ML20195F862

From kanterella
Revision as of 12:23, 9 December 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notifies That Regional SALP Review Board Meeting for Plant Scheduled to Convene at Region V Ofc on 860904.Assessment Will Cover 12-month Period from Aug 1985 - Jul 1986
ML20195F862
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon, 05000000
Issue date: 07/22/1986
From: Kirsch D
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To: Burdoin J, Chaffee A, Crews J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
Shared Package
ML20195F814 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-87-830 NUDOCS 8806270166
Download: ML20195F862 (3)


Text

1

, s , -

,/pa *4 coq #o UNITED STATES

, [ \ ) s-i( (',i NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION gg y.j . . REGION V 0, A' b' .

4 1450 MARI A LANE,SulTE 210 WALNUT CRE E K, CALIFORNIA 94596

% .* . . * ,o -

July 22, 1986 MEMORANDUM FOR: J. Crews, RV A. Chaffee, RV M. Mendonca, RV J. Burdoin, RV P. Narbut, RV M. Padovan, RV R. Scarano, RV S. Varga, Project Director /LB:NRR U. Schierling, Project Manager, NRR G. Nelson, RV K. Prendergast, RV R. Fish, RV C. Hooker, RV P. Qualls, RV FROM: D. Kirsch, Director Division of Reactor Safety and Projects

SUBJECT:

SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PEROFRMANCE (SALP)

FOR DIABLO CANYON (Period August 1, 1985 through July 31,1986)

References:

(1) Proposed changes to the SALP Manual Chapter 0516, J. M. Taylor Memorandum dated November 5, 1985 (2) Region V Instruction 0701 (3) Revised SALP Board Schedule, J. B. Martin Memorandum dated August. 22, 1985 Pursuant to reference (1), (2), and (3) above, the regional SALP Review Board Meeting for Diablo Canyon is scheduled to convene at the Region V Walnut Creek office on September 4, 1986 at 8:30 am. The board members will consist of the abuve addressees and myself.

This July assessment 31, 1986. will cover the 12 month period from August 1, 1985 through July 31, 19S6. The evaluation period will include recent events through Members of the Diablo Canyon SALP Board are herevich provided a review guidance package to be used in preparing performance analyses of the various functional areas. This package consists of the following:

  • Descriptions of functional areas (Attachment 1)
  • Evaluation criteria (Attachment 2)

Attributes for the evaluation criteria (Attachment 3)

Performance categories (Attachment 4)

' SALP evaluation :ratrix (Attachment 5)

Sample SALP functional area performance analysis and guidance on SALP function area evaluation (Attachment 6)

Information in ILis record was deleted 8806270166 880615 in axctdance vdt '

he fretdom of inbrmatigI j g/s k, y.:,

PDR FOIA 4ct, exemptic -

6// .\-

N '@6 '

BOLEY 87-830 PDR f0tA- 8 _ )O -C= g rp .

. M, -

1 o

l 1

i Table Attachments of the supporting data and sucmary (LERs) is under preparation and will be distributed to the SALP Board Members by August 1, 1986. l The' following is the anticipated outline of the Diablo Canyon SALP report, along with the individuals assigned lead responsibility for preparing input for each section. i I. Introduction Burdoin II. Criteria Burdoin III. Su=:ary of Results Burdoin IV. Performance Analysis

'1 . Plant Operations Padovan

2. Radiological Controls Hooker
3. Maintenance Padovan
4. Surveillance Padovan
5. Fire Protection Qualls
6. Emergency Preparedness Prendergast
7. Security and Safeguards Nelson
8. Outages Padovan
9. Quality Programs and Administrative

( V.

Controls Affecting Safety

10. Licensing Activities
11. Training and Qualification Supporting Data and Summaries Effectiveness All*

Schierling Padovan (Including tables) Burdoin o

  • Each contributor is requested to provide an assessment from his perspective on this functional area to J. Burdoin for compilation.

Each person assigned lead responsibility for a functional area shall prepare a performance analysis and submit it to J. Burdoin by COB August 15, 1986.

Each performance analysis shall be prepared as follows:

1.

Assess the licensee's performance in the functional area based upon inspections performed, available data anc - Tervations of the licensee's performance during the SALP pe -sd . Obtain inputs from others who had inspection responsibilities in the functional area.

In assessing the licensee's performance, use the guidance in Attachment 1 through 4.

2.

Prepare a performance analysis for the functional area following the format of Attachment 6. If possible, discuss the trend of the licensee's performance since the previous SALP period. The analysis should reference pertinent data, enforcement items or

(

events, when appropriate, but should be principally a quantitative analysis of the licensee's performance in the area (depending upon

( the level of activity, approximately one to one and one-half page in length when single cpace typed).

I l

. l l

l l 1 l

  • i 1

~ '

3. Include recommendations for licensee actions related to the  ;

functional area. '

4 Provide a copy of the SALP evaluation matrix (Attachment 5),

assigning a performance category for each evaluation criterion.

{

5. Each performance analysis shall address each evaluation criteria clearly in a separate paragraph for each of the functional areas.

(See Attachment 6) 1 By copy of this memorandum, the Director, Office of Investigations, San Francisco Field Office, is requested to provide a summary of major investigative activities and results involving Diablo Canyon by August 15, 1986. l In addition, by copy of this memorandum, the offices of NMSS and AE0D are requested to provide performance analyses by August 15, 1986.

MD. '. .'Kirsch, Director l

Division of Reactor Safety and Projects  !

cc: J. Partlow, IE h(' P. McKee, IE J. Davis, NMSS C. Heltemes, Jr., AEOD F. Hebdon, AEOD

~

R. Marsh, OISFF0 F. k'enslawski, RV H. Schuster, RV J. Martin, RV G. Yuhas, RV J. Montgomery, RV H. Thompson, NRR D. Pereira, RV l

1 I

km

..