ML17334A425

From kanterella
Revision as of 07:42, 29 June 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Documents Discussions on Request for License Amend Granting Relief from Requirements of Tech Spec 3.5.2 Re Safety Injection Pump Out of Svc.Safety Evaluation Prepared in Conjunction W/Westinghouse Supports Relief Request
ML17334A425
Person / Time
Site: Cook American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 09/07/1982
From: JURGENSEN R W
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORP.
To: DENTON H R, VARGA S A
NRC, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
AEP:NRC:0739, AEP:NRC:739, NUDOCS 8209130234
Download: ML17334A425 (5)


Text

~~ANEPICANELECTR1CPGWERSe>viceCorpo~etio)s2Broadu:ay.

Xeu:Pork,.l.}.Ir)00.t(2/2p.S>0.9000September 7,1982AEP:NRC:0739 DonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnitNo.1DocketNo.50-315LicenseNo.DPR-58REQUESTFORRELIEFFROMTECHNICAL SPECIFICATION 3.5.2Mr.HaroldR.Denton,DirectorOfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission Washington, D.C.20555Attention:

Mr.StevenA.'Varga

DearMr.Denton:

Thisletterdocuments thediscussions heldwithmembersofyourStaffconcerning ourrequestforalicenseamendment grantingrelieffromtherequirements of.Technical Specification 3.5.2.EachUnitoftheCookNuclearPlanthastwoSafetyInjection PumpsplustwoCentrifugal ChargingPumpsandtwoResidualHeatRemovalPumps.Inpreparation fortheblackouttestperformed onAugust14,1982,UnitNo.1'sNorthSafetyInjection Pumpsufferedseveredamage.We",haveproceeded torepairthepumpexpeditiously buthavenotbeenabletocompletetherepairsasofthetimeofthisletter.UnitNo.1Technical Specification (T/S)No.3.5.2requires, amongotherthings,thattwoSafetyInjection (SI)PumpsbeoperableinModes1,2and3.UnitNo.1iscurrently

'completing itsrefueling outageandthereturntoModes3,2and1isprevented bytheinoperability oftheSIpumpandtheT/Smentioned above.Inordertoproceedwiththelowpowerphysicstesting,werequestawaiveroftherequirement tohavetwoSIpumpsoperableinModes2(reactorthermalpowerlessthanorequalto5%)and3foraperiodofoneweekbeginning atthetimetheUnitentersMode3.TheSouthSIpumpwillbedemonstrated operablepriortoenteringMode3.Allremaining technical specification requirements willbemet.Attachment 1tothislettercontainsthesafetyevaluation preparedbyusinconjunction withWestinghouse.

Theconclusion isthatevenifweweretolosetheoperable1SSafetyInjection Pumpsufficient marginKP wy,@5"-&~9'M

~-'a wrMr.H.R.Dent.AEP:NRC:0739wouldstillexisttothelimitsspecified in10CFR50.46.Thus,thisreliefisnotdetrimental tothehealthandsafetyofthepublic.IWewouldappreciate theexpeditious handlingofthisrequestbyyourStaff.AEPSCinterprets 10CFR170.22asrequiring thataClassIIIAmendment Feebepaidforthechange.Acheckintheamountof$4,000willbetransmitted toyouinafutureletter.hThisTechnical Specification reliefrequesthasbeenreviewedbytheCookPlantPNSRC.ItwillbereviewedbyAEPSC'sNSDRCatthenext~scheduled meeting.Duetothisletterbeingwrittenonshortnotice,ithasnotbeenpreparedfollowing ourstanda"dCorporate Procedures forsuchletters.Weshall,however,reviewtheletteraccording toourCorporate Procedures andwil'nform youifanymodification isrequired.

Verytrulyyours,/emcAttachment cc:JohnE.Dolan-ColumbusR.S.HunterM.P.AlexichW.G.Smith,Jr.-BridgmanR.C.CallenG.CharnoffJoeWilliams, Jr.NRCResidentInspector atCookPlant-Bridgman'~~

Attachment toAEP:NRC:0739 LOCAEvaluation forD.C.CookUnit1withOneSafetInectionPumOutofServiceThepurposeofthisevaluation istoassesstheeffectofonesafetyinjection pumpoutofservicefortheCookUnit1NuclearPlantonLossofCoolantAccident(LOCA)consequences.

Presently, theplantisfueledbyExxonNuclearCompany.However,theevaluation providedbelowisjudgedtobeapplicable tothenon'Westinghouse fuel,sincetherearenoknownmajordesigndifferences thatwouldhaveasignificant impactontheLOCAbehaviorimportant forthisevaluation.

LareBreakLOCASafetyinjection pumpflowprovidesaninsignificant proportion ofthetotalECCSflowduringalargebreakaccident, whereRCSpressurerapidlydropstonearatmospheric.

Accumulator andlowheadsafetyinjection (RHR)flowareimportant forthisaccident.

Therefore, thelossofasafetyinjection pumphasanegligible effectonlargeLOCAcalculated peakcladtemperature.

SmallBreakLOCATheplant'sprotection againstsmallLOCAscomesfromatwotrainsystemincluding atotaloftwosafetyinjection pumpsandtwohighheadchargingpumps.SmallLOCAFSARlicensing analysesassumetheworstsinglefailuretobelossofatrain,leavingoneintermediate headSIpumpandonechargingpump.ThesmallLOCAanalysisyieldscladtemperatures wellbelow10CFR50.46limits.Thisanalysisassumption boundsthepresentplantconfiguration withonesafetyinjection pumpoutofserviceandnosinglefailure.Iftheworstsinglefailureassumption isconsidered inadditiontothe;lossofthesafetyinjection pump,andfurther,thetrainlostisassumed'tohavetheoperational safetyinjection pump,ECCSflowisdelivered fromonlythehighheadchargingpump.Thefollowing paragraphs evaluatethisscenario.

Reduction ofECCSflowintherangeof600to1200psiahasanadverse--"effect oncalculated cladtemperature forarangeofsmallLOCAbreaksizes.Thelossofasafetyinjectionpumphastheeffectofreducingdelivered ECCSflowinthatimportant pressurerange.TotalECCSflowwillbedegradedbyapproximately 56%averagedoverthispressureinterval.

Established sensitivity studieshaveindicated thatsuchadegradation resultsinasmuchasa550oFsmallLOCAPCTincrease.

~~0t~.ThesmallbreakanalysisforCook1doesnotusethelatestNRCapprovedWsmallLOCAEvaluation Model.ThecurrentsmallbreakLOCAEMwouldcalculate aPCTofapproximately 1200oF,reducedfrom1493F,predicted bytheanalysisintheFSAR.ThisnewPCTisestablished fromanalysisofasubstantially equivalent plant(3250MWt,4Loop,sameSISdesign)analyzedinHCAP-8970-P-A,

,"Westinghouse Emergency CoreCo'olingSystemSmall8reakOctober,1975Model",andappliestoCook.Additionally, creditforconservative assumptions inthesmallLOCAFSARanalysiscanmitigatethePCTpenalty.Also,thecurrentsmallLOCAFSARanalysisisperformed at100%powerwhileduringtheperiodoftimeforwhichweareseekingT/Sreliefthereactorwillnotexceed5%power.Thelowerpower.levelof5%versus100%wouldmorethanoffsettheconsequences ofreducedECCSflow.Inconclusion, operation ofCook1withasafetyinjection pumpoutofserviceandamaximumpowerlevelof5%forabrief'periodoftimeisstillboundedbythesmallLOCAFSARanalysis.

Inaddition,thefactthatthepresentanalysishassignificant marginto10CFR50.46PCTlimitsindicates thatstartupoftheplantfromthisrefueling outageisnotasafetyconcern.