ML20009D888

From kanterella
Revision as of 23:58, 22 December 2024 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards IE Insp Repts 50-329/81-12 & 50-330/81-12 on 810518-22 & Notice of Violation
ML20009D888
Person / Time
Site: Midland
Issue date: 07/10/1981
From: James Keppler
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Jackie Cook
CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
Shared Package
ML20009D889 List:
References
NUDOCS 8107240465
Download: ML20009D888 (2)


See also: IR 05000329/1981012

Text

  1. sa m %,D

'1

s

UNITED STMTES

o

'

[ ' , ,,

g

'

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

,

.'

3 e

REGION lli

"

o,

f

799 ROOSEVELT ROAD

b

'

o

GLEN ELLYN, ILLINOIS 60137

  • ....

"lUE ! 0 1981

'

-

g

s

[/

h g"%

Docket No. 50-329

-\\

9 $(

\\*

~

g

Docket No. 50-330

<1 d *#

.

n

a

E

,

,

of

-.

Consumers Power Company

3

/g

ATTN:

Mr. James W. Cook

o*

s'

6 <

Vice President

'

Midland Project

' Q /Jg

1945 West Parnall Road

Jackson, MI 49201

Gentlemen:

This refers to the special team inspection conducted by Mr. C. C. Uilliams

and other members of this office on May 18-22, 1981, of activities at the

Midland Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, authorized by NRC Ccastruction Permits

No. CPPR-81 and No. CPPR-82 and to the discussion of our findings with you

and others of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.

This was an indepth inspection to examine the implementation status and

effectiveness of the current QA Program, to determine whether previously

identified quality assurance problems were sufficiently precluded from

occurrance in other areas, and to ascertain whether management involvement

in the QA Program was sufficient and effective. The enclosed copy of our

inspection report identifies areas examined during the inspection. Within

these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective examination of pro-

cedures and representative records, observations, and interviews with

personnel.

During this inspection, certain of your activities appeared to be in non-

compliance with NRC requirements, as specified in enclosed Appendix A.-

A

written response, submitteo under oath or affirmation, it required.

Although eight items of noncompliance were identified during this inspec-

tion, it is our judgement that the scope and depth of this NRC inspection

was such that the identified noncompliances do not contravere our conclusion

that Consumers Pcwer Company has established an effective organization for

the management of construction and implementation of quality assurance at

the site. The noncompliances associated with the piping support area of

the inspection were considered the most adverse findings, and precipitatec

the issuance of an Immediate Action Letter (IAL) dated May 22, 1981.

(Attached as Exhibit A to this report.)

TEo '

-

s

/ /

8107240465 810710

PDR ADOCK 05000329

G

PDR

-

>

f

o

0

Consumers Power Company

-2-

g1

n

Based on a July 9, 1981 telephone conversation with you and Messrs. R. Knop

and C. Williams of my staff, in response to our request, you agreed to the

immediate release of this letter and the enclosures, to the NRC's Public

Document Room.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 your response to this letter

will also be placed in the Public Document Room.

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

Sincerely,

e

,/

3

' M va d /Y,J.e

'h

pamesG.Keppler*

Director

Enclosures:

1.

Appendix A, Notice

of Violation

2.

IE Inspection Reports

No. 50-329/81-12 and

No. 50-330/81-12

cc w/encls:

DMB/ Document Control Desk (RIDS)

Resident Inspector, RIII

' Ronald Callen, Michigan

Public Service Commission

Myron M. Cherry

.

RIII

RHI-HQ

RIII

RIII.

RIII

RIII

RIII

.RIII

'-

\\.

,>

c'G bu'lx cdavisjmapD A-

Galfagiter . ho<o c Sc hweibingSpessard

i

-

Kijpler

No r'e

s

Yin

o,

L

.c o EL)1

'

-

,

L

man

Jo es Knop

Wil tams

7/9/81