ML17334B330

From kanterella
Revision as of 00:52, 4 June 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Response to 890809 Request to Investigate Allegation RIII-89-A-0093 Re Alleged Drug Use by Employee at Plant.Search of Employee Personal Automobile W/Use of Trained Drug Dog Revealed No Controlled Substances
ML17334B330
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 09/11/1989
From: SMITH W G
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
To: DAVIS A B
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
Shared Package
ML17334B329 List:
References
AEP:NRC:0995D, AEP:NRC:995D, NUDOCS 8910020021
Download: ML17334B330 (4)


Text

IndianaMichiganPowerCompanyCook.NuclearPlantOneCookPlaceBridgman,MI491066164655901lNDIAMANEC8lGANPQWMAEP:NRC:0995DDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnits1and2DocketNos.50-315and50-316LicenseNos.DRP-58andDRP-74IR!.'i~i7y..GUT".V:AllegationRIII-89-A-0093Mr.A.B.Davis,RegionalAdministratorU.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommissionRegionIII799RooseveltRoadGlenEllyn,IL61037F1LKAttn:Mr.JohnW.N.Hickey,DirectorDivisionofRadiationSafetyandSafeguards

DearMr.Davis:

ThisletterisinresponsetoyourrequestofAug.9,1989,toinvestigateallegationRIII-89-A-0093whichinvolvesallegeddrugusebyanemployeeattheD.C.CookPlant.Thewrittenresponseiscontainedintheattachmenttothisletter.Theresponsecontainsnopersonalprivacy,proprietaryorsafeguardsinformationandcanbereleasedtothepublicandplacedintheNRCPublicDocumentRoom.ThisdocumenthasbeenpreparedfollowingCorporateandPlantProcedureswhichincorporateareasonablesetofcontrolstoinsureitsaccuracyandcompletenesspriortosignaturebytheundersigned.Verytrulyyours,PlantManagerAttachmentcc:D.H.Williams,Jr.M.P.AlexichR.C.Callen,LansingG.CharnoffNFEMSectionChief,LansingNRCResidentInspector8'710020021890922PDRADOCK05000315PPNUSEP>11%0

ATTACHMENTTOAEP:NRC:0995DFollowingistheresponsetoNRCAllegationAMSRIII-89-A-0093:ALLEGATIONRIII-89-A-0093AnindividualcontactedtheNRCRegionIIIofficewithinformationconcerningallegeddrugusebyanemployeeattheD.C.CookPlant.AllegationNo.1:ThecallerstatedthatanemployeeofacontractorattheCookPlantusedcocaine.Thecallerclaimedtohaveseentheemployee"high"oncocaine.AllegationNo.2:Thecallerfurtherstatedthattheemployeewasasupervisorinradiationcontrolandhasneverbeenrequiredtosubmittoaurinetestfordrugsbecausesupervisorypersonnelarenotincludedinthedrugtestingprogram.TheNRCrequestedthattheCookPlant'sreviewoftheseallegationsincludeasaminimumthefollowingmatters:1.IfthisindividualworksatD.C.Cook,ishefitforduty?Whatisthebasisforyourdetermination?RESPONSEAreviewofCookPlant'sAccessAuthorizationrecordsrevealedthattheemployeenotedintheallegationhasbeenemployedbyanon-sitecontractorfrom5-16-88topresent.InterviewsconductedwiththecontractorandIndianaM.chiganPowersupervisorypersonneldirectlyresponsibleforobservingtheemployee'sactivitiesonadailybasisrevealednofitnessfordutyconcerns.Onesupervisorstatedtheemployee's"performanceandappearancewereabovereproach".Anotherexpressedadesirethatallradiationpersonnelwouldemulatehisworkethicsandperformance.Aphysicalsearchoftheemployee'spersonalautomobilewasconductedonsitebysecuritypersonnelincludingtheuseofatraineddrugdog.Thesearchrevealednocontrolledsubstancesorothercontrabanditems.Employeeattendancerecordsfortheemployeeindicatednounusualabsencesortardiness.

0ATTAQiKÃTTOAEP:NRC:0995DALLEGATIONRIII-89-A-0093'Page22.Aresupervisors,companyorcontractors,exemptedfromyourfitnessfordutytestingprogram?Hastheemployeebeentestedfordrugs'ESPONSEAllpersonnelwithunescortedaccesstoCookPlant'sprotectedarea,includingcompanyandcontractorsupervisorsaresubjecttothePlant'sFitnessforDutytestingprogram.Copiesofdrugscreeningrecordsobtainedfromthecontractorrevealedthefollowing:1.Theemployeesubmittedtoapre-employmentdrugteston5-19-88.Resultsofthetestwerenegative.2.Theemployeesubmittedtoarandomdrugtestinitiatedbythecontractoron6-5-89.Resultsofthetestwerenegative.Inadditiontotheabovetestsfordrugs,theemployeewillinglysubmittedtoadrugtestafterbeinginformedoftheallegation.Resultsofthetestwerenegative.SUMMARYAthoroughinvestigationofthisallegationrevealednoreasontoquestiontheemployee'sfitnessforduty.Duringthecourseoftheinvestigation,theemployeevolunteeredthattheallegationmayhaveresultedfromarecentbreak-upwithagirlfriend,whoremainedupsetwithhim.