8.1.5 Verifying and evaluating the implementation and effectiveness of contractors' QA/QC programs as documented and accepted by Ebasco.
-e e
em-7
.e 1336 43/6.76
- U ALITY AS3URANCE CNGINEU.ING peer 4
or 7
NO QUALITY ASSURANCE INSTRUCTION QAl NO.
estt GJ E C ?
6& G E88 0
.QATE 4.lNetCA?e3 WATERFORD SES UNIT NO. 3 i
arvision i
2-21-8/.
"-E QUALITY ASSURANCE INSTRUCTION FOR
,^ * "y C ' * "
j " E * '* C E8 **
8' St*RVEILIANCE AND CORRECTIVE ACTION l,,
i 7-2-82 E:
.aEv E=po p.
l 2i NRS I aH 8.1.6 Verifying the generation, perparation, and processing of documenatation as required per applicable 1.,rocedures.
S.2 Surveillances shall be acco=plished by observing safety-related field construction activities and reviewing associated documentation related to the areas presented in the scope of this Instruction and other areas which may provide support and affect the acco=plishment of the construction activities. During the course of perforning the surveillance specific attention shall be directed to verifying the manner in which the following characteristics and criteria are complied with; in accordance with project requirements.
8.2.1 Suitability of:
a) Material used; its qualification and identification, b) Processes used, 5-c) Equipment used and its calibration.
8.2.2 Worlenanship attained. -
8.2.3 Technique, procedure and method used.
8.2.4 Qualification of processes (methods) and personnel..
8.2.5 Inspection provided; adequacy of coverage and adherence to hold points.
8.2.6 Envionmental controls implemented; protection, and maintenance afforded material, equipment, and activities.
8.2.7 Compliance with drawings, control of desing changes, and adherence to tolerances.
8.2.8 Adequacy of and acceptable performance to tests.
8.2.9 Availability of required documentation, its conditions, and manner of control and processing.
9.0 DOCLMENTING AND REPORTING THE.SLTVEILLANCE 9.1 The Quality Assurance Auditors / Quality Assurance Engineers shall utilize form QAI-7.1 for documenting and reporting activities d
and items which do not comply with project requirements and also when areas of concern or potential problem areas which require cor-rective action are detected.
e
+ew
=,
1334-as/6 78 tu AUTY ASSUR ANC' ENGINE! RING pace 3
or 7 M
CUALITY ASSURANCE INSTRUCT;0N QAl NO.
7 S.=JsEC*
a s gre o poaft 8 = INolf,ATes I tJA M F0DD SES UNIT NO. 3 mevision i
2-21-84
" 8 QUALITY ASSURANCE INSTRUCTION FOR j'l,*yc^**'
I" 8 "' ^ C " ' 88 ' ' *"
I 7-2-82 SURVEU.*ANCE'AND CORRECTIVE ACTION i
.a Ev==
l 2 I pso na NRS sE 9.2 The Quality Assurance Auditors / Quality Assurance Engineers shall complete the heading and Section one (I) of for= QAI-7.1.
g The following information as appropriate to the c.onditions observed shall be provided:
I.
Observations / Comments -
a) What - The item, activity, or area of concern is; the condition that renders the item of activity unaccept-able with relation to project requirements.
b) When - The condition was detected; time of day and the ti:ne frame within the progress and execution of the activity.
c) Where - The item, acrivity, or area of concern exists
/~
with relation to the physical plant location.
\\ -
d) Who - The organization and/or personnel responsible for the activity are and personnel contacted.
a) Why - The condition exists; cause or probable cause.
The above information shall be concise and definitive with all applicable items and activity identifying numbers and nomenclature. The report may be supplemented with appro-priate applicable attachments; 1.e., photographs, sketches, drawi'ngs, etc.
9.3 A nonconformance report shall be prepared for those items and acti-vities whose condition warrants it as per the approved Ebasco "Nonconformance" definition.
9.4 The Quality Assurance Auditors / Quality Assurance Engineers may provide recommendations for discrepant items and also recommend improvement to d
,the Quality Prc' gram that would preventi recurrence of such discrepancies.
9.5 The Quality Assurance Auditor / Quality Assurance Engineer shall_ submit surveillance reports to the Site Quality Assurance Supervisor or _ bis A
designee for review and distribution to cognizant personnel responsible l
for corrective action.
9.6 The Site Quality Assurance Supervisor or his designee shall issue copies of surveillance reports requiring corrective action to the personnel listed below, when appropriate, in addition to the party responsible for corrective action. Additional personnel may receive
=.
4
,4-,,,
n
1334 23/6 76 OU ALIU A$3URANCE ENGINEURING once 6 or 7 M
CUALITY ASSURANCE INSTRUCTION QAl NO.
7 bace
..sssao mars a.INolCATE3 UA*ERFORD SES UNIT NO. 3 arvisteN i
2-21-81.
~'*'8 QUALITY ASSURANCE INSTRUCTION FOR
^llj*'8 SURVEILLANCE AND CORREC*!VE ACTION l
I 7-2-82 pa p a*as=ews-
,asv
!2 1 NRS copies as the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor deems necessary in accordance with the project distribution schedule.
a) Project Quality Assurance Engineer b) Site Manager c) Site Quality Assurance Progra: Manager d) Project Superintendent 4
The corrective action response assignment should be twenty (20) days from receipt of the report. At the discretion of the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor. The response time may either be lengthened or shortened depending on the critical nature of the item, or severity of the finding.
10.0 FOLLOW-UP AND CORRECTIVE ACTION 10.1 Once the surveillance report is issued the Quality Assurance Aud! tors / Quality Assurance Engineers shall_ file a copy
{d of the report in the appropriate monthly surveillance folder g
and enter the necessary information of the surveillance report log Attachment "A".
A* tickler card as per Attachment "B" shall be prepared and filed. The* Auditors and Engineers shall,_,
monitor the actions taken and notify the appropriate personnel when corrective action responses are overdue and update the tickler card accordingly.
10.2 The Quality Assurance Auditors / Quality Assurance Engi=--
i
(
neers.shall review Section II of the report when a corrective l
d action response is received and verify that the response addresses the following as appropriate:
a) Corrective action taken on the deficient condition and re-sults achieved.
l b) Corrective action taken to preclude repetition.
i c) Date when full corrective action will be achieved.
l The response shall be reviewed to determine what impact the dis-crepant condition and action (s) taken have on procedures, speci-
_fications, and Quality Assurance programs. The Auditors and l
Engineers shall verify that the proper and necessary revisions may be neede.d are accomplished within a prompt time frame.
10.3 The Quality Assurance Auditors / Quality Assurance EngineUs
~
shall perform a re-surveillance to assure that the correctiv'e actions d
taken are as presented and acceptable. If the corrective actions taken l
l y
e 1334 43/4 74 CU ALITY ASSURANCS ENGINE" RING paer 7
or 7' NO cVALITY ASSURANCE INSTRUCTION QAl NO.
hwac-
..ssano
.2.rs WA*ERFORD SES UNIT NO. 3
- ~ '~ Nsic.** I 2-21-84 ar v.aQUALITY ASSURANCE INSTRUCTION FOR g",38 cm *
- "*%^cu issus s.
SGVEI'. LANCE AND CORREC*!VE ACTION l
7-2-82 go 7...s..7 l 2 NRS
/ aH are acceptable the Auditors and Engineers shall conplete Section III by checking the accept box, affixing their signature, and dating the report. If after the re-surveillance the Auditors and Liaison are not satisfied with the corrective action taken they shall note g
their findings on a letter, check the reject box, sign and date the report and issue the letter along with a copy of the report. 'his report shall have the same distribution as the initial report.
10.4 If no action is evident within ten (1) additional working days, d
the Auditors and Engineers shall. refer; the natter to the Site Quality Assurance Supervisor for further action.
10.5 When a satisfactory response is received and verified the reject box.shall be circled, initialed and dated. Then the accept box shall be checked, signed and dated. The report along with all re-lated correspondence shall be stapled together, filed, and the status log updated.
~
(,~11.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT 11.1 When conditions adverse to quality are detected, evaluated by Quality Assurance Auditors or Quality Assurance Engineers, and require action to preclude recurrence of a repetitive nature, the QAA or QAE shall recomend to the QA Site Supervisor that
~
~
a Corrective Action Quality Assurance Report be issued. The QA Site Supervisor shall evaluate the condition and make his re-commenditions. If,a Corrective Action Quality Assurance Report is required the QAA or QAE shall prepare the report thru parts I and II.
The QA Site Supervisor shall then transmit the report to the respcusible party and distribute the report in accordance with project requirements. This report will be processed in the same manner as the Surveillance Quality Assurance Report. The Response assignment should be ten (10) working days from receipt of the report.
At the discretion of the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor, the response time may either be lengthened or shortened, depending on the critical nature of the item, or severity of the finding.
i e
l l
~
dA;-7,.1
. QUALIIT ASSI!RANCI INCINIIRING N
~
R* Port No.
Client or Project Draw:.ng No./ Spec. No., procecute Vencer, seasco or Contractor
?.0. No.
\\
Auditor /QA 'iaison:
Date:
Response Required by:
I NCR No.:
Suoject:
i IT. '
ACTIVITY MONITORID OBSERVATICNS/ COMMENTS f
s
)
II.
Corrective Action Assignment:
(Name)
(Title)
(Decart:nent)
Corrective Action Taken (Include Action taken on deficient condition, action taken to prevent recurrence and date when full corrective action trill be achieved.)
(Signature)
(Title)
(Date)
III.
Accept Rej ect (Auditor /QA Liaison) (Date)
(Auditor /QA Liaison)
(Data) r
,,,,e-
---,e---,
w,,,,-,,-,,w
,--,,r--
SK R
O AM E
R "A
8 T
N S
H U
H T
A AT S
TN E
M NG E
I C
S N
S A
A o.
RU E
DS S
ES N
T A S.
O A
F P
RYC S
OTN E
P l.
A.
R RI I.
OA l
CU l NOE I
V
&R S
li EGS i
Cl E
I I G C
VRN N
m,'SHN REI A.
EED I.
I
}A I
OGT E
CNS V
e m
SET R
A U
U Bl O S
i El A F
I 0
RE A
T E
A R
M A
3 E
TA O
D N
E T
U I
S N
S U
I S
E S
D R
O F
R O
7 E
N TA E
W C
N O
A N
L t
L c
I I
e E
A j
Q V
o R
r U
P S
e
- f 5
$ i
!Ii' e
.I
I-e 6
A::achm::: "3" n
!CC-'1 CARD Surveillance Date of Date Racor: No.
Issue Due i,
- 9
, f.,
Fles & Saseeela Serve 111aase
! P.
3"""*
a.
==
e.,
.-e l*
Prepara aspece t
(
- };
1 Superviser esetses 01str1 f T'
- hectos & Response late act i N.
fa.
1emese report i
, g, 4...
Clemed-Oese Me-i l
t
! J.
l lG,s and
'.. ~
!+"
tog i
l l ropero Tseuse P
tV l
l*..
Filar l
8 f.i.
I l
ril.
I h.'-
Quesls tiehler. if so g
,n
-Esse a sepomeer e.
f tafers projett Swporta=
a "l't tendest ae4 Project
,k W esent t-p, Obtate Urtstas Respoome g
s l 2..
J d
3e-3meve111amee 2.
- 4..
e
.g Ascented Ent Aseepted j {',
l l
1,'*
Data sad eleoe lesl =
g 1 itiate Re. serve 111aare Re=
reeve tackler card port = sedate states te les e elese c'eport and and tisuer card = fellemp (11e
ee ertstest serve 111aare j
e.
L I
l j
i I
l
.e j
f n
k
- v..
q e
F
- e.
an. e.
em IMt Ne 7
as tenew7t**"C"
$P'Vf f f I 8 W * ? M* ""*'T.
- a. il tee tti.il son ta' j T etere s rve 11an.s aan, e
{
! documear ee.cevet te**
l o
e
?
CA lats Sww rvaser to see e
witw report and seed to I
tyytac = taatsam assatas f
M mee-i 1 QA aue1Ler/bla&&e3 6 l
I ? Ass to sita reoce t u,si., I
...n,,...
aamenter s uasca re-l T.Aa5 sost;na resuar.4 selves orignat ce?y of l g eenoletten gate and
, er.n.s:s t.
ee t
J.
re,ef t aan sties th. re..
port an the ". ret,say i
I i
i e.e
,utee o r idee e
Awaaters.;aar,ra re-i cetves CAS tile este j
- 1ecers saeses sa Ave-sei files re?* "
{
- et11se;* *.ee l
3 avattar reae:ts u.Je
[
es tis 21er cara a-J filee to freut of due data in the ttskler indes ftte f
1 i secretary easassaas saa l des daf f e 8
l f.
t i;een surves;4 ants sw.
I
'D.'t ut. s.ernar siv.s y
tiel;1er card to I
auditee F.faisen i
a P
v Aes ausstersi aa.see 1.! avatter:Lussee aos has reesteed resposea
. set recesved CA res.
8 he evolmates adequacy
, posse, he investigates J
of reopeese and per.
action takes g
forma a re-surveillasse g
- el previous abeerve.
tiene 14 C.A. gasat. aedstrif
~
Liatase ettstna a res=
l Satistastery pense dua sate f res tiafastery vessessible erta'tasa=
v ties /indie*.tsal and I
!! re-surves1Amese ass / I,
' 11 to-easrveilleese set *d 9
lateetery. aediteetuan
.ettrin ene e ss I
er e=1 tsee et ree.
i paese le unsatisf actory.s see to desonene verttia j
a fellow==, resort anall!
satase of terreestre u
3 be lessed to the endite4 settes en the surveil-l khan reseesse reseawees e
eseandaatim 3ames report. ehoek the I to te *
-j e
setert block, and sign j
end date remet Jf t
I 1
Go t e= =
l aediser se attaen star.
ler card with all his-se..
teria Laformattee to a
l the serve 111ance folder.
1 All other saformaties laeludtet yesponses, ted survellisares, beetap l
'I data. ete to slow be in-t
{
studerd le serve 111ames f alder l
{
Anala ter/Liaaman ea -i.e c; eest.le r., anel file IP trej appropr t te conthly enef =e ve s i t aare tal te*
l j
r'~
,*t..'...
)
j e
F
___