ML18040B026

Forwards Revised FSAR Sections 14.2.12.4 & 14.2.12.5 Covering Preoperational Test Program.Revs Will Be Incorporated in Next FSAR Amend

ML18040B026
Person / Time
Site:	Susquehanna
Issue date:	10/13/1983
From:	Curtis N PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:	Schwencer A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
PLA-1795, NUDOCS 8310180437
Download: ML18040B026 (122)

Text

t SSES-FSAB 14 2 1'1 - - TEST PROGRAM- SCHEDUTE ggiaieO'I~ J

~,

The Preoperational Test Program is scheduled for 15 mon ths duration on. the Unit 1 and Common components and foz 12 months duration on the remaining Uni.t 2 components (see Figure 14.2-4a and 10.2-4b) . The subsequent Startup Test Programs are scheduled for six months on each unit The Preoperational Test Proqram sequential test schedules presented on Figures 14.2-4a and 14..2-4b offer one possible plan for an orderly and. efficient progression of the progzam Phile these seguences may be preferred, numerous alternatives exist The schedule will be updated. periodically. at the; jobsite to reflect construction status,. manpower availability and the required test prerequisites, The safety-related structures; systems: and components wi11 be preoperationally tested The Preoperational Test Procedures are scheduled to be developed from September 1977 to January 1979 for Unit 1'nd from July":f9'82"te .Zuly.: 'f983 fer:.Unit -2.'..:%hers: .: ~

electrical,, m'echanical, physical or administrative c'ommugication.

exists. between Unit 2 and the operating Unit 1, the Unit 2 Preoperational. oz Acceptance Test wiII be divided. iato, 2 or more pzoceduzes to facilitate proper administrative* control, and.

scheduling Any'est procedure which invoIves an. interplant communication. will contain. the suffix B on; the procedure number, The schedule of Unit 1 and Unit 2 S'taztup Tests is presented in Fiqure 14.2-5., This schedule establishes the required testing as a function of test condition. The test conditions are described on Figure 14.2-6. All testing is assigned to a specific test condition for convenience even though some testing, as identified in figure 14.2-5,. is performed outside the bounds of the assigned.

test condition Hot all subtests of a Startup Test are performed at each assigned. test condition.. Startup testing will be divided into three Major Test Phases, and within the Power Ascension Test Phase, into distinct test plateaus. The testing included in each Major Test Phase and test plateau is described, in Table 14'-4..- Even though this basic order of testing, i: s zeguized.

there is stiZI considerable flexibility xn- sequencing" the startup testing. specified'e be conducted; at each plateau Detailed startup testing schedules, commensurate with the requirements of thrs schedule,, vill be developed at'he job site 14 2 ~ 12 INDIVIDUAL TEST DESCRIPTIONS The individual preoperational tests to be conducted. on safety-related structures,, systems and components are listed in Table 14 2-1 for. Unit 1 ant Table 14 2-6 for Unit 2'. The abstracts of 14'-.2.1

SSZ S-Z-SAR these preoperational tests are contained. in Subsection 10 2 12 1 in numericaI order The Startup Test Pzoqram procedures are lilted 8.n Table 14 2-3 The abstracts of Startup Test. procedures are contained in Subsections 10 2 12 2 and 14 2 12..6 for Unit 1 and Unit 2, respectively in numerical order. The abstracts identify each test by title and number, describe the test objectives, specify the test prezequisites, provide a summary description of the test method, and establish the test acceptance critezia.

Unit 2 preopezational program vill be scheduled and performed in a manner that vill not affect the safe operation of Unit 1.,

Several of the Pzeoperational Acceptance- Tests vill be subdivided into A'nd tests The portion of the test vill not affect B A the safe operation of'nit 1,. the B portion of the Preoperational Test is dependent upon an interface vith Unit 1 and may require an outaqe on Unit 1 to perform the test, In addition to Test Reviev Board approval of the Preoperational Test, B designated.

tests vill require a vritten Safety Evaluation submitted and test All pezmanet approval.by the .P'lant Operations Review,.Committee inteMac'e connections. between Unit 1 and,.Uni't 2 vie,l be accomplished in accordance vith SSZS Plant Hodification Procedure, Prior to performing the B'esignated: Pzeopezati.onal t Test the Pork A'ctrvity" Review Committee vi-.lL be briefed on the impact and'equirements- of the test 14,2 12.1 - Unit 1'leo equational Test Procedure Abstracts QP2,1$ 125- Volt DC System Preo~erationa1 Test guet Objective-- To demonstrate the ability of the 125 Volt dc system to perform the following:

The batteries can endure a complete discharge,, based on their ampere hour rating vithout exceeding the battery bank mrnimum voltage limit . (Performance Test) r The .batterxes can. provide..reliable stored energy. to selected!

loads incticated'n Table,8'.3-6 in the event of a design base accident. (Sezvxce. Test).

C The battery chazgers can deliver their rated output D The battery charqers can fully charge their associated batteries from design minimum charqed state (i..e, af ter the service test) simultaneously providing pover to the distribution panels for normal station loads.

14 2-22.

, 1

SSES-FSAH recirculation and; system piping identified in Table 3 9-33 meet acceptable limits duzinq. selected dynamic transients Prereguisites:- Instrumentation has been installed and:

calibration Tes~tethod Devices for. measuring continuous loads, displacements, accelerations and pressures are mounted on piping systems and responses during transients are compared with calculated values. Those portions of the systems which are non-safety related. are visually inspected prior to during and subsequent to the transient loadinq. condition Ancetance. Criteria Level 1 The measured vibration amplitude (peak to peak), for each remotely monitored. point of main. steam.

inside drywell and/or reactor recirculation piping shall .not exceed the allowable value for. each specific point Level 2 The maximum measured loads, displacements,.

accelerations and pressures on those systems listed. in Table 3 9-

~ .- ....33 sha11 n.ot exCeed'- the design maximum::expectedTvaguqs'.at..each: . ~ ~

specific po'int The vibratory. response of non-remotely monitored'ystems identified: izr. Table 3 9-33 shall. be judged. te be within:

acceptable limits by" a'uaIiXied", test engineer Based on visual inspection during a. post transient walkdown,.

there shall be no siqns of excessive piping response (such as damaqed insulation, markinqs on piping, structural or hanger steel, or walls, damaged pipe supports, etc.) on systems listed in Table 3.9-33.

The measured vibration amplitude (peak to peak) for each remotely monitored point of main steam inside drywell and/or reactor recirculation piping shall not exceed the expected value for each specific point..

/ST ~0- BOP Pi~ncC S~tea ~S~tte Vibration (The steady state. vibratf'on. testing, previously'ontained. in this.

II test has. been. merqed, into ST.-33 )',

ln,2,.'t2,3~~euested-Udit -1. ~Acce tunes" Test procedure Abstracts Tests comprisinq the Acceptance Test procedures are listed in Table 14.2-2Fe For each test a description is provided for ob jectiveprerequisites method. and. acceptance criteria, where applicable modifications to these descriptions will be reflected in amendments. to the FSAR.

SSE S-F SA'R Acct%ance Criteria The systems performance is in accordance with the applicable design documents

)

%99 ..6 - Seismogr~ahical Monitor in@ ~Sstem Acceptance Test Test Objective To verify the operability'f the seismic monitoring instrumentation (digital cassette accelerographs, playback unit,, response spectrum analyzer and triaxial accelerometers) and to demonstrate proper integrated response of the system to activate upon occurance of a seismic event as designed.

~P ereguisites Construction is complete to the- extent necessary to perform this test and the system is turned over to the ISG Required instruments are calibrated and. controls are operable .

The required electrical power supply system is available All recorders have ample paper and all accelerographs are loaded with the proper. magnetic tape cassettes Test Method Bqth an internal calibration feature on the SHR-102

~ .. (seismic monitoring'ecoxder)..and. a.. simulated:.seismic"event;.at

.'each triaxial .ac'ce16rometez are. used as ".trigger input"'to the seism'ic monitoring system to verify. automatic initiation and alarm< actuations Playback (production of time-history seismic graphs) is: demonstrated by manual. transfer of'assette tapes from the digital cassette accelerographs to- the seismic monitoring recorder Ancetance"-Criteria The system performance parameters are in accordance with the applicable design documents, 14,2 .12~4 ~

Unit 2 Presto erational Test Procedure Abstracts (P202,1> 125 Volt'C System Preonerational Test Test~ob ective The geaecah objectiee of this test is to demonstrate proper operation of'he 125'olt DC System Specific objectives are to: demonstrate the following-.,

(1'); The ability o2 the 125 Volt DC'ystem. batteries Channels A'C,and. D to provide stored. energy to supply- power to'elected. loads in the event of a- loss-of all AC power at the= station.

{2) The ability of the 125 Volt DC System battery chargers to provide power as required for station operation while simultaneously charging and. maintaining the charge of the 125 Vol t: DC batteries when station AC power .is. available

SSES-PSAR Prer~euisites-- Construction. is complete to the extent necessary to- perform this test and, the system is turned over to the ISG Re4uirel calibration and operation of instruments protective devices, and breakers is verified. 480V AC Power, Resistor Toad Bank Battery Room Ventilation and Emergency Eyewash is available and/or in service Test. Method The Battery Performance Test. is manually initiated by connecting the battery bank to the resistor load bank and discharging the batteries at a constant current for a specified period of time. The Battery Service Test is manually initiated by connectinq the battery bank to the resistor load bank and, simulatinq as closely as possible, the. load. the batteries wi11 supply during a desiqn. base accident Then the battery charger is connected to the batteries and the distribution panels to verify that they can charge the batteries while simultaneously providing power to the normal plant loads The battery charger is also connected to the resistor load bank and current is increased to its maximum ratinq with the charger isolated from its associated battery bank Alarms are simulated, and. verified to"be- operated properly r J Acc~etance Criteria. The batteries caa satisfactorily deliver stored; energy for the specified. amount of time as reguired for the Performance and'ervice. Test, The battery changers. can deliver rated output and.'can charge- their associated. battery bank from minimum voltage to a fully charged: state in a specified amount of time while simultaneously supplying normal plant loads The alarms operate at their engineered. setpoints and annunciate in the Control Room.

QP204. 1g 4. 16 kV System Preoperational Test Test Objective The Unit 2 4.16kv System was. tested during Unit 1 Preoperational Test P 4,1 The objective of this test is to document those items left open when the Unit 1 4 16kv System completed preoperationa1 testing.

Pr~ere uisites Construction is completed to the extent necessary to perform this test and.'he systear is: turned over to the ISG.

Reguired. instruments are calibrated; and coatrols are operable Required'lectrical. power supply systems including 125'olt dc systems are operable Test-Nethod The 4. 16 KV'ystem. is energized. Required controls are operated or simulated siqnals are applied to verify proper operation of protective devices, relaying and logic, transfer and trip devices, permissive and prohibit interlocks, instrumentation and. alarms, breakers, switchgear,. transformers and cables..

~ilcce tance Criteria None.

14 2'-124

SSES-FSAR QP205..1~ESS 480- Volt Load Center.-.Preoperati.'onal Test Te/t Oh~ective The general objective ot this test is to demonstrate proper operation of the Engineered Safeguards System (ESS) 480 volt load centers. Specific objectives are to demonstrate the following=

( 1') Capability of high voltage breakers to provide electrical power to their respective ESS load center transformers (2) Capability of ESS load'enter transformers to provide electrical power to their respective ESS 480 volt load centers (3) Proper operation of instrumentation controls ancL alarms Prerecruisites-- Construction is. completed to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is turned over to the ISG

'.'..:: -'. 'Re j.uirqd electrical,paver. supp1y. systems::are Available'o; .

energize.'the 480 Volt system Required'nstrunf'ents and,.

protective relays are calibrated and controls are operable Test Method-- Feed'er breakers; are. opened ancL closed, by- operating:

or simulating controls V'oltages, on the bus. being fed're measured. to. verify breaker- operations relaying and logic, permissive and prohibit interlocks" and alarms Signals are applied to verify alarms and instrumentation Buses are de-enerqized and enerqized to verify automatic- transfer and re-transfer .

Ancetance Criteria The system performance parameters are in accordance with applicable design documents QP205,$ $ Non-ESS 480 Volt Load Centers Prep erational Test Test~Oh ective The general objective of this test is to demonstra.te proper operation of the Non-Engineering Safeguards System. {Hon-ESS) 480 =volt load'enters.. Specific objectives are to demonstrate the following-, v (1) Capability oF high. voltage breakers: to provide electrical power. to their respective Hon-ESS load center. transformers (2) Capability of Non-ESS load center transformers to provide electrical power to their respective Non-ESS 480 volt load centers (3) Capability of Non-ESS 480 volt double-ended. load centers to manually transfer electrical power. between.

14 2-1 25

SSES-PS AR ends. without momentarily paralleling. transformers at both- end.s (4) Proper operation of instrumentation and controls Pre~eguisjtes Construction is completed to the extent necessary to perform the test and. the system is turned over to XSG.

Required electrical power supply systems are available to energize the 480 volt system . Required instruments and.

protective relays are calibrated and controls are operable..

Test method The 4 16kV system is energized Reguired. controls are: operated. or simulated signalr are. applied to verify'roper; operation. of protective. devicerrelayi*ng'nd j:agic. transfer and tzip devicer.. permissive and prohibit- interlocks instrumentation and. alarms,, bzeakerrswi'tchgeaz transformers and cables Acc~etagce Cri~trja The system performance parameters are in accordance with applicable design documents.

QPR~OB g; '8~8-'480

. WoXt:. MCC~P'~eo enataona? Te~-'-!.:, ~ I Test O~b'ective The general objective of this test is to demonstrate proper. apezation: of the- ESS 480 V ltCC liari.er=.,e Specific ob jectives: are'. to.- d'emonstrate; the and.'u@i foXXowing=

(1) Capability'f 480 volt 3; phase powex- to be delivered at the-buses of the 480 vo1't'ngineered Safeguards System fESS) motor control centers in accordance with the enqineering design.

(2) Capability of the 480 volt ESS auto transfer switches to transfer and retransfer electrical power (3) Capability of the 480 volt ESS swing bus NCC to receive preferred power from the N-G set or alternative power.

from the load'enter bus in the event of M-G set failure through .an auto transf'er switch.

P~e~egu~iites='.-- Construction; is." completed to the; extent. necessary to perf'orm this test. an@'tb.e: system>> ir,'turned'ovez to the: ISG; Reguized: electrical power supply'ystems" are available to energize the 480 volt'ystem, Reguired. instruments and.

protective relays are calibzated and. controls aze.operated'.

Test Nethod The 4e16kV system is enerqized. Reguired controls are operated or. simulated signals are applied to verify proper operation of protective devices, relaying and logic,. transfer and trip devices, permissive- and prohibit interlocks, instrumentation and.'larms, breakers, switchgear tzansf ormers and cables e

14 .2-126

~ '

1 r e C e ,g

~O h SSES-PSAB Ac~ce tance Criteria- The system performance parameters are in accordance with applicable. design documents l

$ 920~5. 4 Mon-ESS 480 Volt MCC Preoperational Test T~et Objective =- The general objective of this test is to demonstrate proper operation of the non-ESS 480 volt HCC and auxiliary The specific objectives is to demonstrate the following:

(1) Capability of 480 volt 3 phase .power to he delivered at the buses of the 480 volt Non-Engineered Safeguards System (non-ESS) motor control centers in accordance with the engineering design

~rereSuisites Construction is, completea to tae extent necessary to perform this test and the system is turned over ta the ISG.,

Required electrical power supply systems are available to energize the 480 volt system Required instruments and protective relays are calibrated and controls are operable..

~ ~

~ V Test- Hethod'..The .4 16kV system is energized.. Hegu5:red:contr'ols are operated or simulated. signals are applied. ta verify proper operation. of protective- devices relayrng and'ogic, transfer and trip.- devices permissive- and'rohibit interlock s instrumentation and: alarms,. breakers svi;tchgeaz transformers and. cables Ac~ce tagcy ~Citeria The system performance parameters are within applicable design documents.

QP213,1$ Pire Protection Water~Sstem Preogerational Test Tegt objective- The general objective of this test is to demonstrate proper operation of the Pire Protection Water System.

Specific objectives are to demonstrate the following:

(1) The ability of the Pire Protection Water System hose reels to operate properly (2). The ability oK- the. followi'ng; automatic sprinkler. types to respond te automatic and manual. initiation=

(a) Wet pipe- sprinkler systems (b) Dry pipe sprinkler systems:

(c) Pre-action sprinkler systems (d) Deluge sprinkler systems Pre~re uisite-- Constructs.on is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is. turned aver to ISG.

14 2-127 1 p-

SSZ S-F SAR Required'nstruments are calibrated. and, controls are operational The river water makeup system instrument air systemand. the required electrical power supplies are available..

Test Method The operating modes are initiated manually and,.

where applicable automatically Pire pump. performance is detezmined for OP511 and OP.5T2 Automatic and manual, initiation of the individual sprinkler systems are conducted Plow tests aze conducted on end of line fire hydzants Flow verification is established at the hose stations Heguired controls are operated or simulated signals are applied'o verify proper operation and proper alarm annunciation. locally and remote y .

Acct tance-Criteria:. The- system'erformance parameters are i' accorda.nce- with applicable, codes and design; documents QP213..3$ - ~F~e:and Smoke.Detection~Sstem Preopezational Test Test Objective The general objective. of this test is to demonstrate proper- operation of the Pire and'moke Detects.on

., 'System .. Specific objectives.ape to:..demonstrate.'the follaving=...'l l

(1) The ability of the system to. sense the presence of smoke (simulated)'n.d'/or fire (simulated) and to.

'annunciate these;;conditions' (2) The: ability of the system, to supervise various circuits, and'. annunciate trouble conditions Pger~euisite Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform: this test and the system is turned over to ISG. The required instruments are calibrated and controls are operational.

The requized electrical power supplj.es are available..

Test- Method The fize and smoke detector system required controls and instruments are operated or simulated. signals are applied to ensure proper operation of interlocks and alarms..

performance parameters are in.

accordance with,. applicable~ codes and:desi;gn: document.s,."

t 14 '2-,128 h

'i

/

k h

SSES-PS AR

~Test Qb.'ective- The qeneral objective of this test is to demonstrae proper operation of the Halon 1301 Extinguishing Systems. The specific objectives are to demonstrate the following:,

(1) The ability of the system to initiate a pre-alarm condition upon acti.vation of a product-of-combustion detector (2) The ability of the system to automatically. initiate a Ealon 130'1'elease upon activation of a thermal detector (3) The ability of each pushbutton station to initiate a Halon 1301 release (0) The ability. of the supervisory systems to monitor the control systems for faults.,

-'~P eregoisjte . t"onstruction i.s Complete to the 'extent'ecess4riy .

to perform this. test and. the system i.s turned over to ISG'.

Required instruments are calibrated. and controls are. operable Required, electrical'. power supplies; are available

~e~t- method' The operating modes, are initiated manually and automatically The required controls are operated or simulated, signals are applied to verify system interlocks and alarms Acceptance Criteria - The system performance parameters are in accordance with the applicable codes and design documents.

(P210 I) Reactor Building Closed Cooling Water System

~P eogerational Test Tes~t~bective=- The general objective of this test is to demonstrate proper operation of the Reactor Building Closed Cooling Hater (RBCCM) System.. Specific. objectives. are to demonstrate the-.followiing=

1 o

(T) The ability, of the. RBCCQ'. System to provide: cooling water to: equipment located in the Reactor and Radwaste Build'ings, during normal operation and on loss of off-site power..~ .

(2) The ability of the standby pump to automatically replace the operating pump upon loss of pressure in the header 1 4 2-.1'2,9

SSES-PSAR (3) The ability of the RBCCQ System to cooling. water to the Reactor Building Chilled.

automaticallpurnish I s Hater (RBC'H)'n loss- of off-site power (0) The ability of the containment isolation valves to close automatically upon a loss-,of-coolant accident (LOCA)

P~ere~uisite Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is turned over to the ISG Reguired. instruments are ca].ihrated and. controls are operable Required, electrical power supp1y systems are available The Service Hater System Instrument Air System and a makeup water source- for the RBCCM System. are available T~et method The system operation is. initiated manually and the performance of the pumps is determined Required controls are operated or simulated signals are applied to verify; automatic.

change of Service Hater flow from RBCCH System with changes in the- closed cycle water temperature:. and. system interlocks'nd 0

accordance. with. the applicable design. documents (P2 1'~6..T -

HHR-Service Wa~ter. S stem Pr~eo erational Test:

~Test Ob.'ective The Ceneral oh]ective of this test is to demonstrate proper operation of the Residual Heat Removal Service Hater System (RHRSHS) as much as possible while Unit separation is installed. Specific objectives are to demonstrate I/II the following:

(1)'he operability of the system valves which provide flood service water to the reactor when required..

ability of the system controls to operate in (2) The accordance i with design intent,, e., to verify automatic loop/valve alignments system interlocks and alarms.,

(3)'he ability oS the systemtheto residual circulate water fro'm the heat removal heat ESSF spray. pond through exchanger and'ack. to the pond. After the Unit I/IE separation is. removed, Prereguisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is turned over to the ISG Required instruments are calibrated and controls are operable.

Required electrical. power supp'ystems are available The spray pond and a make-up water source to it are. available RHR 14 2-130 v

SSES-ZS Service Rater is: required. to- conduct the flow- balancing AR'mergency test' A

Test-Method System operation is initiated manually and where applicable automatically The system is operated in the system design modes and RHR service water. pump performance is determined Reguired. controls are operated or simulated signals are applied to verify automatic loop/val've alignments,, system interlocks and alarms.

Criteria The 'cceptance system 'performance parameters are in accordance with applicahle design documents (2216.,2) RHB'eat Exchanger Di;scharge Temperature I'ndicati.on.

-Prep e ational Test Test-O~b ective-- The general, objective of. this test's to d'emonstrate the proper operation. of the reactor heat removal heat exchanger discharge .temperature indication

.

Prepare uisiOO-.'.-'.

Canstrucg~on, is: comple'te..to:,the .'exit necessar'y...

I

~ I td. perform. Qhisdtest and'the.'8HR.system has.beeh turned oyer to'. ~ ~

ISG" Instrumentation has been installed and calibrated anL

~

controls. are operable A Test.- method'-- Required" controls. are operated'r siAmu fated'. sf gnaws are applied to verify proper.- operation, signals. and alarms Acc~etance Criteria performance parameters are in accordance with applicable design documents.,

JP217.1$ Instrument AC Power System Preogerational Test Test-Objectives- The general objective of this test is: to demonstrate proper operation of the Instrument AC Power System Specific objectives are to demonstrate the following:

The ability 'of'he system to provide power to the four CI:ass 1E'Engineered. Safeguard Feature (ESP) instrument load". groups',,"

w (2)', The ability -ofn the. system to,provide power te three non-.Class 1'E;, miscellaneous. 208/120V -.instrument d'istribution- panels.

(3) The ability of the system to identif y a power loss to any 208/120V distribution panel.

(0) That electrical independence between 1Z and. non-1E equipment is in accordance, with design

~, A ~

\

SSES-P SAR P~e~eguisites;-- Construction is complete to the extent, necessary to perform this test and. the system is turned over to the ISG..

Thd alarms operate properly and 480V AC power is available Test-Method The four class 1E ESP distribution panels are energized by manually. closing their respective feeder breakers.

awhile maintaining required voltage of three distribution panels, the zemaining fourth panel is de-energized to show that distribution it is electrically independent of the other three panels.

{This is performed for all four distribution panels.) Also, the undervoltage alarms aze checked vhen each panel is de-energized.

The three non-class 1Z distribution panels are also energized by manually closing their respective feeder breakezs transfer switch normal supply. breaker is manually. The'utomatic opened. to simulate a loss of normal power and the output voltage of the distribution panel is monitozed to verify that the supply voltage switched from normal to emergency in a specified time period.. The emergency supply breaker is. opened and the output voltage of the distribution panel is monitored to verify that output voltage is not present The emergency supply breaker is

'.c3;osed..and::thg--gozmal .s'upp3.y;.breaker'.;is:.cloyed..to restoze nozmaX.

pover Output, voltage'sis',monitored to v'erify that supply, voltage switched from emergency to normal in the specified. period of time The non.-class. 1E distribution panel undezvoltage. alarms are verified vhen both nozma3: and: emergency supply.breakers.. in the automatic- transfer switches: are opened; Ac~ce tance Criteria That reliable 120V'C Pover at design load is supplied to all instrument buses.. That loss of normal supply to the automatic transfer switches causes a shift, in a specified time period, to the emergency supply and vice-versa when normal supply voltage is restored. That the four class 1E distribution panels are electrically isolated from each other and that loss of power alarms operate and, annunciate in the Control Room (P225 1) Primary. Containment Instrument Gas System Preoperational

~est

~Test- bjective-- The generaL objective of this test ir, to demonstrate proper operation. of the:.Primary Containment Instrument, Gas: System, Specific ob.electives are. to demonstrate the following=

(1) The ability of the system to provide a continuous supply of filtered, dry, oil free gas at suitable pressure for operation of the main steam relief valves (with Automatic Depressuzization System function) and other pneumatic devices located inside the containment.

1'4 2-.132.

SSES:-ZSAR (2) The abi;lity of a standby, compressor to automatically start and support the operating compressor in. case of

, low. pressure in the header=,

(3) The abiity of the system to override manual controls and. automatically'ngage the standby,reserve nitrogen bottles- in case of gas compressor low discharge pressure or: during- a containment, isolation actuation.

(0) The abiity of compressor controls and protective devices to function properly and annunciate abnormal conditions (5) The ability'.of', the compressor controls. to trip the compressor; durinq a LOCA coinci;d'ent with.

Construction is complete to the extent necessary a.'LOOP're~eceuisite--

to perform this test and the- system is turned over to the XSG.

Required. instruments are. calibrated and'ontrols are operable Required. electrical power. supply systems the Reactor Build.ing

. Closed.'Coolie Pater..System and..Instrument* fir:System; are "'.

availah3,e "

Te~st- ethod. System operation. is. initiated'. manually to determine the- performance of, compressors,. moisture: separators driers and filters'equi'red'. controls. are" operated'. or simulated.'ignals: are applied; to verify- i;nstrument= gas. system- backup,, isolation on primary'ontainment i;solation signal,, and other system. interlocks and alarms Acceptance-Criteria The system performance parameters are in accordance with the applicable desiqn documents.

(P225 2) Containment Instrument Gas Pressure Loop

~reoperational Test Test Objective The general objective of this test is to demonstrate the proper operation of the containment. instrument qas: pressure loops

' e Pe~ere uisites'. Construction is complete to; the extent necessary to. perform this test ahd. the. system has been- turned'ver to ISG Test-Method'-- The required.. controls are operated or simulated siqnals. are applied to2 verify proper. operation, signals and alarms..

Acc~etance Cgiterja Performance parameters are in accordance mith appropriate design documents ~P~230. 't Control Structure HS V -~Sstem+reoperationag Test f 14 2-,1 33 a

V

SSES-FSAR Test Objective The general objective of this test is to demonstrate proper. operation. of the control. structure HG'V system Spdcific objectives are to demonstrate the following=

(1) Loss of offsite power, trip schemes interlock as designed with related systems'.,

Prereguisite- Construction is complete and the system is turned over to the ISG., Reguired instruments are calibrated and controls are operable The Control Structure Chilled Hater System,, Instrument Air System and turbine building vent are available . Reguired electrica1 power supply systems are available Test-)method.- The system operation is initiated manually and. fan performance,. damper operations and heating. element operation are determined. The differential pressures with respect to outside atmosphere are measured 'eguired- controls are operated or simulated signals; are applied to verify the emergency filter operation on high radiation signal, automatic recirculation on "

.. -.. high..eh1oeine:.signal, pystem. ma'nual isolation::and. othe'system. .

interlocks and. 'alarms .

The system- performance. parameters

'cceptance--Criteria'- are in accordance. with the; applicable d'esiqn documents Test Objective= The general objective of this. test is to demonstrate proper operation of the ESSR Pumphouse HGV System.

Specific objectives are to demonstrate the following:

{1) The ability of each of the ventilation fans to start automatically when its RHR service water pump starts (2) The ability of the ventilation fans to start automatically when ambient temperature in the ESSQ pumphouse increases to a predetermined'evel, provided that the corresponding pump is not running.

~ e. e*

(3); 'The. ability of the.'entilation: fans. to- stop automati;cally after" they have>> been started automatically when: ambient termperature in the ESSQ pumphouse decreases; t.o. a. predetermined level (4) The ability of. the damper systems to respond to temperature changes in the ESSQ pumphouse.

{5) The ability to operate properly following a LOOP.

~prere uisite Construction is- complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is. turned over, to the ZSG N'-1'34

SSES-PS'AR Required instruments're calibrated; and controls are operable Required electrical. power. supply'ystems. and. the. Instrument Air.

System are available Test method. System opezation is, initiated manually and the fan air flow damper operation, heater. operation and ambient conditions inside the pumphouse axe determined . Required controls are operated or simulated signals are applied to verify fan {s) automatic starts with associated pump starts and system interlocks and. alarms.

Acceptance-Criteria The system performance parameters are in accozdance- with the applicable design documents QP233..~4- Post Kcci3ent f3 Pose~rPreo erational Test Later

- .:.gpss Obgec'tive'.'The qenezaTI'b'jective.of. this'est. is.fp...

'Qemonstra'te pro'per operation of. the. Unit; XX;.Reactor. Huildi.'6g Heatinq and Ventilation (HGV) Systemafter the remova1 of the I

Unit isolation boundary" tags, Specific objectives; are to

.d'emonstrate.'the 'following=,'

t (1) The, ability. of; thesystem; to isolate the required. areas.

on receipt of a L'OCA'i;gnaI'r high radiation signal (2) The ability of the system to maintain the Reactor Buildinq at a negative pressure.

(3) The ability of system fans to perform in accordance with design intent (4) The ability of the backdraft isolation dampers to automatically isolate localized areas of the HGV system (5)':-= The. abi'lityt.of.. the- system;,to.-maintain the areas: of greater; potentiaI contamination. a.t a lover pressure than, the. rest. of t the buH;ding P~er~euisite-- Construction. i:s complete .to the extent, necessary to perform this'est an.d. the-. system is. turned over. to the ZSG Required instruments and controls are operable., The Instrument Air System is available., Required electrical power supply systems and Reactor Building Vent are available.. The Reactor Building ventilation flow balancing is complete.

Te~t ethod The system, is operated to measure the fan.

a performance. and, determine the capability to maintain the Reactor 1 4 2-'3.5 1

~

'e

~

t

SSE S-Z SAR Building at negative pressure within the requized thermal environment and areas of greater potential contamination at. a lover pressure than the rest of the building Required controls are opezated or simulated signals are applied to verify the system isolation on LOCA and/or high radiation signal and other system interlocks and= alarms Ancetance Criteria The system performance parameters are in accozdance vith the applicable design documents.

3=-n

~Test Ob'ective- The general objective of this test. is to demonstrate proper operation of the REactor Building Chilled Hater System Specific objectives are to demonstrate the followinq (1) Proper operation of all alarms and interlocks

"(2).-'roper" system glov path'd.:an) ..rtes (3) The ability of system automatic features to function as required.

~pereqnisite Construction is: complete to the extent necessary to perform this- test an:d'. the system, is: turned over to the ZSG Required instruments are calibrated. and, controls are operable The Reactor Building'losed Cooling Hater System,. S'ezvice Hater System, Instrument Air System, Hake-up Demineralizer Hater System and required electrical pover supply systems are available.

Test method The system is operated to demonstrate the chiller and chilled. vater pump operation Required controls are operated or simulated siqnals are applied to verify system isolation, automatic valve alignment, eq'uipment operation undez emergency condition and system interlocks and alarms.,

Acc~etance Criteria The system performance parameters are= in accordance vith the'pplicable design, documents.,

(2230: 3)'eactor Buiild'kg ElectricaI. Equipment Room. HS V'- System zeopegatiorra1 Test

~Te t Objective The general objective of this test is to demonstrate the proper operation of the Reactor Building Electrical Equipment Room Heatinq and Ventilation System.

Specific objectives are to demonstrate the folloving..

(1) The ability of the system to supply cooling aiz to the reactor. building electrical equipment room 14 2-.136

. ~ SSES'-PS AR (2) To verify the operation of the. unit heater Prereguisi.te-- Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is turned over to the ISG Reguired instruments are calibrated and controls are operable.

Required electrical power supply systems,, the Instzument Air System and Reactor Building- Chilled Water System, are available Test ttethod- System operation is initiated manually and fan air flow, damper operation-, heater operation, and ambient temperatures inside the reactor building, electrical equipment room are determined., Regui.red controls- are operated or simulated to, verify fan trips on low,air flow- and., annunciation is received on loss of power to

(

fan.

Ance tance'riteria The system performance parameters are in accordance with appli.cable design documents (P234 4). Emergency Switchgear Room Cooling, System Pzeoperational Test ~

ective-'- 'To'.demonstrate the 'capability. of the system to

'est-e~b-maintain the required ambi.ent temperatures inside the Emergency Switchgear Room.

Prereguisi:..tes-- Construction. is'r complete. to tlie extent.

perform.. this, test'nd:,the..system i:s, turned'ver- to ZSG necessary'o.

Reguired'nstruments are calibrated'. and controls are operable Required electrical supply systems,, instrument. air system,. and chilled water system are available.

Test Method System operation is initiated manually and fan air flow, damper operation,, and heater operation is verified.

Required ambient temperatures are determined Required controls aze operated or simulated signals are applied'o verify automatic starts,, system interlocks and alarms.

n~cce tance-criteria The system performance parameters are in nc~'

accordance with. applicable .design documents ~

=

T~et" O~bectives The general objective of this test is: to-demonstrate proper operation of'he Feedwater System. Specific ojbectives are to demonstrate the following=

1) System controls function in accordance with design intent.

2)'nterlocks with the main turbinerecirculation system and feed'umps function correct y.

14 2-137 4

"1

SSES-PS'AR'ferecCuisites ihe. prerequisites for: this test are as, follows=

1)'onstruction is complete to the extent necessary to perform- this test and'he system is turned over to the ISG .

2) The Service Mater System is operational..

3), The Hain Turbine Lube-Oil System is filled and operational

4) The Instrument Air System is operational

5) The Comput'r is operationa3'o the- extent necessary to verUy. inputs from the f'eedvater system

'6) The 480 volt motor. control centers necessary for this test are operational

7) The 250 volt DC control centers necessary for this test

~ ~ are'.pera.tz.:onal'

8) REPT.'B,, and C'ube-Oil resezvoirs are filled.

Testa][cthe&-- SormmL'nd'. emergency responses: of the lube oil. and turbine: trip systems: are verfffed:.'o1lowfnq; sfmuiatfon: or, process manipulation of: the controlling.. variable.=

A'cceotance Criteria

1) Interlocks of the reactor feed pump turbine (RFPT) and of the alternate and emergency lube oil pumps and theiz corresponding alarms function as designed

2) All abnormal conditions providing trip signals to the RFPTs function as designed Qp2ag 2) pea&water-Control. Slstem pr~eo erational Test Test O~b-"ectiver- , The: generaI...oh)ective'f: this test:.;,is. to d'emonstrete.propeL" operation. 'of tha;.See&water -Control System .

Thish vill be;-'accompZzshed- to~ the'xtent possi;bl'e without. actually pumping eater" with the fied pump, turbines, The test wil1 d'emonstrate.-')

Interlocks to the main turbine, recirculation sys em, and feed pumps function corzectlye

2) Feedvater contzol signals to the start-up regulating valve and feed pumps. function- correctly with. simulated 2-'. 1'3 8 v m

IF SSES-ZSAB'nputs and'tep commands originating from their respective control stations 3)'ll feedwater alarm/trip points have correctly, been set

4) A'll recorders,. indicators and annunciators function correctly..

Prereguisites The .prerequisites for this test are as follows:

'1) Construction of the. system is complete to the. extent reguire'd. to- conduct this test and. the system is turned over to. the ISG

2) The 1'25 Volt DC'ystem is. operationa.l

3) The- Instrument AC system is, operational..

4) The 24 Volt DC. system is operational

~ S

5) Pahel.'C651 ann'unciator. is. energized gest. Method'-- Various. level,. flow pressureand; speed signals will. be simulated and'he. proper.. responses'ii:I. be:

verified'ccs~ag cs~Cit eria.-

1) The reactor, main- steam,. and feedwater pressure and flow indicators, recorders, computer inputs, and trip points respond within designed tolerances.

2) Speed regulation response of each RZP Turbine is within design limits.

3) The response of the startup regulating valve is within design tolerances,

4) Changes in, the control mode selection of control channels, or integrity. of"i'ncoming signal'. do not: produce adverse-changes. in...the- controlled; variables I I Test Objective- The general.ob jective of this test is to demonstrate operation of'he Residual Heat Removal System (RHRS).,

The system performs both safety and normal operational functions.

The specific ob jectives of the test are intended to:

(1) Assure:the proper functioning- of the.- components. of. the system, including, interlocks;,

" 14,2-139

SSES-ZSAR'2)

Demonstrate the abilities- of certain. components to be operated from the Remote Shutdown, Panel (3) Demonstrate the ability of certain valves to automatically isolate from signals generated from the Nuclear Steam Supply Shuto f f System ( NSSSS) ~ ~

(4) Demonstrate the ability of the system to automatically initiate into the Low Pressure Coolant Injection (LPCZ)

Node upon receipt of an automatic initiation signal.

(5) Demonstrate the'pump flow rates and NPSHA are acceptable (6) Demonstrate the various. operational modes of the system as practical These modes. include=

(a) Puel. Pool Cooling Node

~

(b)

I~

Steam. Condensing only)"-'.- '.i LPCZ. Node

'.- C' P

~

Node "c

(logic.

. ~ -- .

y.nd

~ ...

valve operability

~

h

-:- ': /

~ ~<

(c)

P (d)'uppress'.on Pool. Cooling; Mode (e)'.. Shutdown Cooling.. Mod'e (f) Containment Spray'ode (logic and val've operability only)

NOTES 1.. RHR Heat Exchanger sample isolation valves E11-2P079AGB and 2P080ASB interlocks and logic are tested in the NSSSS Preoperational Test P283.,1A 20 RHR Service Water Znjection valves HV-E11' 2P073ASB, 2P070AGB and'P075ASB interlocks and logic are tested

~ in: the.. RHRSM--Preoperational Test P2.;l6 1 f The~ integri.ocks 'between. Unit. 1: 8 XZ automatic initi;ation logic'f*the RHRS'umps will be- functionally demonstrated

4. Steam Condensing Node is fully demonstrated during the Startup Program.

All GE components are prefixed by NPL E11 unless otherwise noted 1'4'2-140

SSES-PSAR'~e~re uisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this. test and the system is: turned over to the ISG, Required instruments are calibrated and controls are. operable Required electzical power supply systems and the Instrument Air Systems are available Reactor pressure vessel, suppression pool,, fue1 pool,. and. fuel pool. skimmer- surge tank aze filled up to required level. to provide enough suction head to the RHR pumps.. Makeup water sources are available.

Tegt Method The operating modes of the system are initiated manually and where applicable automatically., RHR pump .

performance is determined for each operating: mode Control devices are- operated or. simulated signals are applied to vezify valve alignment T.PCI'ode, operation, f'z low. reactor water. level and hiqh. dzywell..pressure and.,other system interlocks and.,

alarms.

Acceptance Criteria -- The system performance parameters are in accordance with applicable engineering design documents .

(P249 2); Post A'ccident. Residual Heat .Removal Plow..Preoperational Xa.ter t -- --Test'- -"

I (P250'l)r Reactor Coze Isolation. Coolrng; System: Pzeoperational Test objective The general. objective of this test is to demonstrate proper operation of the Reactor Core Isolation 4

Coolinq System. Specific objectives are to demonstrate the followinq:

(1) The ability of the system to automatically start upon receipt of an initiation signal.

(2) The ability of the system to isolate upon receipt of an isolation signal...

-: (3). The.: ability"-of the RCIC turbine to trip upon receipt of

a. trip" signal I" .

(4); The ability of. the system to operate in the- following flow,, mod'es='a)

Minimum flow suppression pool to suppression pool (b) RHR heat exchanger suction (steam condensing)

(c) Test mode-CST to CST 14,2-14.1.

SSES-:PS AR (d) Vessel. infection-

{5) The ability'f the system to be operated from Control Boom and. the Remote Shutdown Panel the Hain (6) Assure proper, system component function including interlocks grereguisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform these tests and the system is turned over to ISG Required. instruments are calibrated and controls are opera/le.,

Required electrical power supply systems and the Instrument Air System are available Suppression pool and condensate storage tank are* fi3.led. to provide enough suction head'o RCIC pump and reactor pressure vessel, is available to; receive water Auxiliary.

steam is available for RCIC. turbine operation Part of the RHR system will also be available to provide a suction flow path for RCIC pump .

Test.Nethod=- The system operation is initiated manually and automatically. .Qe..system- is. operated,.to:.determine, thy..

'performance parameters for, the RCIC ku'rbine and pump and the barometric- condensate pump Control. devices are operated or simulated: signals", are- appliecL to: verify automatic. valve alrgnment (system isolation),,-, turbi'ne trip and." start: modes and. other system. interlocks. and alarms=.; 1 Acceptance- Cri;~te ia-- The. system. performance parameters are in accordance with applicable engineering design documents.

QP251,1) C~oe Spgag System Pr~eo erational Test Test~Oh ectives The general. objective of this test is to demonstrate operation of -the Core Spray System. The of this test are intended to: specific'bjectives

{1) Assure the proper functioning of components of the system, including- interlocks (2) -: The ability",of-.-the. system .to automatically'tart upon; receipt of.-an.initiati.'on signal ':;

I'4 '.

(3)'emonstrate the operabil'ity of the Uni:t- I to Unit Spray Pump Interlock.,

II'ore-Pger~euisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perf orm these tests and the system is turned over to the ISG.

Power and control voltage is available for the motors, valves and instruments associated with this system.. Reguized instruments are calibrated and, controls are operable. The suppression pool.

ancL condensate storage tanks are fil'led. to the reguized. level

SSES'-CESAR The reactor pressure vessel head's removed and the vessel can.

accept water The condensate transfer. system. is available I

Test method- The normal system operation- is initiated automatically by simulating a.Design Base Accident The pumps are started and. the appropriate valves and instruments aze-opezated to ensure that water flow is established. to the reactor pressure vessel.. System logic;, interlocks,. and alarms are verified to be in accordance with design intent and. system flows and pressures are verified to ensure- that they are adequate to inject water into the reactor pressure vessel via the core spray spargers. .The system is'operated'anually through the test line back *to the. suppression." pool Also,. the .system is manually lined.

up to accept'ater, from. the condensate, stozage tank and deliver core cooling water to the. reactor pressure vessel Acc~eta~ce. Criteria That the core spray system can deliver coolinq water at design flow and. pressure to the reactor pressure vessel within a specified period of time for various simulated operatinq conditions

~

1 QP251. 2) - -Core Snray STstem p~ai ern Pre~oerational Test

~

~Te t O~b'ecti.ve 1

(1): This- test:.shalX,. d'emonstrate proper= spray pattern of. the Core, Spray System at;- ra.ted'. and; run. out. flow conditions., Each core spray loop shall be operated independently as welL as. in. parallel operation together.

(a) Photographs shall be taken to document that sufficient flow is provided to all parts of the core,, and that the flow pattern is acceptably uniform., These photographs will be evaluated by site test personnel and by General Electric-Operating Plant Engineering/San Jose (b) Photographs. of core spray patterns aze taken. for

,,'---;-'the.-following:,-.sr'x-conditions. '

'i)"." Rate spray. flow; I;oop. B'tA.. at. 6350'100'. -0. gpm' 6350, +100 -0 gpm soap Eoops A and' at 6350, +100,.

-0 gpm each (ii) Run out spray flow Loop Loop A at 7900, +0, -300 at 7900, +0, -300 gpm B gpm Loops A 6 B at 7900, +0,

-300 gpm each

0 SSES-PSAR (2) Observe the physical, response of the Core Spray System components. within the reactor pressure vessel during system initiation and operation (3) Properly size the restrictive orifice FO-2D002A and FO-2D002B such that. run out flow does not exceed the design values in the system Process Flow Diagram (Bode G -7900 gpm) manufacturer's specification and manufacturer's tested values..

(4) Demonstrate pump flow rates and NPSHA are acceptable Prese uisites Construction is'omplete to theover extent necessary to perform this test and. the system is turned to the XSG..

Power and contxol voltage'is. available for the motors valves and instruments associated with this system.. Required instruments are calibrated and controls are operable The suppression pool is filled to the reguired level The reactor pressure vessel head is removed and the vessel can accept water. The condensate transfer system is available, T~est e'thud System operation shall be manually i'nitiated and controlled such that vessel injection is achieved 'onitored in accordance with. test objectives A'~cce tance Cli.tmria The, Core Spray System can. deliver cooling water at desiqn flow. with. an. acceptable. spray pattern to the reactor pressure vessel During this test photographic records shall be made, no system abnormalities shall be observed, restriction flow orifices shall be properly sized, and free route from the core spray junction box vent holes shall be verified.

(P252 1) High Pressure Coolant Injection System Preoperational T~st Test Objective The general objective of this test is to demonstrate operation of the High Pzessuze Coolant Injection System, Specific ob jectives. are to demonstrate the following:.

The ability: of the; system. to automatica11y start upon.

receipt'f t

an =

initiation. signa1 (2) The ability of the system to isolate. upon receipt. of an isoIation signal>>

(3) The ability of the turbine to trip upon receipt of a tuzbine trip signal.

(4) To verify the HPCI system flow paths..

Prese uisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is turned over to ISG.

14,2-144 w

SSES-PS AR Required instruments are calibrated and. controls are operable..

The suppression pool and condensate stozage tank are filled to prdvide'he zequired suction head to the HPCI'ump The reactor pressure vessel head is off and the vessel is ready to receive water from the HPCl system Required electrical power supply systemsStandby Gas Treatment required ventilate.on systems and Instrument Aiz System are available The Auxiliary Boiler or another source of steam supply is available to run the HPCI'urbine Test Rethod System operation is initiated manually and where applicable automatically Reactor water. low level and drywell high pressuze signals are simulated to verify HPCI turbine automatic functions S'stem; isolation is verified'y operating required controls and oz: simulated. signa.ls Steamline high differential. pressure signals are simulated to verify automatic.

functions Limited turbine and pump operation (depending upon.

auxiliary steam conditions) and automatic valve alignment are demonstrated Containment isolation. valves are functionally tested Reguired controls aze operated oz simulated signals are applied:to.. verify interlocks trips. and. alarms=-

ncc~etance Criteria ihe system performance characteristics are in: accordance with applicable design. documents h-h -"-'I --='-': h"'

Test Objective The general ohj'ective of, this test .is to demonstrate the proper and reliable operation of the Standby Liquid Control Svstem. Specific objectives are to demonstzate the following:

(1) The ability of the system to deliver, the designedtest quantity of fluid to the reactor vessel This will be performed with water as a substitute for the neutron absorber (2) The operability of instrumentation, controls, interlocks, alarms heaters, air spargers and heat

'.-; tracing

'l

{3)'he abilxty'o. verify redundancy and electrical.

independenceand conduct test sizings of squib actuated valves'nd demonstrate design injection capability Pger~e uisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is turned over, to the ISG.

Required instruments are calibrated and controls are operable.

The reactor vessel is available to receive water injected from the Standby Liquid Control System.. Required electrical power

SSES-PS'AR supply systems. and a source of d'emineralized ma:keup water are available E

Test Me)bod System operation is initiated manually-,

Deminezalized water is used for testing the system The pumps are run taking suction, from the standby liquid storage tank and the test tank Squib valves are fired and the rate of demineralized water injection into the reactor vessel from each pump is measured.. Reguired controls are operated or simulated signals are applied to verify interlocks and alazms.

Acceptance= Criteria The system performance characteristics are in. accordance with the applicable design documents,

~P25~4-.. l--WmeWSenc2 Serv2,ce Wat~er S stem ~prep erational Test Test Objective--. The general objective of this test is to demonstrate proper operation of'he Emergency Service Hater {ESH)

System, Specific objectives are to demonstrate the'following.-.

. f1): The. 'ability:of the ESSES, eto.supply. cooling. water'.to the-following:;

(a),'HR'ump'oom.

r unit coolers (b),'HR; pump: motor'x', coolers.

(c) RHR pump. sea%. water coolers (d) Core spray pump room unit coolers (e) HPCX pump room units coolers (f) RCIC pump room unit coolers (g) Control structure chillers (h) 'mergency switchgear and load center. coolers (i)'-'-RBCCM.i heat. exchangers:

i h

( j)r . 'BCCH h eat. exchanger s

'(k) Fuel pool, 'akeup:; I (2) The'bility'o start the ESH pumps from the control room or a remote location..

(3) The ability to operate the spray pond valves from a remote'ocation.,

,a i

SSES-ZSAR'raise uisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform: this; test and the: system is turned over to the ZSG-Required instzuments are calibrated and controls are operable.-

Required electrical power supply systems aze available The spray pond is filled to provide enough suction head. for the ESW pumps. and a makeup source to the spray pond is available, The RHR service water system is in operation

'Test Nethod The system is started manually and automatically throuqh the associated diesel generator start signal.. Pump flow oaths are established and pump flows are measurecL for each loop.,

Plow. balancing of'he RHR Sezvice Water System and. Emergency Service Rater, System is pezformedeu Proper operation of the line break detection system is. verified , Required controls're operated and'imulated: siqnal's are applied.'o verify interlocks and alarms Acct tance Criteria The system performance parameters are in accordance with the applicable design documents

/+5~5..1 "- Control Rod'~Dive RZd~aulxc- System pr operational Test Test Objective The- general ob]ective of this test is to demonstrate the. proper. operation:. of the: Control Rod: Hyd,raulic.

System - The specific". obgecti ves'Z this, test aze ilntend'ecL1 to=

I (1). Demonstrate the abili;ty'f the hydraulic system to supply watez't required pressures and flowses (2) Demonstrate the ability of the system to position all control rods inside the core at specified speeds.

(3) Demonstrate the ability of the system to rapidly insert (SCRAM) the control rods into the core within a specified time period.

(4) Assure the proper functioning of all components of the system, including the control zod mechanisms control rod; position: indicator, system, alarms and interlocks',

r (5) . Obtain:,=baseline operating data for the-system I 'I e Prer~euisites'- Construction is complete to the extent necessary to- perform this test and the system is turned over to the ISG'.

Required instruments are calibrated. and controls are operable.

Required electrical power supply systems are available. The condensate storage tank is filled to provide enough suction head to the CRD pump. The TBCCW System and Instrument Air System are available The Reactor Manual Control System is operational to the- point zeguized. for continuing;- with, this test. Initial coupling. and. ventinq is completed..

14 2-'1'4.7'

SSES-FS AR Test Nethod System. operation is initiated. manually and the system flow and pressure control stations are adjusted. CRD pump performance parameters are measured Control rod drives are exercised to verify position indication and insert/withdraw speeds. Scram tests are conducted and scram times are .measured for each control rod drive Required contzols aze operated or.

simulated. signals are applied to verify system interlocks and alarms Rod buffer performance is also tested..

Accttance Criteria System performance parameters are in accordance with the applicable design documents QP)56 .1+= Reactor Nanual -Control System Pr~eo erational Test Test. Objectives To. verify the operation of the Reactor Hanual, Control System,. including relays, control circuitry., switches, rod blocks indicating lights and control valves.,

Prerequisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and system is turned over to the are calibrated and controls are operableISG'equired.'.instruments Required e'lectrical power supply syst:ems aze available '.

Test Nethod System integrated operation. is initiated manually Controls. are'perated. and. simulated.'ignals are applied to verify" rod blocks alarms and" interlocks; of. the- reactor, mode switch.-,. proper operation "of the rod:. position information system and rod drift alarm circuit directional controL valve time sequence for insert and withdraw commands Acceptance Criteria The system performance parameters are in accordance with the applicable design documents.

QPQ56.$ $ Rod Sequence Control ~S stem Prestoerational Test Test Objectives To demonstrate and verify the operation of the Rod Sequence Control System, including the Rod Pattern Controller and its associated external test circuitry-...

~Peh~euisites. 'Construction. is complete to the extent, necessary to perform, this. test. and system is- turned: over to the are'"calibrated'. and controls are operable ZSG'eguiyred'nstruments Required, electrical power supply systems aze available.

Test. Nethod.=- The, Rod Pattern Controller will be- tested and verified to operate correctly in the "Self Test" mode., All display functions and controls as well as the ability of RSCS'perator the RSCS to substitute rod position data will be demonstrated and verified Systems operations of all control rod withdraw and insert blocks and forced. single notch rod. motion. will be verified by'onducting rod movements under the control of both sequence nAn'nd ftgtt~

14 2-'148

SSES-,FSAR Acceptance Cri:teria The System. performa.nce parameters are in accordance with. the applicable desiqn documents

(

QP256.3)'od Worth Ngnimizer System- Preoperational Test Tegt~bgectives To demonstrate and verify the operation of the Rod Worth Minimizer. System, including the ability. of the system to provide insert- and vithdrav blocks below low power setpoint,.

when the control rod insert/withdraw sequences are not within.

pre-set sequences and the ability to provide visual displays and alarms between low power. setpoint and. lov pover- alarm point PrerecCuisites-- Construction is. complete* to the extent necessary to perform. this test and system is turned. over to the ISG Required'- instruments are calibrated and controls are operable Required electrical power supply systems are available.,

~Te t Method The Rod Worth IIinimizer will be tested and verified to operate under various- acceptable and non-acceptable rod position modes,. while demonstrating rod blocks, and alarms for lov.

pover.'. interlocks .

A~see tance~Ci~eria The: system performance Parameters are in accordance'ith. the applicable +I design; documents

~p2ST~Ii--IynfnterrnRtable. A'C'ower- S stem prep erational Test lest Objective- The general objective of this test is to demonstrate proper. operation of the IIninterrnptible AC Power System.. Specific object:ives are to demonstrate the following=

1) Tha+ full load power is supplied to the distribution panel

2) That; the static transfer svitch vill automatically shift load from the preferred to the alternate source upon loss of the preferred source

3) That the static transfer switch will automatically shift

~ load *from: the preferred source to the alternate source vhen the- preferred source: becomes overload'ed'nd.', shift. back; to.

.the preferred source -vhen. the..overload condition, is cleared:

k R

4) That loads can- manually'e svitched from preferred toI alternate source and." vice-versa, Prereguisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is turned over to the ISG.

Required calibration and operation of instrument, protective devices and breakers is veri. fied 480V AC Pover, 250 V DC Power, and; Resistor Load Bank are available 1'4 2-', 1'49

SSES-FS AR'Test eood The Uninterrnptable power Snppiy is energized hy manually closing the 250 V'C preferred. breaker (inverter) and th4- 480' AC A1ternate Breaker (Voltage Regulating Transformer)

With the static. transfer'switch in normal mode,. the load is increased by use of the Resistor Load Bank while the voltage and current is monitored The current is gradually increased above normal rating until the automatic transfer svitch shifts the overload, to the alternate source Then the load is slowly decreased to clear the overload and to verify that the automatic transfer switch shifts the load back to the preferred source. A loss of the preferred souzce is simulated to verify that the automatic transfer switch vil'1 shift the load to the alternate source Then vith both sources available the transfer switch is manually switched from. the preferred. to a,lternate source and vice versa. by means of the bypass mode and normal mode pushbuttons Alarms are either simulated or functionally checked, throughout the above procedure..

~Acce tance Criteria That reliable 'l20 y AC Power at design load is supplied to the distribution panel That the automatic transfer switch will.shift..loads from the preferred to the:

alteznate source with neglfgable power interruption upon loss of preferred source That the automatic transfer switch .vill shift load; from the preferred to. the alternate source in an. overloaded cond'ition and'ack. to the pref'erred'. source when the overload.

condition ir cleared and that the: 1'oad.'an. manually be shifted from the preferred'. to. the alternate source and vice-versa that alarms operate at their engineered set points and annunciate in the control room

~P258,1$ reactor Protection System Preoperational Test Test~bgectiye The general objective of this test is to demonstrate proper operation of the Reactor Protection System (RPS). That is, to initiate a REACTOR SCRAM vith pzecision and reliability in order to prevent or limit core damage following abnormal conditions.

Specific objectives are to demonstrate the folloving=

electrrcaI. -components of the RPS'. operate correctly rll, and that: the Integrated System functions as intended (2) R'clay contact annunciations; function as designed in accordance with the applicable RPS Elementary Di~arams.,

To prove the System Logic Comb'inations by inserting simulated signals or actuating the device.

To perform. response time. tests by inserting a simulatecl signal and timing the scram chain.

10 .2-150

0 SSES-CESAR (5). To verifier BPS Related: Recirc Pump Trip. (RPT). logic f6) To demonstrate'edund'ancy-; electrical independence,,

mode switch operation and saf'e failure on loss of power (7) To test the RPS'ower Distribution System to assure its availability and verify its tripping capabilities grez~euisites Construction, is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and, the system is turned over to the ISG.,

Required instruments are calibrated and. controls are operable Required electrical power: supply systems are available

~est ethod' Integrated: system:. operation. is initiated mannaliy to verify'-G set performance and electrical independence Required controls are operated or simulated signals are applied to verify= sensor. relay-to-scram trip actuator response time, scram reset delay time, mode,'switch operation,, and system interlocks and alarms C

Acceptance Criteria 1

System performance I

is'n accordance with the applicable design documents.

E Test- Objective- To demon'stratei the opezabili;ty: and'solation capability of the Primary C'ontainment: System. Containment.

isolation valve functional tests: will be performed, To test the vacuum breakers and show proper operation of the controls and actuators,. which will demonstrate the ability to limit the drywell and suppression pool internal and differential pressures Jrereguisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and. the system is tuzned over to the ISG'.

Required instruments are 'calibrated and'ontrols are operable.

The suppression pool is filled with. demineralized water to the.

reguired.. level,- and 'the .:hotwell..is. available='-,. The- Containment; Instrument" Gas System; Instrument'A'i'z..Systemh and. required.,-.

eI;ectrica'1 power. supply,'- systems are. available

- . All primary

containment isolation valves. are- operable

.1 gest-Method The suppzession pooI'leanup system will be tested for proper operation; the primary containment isolation system will have signals simulated withcontainmentthe valves in the non-isolation isolates when an position, to verify the primary isolation signal is received.. The test method is described in the General. Test Statement; Vacuum breakers will be actuated. to show..proper directional movement when. permissives are a;vailable to control circuitry.

SS ES-PS'AR Acc~etance Criteri;a- The Suppression Pool Cleanup System fu.nctions are as designed I

Primary Containment isolation functions are designed when X'he appropriate isolation siqnals- are present

~P25~92~Containment Inde gated Leak Rate Preogerational Test T~et Objective To demonstrate that the leakage through the primary containment pressure boundary at design base accident pressure does not exceed the specified maximum allowable value and to demonstrate that the bypass leakage from the dryvell to the suppression, pool at a specified. differential pressure The data. collected- during the does'ot exceed. the allowable leakage test vill be-..'1)

To determine the primary reactor containment integrated leakage rate at test pressure (Pa).

(2) To obtain a calculated. leakage rate vith a

. statistically determined..95$ confidence leveX. such that the calculated leakaq'e rate at the 95% confidence level does not exceed'. the acceptance, criteria.

I (3) '2'a conduct a.'uppXementaI verification. test at test.

pressure such, that the verifi'catic'n test* results meet the acceptance-.criteria (0) To determine the bypass. leakage from dryvell to suppression pool at 0 3 psid.,

Prereguisities Construction of the primary containment, including installation of all portions of mechanical, fluid, electrical, and instrumentation systems penetrating containment is complete. Type B and Type C local leakage rate is satisfactorily complete.. Required, test equipment instruments and data acquisition systems are operable Systems required to support'he iLRT are operational Test-'-Method" :The-.test-shal'l be conductect. in.. accord'ance with. the-requirements. of:: Subsection., $ V 66'f: the PSAR...

A'ccegtance Criteria Acceptance. criteria for this, test are in accordance with the.. requirements oZ Chapter 16 of the FSAR.,

I gP259.3$ Local Leakage Rate Test Test Objective" The objective of this test is to ensure local leakaqe- rate test requirements for Type B and C containment penetrations. are identified and documented Addit ional objectives are as follows:.

'4

r 4 SSES-PSAH Specify acceptance methods for performing type B 6 C local leakaqe rate tests (2) Serve as a prerequisite for the performance of the inteqrated leak rate test..

,(3) Provide standard forms for recording local leakage rate test data.

(0) Insure sufficient data is obtained for evaluating local leakage data against plant technical specifications.

mr~ere uisites Construction of the primary containment, includinq installation of all portions of mechanical,, fluid, electrical,, and. instrument systems. penetrating containment is complete. Heguized test equipment instruments and data.

acquisition systems are operable Systems required to support the TIGHT are operational Test Method- Type B tests aze performed by local pneumatic pressure.zation: of.penetrations,.either indiyidually or in groups.'ype C tests measure local leakage across containment isolation val.ves either by local pneumatic or hydrauIic pzessurization of incEviduaX. containment, penetratxons. Containment isolation.

valves: which are in. Lines: not designed. ta be or remain. filled with water for at least 30. days- subsequent. to a LOCA,, are tested bY local pneumatic pressurization Containment isolation valves which are in lines designed to be, or remain filled with water for at least 30 days subsequent to a LOCA, aze tested by local hydraulic pzessuzization.. The FSAR identifies those valves which are hydraulically tested.

Acct%ance Criteria Acceptance criteria for this test are in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 16 of the FSAH.

{P259.0) Primazy Containment Isolation Valve Timing Preoperational Test

. ~est-ob ectave The general oh]ective of this test is to demonstrate the closing (opening). time of containment isolation valves receiving an automatic'ctuation signal Prereguisites.-- Construction is complete to the'xtent necessary and the various systems are turned over to the ISG. Heguired instruments are calibrated. and control schemes have been checked and are operable, The required electrical power supply systems are available.

Test Method- Each valve receiving an automatic'solation signal will be closed'opened) by simulating the isolation. signal of the 14 2.-153

SSES-'PS AR interlock relay contacts

~

Upon initiation of the simulated siqnals, the valve(s) will be timed. from their pre-isolation to their pbst-isolation position

~

Acceptance Criteria Valves receiving automatic isolation signals close (open) within the required time noted in PSAR Table 6 .2-1'2 (P260..1) Containment Atmosphere Circulation System Preoperational

~

Test Test~~bectiye- The general objective of this test is to demonstrate proper operation of the Containment Atmosphere Circulation System. Specific objectives are to demonstrate the following =

The ability of the primary Containment Atmosphere Circulation System to maintain temperatures in .the drywell various spaces within specific limits during normal or transient mode of operation II The ability, to'rovide additional cooling in the CRD P

(2)

(control rod drive), area. after a SCRAH (sudden

,shutdown. of nuclear reactor) mode of operation Prereceuisites- Construction is complete to the extent: necessary to perform this test and the. system is: turned. over. to the ISG Required instruments are calibrated and controls are operable..

Required electrical power supply systems are available. The Reactor Building Chilled Mater System or 'an alternate cooling water supply is available.

gest Method The system operation is initiated manually,, and flow for each fan is determined. Reguired controls are operated or simulated signals are applied to verify; automatic start of standby units and other system interlocks and alarms No heat loads are simulated during the test

~Acce tance Criteria The system: performance is in accordance with. the applicable design. documents.

(P261 ]). Reactor Mater Cleanup and Piler. Demineralizer System.

-. Preoperati~oal. Test Test-O~b- ectives'=-- The general objective of: this test is to demonstrate proper operation of the Reactor Mater Cleanup and Filter Demineralizer System. Specific ob jectives are to demonstrate the following:

(1') The ability -flow of the Reactor Mater Cleanup System to use the various paths=

SS ES-PSAR (a) Reactor. to reactor thru Filter Demineralizers and bypassing heat exchangers (b) Reactor to radwaste .

(c) Reactor,- to condenser hokwal1 thru. Filter,.

Demineralizers and. bypassing them.

(d) Influent from reactor recirculation loops.

(e) Influent from reactor drain.

(2) The ability to check system performance=

(a) Capability for., design flow rate (b) RWCU pumps suction. and discharge pressure.

(c) Effluent water quality from both filter demineralizers F ~ ) ~

ability of trip logic:

g (3) The RWCU pump (a)', System isolation valves.- closed.

(b) Pump'cooling- water high temperature (c) Pump discharge low flow (4) The ability of system isolation logic=

(a) Leak detection high differential flow.

(b) Nuclear Steam Supply Shutoff System isolation relays.

(5) The ability of the filter demineralizers:

(a) Filter demineralizer isolation logic.

(b)'utomatic backwash operation (c) Automatic precoat operation (d) Valve cycle times and. failure modes Prereguisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is turned over to the ISG..

The Reactor vessel is filled to provide enough suction head to the Reactor Water Cleanup'ecirculation.,Pumps. The Reactor Building Closed Cooling.'ater. System, Instrument Air, System,,

condenser hotwell'or T.iquid. Radwaste Collection System, and. the

SSZS-r S-aR RWCU Precoat S'stem are available Required electrical power supply systems are available a

gest~ethod System operation is initiated manually Pump flow and filter and demineralizer differential pressures are determined.. Precoat and.'backwash cycles are tried Control's are operated or simulated signals are applied to verify system isolation upon initiation of the respective NSSS isolation relay, other system interlocks and alarms.

Ancetance Criteria The system performance parameters are in accordance with the. applicable design documents A

T~est f

~bectaves The ohj'ective o this test is to demonstrate the proper operation of the Reactor Recirculation System.

Prereguisites: Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is turned over to the ISG Required. j.nstruments:..are calibrate'Q and controls are qperabl'e::

Required electrical power supply systems are availa'ble The Reactor. Building Closed Cooling Mater System is available.. The reactor vesse1 is filled with demineralized water to the reguired level Te~st ethod System operation. is initiated manually The system-is tested by individual and integrated operation of'-G sets, pumps and'alves Performance of the M-G sets, recirculation pumps, and get pumps are determined to the extent possible Curing this test. Required controls are operated or simulated signals are applied to verify interlocks and alarms.

Acceptance Criteria=- The system performance parameters are in accordance with the applicable design documents..

$ ~26,1) L~iuid Radvaste Collection Slstem Pre~oerational Test T~est-Ob ective-- The general, objective of this test is to demonstrate proper operation of the, rignid Radvaste Collection after the Unit X/XX separation: is removed: Specific" objectives.

are to demonstrate the- following:.

(1) The ability of area tanks and sumps to collect and hold.

drainaqe.

(2) The ability of drain line drum traps to be either automatica11y or manually flushed.

14 2-156

SSES-PSAR (3). The ability- of the leak detecti:on instrumenta.tion for the d'rywel3 floor drain. sumps and equipment drain tank to detect abnormal leakage (4) The ability of the drywell floor drain sumps and.

equipment drain tank primary containment isolation valves to isolate on receipt of a primary containment.

isolation signal (5) The ability of the condenser area transfer sump to automatically isolate .

(6). The ability of the oil interceptors to separate oil.

from orly'astes .

~prese uisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary.

to perform this. test and. the system is turned over to the ISG Required instruments are calibrated. and controls are operable Required electrical power supply systems are available Collection System and. storage tanks are available Liquid'adwaste I

~I Test Method= Sump pumps are operated and. performance characteristics are determined'evel controls are, operated to, verify pump.. starts and. aI:arms.. liquid; radwaste discharge valves from primary. containment',"are verifyed', toi close.-;-upon. containment isoI'ation signal.

1 Acce2t~ace accordance Criteria The: system performance parameters with the applicable design documents.,

are in (P270. 1) Standby Gas Treatment System And Secondary Containment Isolation Preoperational Test Test Objective To demonstrate the capability of the Standby Gas Treatment System (SGTS) to function as designed.

Pre~eceuisites-- Construction is complete to the extent necessary to "perform this'est and the system is turned over to the ISG Required'nstruments are calibrated and controls are operable..

Required.'lectrica3'ower supply. systems. are available '..: The Reactor;."Build'in@'ea~g. and! Venti::Iation. System SGTS'ent, and:

Instrument A'ir Systems are.'available ',=

~Te t Nethod-- System. operation is initiated manually and: where applicable aut~oatically Reguired controls aEe operated or simulated signals are applied to verify secondary containment isolation and start of SGTS. SGTS performance is determined by measurinq secondary containment pressures,. system pressures and fan flow rates. System interlocks and alarms are verified.

t ~Acce tadce-Cri~te a. rhea system, performance. parameters, are in accordance uith the applicable design. documents

SSES-.ZSAR QP273~1.-- Containment AtmosPheric Cont~rol S stem ~Prep erational Test ge~kt b'ctiye The general objective of this test is to

~

demonstrate proper operation of the Containment Atmosphere Control System Specific objectives are to demonstrate the followinq.

(1) The ability of the Containment Atmospheric Control System to operate under, a LOCA.

Pre~re uisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is turned over. to the ISG Required instrumentation are calibrated and controls are operable Required electrical power supply system are available Test Method The- system. valves will be operated to demonstrate proper operation Simulated signals are applied to verify interlocks and alarms Acceptance Criteria The system performance parameters are in accordance with the ..'applicable,design 8ocumqnts 0 A (PZ73 2) Containment Hydrogen. Recombiner System Preoperational

---* T'est- -.- 4 ge~st Ob ective- The general ob]ective of: thfs test is to demonstrate proper operation. of'he Containment Hydrogen Becombiner System Specific objectives are to demonstrate the following=

(1) The ability of the hydrogen recombiners to achieve rated temperature and air flow within the required time.

prereguisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is turned over to the ISG Required instrumentation is calibrated and controls are operable.

Required. electrical power supply system is available

~fest ethod' The.'ydrogen. Recombiner system vill'. be operated to

• the extent'ractical Bv A

Ancetance-CIiteria. The system performance parameters are in.

accordance with the applicable design documents I (P273. 3) Containment Oxygen-Hydrogen Analyzer Preoperational T~et Test ~Ob 'ective The general objective of this test is to demonstrate proper operation. of the hydrogen and oxygen analyzers . Specific objectives're to demonstrate the following:

14 2.-158

SSES-PSAR (1). The ability of the analyzer. to measure the percent hydrogen at a.'ample point (2) The ability of the analyzer to measure the percent oxygen at a sample point (3) The ability of the analyzer to automatically switch to the standby mode on a simulated. containment isolation signal~

grereguisites Construction is complete- to the extent necessary to .perform this test and the system is turned, over. to the ISG.,

Required instrumentation is calibrated and controls are operable Required electrical power supply'ystem is available Test method The oxygen and hydrogen analyzers are utilized. to determine the containment atmospheric analysis Acceptance-~C iteria-- The system performance parameters are in

.accordance, with the- applicable'esign documents

't QP275. 1) 20 Volt DC'ystem'- Preoperational Test Test Objective-- The general. obj'ective'f this; test is.: to-demonstrate proper. operation, of the'4--V'olt: DC; System, Specific objectives are to d'emonstrate the following"

1) That the batteries'an ensure a complete discharge,, based on their ampere-hour rating,. without exceeding the battery bank minimum voltage limit (Performance Test)

2) That the batteries can provide reliable stored energy to their design loads as indicated in Table 8.,3-8 in the event of a Desiqn Base Accident

3) That the battery" charqers can deliver their rated output..

That the battery chargers can fully charge their associated batteries .from design minimum discharge (i. e., after the service. test): while.. simultaneously providing, power to the for. normal- station: loads 'istributed'anel

5) That alarms operate- and annunciate. at their specified abnormal condition

6) That reliable + 2Q Volt DC is. delivered'o the distribution panels.

Prereguisites Construction is complete. to the extent necessary to perform this test and the. system-is turned over. to the XSG Reguired calibration, and operation- of instrument protective devices and breakers is- verified 120 7 AC,. Resistor Load Bank,

SSES-PSAR Battery Room Ventilation and Emergency Eyewash is available and/or in service l I Test ifethod- The battery performance test 'is ma.nually initiated by connecting the battery bank to the Resistor Load Bank and discharqinq the batteries at a constant current for a specified period of time The Battery Sezvice Test is manually initiated by connecting the battery bank to the Resistor Load Bank and simulating, as closely as possible, the load the batteries will supply during a Design Base Accident Then the battery charger is connected to the batteries and. t'e distribution panels to verify that they can equalize charge the batteries while simultaniously providing power to the normal plant loads.. The battery charger is also connected to the Resistor Load Bank and current is increased to its maximum rating with the chazqer isolated from its associated battery bank Alarms .are, simulated .and verified'o operate .properly . '

Acceptance Criteria The batteries can satisf ac to rily deliver.

stored energy for the specified. amount of time. as reguired for the performance and. service tests . The battery chargers can.

deliver rated output and. can charge their associated battery bank from minimum voltage. to a fully charged state in a specified amount of time while simultaneously supplying normal plant loads.

The alarms operate at their engineered setpoints and annunciate in the control room.

QP276,1) Plant Leak Detection System Pzeoperational Test Test Objective The general objective of this test is to demonstrate the operability of the sensors associated with the detection of leaks from the primary system during normal plant operation and to verify the system logic and active components associated with the annunciation of these leaks. Specific objectives are to demonstrate the following.-

-(1). The flo'od. d'etecting; switches actuate. the proper, alarms for. the followinq'ooms.

(a) RHR Loop A pump room and, Loop B pump room

{b) ROC pump room (c) HPCX pump room (d) Core- spray Loop A pump room. and Loop. B pump room

('e) TBCCW'eat. exchanger area.

1'0 2.-1 60

S SES.-ZS AR, (f) -RBCCV, heat. exchanger A and heat exchanger B areas Prereguisites Construction is complete to the'xtent necessary to perform this test and the system is turned over to the ISG.

Required instruments are calibrated and controls are operable Required, electrical power supply systems are available..

Test Method Sump levels will be varied {if practicable) or simulated signals are applied to level sensors to verify the leak detection system alarms.

Ance tance Criteria The system performance parameters are in accordance with. the. applicable design documents QP276. 3] - -post Accident-Sa~mlin~sfstem ~prep erational Test Test Objective The ob jective of this test. is to demonstrate proper operation of the Post Accident Sampling System Specific objectives are to demonstrate the following.

(1) The proper operation of the system's sample line.

solenoid. valves from panel. 2CI04D (2) The proper operation oC the.permissive switch: on paneL 2C693-"

(3) The proper operation of the sample system control logic (4) The proper operation of the 2C104A graphic display liqhts.

(5) The proper. operation of the process heat trace P~rr~euisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is turned over to ISG.

Required instruments are calibrated and controls are operable Required electrical power supply systems are available Test Nethod-- ControL switches wiU be manipulated. and proper relay. and eradicating light operation wi1L be verified Response oK valves wilI. he checked. functionalLy (i e voltage used, as. an indication that. the valve is open or closed' The system will then. he- operational checked by taking, actuaL samples Acct tance Criteria Control switches and associated interlocks function properly and the system shall he capable of obtaining a sample in less than one hour from initiating the sampling operation

SSE S-ZS A The objective of this test is to .demonstrate the R'est'bjective proper operation of the Souzce Range Monitoring System= Specific.

objectives are to demonstrate the followinq=..

{1) All source range monitors have been calibrated for the design, range of operation (2) Source range monitor trip settings are as zequired by design specification.

(3) All source range monitozs, recorders, meters, indicators and. annunciators function properly.

Rod withdrawal interlocks that are a function of'he source range monitors operate- as, designed.,

(5) Reactor Protection System: trips that are a function of the source range monitors operate correctly (6) Source range monitor insert- and retract drives function as Construction. is, complete to the extent necessary, designed'~eze~uisjtes to: perform'his- teat and the.-system is: turned: over. to.. the ISG, Required reactor: internaZs are:,installed'.'nstruments're calibrated'nd. control*s. are operable. Required'l.'ectzicaZ power supply systems are available Test Method Source Range Monitor Detector insert/retract drive mechanisms aze operated to verify proper operation. Required simulated signals are applied to verify SRM channel trips,.

indicatinq lights and alarms.

Acceptance =Criteria The system performance parameters are in accordance with the applicable design documents.

{P278.2) Intermediate Ranqe Monitoring System Preoperational.

Test Teem~ah. ective-. The objective 'of this test: is:;to Keeanstrate proper ' operation: of the., Intermed'iate Range" Neutron. Monitoring .

System Specific. objectives are to. demonstrate the following::

4 (1) All -Intermediate. Range Monitors have been. calibrated for the- design range of operation...

(2) Intermediate Range Monitor Trip Settinqs are as required by Design Specifications.

(3) .All Intermediate Range Monitors,, recozders meters,,

indicators, and annunciators function properly 1.4 2-.1 62

-1

'h~ h

SSES-PSAR (0) Rod Fithdrava3 interlocks that are a. function of .the Intermediate Range Monitoring System operate as designed (5) Reactor Protection System Trips that are a function of the Intermediate Range Monitoring. System operate- as designed.

(6) Intermediate Range Monitoring Drive Control System functions as designed Pregeguisites. Construction is complete to the extent P

necessary'o perform this. test and the system is turned. over to the ISG..

Required reactor. internals are- installed: instruments are calibrated. and con.trois are operable Required'lectrical power supply systems are availabLe Test Method Intermediate Range Monitors detector insert/retract-drive mechanisms are operated Required simulated signals are applied'o verify IRM channel trips,, rod blocks indicating

.lights ance a'larms... 0 Acce2tagce.Criteria-- The, system performance parameters aze in accordance vith the applicable design, documents (P278 3)verage'o~er Ran'ge N'eutron, Monitored;ng System'

- - --- ---P~eoperational Test-T'est Objective To demonstrate the operability. of the Average Power Ranqe Neutron'onitorinq (APRM System) including LPRM',

Recirc. floe bias signals and Rod Block Monitor.

Prereguisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform- this test and the system is turned over to the ISG Required reactor internals are installed. Instruments aze calibrated and controls are operable.. Required electrical power supply systems are available..

Test~ethod- Required input signals are si.'mulated to verify LPRM channel;,- trap'. lamps'emote~ meters and'larms=. Required'ignals from the- LPRM" System. are.'simulated'- to. each. APRM'hannel. to verify-trip functions indicating'.meters, lights.. and'larms. Each floe transmitter is-., checked: from flov" element; to. its end'unction Signals are simulated'o verrfy'" flow inducted trips,, remote.

meters; and. alarms Required signals from the LPRM and. flow bias systems are simulated to each RBM channel to verify trip functions indicatinq lights, and alarms.

Acceptance= Criteria The system performance parameters are in accordance- with, the applicable design documents; 8

S S E S-'F SAR Test Qbjec~tiv To demonstrate the proper operation of the Traversinc In-Coze Probe System Specific objectives are to demonstrate the following=

1) Manual and automatic Operation.

2) Proper operation of all interlocks, overzides and automatic functions.

3) Proper operation of all indications and alazms

4) Simulated operation of the shear valves

5) Proper intezface between. the TIP system and process computer Pgereguisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is turned over to the ISG LPRMs are installed. inside the reactor vessel and required instruments are calibrated and controls are operable TIP t'racing X'-Y zecqrr1er and purge"system-are available.

Test Method. System operation is initiated manually The indexer. interlock shear. va1ve contzol. and. monitoring ball. valve control and monitoring . squib circuits. and; purging operations are.

verified R'equfred'ontrols. are- operated or simulated signals are applied to verify interlocks external to the system and system alarms Acceptance- Criteria - The system performance parameters are in accordance with the applicable design documents.

~P278,5) Po+s Accident Neutron Monitor inq Preparation al Test Test Objective The general ob jective of this test is to demonstrate the proper operation of the post accident neutron monitors Prese uisites: Construction is complete to the extent necessary to pezf'orar this test'nd. the.- system'as: been turned. ovez to ISG Te~st ethod. The required controls are operated'r sisulated:

signals are applied to'erify proper operation, signals and alarms.

Acceptance Criteria Performance parameters are in accordance vith appropriate design documents..

SSES-PSA'R Test Obggctive The general objective of this test is to demonstrate proper operation of the Area Radiation Monitoring System.'pecific objectives are to demonstrate the following=.

(1) System response with a calibrated gamma source.

(2) Indicators, local horns,. zecorders, annunciators and trip circuits function correctly The Area Radiation Monitoring System does not have any automatic protective functions Pgegeguisites- Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this. test ant the system: is turned over to the ISG, Required instruments. are calibrated and required electrical power supply systems are available., The required radioactivity sources with known strengths are available Test Method The radioactive sources are used or simulated.

siqnals are applied to. verify area zadiation monitor channel

~ " trips;.indicatinq lights ',and alarms Acceptance Criteria The system performance parameters are in accordance with. the- applicable d'esign documents (P279 2)'ain Steam L'ine Radiation. Monitoring Subsystem Test

- Pzeooerational 2

Tegt O~bective The- general objective of these tests is to demonstrate proper operation of the Process and Effluent Radiological Monitoring and Sampling System. This specific test is to verif y the propez operation of the Main Steam Line Radiation Monitoring Subsystem..

Prereguisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the. system is turned over to the ISG.

Required instruments are calibrated and required electrical power supply systems aze available.. The required radioactivity sources with known strenqths are available.

~est method- The radioactive sources. are used: or simulated.

signa'ls; are applied'o'erify process radiation monitor channel trips, indicatinq lz.ghts'nterlocks, and alarms Acceptance Criteria-- The system performance Parameters are in accordance with the applicable design documents.

(PZ79 3) Liquid Process Radiation Monitoring Subsystem

- Preooerational Test Test Obgective The general oh/ective of these tests is to demonstrate proper, operation ot the: process and Effluent 10 2-165

SSES-TSAR Radiological Honitorf.ng and Sampling System This specific test is to verify the proper operation of the Liquid. Process Radiation Ho'nitoz'ing Subsystem.=

(1) RHR Service Mater Loop A (2) RHR Service Mater: Loop B (3) Reactor Bldg Closed Cooling Water (0). Service Water Effluent This subsystem has no- automatic protective functions P~egeguisites Construction fs complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is turned. over to the ISG Required instruments are calibrated and required electrical power supply systems are available The required radioactivity sources with known strengths are available Test Hothead The. radioactive sources ure:used or simulated siqnals are appli'ed 't'o verify process radiation monitor channel trips indicating lights interlocks,. and alarms Acce tance: Criteria-- The system." performance parameters are in.

accordance with the applicable design. documents 4

(P279 0) Refueling Floor Mall and'High Exhaust Subsystems Preooerational Test Test Qbjectiye The general objective of these tests are to demonstrate pzoper operation of the Process and Effluent Radioloqical monitoring and Sampling System. This specific test is to verify the proper operation of the following radiation monitorinq subsystems:

(1) Refueling Floor Wall Exhaust (2) Refueling Floor High Exhaust Pge~euisites- Construction is. complete to the extent necessary to perform this" test and the- system is'urned over to the ISG Required instruments are calibrated and required electrical power supply systems are available. The required radioactivity sources with known strengths are available .

Test Method The radioactive sources are used or simulated signals are applied to verify process radiation monitor channel trips, indicating liqhts, interlocks, and alarms Acce tance- Criteria. The system performance. parameters are in accordance with the applicable design documents 10 2-166'4

SSES-PSAR (P279 5) Offgas. Pretreatment Bali.ation Monitoring Subsystem

- Preo2erational Test I

Test Objective The general objective of these tests is to demonstrate proper operation of the Process and Effluent Radiological Monitoring and Sampling System. This specific test is to verify the proper operation of the Offgas Pretreatment Radiation Monitoring Subsystem This subsystem does not have any automatic protective functions and is used for alarms only.

Pgereguisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform. this test and. the system is turned over to the ZSG Required instruments are cali*brated and required. electrical power supply. systems are available The required radioactivity sources with known strengths are available Test method The radioactive sources are used or simulated signals are applied to verify process radiation monitor channel trips indicating. lights .interlocks :and alarms=

Acceptance C~tegia The system performance Parameters are in accordance with..the applicable design, documents 4

(P279 6) Reactor and Turbine Vent Stack. Radi;ation Monitoring Subsystem. ~Peo2e~tional Test Test~Ob ective The general objective of these tests is to demonstrate proper operation of the Process and Effluent Radioloqical Monitorinq and, Samplinq System. This specific test is to verify the proper operation of the Reactor and Turbine Vent Stack Radiation Monitoring Subsystem The Reactor and Turbine Vent Stack Radiation Monitoring Subsystem has no automatic protective functions Prereguisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is turned over to the ISG.

Required instruments are 'calibrated and. required electrical power supply systems are available 'Zhe required radioactivity sources with known. strenq'ths are available Test Method' The radioactive sources are used'r simulated signals are applied to verify process radiation monitor channel trips, indicatinq locating lights, interlocks, and" alarms.

Acceptance Criteria The system performance parameters are in accordance with the applicable design documents (P279.7) Primary: Containment Radiation. Monitoring, Subsystem

~rea~e~atj,~on 1 Test

0 SSES-PSAR Test-Objective The general. ob]ective of these tests is to demonstrate proper operation. of the Process and Effluent Rad'ioloqical Monitoring and Sampling System This specific test is to verify the proper operation of the Primary Containment Radiation Monitoring Subsystem.

This subsystem has no protective automatic functions Prereguisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is turned over to the ISG Required, instruments are calibrated and required electrical power supply systems aze available The required radioactivity sources-with known strengths are available Tgst Nethod The radioactive sources are used or simulated signals are applied to verify process radiation monitor channel tzips indicatinq lights interlocks, and alarms.

Acceptance Criteria The system performance parameters are in accordance'with the applicable design documents ..

{P279 8) Containment Accident Range Radiation Monitoring Subsystem

-- - - - - - -- greo2erationa 1 Test il fed~tub ective- The objective of this specific test is to verify the proper operation. of the Containment Accident Range Radiation Monitorinq Subsystem pgegeguisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is tuzned over to the ISG.

Required instruments are calibrated and required electrical power supply systems are available. The required radioactivity souzces with known stzengths are available..

Test Method The radioactive sources are used or simulated signals are applied to verify process radiation monitor channel trips indicating lights, inter'locks, and alarms Acceptance Criteria-- The system performance parameters are in accordance with the applicable design documents.

{P279 9) Post Accident A'rea Radiation Monitoring Preoperational T'est Test Objective The general objective of this test is to demonstrate the proper operation of the Post Accident Area Radiation Monitors.

grereguisites--- Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system has been turned over to ISG

SSES'-PSAR Tes~teghod. The- reguired controls are operated or'imulated' signals are- applied to verify proper operation signals and.

alarms '

Acct tance" Criteria Performance parameters are in accordance vith appropriate design documents (P280.,1) Reactor Non-nuclear Instrumentation System Preoperational

-. Test Test-Objective The general objective of. this test is to demonstrate proper operation of the Reactor Non-Nuclear Instrumentation System . Specific objectives are to demonstrate the following=

(1) Verif'y that reactor vessel surface temperature instrumentation is operational.,

(2) Verify. that reactor vessel level .instrumentation is operational e

3

~ ' 5 5 I (3) Verif'y that reactor. vessel pressure instrumentation is'per,ational.

(4)'- 'erify: that the,r.eactor: vessels heat vent valves. are.

operationaI prereguisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is turned over to the ISG.,

Required instruments are calibrated and the controls are operable. - All relays that are initiated from reactor vessel level and pressure sensors are placed in the untripped condition.

Test Method Simulated signals are applied to instrument loops and trip functions, indicating functions and alarms are verified.

Acct tance- Criteria. The system performance parameters are in accordance with the applicable design documents.

Qp+80 Qi- post-Accisent'RV-Instrumentation preoperational-Test I

res~rob ective" The Ceneial ob]ective of this test's to demonstrate the 'proper operation:. of the- Post Accident BPV Instrumentation-grereguisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system has been turned over to ISG.

Test Method=- The required controls are operated. or simulated signals. are applied to. verify proper operation, signals; and alarms

, 10,2~169 5 I

5

~ I

~

• Y.f Y 5

I' I

SSES-P.SAR acc~etance.criteria. performance parameters are in accordance with appropriate design documents QP~81 .1~= Fuel Handling ~Sstem Preopezational Test Te~sObjective The general. objective of this is to demonstrate that the reactor refueling and servicing. tools and equipment operate in a safe and proper manner.. Specific objectives are to demonstrate that= '<<

(1) All interlocks with the reactor manual control system vill be verified (2) All equipment. logics and interlocks wi11. be verified' (3) All, tools have been accounted for and operate satisfactorily Pregegaisites-- Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is turned over to the ISG.,

Required'nstruments are calibrated'nd:, controls are operable Required. electrical, power supply systems are available The fuel pool and, reactor caviar@ are available to test the fue1 grapple and'. the- auxiliary: horsts.,'heReactor Manua3'ontrol. System. is available to; test..the-"refueling, platform,interlocks Test Method' The. refuelinq platform travel. speed and'nterlocks with the Reactor Manual Control. System are verified.. All servicinq tools are tried for proper operation Load tests for the fuel qrapple and the auxiliary hoists are performed. The fuel grapple and the auxiliary hoists are operated at designated speeds. System alarms are verified by operating the controls or simulating the required signals Acceptance-Criteria The system performance parameters are in accordance with the applicable design d.ocuments..

~83..1l- Nuclear Steam S~nlT Shntoff~sstem ~prep erational Test

~

T~st~Ob. ecti.:ves.= The general; ohjective of thi's test is to demonstrate the. proper operation: of the Nuclear Steam Supply.

Shutoff'ystem Specific,'objectives are to demonstrate the fol'loving.",

(1) The ability of the~ain Steam Isolation Valves (MSIV's) to function properly.

(2) The ability of the Main Steam drip leg drains to f unction properly (3) The abili'ty= of.- the. valve isolation logic to function properly~

= -""., 10 2-..1,7,0'.

<<r<<

SSZS-PSAR (4) The. ability. of the steam .jet air ejector steam. supply. valves to function properly I

C (5) The ability of the main steam supply drain valves to function properly..

(6) The ability of -the instrumentation that initiates NSSSS isolation to meet required time responses.

Prereguisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is. turned over to XSG..

Required. instzuments are calibrated and controls aze operable.,

Reguired electricaL power supply systems,, Instzument Aiz System.,

ant the Containment Instrument Gas System are available Te.st~Nfhod The Hain Steam I'solation Valves. are exercised and functional',y checked for closuze by their. logic circui.'t trips,,

loss of control power. and loss of normal air supply using their charged accumulator The Nuclear Steam Supply Shutoff System isolation logic. is. tested by.. verifying it sends appropriate signals: to i:solate the. RHR System the RRCU System. and. the Main Steam. drains,. The Hain, Steam Line Drip Leg Drain. Valves and the Hain Steam Line branch..valves are'functionally checked'. for proper operation Instrumentation: time responses are measured;. from the time" the setpoz.nts're~ reached" to the'"tS.me; the. ffnaL'ogic.-

contacts change. state Acc~etance Criteria The system performance parameters are in accordance with the applicable design documents.

QP283,2)- ADSQSafetg Relief System Pceoperational Test Test Obg~ctives=-= The general objective of this test is to demonstrat'e the proper- operation of the ADS/Safety Relief System..

Specific objectives are to demonstrate the following:

(t) The ability of the Safety/Relief Valves to operate cozrectly in the safety relief'ode 1

(2)'he: abi.'lity: of -selected Safety/Relief Valves to operate correctly,. in the.- ADS mode (3) The ability of 3 Safety/RelieE Valves,, which are not ADS valves to operate from the Remote Shutdown Panel,.

2C20 5 Prerequisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is turned over to ISG.

Reguired. instruments are calibrated and. controls are operable Reguired electrica1 supplies.. areavailabl'e and the Containment Instrument Gas, System, is availabXe I

B

~ .

P

SSES-PS'AR Test-Method -- The Automatic. Depressurization System is functionally'hecked for proper operation in automatic and manual modes 'ach Safety/Relief valve is verified. opezational when any one of its control solenoids is energized The Remote Shutdown Panel operation is also demonstrated., Valves are also checked for, the following:. .fail close. on loss of air, loss of power, and full stroke operation., The acoustic Monitor System is functionally tested to verify proper operation Acceptance- Criteria The syste'm performance parameters are in accordance with the applicable documents

.3)-- = gain- Steam- LeakacCe Control System Preoperational Test I'p283 Test Objectives- To demonstrate the proper, operation of the Main Steam Isolation Valve Leakage Control System to collect steam from the main steam lines by operation of its air blowers, heaters and. motor operated valves.,

Pre~re uisites Construction., is complete to the- extent necessary to. perform: this test and the system is turned'ver to ISG Required instruments are'alibrated and controls are operable.

The, required'- electrical. power supply systems, aze also available F

4 Test- Method'-'-- The'ain: Steam; IsoIa..tion Valv.e:; leakage Control.

interlocks're verified'nd'- the system i:s initiated System manually. and'hecked f'r proper operation Ac~ce tance Criteria-- The system performance parameters are in accordance with the applicable design documents..

QP283. 4g Main Steam Leak Detection System Pre~oerational Test gest Objectives. The general objective of this test is to demonstrate proper operation of the Steam Leak Detection System.

Specific objectives are to demonstrate the following:,

The ability of the equipment area ambient temperature recorder to monitor and'ecord area temperatures.

The ability of -the equipment. area differential temperature recorder to monitor. and'ecord differences in area'temperatures; (3) The a.bility of the isolation logic. to generate isolation signals to'the Nuclear Steam Supply Shutoff System (NSSSS)

P~ereguisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is turned, over to the ISGand' Required'nstruments are'calibrated', controls aze operable electrical. power supplies; are available.',

I t

I V

SSES-PSAR Test-Method-- The Main Steam Leak Detection System is functionally tested to- verify the ability of the area temperature monitors- to monitor changes in temperature and to give isolation signals into the Nuclear Steam Supply Shutoff System logic.

Acceptance-Criteria The system performance parameters are in accordance with the applicable design documents.

gP288,1$ 250 Volt DC System Pr~eo erational Test Test Objective The general objective of this test is to demonstrate proper operation of the 250 Volt DC System. Specific objectives are to demonstrate the following:

(1) The ability of the 250 Volt DC System batteries Divisions I and II - to provide stored energy to supply power to selected loads in the event of a loss of all AC power at the station.

(2) The ability of the 250 Volt DC System battery chargers

,to provide power as reguired for station operation "while'*simultaneou'sly charging an'd'aintain'i:ng'h' charge of the 250 Volt DC batteries when station AC power is available.,

Prereguisites Construction is. complete to the extent. necessary to perform this test and the system is turned over to the ISG Reguired instruments are 'calibrated and controls are operable..

Required electrical power supply systems and a load resistor bank are available. The Battery Boom Ventilation system is also available.

Test Method The system is operated and a load capacity test is conducted for the battery with the battery charger disconnected,.

Required controls are operated or simulated signals are applied to verify battery charger performance, system interlocks and alarms.

Acceptance- Criteria The system performance parameters are in accordance with. the applicable design documents.

~P2~9:; ) -Reacto~Buildgn~Cran~eg~eo erational Test Tegt-objective The general objective of this test is to demonstrate proper operation of the Unit 2 Reactor Building Crane. Specific objectives are to demonstrate the following:

(1) The ability of the Unit 2 Reactor Building Crane to handle all normal plant operation loads except the spent fuel cask.

10 2-173 .

SSES-CESAR (2) The ability of mechanical stops and/or electrical interlocks to prevent the Unit 2 reactor building. crane from handling the spent fuel cask when stored in the spent fuel shipping cask storage pool and otherwise restrict the main hoist from moving loads in travel restriction zones.

(3) The performance of the Unit 2 reactor building crane' components in accordance vith design requirements.

(4) The ability of the crane to stop all movements and safely maintain suspended load during a. loss of offsite power The ability to safely lover a Load. by manual, means (5) should. the hoist drum shaft fail or it otherwise be required.

Pgereguisites Construction is complete and'he system is turned over'o the ISG Required electrical. powez supply systems are

.available and controls are operable Required .loads are available to perform 1'oad" testing'f this crane.. Construction phase static load, testing. (125% of rated load) is completed observed for proper operation Tha. brid'ge and the trolley are speed-tested in both. directions'urrent and voltage readings are taken in both directions The proximity svitches are- tested for both the bridge and. the trolley including trolley movement restriction switches in zones A B,. and C The main hoist and. the auxiliary hoist are speed-tested traveling up and traveling down. Current and voltage readings are taken in both directions All limit switches are tested A loss of power situation is created for both hoists to check the brakes ability to hold without power An overspeed test is simulated for the main hoist. The main hoist load limit switch is also tested.

The above listed tests are run from the pendant pushbutton control. system Operability of the: crane;. is also demonstrated'-

from: the cab The anticol1ision system. is. tested and.- the- crane power source is verified'nce tah~cCriteria The system performance parameters are in accordance with the applicable design documents.

JP200. 1) Cold Functional Test Tes~tch 'ective- 1o demonstrate that the Unit 2 plant systems alone and, the Unit .1 and Unit 2. plant systems togethez, are capable of operating on an integrated basis in normal and emergency modes.

4,2-.1 7.4.

SSES-PSAR Prereguisites-- Required'ystem preoperational tests have been completed and plant systems are: ready for operation on an integrated basis Test Method . Emergency Core Coolinq Systems {RHR 6 Core Spray) are lined up in their normal standby mode The plant electrical system is lined up per normal electrical system lineup.. Loss of coolant accident signals are initiated with and without a loss of offsite power Voltages and, loads are adjusted, as practical, to simulate the anticipated ranqes of variations., Proper response of the electrical distribution system,. diesel generators, and ECCS pumps will be 'verified..

Acceptance-Criteria- Systems. performance parameters are in accordance with the applicable design documents 14,2. 12 5== Unit 2 Acceptance. Test Procedure Abstracts Tests comprising tge..Acceptance Test procedures- are listed in Tab'Xe 14'.2-T For.'"eicos. test a: d'escription i's 'provided"for prerequisites,. method: an'd'. acceptance criteria,, where

'bjective,.

applicable.

A 20.3' 1'- - 'l'3"V'-:SYSTEN'- ACCEPTANCE'EST:.

Test- Objective=-- To demonstrate-'he- capabiIity. of the 13..8 to provide electrical. power to the Staitup and Unit 2 kV'ystem Auxiliary 13.8 kV Busses by demonstrating the proper operation of breakers, relaying and logic, permissive and prohibit interlocks, and instrumentation and alarms.

fr~ere uisites Construction is completed. to the. extent necessary to perform this test and the systems are turned over to the ISG..

Required 230 kV transmission lines are available to energize the 13..8 kV system. Required instruments and protective relays are calibrated and controls are operable..

ges~t'= eghod'--. Breakers are. openedl,.and'.closed by: operating or

,simulating; controls to.verify .breaker, operation." relaying ancL logic 'permissive ancL prohibit interlocks, instrumentation and alarms and: automatic transfers P

accordance with applicable design documents.

A207.1 LIGHTING SYSTEM AND MISCELLANEOUS 120V DISTRIBUTION ACCEPT A NCE EST n

F

- E i X.,'

SSES-PSAR Test ~Ob ectives-- The general objective of this test is to demonstrate proper operation of the Power and Lighting System Specific objectives are to demonstrate the following=

(1) The ability of Station Battery Lighting System to automatically transfer on loss of the Normal Lighting System (2) To provide a format for tabulation of Technical Procedures (TP's) performed on system components during startup testing Prerecruisites Construction is: complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system; is turned. over to the ISG Normal and essential 480 volt Ac'nd 125 volt DC'ower is available . Required test equipment is calibrated and controls are operable.

Test Method The Station Battery Lighting System and Control Room Emergency Lighting System are tested by interrupting normal power supply feeds:..and ver.fying: proper switchoyer from normal to "emergency power. an'd'ack.'to normal power Acce ta ce Criteria The system, performance parameters are in accordance with the applicable,-.d'em;gn- document, QA208 1~Domesti~-Rater- S stem. A'cce tance Test functus.'onally Test Objective- The objective of this test is. to test the Domestic Water System and to demonstrate the following-.

(1) Ability of the Domestic. Water System to provide hot and cold water for designated areas of the plant.

(2) Ability of the Domestic Rater System to provide required pressure for system operation.

Pregeguisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is turned over to ZSG.

. Reguired instruments are. calibrated and controls are operable Reguired electricaI. poser supply".systems- are available Te~st- ethod-- System operation is. initiated manually Ability of the- system -to provide water at the required. temperatures and pressure is verified.

Acct tance Criteria The system performance parameters are in accordance with applicable design documents.

A211 1- -SERVICE RATER SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE TEST

SSE S-F SAR t gest-O~b- ective The general objective of this test is'o demonstrate proper operation of the- Service Water System..

Specific objectives are to demonstrate the following=

(I) The ability of Unit 2 Service Hater System to supply the common loads after Unit I/II separation is removed.

(2) The ability of Unit 2 Service Water to furnish a backup supply for dilution and in jection water to the Cooling Tower Chlorination De-chlorination and Acid Injection Systems (3) The ability of the system to furnish cooling water to the assigned Unit, 2. heat exchangers and coolers.

/frere nisi tes Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is turned over to the ISG.

Required instruments are 'alibrated and controls are opezable..

Required electrical power supply systems are available., Water supply from the cooling tower is available..

Test~ethod System operation.'is i.nitiated normally 'he system is operated in the different. design modes and Service Water Pump performance is determined Reguized. controls are operated or simuEated signals. are applied. to verify automatic- f'eatuzes system- interEocks and: alarms Ac~ce tagce Criteria The system performance parameters are in accordance with applicable design documents..

A215 1'URBINE BUILDING CLOSED COOLING WATER SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE TEST Test Objective The general objective of this test is to demonstrate proper operation of the Turbine Building Closed Cooling Water (TBCCW) System Specific objectives are to demonstrate the followinq:

(1) The ability of the TBCCW System to furnish cooling water to miscellaneous turbine plant. heat exchangers, E

coolers, =and'. chill'ers.

{2) The ability. of', standb'y- pump to automatically start in case of pressure loss in the head'er.

P~re e~usites-- Construction is completed to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is turned over to the ISG.

Required electrical power supply systems are available to energize the necessary 480 volt motor control centers Required instruments are calibrated and controls are available. The service water system is available The instrument air system is available-

SSES-PSAR Test=Method. The system operation is initiated manually and where applicable automatically The system is operated in the system design modes and TBCCW pumps performance is determined.

Required controls are operated or simulated to verify automatic system functions and alarms.

Acceptance Criteria

1) Each of the two TBCCH pumps is capable of delivering a minimum flow of 292 5 gpm

2) With one pump in operation the standby pump starts automatically at a low header pressure of less than or equal to 70 psig

3) The TBCCR system provides cooling water to the following:

a>> Control rod drive pump bearing and. oil coolers b Condensate pump motor bearing coolers c>> Instrument air compressor coolers Service air co mpresso~ .coolers A 4' e>> EHC" fluid coolers f Turbine Building sample station chillers g>> Auxiliary Boiler. sample station chillers J

A'218'- - INSTRUMENT'- AIR- SY'TEM'- A'CCEPTA'NCE TEST'est Objective- The general. objective of thi,s- test: is to.

demonstrate proper operation of the Instrument Air. System Specific objectives are to demonstrate the following:

1) The ability of the Instrument Air System to provide air to outlets located throughout the plant.

2) System controls function in accordance with design intent.

3) Alarms function properly to provide alert of an abnormality in the Instrument Air System.

Instrument, air dryers reduce instrument; air moisture in accordance with. desfgri. reguirements..

5) Service Air System" can supply air at, the dryer inlet of the Instrument'ir System..

6) Standby Instrument Air Compressor, under AUTO Mode, starts automatically when the system pressure is below acceptable limits.

7) The ability of Unit 2 Instrument Air System to provide Unit 1" Instrument Air Distribution System with air,, after Unit I

I/II Separation is removed. ~

14 2.-"178

SSE S-'P,SAR t 8) The to.-

LO,OP ability: of Unit. 2, Instrument Air System control circuits trip- the compressors during a. I.OCA coincident with a-Prereguisites Construction turnover of the system is complete to. the extent required to conduct the test The system has been valked throuqh verified complete and air.blowing has been, completed The required Technical Tests have been completed and the required. instruments aze calibrated Test- Method Both compressors are fully tested in both.,Manual and Auto mode of- operation The Dryer: packages are tested for, eff'ectiveness and. all automa.tie trips, and alarms are verified I

Acc~etance.- Criteria: The- system'. perf ormance, parameters: are in accord'ance with. applicable: engineering design. documents; A/19 1-= - = = SERVICE'IR SYSTE~ACCZPTANCE

~ TEST Test Objectives--- The general, objective of this test- is to

,demonstrate proper operatian of: the General. S'ervice Air System .as much as'possible. vhile. Unit I'/II separation i'. installed Specific; objectives aze to demonstrate that=

(T)... The- Service. Aiz,System-." can,prov@de;-- pressurized.'iz to outZets: located', throughout." the: plant (2)'ystem: controls; function: in accord'ance with design intent (3) The standby unit will start automatically if the operating unit malfunctions.

(0) The Unit II'ervice air: syst'm can provide the Unit I service air system with air after the Unit separation is removed.

I/II

~re~re uisites The pzerequisites of this test are. as follows=.

1): = 'Constructs'on" i:s"- comp1ete=.to~, the-. extent "necessary to'onduct, thzs'=, test" ';and'.. system; i&;turned: over =to~ IS@

2) Ail'omponent inspecti;ons,, tests and: calibrations have- been.

completed satisfactorily Test Method' The system will be pressurized by starting the compressors. Compressor modes and functions will be checked for proper operation. Alarms will be verified as they are induced during normal operation or simulation.,

~Acce t~nce~Citeria:.

,10 ?='179, ', t 4

a I I ~

The service air compressors, have the capacity to deliver 440 scfm of air ea'ch. and provide a.ir to outlets located throughout plant.

2) The compressozs will automatically trip when an abnormal condition exists and alarms- perform their design function

3) The standby compressor will automatically start compressor fails or if if its operation cannot meet service air the lead system demand.

4) The Service Air System is capable of providing backup supply to the Instrument Aiz- System A220<<T' NON RADIOACTIVE-BUILDINGDRAIN SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE TEST

~Test Ob. ectiyes The general oh)ective of this test is to demonstrate proper operation. of the Nonradioactive Building Drain System, Specific objectives are to demonstrate the following:

The. ability of the. system to collect al1 radioactive liquid was'te 'produced in- te 'plant

2) The ability of system controls to automatically or manual1y remove the nonradioactive, lxq;uid waste from its source to a.

suitable designated storage point

~pre ~euisites Construction is complete to the necessary extent and the system is turned over to ZSG Required instrumentation is calibrated and controls are operable Required electrical power supply systems are available. Instrument air is available.

Test Method -- Low, High and High-High sump levels are simulated to verify pumps start and stop as required.,

Acceptance Criteria The system performs in accordance with design documents.

A228 ~ 5 CIRCULATING WATER PUMPHOUSE HEATING 6 VENTIIATION SYSTEM ACCEPT~ACE' ST'* - '

~ '- . - -- - - -*

r

~ i demonstrate proper operation. of'he Circulating Water Pumphouse heating and ventilating systems . Specific objectives are to demonstrate the following-

[1) The ability of the following systems to maintain temperatures in their specific areas in accordance with selected set points of the corresponding thermostats:

(a) Circulating Water. Pump HGV System

SSES'-PSAR (b) Service Rater Pump

~

(2) The ability of each exhaust fan to start automatically and remove overheated aiz when the room temperature reaches the thermostat set point temperature.

(3) System controls function in accordance with design intent.

(4) Alarms function properly to provide alert of an abnormality in the HS 7 Systems.

aisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test. and. the system is turned. over to TSG'll Pr~e ~e instrumentation contained in this system is calibrated and the.

controls are operational stance Criteria The system pezformance pazameters are in

'~cc

'accordance with applicable design documents A231 1 . CONPUTEB UNYNTBHJU~PZBLB PO'NE'B'UPPIY ACCEPTANCE TEST gest Objective--. The general objective of this test is to demonstrate proper operation of the Computer Uninterzuptible Power Supply: Specific. objectives are to demonstrate the f'ollowing=

~ 1) The ability of'he static transfer switch to provide automatic transfer of the 120 volt AC distribution panel loads from the preferred to the alternate supply on loss of the preferred supply or overcurrent or in case of load side fault.

2) The ability: of the manual transfer switch and manual operation of the static transfer switch to transfer distribution panel loads between the preferred and the alternate source.

Prerequisites-- Construction turnover of the system is complete to the extent required to- conduct this test. The system has been walked'hrough: arid,,verified: complete., The required.

have been completed. and; the zeguired'instruments; aze Technical'ests calibrated'.

Test~e hod-- The power supply is operated. at full. load, the static transfer switch is tested, the manual transfer is tested and all alarms and computer inputs associated with the system are verified.

AcceEtance Criteria The svstem performance parameters are in accordance with. applicable engineering design documents.

0

~

y

SSES-..PSAR A23~1- - COMPUTER- ACCEPTANCE TEST Test~bjective The general objective of, this test is to demonstrate proper operation of the computer Specific objectives are to demonstrate the following, (1) The ability of the Display Control System (DCS) to monitor unit operation and generate video displays for opezator use.

I (2) The ability of the performance Monitoring System (PMS) to loq Cata:,, make historical zecords, generate video displays and'enerate alarm status summary displays Preg~euisites Construction turnover of. the system is complete to the extent required to conduct; this test The system has been walked through and verified complete.. The required, Technical Tests- have been completed and the required instruments are calibrated.,

Test Method --'omputer inputs, are verified'the and1'arm spftware...programs aze tested.'and'computer'self-pr'otectioh functions. are' verified Ance ~a~ce~Ci;teria The- system: perf'ormance, pa.rameters're in accordance with applicable engmeerfng. design documents A232 1 -

SE~CU XTY DEVICES'CCEPTANCE TgST'est Qbgectiye The qeneral objective of this test is to demonstrate pzoper operation of the Phase IZ security devices.

Specific objectives are t'o demonstrate the following:.

1) Video output- of CCTV'ameras and tamper and environmental functions operability.,

2) E-Field detection and alarm capability also tamper and. loss-of-powez functions. ee 3): Hatch manhole. and, han dhole. tamper/positio n. ind'ica tron functi;on ',

4) Microwave d'etection and al'arm-. capability, also tamper and loss-of-power functions Pgegeguistes Construction is complete t'o the extent necessary to perform this test, and components and systems have been tuzned over to the ISG..

,'le ee Test-method Verify" operation. of. components I'

A 1'4 .2', f82' ee 'e JJ' '

'e

SSE S-F.S'AR a'cce~ta c~e. C iteria.- Components perform in acc'ordance eith appropriate design documents I

A232 2- - SOUTH GATEHOUSE EQUIPMENT ACCEPTANCE TEST gest O~bective The qeneral objective of this test is to demonstrate proper operation, of the South Gatehouse Equipment.

Specific. objectives are to demonstzate the following:

1) Video output of) locally controlled CCTV cameras and environmental functions operability 2)'etal material and explosion detectors operate properly.

3) Truck. bay gates open shut. and lock as. designed')

Microwave detection and. alarm capability,. also tamper and 1'oss-of-power functions.

5) Turnstiles and. handicap doors operate properly.,

') Inspection pit's'ump pumps wil1 control sump'evel e

~ ~ *

7) - Snow detection, system~,operates'orrectly.

Prerequire tes.-- Const'ruction: iscomplete='to-. the extent necessary:

to; perform'his test'nd. components. and systems have been. turned over. to ISG'est Method Verify operaton of components.

Acce2tance Criteria Components perform in accordance with appropriate design documents A232.3- - SOUTH GATEHOUSE HVAC SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE TEST Test Objective The objective of this test is to demonstrate proper opezation of the SGH HVAC'ystem.. Specific objectives are to'emonstrate the .following=

.1)p.',The abzlity of;-.the. Heating; and'.-Ventilation. system. to maintain temper*atures in. accordance.'ith, selected" ,setpoints.

in the- South Gatehouse compartments'. /

2) Ensure baseboard and:. unit heaters operate per thermostat.-

control.

3) System controls function in accordance with design intent.

~P erequisites-- Construction.. is complete to the extent= necessary to perform this test and. the 'system is turned. over to ISG'-

Reguized instrumentation.'is calibrated. and control's are operable.,

'1'4 2.1:8'3 m

1

~ ', Ve e,

4

SSES-FSAR Instrument. air is avai,lable Required electrical power is available..

C I Test. method -- System operation is initiated manually.. Required controls are operated or. simulated signals are applied to verify system operation and temperature setpoints tance. Criteria System performance parameters are in 'cct accordance w'ith applicable design documents A232 0- -LIRWF" SECURTTY- SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE TEST gegt Objective- The general. objective of this test is to demonstra.te proper operation of the LLRMHP Security System Specific objectives are to: demonstrate the following=

a

1) The functional operation. of Closed Circuit Television System (CCTV);,

2) Proper operation of E-Field Devices,, including normal operati:oh" a1arm- and tamper.-..of the d'evices .

3) Proper operation of manhole and handhole tamper switches P ere uisites Construction: is. complete,tai the extent necessary to, perform this test. and, components; and'ystems; have been turned, over to.. ISG Test~ethod. Verify operation of components.,

Acceptance Criteria Components perform in accordance with appropriate design documents..

A233 1 TUH'BINE BUILDING HEATING 6 VENTILATING'YSTEM ACCEPTANCE TEST Test Objectives The general objective of this test is to demonstrate proper operation of the Turbine Building Heating and Ventilating;, System. ,Specific objectives.,are to demonstrate the

1) The ability'f- the.to'X3'reas system to. provide- a; supply of filtered; and'. tempered; air of the- Turbine Building

2) The* ability of'he system to maintain air flow. from areas of lesser potential contamination to areas having greater potential contamination.

3) The ability of the system to exhaust a,ir from potentially contaminated. spaces. through particulate and charcoal fi;lters X *a 'r 10 2.-1,84. ', "

a

',f a

a,

SSES-FSAR The ability of the system to maintain the Turbine Building at a slightly negative pressure (with respect to atmospheric)-to minimize exfilteration to the outside atmosphere.

5) The ability of the system to recirculate and cool Turbine Building air to reduce exhaust volume.

6) The ability of the system to discharge all exhaust air through the Turbine Building exhaust vent.

7) The ability of the system to supply cooling air to the reactor recirculation motor-generator sets .

gger~uiai.tea-

1) Plow balancing is completed

2) Instrument Air System is operational 3), Pire .Protection System, is operational wm w Test method The system will. be tested with manual. controls and automatically where applicable, A11 interlocksstart and trip t

schemes wild also be verified cce tance- C ter a .

1) Maintain. building temperature above 40oP

2) Maintain building spaces below the following maximum tempera tures:

a) General areas 104o P b) Electrical rooms 104o F c) Mechanical areas 120~

P233'2.'--TURBINE-BUILDING-CHIL'LED-'WATER SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE TEST gesg=Objectiver.-- The genera1 objective of this test is to demonstrate proper operation of the<< Turbine Building Chilled Rater System Specific objectives- are to demonstrate the following.

1) The ability of the Turbine Building Chilled Water System to maintain design temperature

2) The ability of the Service Water System to remove the chiller condenser. heat

SSES-ESAR

3) The ability of the.,'Chilled Water System pumps to perform their design. function I

0) The ability of the chillers to perform their design function.

5) The ability of the temperature control valves to pezform their. design function .

Prerequisites 1); Construction. is complete to the extent required to complete this test

')

The folloving systems. are operational=

a) Znstrument Air System b) Turbine Building HSV is functionally checked d)'ervice:,,Water System.

Makeup Demineralizers Expansion:-tan)c is filled'alfway and pressurized to 20 psi Tes~tethod The.. system.. vill be initfated',

with all automatic. functions. vezified manually'nd'utomaticaLy All.

interlocks will be verified and alarms checked as they occur duzing normal process variation.

Acceptance Criteria Turbine Building Chilled Water. System will supply vater at 50~P + 5~P'..

A233 .3 -

TURBTNE BUILDING BATTERY ROOM EXHAUST SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE TEST Test. gbQectives The general objective o f this test is to demonstrate proper operation. of the Turbine Building Battery Room Exhaust" System- ., Specific objectives-. are:.".to, demonstrate the:

following,"-

(;1) 'he ability of the. system to exhaust air from- the C

turbine build'ing'attery. zoom"to the atmosphere., F

~Pereguisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to complete this test and the system is turned over to ISG.

Required instrumentation is calibrated and controls are opezable.

Required electrical power is- available operation is ver'ified,, Required controls are operated or a h

IC 10'-f86'.; 1 C h A, I. C p C

'C II

SSES-PSAR simulated siqnal is applied to. verify that the fan will trip automatically on a low flow signaI after a time- delay.

Accmmtance~Citeria System performance parameters are in accordance with applicable design documents.

A235 'I FUEL POOL COOLING AND. CLEANUP SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE TEST Test ~Oh ective The qeneral objective of this test is to demonstrate proper operation of the Puel Pool Cooling and Cleanup System Specific objectives are to demonstrate the following:

(1') Puel pool filter/demineralizers operate as designed.,

(2) The system is able= to'a.intain a minimum differential pressure between shell and tube sides of the fuel pool.

cooling heat exchangers..

(3) The fuel pool skimmer surqe tank operates properly

. (4) It is. not possible.to siphon. water from. the, through ang co'oling Qate'r suppl'y'=Ii'ni fuel pooI

{5) The system. wil1 automatical1y apply and remove filter medium; from the fighters Pre~re nisite- Constractfon: is compiete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is turned over to instruments are calibrated and, controls are operable.. ISG'equired.

The Demineralized Mater Transfer System, Service Rater System, ~

Sample System, Condensate System, Instrument Air System, Residual Heat Removal System, Liquid Radwaste Drain System, Emergency Service Water System,. Solid Radwaste System and required electrical power supply systems are available Test+ethod The system is operated to demonstrate the demineralizer heat exchangers and fuel pool. cooling pumps operation. Required controls are operated or simulated signals are applied to verify system operation automatic valve alignment and system:= interlocks 'nd., alarms I

Acce ta ce- Cr teria The system performance'arameters are in accordance with the appIicable desiqn requirements A

A237~1 MAKEUP TBANSPEB AND STORAGE~ CONDENSATE AND REPUELING' RATER TRANSFER SYSTEMS ACCEPT ANCE TEST Test g~bectiyes. The general objective of this test is to demonstrate proper operation of the Makeup Transfer and Storage, Condensate and Refueling Water Transfer Systems The specific objectives are to demonstrate the following:;.

14 o2-187

SSES-FSAR (1) Ability to supply demineralized vater as makeup to the reactor closed coolant. systems..

(2) Ability to supply deminer'alized watez to the condensate storage tank (3) Ability to supply condensate makeup for the various plant systems, includinq the condenser hotvells.

(4) Ability to supply condensate to the suctions of the hiqh pressure coolant injection (HPCI),, reactor core isolation. cooling {RCIC), core spray and control rod drive {CRD) pumps.

(5) A'bility to supply demineralized water as makeup to the TBCCH and GRR closed coolant systems.

(6) Ability of the Condensate Transfer System to supply a suction to condensate transfer pumps from condensate storaqe Tank B.

Prerec(uisites -" Construction'is 'complete to'the exteht necessary to peform this test anci the system is turned over to ISG.

Hydrostatic testing: velocity flushing and'ir blowing have been.

complete to. the: extent. zeguired: to perform this test are. calibrated. ant. controls aze operable Reguired-Required.'nstruments electrical. power supply systems-makeup deminerali;zers and instrument air aze available The associated plant systems vhich are capable of receiving vater. from the Demineralized Water System. are available to the extent required to perform this test Test Method The operating modes of this system are initiated manually and, where applicable,, automatically. The system is operated to determine performance of all pumps. Control devices are operated o- simulated signals are applied to verify system automatic functions and alarms Acceptance. Criteria The system performance parameters are in accordance eith the applicable desiqn documents. All automatic

-trips and.'Xarms..actuate:.within their allowable limits A'2~3: 1- CONDENSATE~DNXHERAL'ZZE SISTER'CCEPTANCE'- TEST.

Test~b+ective: To demonstrate the ability of the Condensate Demineralizer System to process"full condensate flov producing effluent of acceptable quality thereby providing reasonable assurance that contaminants vhich may be introduced to the condenser during normal and abnormal plant operation vill be removed. Also demonstrate that resin transfer,, cleaning and regeneration. a.re'ushbutton. initiated fully automatic processes.

that clean ancL regenerate for reuse Demonstrate valving and controls. are. such that a ready standby unit can be placed in 1'4 2-1 88

0 SSES-FSAR service or any operating unit can be taken out of service. from the- local control panels Prese uisites Consruction is complete 'to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is turned over to the ISG..

Component technical procedures component calibrations have been completed satisfactorily Test- Method The system will be tested while processing water at

'100'%ated flow and at 120% rated flow, verifying that monitored influent and effluent parameters do not exceed design values.

Resin capacity will be tested (one bed. minimum) by processing'he design quantity of water and verifying that monitored effluent paramenters do not exceed desiqn values prior to achieving the desiqa output Control functions related to all modes of operation shal1 be demonstrated Flow paths will be verified under actual operation as will all valve operations motor-driven equipment performance demonstzation of all monitorinq control and support equipment while processing dirty,, exhausted resin charqes exposed to condensate flow, through the regeneration modes returning: the resin charge to, inservice. processing condensate to design quality effluent Simulation of functions vill. be used where off-normal conditions cannot be established or zedundant testing of the same function under actual conditions serves no purpose k

~Acce tahoe Critkaria Each vessel. passing. rateki flask vill. prokiuce water quality- at design spec oz better Each vessel is, capable of passinq 120% rated flow for a. short period of time The condensate demineralizer and regeneration systems aze pushbutton initiated, automatically controlled from a local control panel for all modes of operation. An automatically controlled isolation valve protects the resin transfer system from condensate system pressure . A proper concentration of acid solution is supplied to reqenerate the cation resins and the proper concentrations of caustic- solution at the proper temperature is supplied to regenerate the anion resins.

A200 1'UBE. OIL TRANSFERS STORAGE~ 8 PURIFICATION SYSTEM

- ACCEl?T~ll CE TEST'-

V k' Test.-Objectives.- The-general objective of. this test is to demonstrate proper operation of the Lube Oil Transfer,. Storage and Purification System Specific objectives are to demonstrate the ability of the system to do the following.-,

(1) Transfer lube oil to and from any combination of the followinq reservoirs:

(a) Reactor Feed. Pump Turbine Lube Oil Reservoir A (RFPTLOR A)

T'0-,2-"T89'

SSES-PSAR (b)'PPTLOR B

~

(c). RFPTLOR C (d) Batch Oil Tank

{e) Main Turbine Lube Oil Reservoir (2) Purify the lube oil during any of the above mentioned.

transfers.

(3) The centrifuge safety interlocks and al'arm devices function properly (4}* The. Lube Oil Transfer, Pump 2P-143 meets oz exceeds the minimum capacity- given in the manufacturers data..

(5) The Batch Oil. Tank Pump 2P-144 meets or exceeds the minimum, capacity given in the manufacturers data pre~eguisites--,Construction is".complete to; the, extent,ISG.'.I necessary.

to perform this test ahd the 'system is turned'. over to Reguired instruments are calibrated and. the controls are operable D'emineralized'ater transfer system. and instrument air system, are operational Required electridaX, supp'. systems.- are avai'lablel and'ube oil; is, avail'able in: suffi'cient guantity Test Method" The tube oil. transfer pump performance parameters; are measured and recorded'... The batch oil: tank pump performance parameters are measured and'ecorded.. The centrifuge and oil heaters control and alarm circuits are tested and the operating parameters are measured and recorded. All flowpaths are then .

verified..

Acceptance Criteria The system performance is in accordance with the applicable design documents..

A24~1 COOLING TOWER SYSTEM=ACCEPTANCE=TEST

~et~+bectives- The.genlera3.'.objective. of this. test is to:-'

demonstrate proper operation og the, C'ooling; Toher,'ystem .

Specffic objectives: are- to. demonstrate the* following=.

v 7 (1) The ability of the chlorination system to prepare and.

deliver.. a. chlorine. solution of the proper, strength to the cooling tower basin diffusers.

(2} The ability of the sulfuric acid injection system to prepare and deliver an acid solution to the cooling tower basin diffusers 1'4'..2-1 9 0 I

h*

SSES-PSAR (3) The ability'f the cooling tower blowdown- valves to blowdown water to either the discharge spargers direct or the cooling'pond Pre~re uisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to.perform this test and the system is, turned over to the ISG Required instruments are calibrated and controls are operable Required electrical power supply systems, instrument air system, plant makeup water system, and chlorination building HGV are available.

Test method Sliding gate valves and bypass valve operation is verified Makeup system is verified to keep basin. water leve1 at.

the proper level Chlorination addition capabilities are verified, and'he acid system is verified to control pH at the proper value., The blowdown treatment system will remove enough chlorine to allow the plant to meet the reguirements of its environmental, discharge permit Acceptance..Criteria The. system performance parameters. are in accordance with the applicable 'design d'oicuments Tent~Oh- acti ves- The general. oh@ective of this test is, to demonstra.te proper operation of the Circulating Water System Specific ob]ectives are ta demonstrate the following=

The ability of the system to circulate water from the cooling tower through the circulating water pumps and main condensers at design pressure and flow and return it to the cooling tower..

(2) The ability of the control systems to perform within design limits.

(3) The ability of interlock circuits to protect against-component failures that might result from improper system'ineups

~ergguisites -- Construction. is complete to the toextent k

necessary to run this test and the system is turned over the ISG Required, instruments are'calibrated and. controls are operable Required electrical power supply systems and the cooling tower system are available.

Test+ethod Pump protective interlocks and system design pressures and flows are verified

SSES-PS AR Ance tance Crit~cia-- The system performance parameters are rn accordance with. the applicable design. documents..

(

A/43 1- CONDENSER AIR REMOVAL SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE TEST Test Objectives The general objective of this test is to demonstrate proper operation of the Condenser Air Removal System.

Specific objectives are to demonstrate the following:

1) The ability of the mechanical vacuum pump to pull a vacuum on the condenser

2) The ability of the SJAE's to maintain condenser vacuum

3) The ability of the SJAE condenser to remove noncondensible gases from the main condenser and discharge them to the gaseous radioactive waste system

\

4) The ability of SJAE condenser to condense any steam removed from the condenser with the noncondensible gases and return the condensate.to .the condenser,

5) The ability of dilution steam flow controls to operate pzopezly and, to verify the low and low-low flow. alarms e

~Pre e uisates. The prerequisites for this test are as folloes=

1) Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and system is turned over to ISG

2) The main turbine is on turning gear.

3) The aux boiler is operational and the main turbine seals are established

4) Instrument Air System is operational.

5) Turbine Building HGV is operational.

6)'The Condensate System is operational I

7) The'Off-Gas System. x.s operational

8) The separator-silencer is filled. to the proper. level..

9) All steam lines are properly drained of condensate.

Test Method A vacuum will be pulled on the condenser using the mechanical vacuum pump and SJAE~s.

it will be maintained using automatic Valve interlocks will be checked as. vill al1 the functions Alarms will be verified as they are induced duri g normal. system change or simulation 14 2-'192 L

'1

SSES-PSAR Ancetance~Cr teria

~ ) The mechanical vacuum pump can 95 min.. on the main condenser pull a vacuum of 5 in Hga in l

2) The SJAE's can maintain the vacuum after the mechanical vacuum pump is shutdown..

3) Valve sequencing operates per design:

JA243 2}.-- CONDENSER TUBE CLEANING SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE TEST

~Te t Objectives- The qeneral, objective of this test is to demonstrate- proper operation of the Condenser Tube Cleaning System.. Specific objectives are to demonstrate the, following=

(1) The ability of the system to operate automatically and in proper sequence foz all functions.

(2) The ability of'he alarms. to provide alert of'n

.-abnormality: in. the. system.,

(3) The ability'f the. system to be operated manually to: perform-. this test and: the.. system i;s. turned:. ovex=- to instruments'ze:"caI;ibrated ance controls. are opezable ZSG'equired.

Test Method System operation is initiated manually and verified.. System operation is put in automatic and sequencing is verified. Controls are operated or simulated signals are applied to verify operation of alarms.

Acceptance Criteria System performance parameters are in accordance with applicable design documents.,

$ /44 1 - CONDENSATE SYSTEN ACCEPTANCE TEST

~

Te~st-Ob ectives-- The general objective of. this test is to d'emonstrate. proper operation <<of, the- Condensate- System Specific: =,,

~ '

obj'ectives" a'ze to 'demonstra;te the followi'.ng=... v (1)'he:-ability of the- condensate pumps and'heir: associated valves to function properly (2) The ability of the system to maintain minimum recirculation flow through each condensate pump.

(3) The ability of the Turbine Building Closed Cooling Hater System to provide sufficient cooling. flow. for the. condensate pump bearings, v

14~2-',.1:93'

~

iI 'v=

i 'Ii v '

SSE S-FS.AR

.~eg~euisites: Construction is complete to the extent necessary

-to perform this test and the system is turned over to the ISG Power and control voltage is. available for the associated motors,,

valves and instruments., Required calibration and operation of instruments,. protective devices and. controls is verified. Motor bearing. cooling and pump seal water and instrument air is available Main condensers are cleaned and filled. with water.

Test. Method The system operation is manually initiated by startinq the condensate pumps and establishing flow through

~

various paths.. System logic, interlocks and alarms are verified to be in accordance with design intent and system flows, pressures are within enqineering- specifications under. various simulated. operati:ng. conditions .

A'cue tance Criteria- The System. performance parameters. are in accordance with the applicable design documents for the.

conditions simulated. during the test A2~46 1 EX~TACTION STEAM. SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE TEST Tes't Object'ives;. Th'e general objective of'.this test is to demonstrate proper operation of, the Extraction Steam System and.

Zeedwater Heaters: Drainsand Vents- System Specific objectives; are to. d'emonstrate the following=.

t 1)'he isolation. valves in. the Extraction.

Feedwater H'eater Drai.'n System', and the Steam: Sytem the Feedwater Heater Vents operate- as required by'heir; design..

2) All associated systems that drain to the feedwater heater systems isolate when required by the Feedwater Heater System desiqn prerequisites- Construction is completed to the necessary extent and the system is turned over to ISG Required instrumentation is calibrated and controls are operable. Required electrical power supply systems are available.. Plant demineralized water and instrument'ir is. available..

~eet-Method.--" Extraction-; Steam and., Feedwater Heater System tests.

are simualted;; and'erformed: wi.',th- no steam present'o'he turbine All system interlocks are'ested' Acc~etance- Criteria;. The system; performance parameters are in accordance with the applicable desi:gn documents.

A263 .1 - BYPASS INDICATION SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE TEST Tegt-O~b- ective. The general objective of this: test. is. to demonstrate proper operation of the Bypass Indication System and the Bypass. Indication, System Panel 2C694.

SSES-PSAR'zezequisites Construction. is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is-.turned over to ZSG Test+ethos The system is placed in operation., Proper operation and indication is verified by operating. controls or applying simulated signals.

Acceptance. Criteria. System performance parameters are in accordance with applicable design'documents.

a)67,.j- - vibration an6 loose parts. Nonitoiinci ~sstem Tes~tcb ectives The general objective oT this test is to d'emonstrate proper operation of the Loose. Parts Monitoring; System.-

and. Vibration Monitoring: System,'pecific. objectives are to demonstrate the following.=

(1) The abili;ty of the system to detect, and annunciate unusual, noises that indicate a. metallic loose part

'-..(2): . The ability: of: the'system..to detect excessive. vibration-in', the 'reactor" r'ec'irculatioii pumps I

P ere uisites" Construction. is .comp1ete, to the. extent necessary and'he various systems.: are turned over'-ta" the.-ISG'eguired instruments are calibrated.'nt control. schemes. have been are- operable, checked'nd; Test Method Each Roose Part, Detection. (LPD) channel i,s tested by causing an impact on the piping monitored and verification that a corresponding visual alarm is act'ivated. The Digital Loose Part Location (DLPL) is functionally tested by placing any two LPDs in alarm test condition and then verifying that the DLPL visible and audible alarms annunciator, are activated and that the tape recorder starts recording the signal on the alarming channel Each vibration. probe channel is tested during recirculation pump operation and proper indication verified including visible; aiazms..

coolant- piping will- result"in;. a. corresponding. visuaI alarm A; series of impacts...-based. on the logic; indicatincp a loose'art,.

will'. initiate an audrble'and visual'larm and the tape record'er will start automaticilly, Excessive vibration in. either zecirculation pump, in any'irection. will be- detected and a. visua1 alarm initiated.

A268 1 SOLID RADWASTE SYSTEM* ACCEPTANCE TEST Test.-Objective. The gene'ral objective of. this test. is to demonstrate proper. operation. of the Solid Radwaste System.

Specific- objectives are to demonstrate the following:

14 .2.-195*,

t M

v m

SSES-PSAR The ability of the system to control handle and transfer wet. waste. sludges generated by the Reactor Water. Cleanup System,. the Puel Pool C'leanup System and the Condensate Cleanup System..

Prereguisites Construction is. complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is turned over to the ISG..

Required instruments are calibrated and controls are operable.,

Required electrical. power supply systems are available.

Test Method- System operation is initiated manually., Required controls are. operated. and. process is varied to verify interlocks and alarms ncce2ta~ce Criteria ihe: system: performance parameters are in accordance with the. applicable desiqn documents.

A269. 2- - LIQUID RADWASTE PROCESSING SUBSYSTEM ACCEPTANCE TEST gegt Objective The gener'al. objective of this test is to

,demonstrate .proper operation of the Liquid Radwaste Subsystems SpeeCifiC. ObgeCtiVeS. aret O'O "de'mO'nSt'rate the ability 'Of the following subsystems to collect, process,, store and monitor for reuse: or disposal all potentially: radioactive liquid, waste=

(.1)." 'liemicaE:" waste 'collection t

(2)' Chtemica3'aste-'neutralizing (3) Chemical waste storage and transfer Prer~euisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the subsystems are turned over to the ISG., Required instruments are calibrated and controls are operable.. Required Electrical Power Supply Systems are available. Liquid radwaste subsystem storage tanks and sample tanks are available to be filled with water.,

Test m~ehod Subsystem pumps are. operated and performance characteristics"are: determined':level: controls:: are operated to:

verify': alarms, pump '-'starts acct pump;.shutoffs- ', -;Per'f ormance .of the liquid-rad'waste fiIti=ation'."demhreralizatfon chemical, waste neutralization, chemical, radwaste evaporation system-,, laundry-rad'waste"filtration and effluent isolation isetermined to the extent possible during this. test.

Acceptance Criteria The system performance parameters are in accordance with the applicable design documents.

A27'1 1 GASEOUS RADWASTE RECOMBZNER CLOSED, COOLING WATER SYSTEM

~ -

AC~CPTA'NCE. TEST'-

F 11

SS E S:-F S'AR Test Oh~ective To demonstrate the.. proper operation of the GRRCCW system,. specifica11y that; the cooling pumps: supply the rated'low to the system the cooling. water is temperature controlled,, and the chemical addition tank has flow capabilities for addinq chemicals to the system .

Pre~re uisites Construction is completed to the extent necessary

~

to perform this test and the system is turned over to the ISG Required electrical power supply systems are available Required instruments are calibrated and controls are available.. The instrument air system is available The service water system is operational and lined up to the GRRCCW heat exchangers Test-Method' Th'e system. operation is initiated, manually, and where applicabZ.e automatically. The system is operated. in the system design modes and GBRCCH= pumps performance is determined.,

Required controls are operated or simulated to verify automatic system functions and alarms

~Aces tance Criteria The Unit One (1), an6 Common cooling water through, the'eat. exchangers is: temperature control3,ed.

'throuqh a range of'0 'o 1'200P

. Xloww The 'Unit One (1) and: common cooli,ng, water pumps- deliver 1'1'Z4'pm. to the respective system Chemicals can be. added; to the system when, flow is; established.

through. the- Unit One. (1).',:'and~ common:, chemical ad'dition tanks=-

A@72-'1'. GQ~SOUS RNDNASTR STSTRS- 'ACCRPT'ANCR T'EST

~

Test ~Ob ective The general. objective of this'test is to demonstrate the proper operation of the Gaseous Radwaste System Prerequisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to pezform this test and the system is turned over to ISG..

Required instrumentation has. been, calibrated and controls are operabl'e.

Test Method The system operation is initiated manually and verified.. Controls aze operated, or simulated signals are applied to verify'utomative operation and alarms.

~cceRtmDce~ci~te ia... System 'erfnimance'parameters. are 'in;.:

accordance with" appropriate. d'esign;-. documents.,

I A'274 1-- NITROGEN .STORAGE ~ AND SUPPLY'SYSTEM'CCEPTANCE" TEST Test Objective- The general objective of this test is to demonstrate proper operation of the Nitrogen Storage and Supply.

Specific objectives are to demonstrate the following:

(1), Ability to control the supply- of nitrogen. gas for primary containment. purging w

SSES-PS AR (2)

Ability to provide and contro1 the supply of makeup nitroqen gas to maintain an inert atmosphere in the

~ containment during: normal operations and for post LOCA containment dilution.

Prereguisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is turned over to the ISG Required instruments are calibrated and controls are operable.

Required electrical power supply systems are available.

Test Method System operation is initiated manually The system is. operated. in the. different design modes,. system performance is determined and a purge flow

'proper operation vill be established to demonstrate Requir'ed controls are operated or simulated siqnakls are applied to verify automatic features, system intezlocks and alarms acceptance Criteria The system performance parameters are in accordance with applicable design documents.

A276 2:-PROCESS-SA'MPLING'YSTEM ACCEPTANCE'EST ~

k Test Objective The general objective of this test is to demonstrate proper operation; of the Process Sampling, System Specific objectives are to d'emonstrate the following=

I) The. operabil'ity of the reactor and tuzbine building therma1 baths

2) The ability o9 the system to provide required flow to all associated analytical and monitorinq equipment.

3) The capability to obtain grab samples at, required locations.

4) The proper operation of all instruments to give proper indications, readinqs and alarms.

5) The ability of chemical fume hoods to prevent or control outleakage when drawing grab samples. at the turbine reactor and. zad'waste building; samp1ing, stations il ~

i, k

~1> ere uisites- Construction is complete to the extent necessary to pefozm- this. test and the system is turned over, to* ISG Required instrumentation. is calibrated and controls are operable Required; electrical power supply systems are available. Plant demineralized water is available. Turbine Bldg. and Reactor Bldg. closed cooling water is available.

Test Method Tests vhenever feasible is in operation vill be perf ormed when the Other tests such as main process being sampled steam samples, will be simulated. All sampling devices vill be calibrated and alarm conditions set 10'. 2-198-k

SSES-PSAB Acc~etance-~Citeria The system performance parameters are in accordance with the applicable design documents I

~A84el MOISTURE- SEPARATORS ACCEPTANCE TEST Test Objective The general ob j ective, o f this test is to demonstrate proper operation of the Moisture Separators.

Specific objectives are to demonstrate the following:

(1) The ability of the moisture separators drain tank level controls to maintain level and provide a main turbine tzip siqnal. as a result o f . high level Pgerequisites Construction: is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and. the system is turned over to ISG Hydrostatic testing, velocity flushing and air blowing have been completed Requized instruments are calibrated and controls aze operable Requized electrical power supplies,, water supplies and instrument air are available The associated, plant systems which are capable of receiving water are available t'o the extent necessary to. peform this test Test pathos 'he water level in the drain tank will actually be varied: and. the proper. operation. of the. level controls,, leveX.

alarms: and level, trips wiI1 be verified 1

~recce tance-criteria - The system: performance: parameters are in accordance eith the applicable desion documents All automatic trips and alarms actuate within their allowable limits.,

A285 1 CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE TEST Test. Objectives The general objective of this test is to demonstrate proper operation of the Cathodic Protection System Specific objectives are to demonstrate the following:

(I) To ensure that Cathodic Protection System equipment has been completely installed and the various components properly tested and. adjusted for. system startup and operation..

5 ~ I (2) To demonstzate 'that...the Cathodic protection System performs:

its.. design. functus'.ons to protect the various underground structures. and. piprng systems g~ereguisites Construction is. complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is turned over to ISG Test Method Verify equipment has been completely installed.

Operate controls or apply simulated signals to verify system performs to its design function 1 4 2-.1 99

SSZS-FSAR Acceptance Criteria.-- System performance parameters are in accordance with applicable. design documents 1 I A285 2'- FREEZE PROTECTION SYSTEM ACCEPTA'NCE TEST Test ~bective To demonstrate the ability of the. system to supply. and interrupt po~er. to the individual heater circuits at the correct voltage and current in both the AUTO and. MANUAL mod'es of operation anB to demonstrate the system's ability to detect a loss of source supply voltage on a faulty heater circuit.

Pre~re uisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perf'orm this test and the system is turned over to ZSG The required instruments are'calibrated'nd'he. controls. are operable Test Method Each. control panel is energized and proper source supply voltage verified The required controls wil1 be operated.

and siqnals simulated. as necessary to verify the individual heater. circuits function per design in the AUTO, OFFand Manual mod'es,.and, are: providing the. design. specified; heat reguirements.

for the applications.

ac~em tame~a- c iteria The- system:. performance parameters: are in.

techni.:ca1 accordance with. the applicable;;.desi;gn, d'ocuments.

spec's and: vendor. prints',

A288 .2 - NON-'ESS'- 250 VOLT" DC SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE TEST'est Objectives'- The qenera1 objective of this test is to demonstrate proper operation of the Non-ESS 250 Volt DC System.

Specific objectives are to demonstrate the following:

(1) The ability of the. Non-ESS 250 Volt DC System battery to provide stored energy to supply power to selected loads in the event of a loss of all AC power at the station (2) The ability =of the Non-ESS 250 Volt DC. System battery chargers," to', provide- p'ower;as: reguired. for station .-

'peration: whiXe'- simultaneously. charging;. and: maintaini'ng.

.=

the charge-'of the 250 Volt'C" battery'hen. station A'C power is: a,vai.'lablemc 1

~Perquisites- Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test an'd the system is turned over to the XSG.

Required calibration and operation of instruments, protective devices, and breakers is verified. 080V AC Power, Resistor Load Bank, Battery Room Ventilation and Emergency Eyewash is available and/or in service.

'";..1 0 2.'-20'0" R

~

As+ - ~

pm ~

h

SSES-'ZSAR Tnst MMethod. The Battery Perf'ormance Test i:s manually initiated by connecting, the battery .bank to the resistoz load bank and discharging the battery at a constant current. for. a specified period of time The Battery Service Test is'anually initiated by connecting the battery bank to the resistor load bank and simulating,, as closely as possible,. the load the battery will supply during a design basis accident Pollowing the battery will service test, the battery be charged. while the chargers are also supplying the maximum expected steady-state plant loads as simulated with the resistor load bank. 'Each battery charger is also connected to the resistor- load bank and curzent is increased to its maximum rating with the charger isolated from the battery bank to verify charger capacity, ripple requlati'on and'. cuzrent.

limit. capabilit y Acceptance Criteria The batteries can satisfactorily d'eliver stored energy for the specified amount of time as required for the. Performance and Service Test The battery chargers can deliver rated output and."'can charge their associated. battery bank from minimum voltage to a fully charged state in a specified amount of ti.'me while. simultaneousl y'. supplying normal loads....

A291" 1- -ANNUNC'GATOR SYSTE~ACCEPTA'NCE TEST..

r

~est-ob ective The- generaI, objective:.oT this" test's: to demonstrate: proper,'pera;tion of the: plant! annunciators . Specific objectives. are- to d'emonstrate the foI'lowing=

The ability of the main, control zoom annunciators to provide audible and visual indication of an alarm condition.

pgegequisites Construction turnover of the system is complete to the extent required to conduct this test. The system has been walked throuqh, verified complete and the component technical tests have been completed, Test-Method Simulated alarms are applied. and the audible and visual indication verified': Annunciator loss. of power and ground detection AZeatnre aze also-;-tested'- -where applicable.,

Acceptance "Criteria*-- TheA. system. pezformance parametersaze in-accordance with applicable. engi'neering design d'ocuments A292 i -- TDRBXNE'- STEAlf- SEALS'-DRAFTS.ACCEPTANCE TEST'est Objective The objective of this test is to demonstrate the proper'peration of the turbine steam seal system and drains using. the auxiliary boiler steam supply to the turbine steam seal header. Also, the. test. wil1 demonstrate the ability of the steam packing exhaustez to maintain a proper. vacuum- on the steam seal exhaust header .

14'.-20'1-,

SSES-FS'AR grereguxsites-- Construction is: complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is turned. over to the ISG Required instruments are calibrated'nd controls aze operable Required electrical supply systems are available'he instrument air- system is. operational The auxiliary boilezs are available and in the standby mode. The condensate system is. operational..

The main turbine and feedwater turbines are available to be placed, on turning.'ear The main condensers are lined up to receive drains and to provide support to seal the main and reactor feed pump turbines gest-me~had The auxiliarp'oilers will provid'e a'ontinuous and regulated supply of steam to the steam seal. evaporator header The performance of the steam: packing exhausted to maintain a.

proper vacuum on. the exhaust: header is verified Simulated and automatic. signals are applied. to. verify'ystem interlocks and alarms for. the seal steam evaporator drain tank,, seal steam system and steam packing exhauster-..

Ance tance- Criteria The steam packinu exhauster will maintain

as'pproximate vacuum, of .5'0 inches- H., 0 on the peal,steam .

evaporator exhaust headerr, during 'normal operating coridx.ti'ons',

The auxiliary steam system can. provide a, continuous amount of clean. steam; ta, the seal, steam: evapozator header: at approximately.

psig- to suppLy. the. following .'with. sealing'; steam= the main turbi.'ne~ shaft seals the stem. packings: of'he" main.. steam stop va1vescontrol. valvesand..bypass. valves. the combined; intermediate valves the shaft, seals of the: reactor. feed. pump turbines, and'he stem packings. of the reactor feed pump turbine stop and control valves=

A293 TURBINE LUBE OIL SYSTEN ACCEPTANCE TEST I

Test Objectives The general objective of this: test is to demonstrate proper operation of the Turbine Lube Oil System.

Specific ob electives are to demonstrate the following:

(1), Turning gear operates per. design (2)'- Lube oH"--vapor, extractor and'ist", elimfnator, operate.,

'per:.d'em".gn- ", '.;;. ~

(3)> Turbine-generator motor, suction. pump operates per

'design..

(0) Emergency bearing oil pump operates per design; (5) Turning gear oil, pump operates per design..

(6) Turbine-qenerator, design'~,

bearing lift pumps operate per

',14. 2-202

SSES-PSAR Prer~e uisites -- Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is turned over to the ISG Required instruments are calibrated and controls operable .

Required electrical power supply systems are available The Service Hater System and the Main Turbine-Generator Assembly is available Test Method System operation is initiated manually and automatically testing all trips and interlocks. The main reservoir vapor extractor is tested manually and automatically to verify proper vacuum in .the main reservoir and isolation on detection of fire All main. lube'oil pumps are tested for proper manual and automatic start to verify. proper bearing oil supply pressures during all conditions including loss of AC power Bea.ring lift pumps are tested'anually. a:nd automatically to verify proper bearing lift for turning. gear operation, The main turbine turning gear is tested for both manual and auto engaging and startinq to ensure proper rotation during shaft cooldown Accepfagce- Cribte ia The system performance parameters are in accordance with the applicable design. documents .

'I Il A293 2 TURBINE ELECTRO HYDRAULIC CONTROL AND SUPERVISORY SYSTEMS

- - ACCEPTANCE'- T St T'est Objectives- The general. objective oZ" this test is ta demonstra.te proper operation, of the Turbine Electro Hydraulic Control (EHC) anL'upervisory System Specific objectives are to demonstrate the followinq:

(1) The EHC Hydraulic System operates per design.

(2) The hydraulic trip circuit operates per design..

(3) The EHC operates to control the turbine per design'.

(4) The turbine valves and valve test circuits operate per desiqn pre~re nisi.tes- Constrnction is complete tc the extent necessary to perform this test and'he system: is: turned over to the ISS' Required.'nstruments ace calibrateL and controls operable Required electrical. power supply systems are available The Hain Condenser,. Stator Cooling and Instrument. Air Systems are available.

Test Method Hydraulic System Manual and Automatic Modes are tested. All turbine trip paths are verified. All system stop, control and bypass valves are tested for EHC operation. Turbine warm-up, speeL select, and. load zamp functions are verified.

Turbine steam leaL drain valves are tested for proper operation.

II 14 2;203

SSES-'PS'AR

~ccedtance criteria The system performance parameters are in accordance mith the app1icahle design documents e

~A95-1'YDROGEN SEAL OIL SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE TEST

/

Test-Objectives The general objective of this test is to demonstrate the proper operation of the Hydrogen Seal Oil System.

Specific. objectives are to demonstrate the following:

(1) Proper flows and pressures can be maintained in the Hydrogen SeaL Oil System (2) The generator can be" purged. with carbon dioxide to an air-free acceptable- level (3)- The Generator. Gas Sampling System operates per design Pger~e ujsites Construction'is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system has been turned over to ISG.

All necessary support systems are operable Required instrumentation i;s. cali:br@ted. and controls are .operable .

Test Method System operation is initiated. manually The system is operated. in the system. design. modes reguired. controls are operated'. or. simulated',-to'verify'utomatic. system. functions'nd.'larms.

Ance tance ~C iteria System'erformance parameters are in accordance with applicable design documents A297;1 STATOP COOLING SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE TEST Test Objectives-- The general oh]ective of this procedure is to demonstrate proper operation of the Stator Cooling System.

Specific objectives are to demonstrate the following=-

(1) The system provides automatic regulation of flow and temperatures of clean de-ionized water to the stator windings, alterrex-exciter power rectifiers and high voltage- bushr'ags .,-

(2) ". The, stator liquid. syst'm- functions- as-

/

required, for.

proper safety protection. of system components (trips indications . alarms) .

Prereguisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system has been turne'd over to ISG.

AlL necessary support systems are operable. Required implementation is calibrated and controls are operable..

/

Test'Method -* System operation is initiatedi manually The system is. operated in the system design modes-reguired controls are.

i

/

F i

/

10';.2;.20 1 0- /

'i

/

k

/I /

/

c 'm

, ~

/+ m i

i

'i

SSES-FSAR operated or simulated'o verify. automatic'ystem function and alarms=

I Acceptance Criteria System performance parame ters are in accordance with applicable design documents.,

A298 ~ 1 '- MATN GENERATOR AND EXCITATION SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE TEST Test Objectives To demonstrate the ability of the protective relays and their associated interlocks to shutdown the generator.

~Pereguisites Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is turned over to the ISG Component calibrations and; alarm verifications are complete to the extent necessary to perform this test

~est method Through the use of Jumpers, lifted leads,. pulled fuses, and manual manipulation of relay contacts conditions are simulated to initiate automatic responses of the generator protection circuitry Proper operation of the generator protection circuitry .is verified Ancetance Criteria. The following is. verified=

(1) The ability of the.,voltage regulator to, transfer from:.

auto to manua1 upon initiation. of. design events (2) The ability of the exciter field breaker to function according to design basis events..

(3) The ability of the primary and backup lockout relays to trip the generator upon initiation of design basis events A299.2 COMMUNICATION SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE TEST Test-Objective The general objective of this test is to demonstrate proper operation of the Communication System.

Specific. objectives are to demonstrate the following=

t Y t

(1),', The aobxlity'X PL System components. to. functi.on as an integrated system (2) The ability of the Plant Evacuation Alarm System to braodcast select'ed. signals to selected areas of the plant.

Prereguisjtes Construction is complete to the extent necessary to perform this test and the system is turned over to ISG.

t Test Method By operating the reguired. controls each Public Address station will, be tested. in the transmit and receive modes 4

SSES.-ZS'AR on all channels The associated speakers will be tested for, functional. audibility The Plant Evacuation and Alarm System will be used in. conjunction with the PA system'to broadcast all. 5 of'he possible tones and fand reguencies- generated. by the system silencing features will be operationally verified.,

Also the systems isolation Acc~etance Criteria The systems- performance is in accordance with the applicable design documents.,

A299. 3 -- COMMUNICATION SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE TEST Test-Objectives:-- The. general, objective of this test is to demonstrate proper operation. of -the Communication System.

Speci'fic ob jectives are to. demonstrate the following=

(1) The ability of the Plant Maintenance/Test Jack System to provide communications throughout the plant.

PrerecCuj~stes Construction, is complete. to.'.the; extent necessary to perform, this test and the, syste'm is turned over'o ISG.. Th' required instruments. are calibrated and controls are. operable.

I Test Method-- The-. Plant Maint /Test Jack: System vill be test.ed by:

operating the. requfrecL'ontroIs'nd: verifying each Jack Stations transmit/receive-.capab&ity: on:,'alL..of the. systems 23'hannels An. i:ntegrated'. test with several remote Jack Stations attached vill also be-is in performed'cceptance Criteria The systems performance accordance with the applicable design documents..

A299.,0- =RADIATION-AREA DOORS'CCEPTANCE TEST Test Objectives- The general objective of this test is to demonstrate proper operation of the Radiation Area Doors Specific objectives are to demonstrate the following:-

. -'-'-;;. {.1) '-" RacU.'ation,-area.,doom- "CAUTION/HIGH; RADIATION A'REA"'-

'- '-.==--: =,'-, alarms actuate. properly' f2) Air Lock- door Zndz:cating lights operate properly Pre~re uisites- Construction is complete: to the extent necessary to perform this test and areas are turned over to ISG.

Test Method- Unlatch radiation area door to ensure alarm actuates Verify air lock. door indicating lights operate pro perly.

SSES-FSAR . ~

Ac~cptance -Criteria Components perform in accordance with applicable design documents.

14; 2. 12.6 - Unit 2 Startup Test Program Procedure Abstracts All those tests comprising the Unit 2 Startup Test Program (Table 14 2-3) are d,iscussed in this section. For each test a description is provided for test purpose, test prerequisites, test description and statement of test acceptance criteria, where applicable. Additions deletions, and changes to these discussions are expected to occur as the test program progresses Such modification to these discussions will be reflected in amendments to the FS'AR Zn describing the purpose of a test an attempt is made to identify those operating- and safety-oriented characteristics of the plant which are heing explored Where applicable, a definition of the relevant acceptance

~ .criteria..foN the .test. is .given .and is designated .either Level, 1 or Level 2 A Le~el 1 criterion normally relates to the value of a process variable assigned in. the design of the plant, component systems:- oz associateL equipment Xf a.'Level 1 criterion is not satisfied: the plant vie. be. placed in. a suitable. hold-condition until resolution. is obtained'ests. compatible with this. hoId-condition may be continued FoIlowing resolution applicable tests must be repeated to verify that the requirements of the.

Level. 1 criterion are now satisfied A Level 2 criterion is associated vith expectations relating to the performance of systems. If a Level 2 criterion is not not necessarily be satisfied, operating and testing plans would altered. Investigations of the measurements and of the analytical techniques used for the predictions would be started.,

For transients involving oscillatory response,, the criteria are specified in terms of decay ratio (defined as the ratio of successive maximum amplitudes of the same polarity) The decay

'atio must be less than.'unity to meet= a. Level criterion and 1 less than- 0'~25 to meet.,EeveX.

2'est Objectives The principal objective of this test is'o demonstrate that the chemistry of all parts of the entire reactor system meet specifications and process requirements.

Specific objectives of the test program include documentation of radwaste liquid discharge, evaluation of the Condensate Polishing system, and evaluation of the Reactor Rater Cleanup system Data for these purposes. is secured from a variety of sources=. plant 1 4 2-207

SSES-PSAR TABTE "14 2-6 UNIT PREOPERATIONAL'EST PROCEDURES Page 1 Test Number- Test Definition-P202 .1 125 volt dc System P204 1 16 KV System P205 1 ESS 480 volt Load Center P205 2 Non-ESS 480 Volt Load Center P205 ESS 480 Volt Motor Control Center Non-ESS 480 Volt Motor Control Center 3'205-4.

P213 1 Pire Protection Water System p21,3 3 ,,Pire-. and, Smoke detection; System P213 4 Halon 1301 Extinguishing System P214 1. Reactor Building, Closed: Cooling Water System P216 RHR'ervice Water System heat Exchanger Discharge Temperature Indication I'216

.2 RHR P217.1 Instrument ac Power System Z225.1 Primary Containment Instrument Gas System P225.2 Containment Instrument Gas Pressure LOOP P228-1 ESSW Pumphouse HGV System P230 Control Structure HSV System Post,A'ccxdent IE Power 1'233 P234 Reactor Building HGV-'ystem Reactor Building Chilled Water. System 1'234 2

P 234.3 Reactor Building Electrical Equipment Room HGV System P234 4 Emergency Switchgear Room Cooling System P245. 1 Peedwater System

SS ES-FS AR TA'BEE 1'4. 2-6~Continued) Paqe 2 gest~umber inition . 'est'Def P 245.2 Feedwater Control System P249 1 Residual Heat Removal System P249.2 Post A'ccident RHR Flow P250.1. Reactor Core Isolation Cooling System P251' Core Spray System.

P251,' Core: Spray System Pattern P252 .1 High Pressure Coolant Injection System P253 1 Standby Liquid Control System P254 at ~<

~

Emergency Service Water System

~

P255 1 Rod. Dri.'ve System.

P256 Reactor Manual'. Contro'1'. System:

1'256 2 . Rod Seguence -Control; System..

P256: 3 P257.1 1'ontrol Rod'orth. Minimizer Uninterruptable System, ac Power System P258. 1 Reactor Protection System P259.1 Primary Containment System P 259.,2 Containment Integrated Leak Rate Test P25'9 3 'cvocal. Leakage I

Rate Test P259'='; -.-. Primary. -C'ontainment .*Isolation Va.lv.e T'iming Test.

P260;1.'261 Containment Atmosphere CircuIatxon. System 1, Reactor Water Cleanup award Filter Demineralizer System P264.1 Reactor Recirculation System P269.1 Liquid Radwaste Collection System P270 Standby Gas Treatment and Secondary- Containmentsolation System s-: 'I h

t y

SS ES-FS AR TABL'E 10 2-6 /Continued) Page. 3 Test Number. Test Define.tion P27'3,l Containment Atmospheric Control System P 273,2 Containment Hydrogen Recombiner System P273 3 Containment, Oxygen and Hydrogen Analyzer p275 1 24 volt dc System P276'T Plant Leak .Detection System.

P276 3 Post Accid'ent Sampling System.

P278 1 Source Range Monitoring System P278..2 Intermediate Range. Neutron Monitoring System p278.3 Average Power. Ran'ge Neutron Monitoring System P278: 4 Traversing Incore Probe. System P278.5 Post. Accident Neutron", Moni.'toeing, P 279., 1' A'rea Radiation Monitoring System 279=2 Main Steam Tine Radiation Monitoring Subsystem P 279-3 Liquid Process Radiation Monitoring Subsystem P 279.,4- Refueling Floor Wall and High Exhaust Subsystems P279 5 Offgas Pretreatment Radiation Monitoring Subsystem P279 .6 Reactor and Turbine Vent Stack Rediation Monitoring Subsystem;

.. P279'.7", .Pre:mary" Containment. Ra@;ation- Monitoring Subsystem'ontainment P279: 8 Accident Range Ra;diation Monitoring S ubsystem.

P279.9 Post Accident Area Radiation Monitoring P280 1 Reactor Nonnuclear Instrumentation System P280 .2 post. Accident RPV Instrumentation P.281-.1 Fuel. Handling'ystem

SSES-FSAR t Test Number 2283.

TABLE - I@~2.-6 Test Definition Continued Nuclear Steam Supply Shutoff System Page 0.

Relief 1'283 2 ADS/Safety System P283.3 Main Steam Leakage Control System P283 0 Steam Leak Detection System P283' Post A'ccident HSXV: Line Instrumentation P288 1: 250 volt dc System.

P299,1 Reactor Building Crane P200.1 Cold Functional Test l

V E

4 en eg e

i

SSES-PSAR TA'B L'E 1'4 UNIT' ACCEPTA'NCE TEST PROCEDUR ES 2-7'est page 1 Number Test Definition A203 1 13'.8 kU System A207. 1 Light'ing System and Miscellaneous 120V Distribution Domestic Water System A208<<12T1" Station. Service Water" System Turbine Building Closed Cooling. Water System 1'2.1 5-1 A2.1'8 1nstrument Air System 1'219.,1 Service Air System 4 22'0'~'I'23l Non-Rad'ioactive Bui1ding-Drain:Sy'Stem'omputer Uninterruptible Power Supply 4

Compater.-

1'"-23"I'.

A'23 2 1' 'Securi.ty. Devices 232-2 South Gatehouse Equi;pment A232.3 South Gatehouse HVAC System A232.,4 LLRWF Security System A23 3.,1 Turbine Building HGV System A 233 2 Turbine Building Chilled Water Syste m

.,-; A233:=3, '..', '-:., '. '..:-Turbine'.- Building, Battery,: Room: Exhaust System, .

A235'.T", 'uel, Poo1-..Cooling and; Cleanup System A237-1'akeup Water.

Transfer and'torage, Condensate and Refueling Transfer Systems:

A239. 1 Condensate Demineralizer System A240 .1 Lube Oil Transfer, Storage 6 Purification System A241 1 Cooling Tower System Circulating Water System'24'3,.

,, C'ondenser Ai.'r Remov,al System t

S Q+

SSES-FSAR TAB'LE 14..2-7'ONTZNOED Page 2 Test Number Test Defini.tion A243 2 Condenser Tube Cleaning System A244 1 Condensate System A246 1 Extraction Steam System A263 Bypass Xndication Loose Parts Monitoring System 1'267' A268 1 Solid Radwaste System A269 2 Liquid Radwaste Processing Subsystem A 27'1,1 Gaseous Radwaste Recombiner Closed Cooling 'Rater A272 1': a'seous. RacTw'aste System A'274' 1- Nitrogen. Storage 6 Supply. System A276 Z' -

Process Sampling'ystem A284 1 Moisture- Separators.

A285 1 Cathodic. Protection System A285.2 Freeze Protection System A288 2 Non-ESS 250 Volt DC'ystem A291 1 Plant Annunciators A292 .1' .Turbine Steam Seal's 6 Drains A'29 3 T.-', , Turbine; Lube. Oil:.Syst'ems.

A'29.3 ,Turbine 'lectro Eydr;auli'c Control-

295 and'upervisory Systems 1 Seal Oil. System A297- 1 Stator Cooling System f'ydrogen.

A 298 Main Generator 6 Excitation System t

1 A299 2 Comm un':cation System-A299 Communication System A299 4- Rad'atron; Area. Doors:

k II 1.

'I t

~t I

k