ML19290G659

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC 801027 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Health Physics Appraisal Rept 50-298/80-07.Corrective Actions: Procedures Will Reflect More Explicit Use of Frisker
ML19290G659
Person / Time
Site: Cooper Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 11/17/1980
From: Pilant J
NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To: Seyfrit K
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
Shared Package
ML19290G655 List:
References
LQA8000441, NUDOCS 8012180232
Download: ML19290G659 (2)


Text

, .

~ gx  ::cata suctsaa star en N

_J %.

Nebraska Public Power District

'" " *s " .'s Oj;;ff;tr^ "

1CA30004-1 November '7,

. 1980 Mr. Karl '. Seyfrit, Direc:::

s.d. Nuc., ear segu.,at:ry c,c- dasion Office of Inspection and Inforce=en:

Region 7 611 Ryan ?la a Drive Sui:e '000 .

Arling::n, Texas 76011

Subject:

Additi:nal Infor ation c li??D Response :: Health Physics Appraisal ?regra=, !I Inspection Repc : No. 30-298/30-07 Oear Mr. Seyfrit:

Your le::ar dated October 27, 1980 indica:ed : hat you needed addi:icnal infor ation in Our respcnse to Ite= C af Appendix A :o Repor: No. 50-298/30-07. In particular, you Ladicated we did not address interis reasures which : uld be imple=ented reittively rapidly, such as use of

he existing frisker by personnel during the evaluation pericd of the liquid scintillatica valk thr: ugh type cni:or.

A1:hcugh we :encur tha :he present portal Icnitor is inadequate f:r

=:taia :endi: ions, we believe :ha: the use of the portal cni:or along vich pecper use of :he existing frisse: <111 ae scequate . :11 r: in-proved detec:Or can be installed. We further believe : hat required use of he frisker for every exi: of the reac:or building is unnecessary and undesirable. Thus, effective Dece=ber 1, 1990, we vill change aur pr:cedures :o provide core explici: use of the frisker. This change in pr:cedure vill require tha: all persennel 1se the frisser exi:ing the reaccor building if : hey have previously entered a conta=inated area in

he reac:Or building and, also , if thev suspect tha: : hey have becece
nta=inated due :o contact vi:h possibly centaminated materials such as un=cni:: red leaks. We vill also install a sign :n the reactor building Ve believe airleck
hese act,.:ns dcor :: vprovide

.. ,:e a recinder acequate of,n:er

or _
his requiremen:.

.. an ,.: proved 2 :easures un:1_

fetec:Or is in place. We also believe : hat it vill 20: restrict an

perator f c frequent and rapic. egress of the area wh., e ::ncuct,.ng his acr=al duties and emergency functi:ns : hat =ay occur. In addi: ion. :his requirement v111 per:i: proper meni:Oring of : cur groups thr: ugh clean areas of the reac:cr buildin~e vi:hcut providing unnecessary delays in the airlock area : hat would be required by frisking every person exiting the reactor building.

8 0 1 p , c. o 2 37_

.v..

.. .g ,.. .* ". .ge V. #. *. *. *.

cvenber 17, 1980 Fage 2.
e . ..g.. - . a < .,. .
., . , c u. . .a ,. . .u. e ,,. g -- ,. .,.a s . , . a. ._ a . e ,

, 2 ,3.,. .ae . ~. ., f- .

a e ya. m as 41:h the salk through liquid scintilla:icn type acnitor :n Nevenber 2 ,

. 3 5,0 :.:: ,.e:cnstratien put ses.

?iease :Ontact L. C. Lesser - J. V. Sayer at the site 'i you have further questi:ns or cencerns.

Sincerely,

/, ^$#h

/ 4

/

.. u. .

v. a_. .t...

<- n .-.

mJee,w =w.

wa a ... G.<a..

=*wC Quali:7 Assurance

.v.a .. C'.

-,