ML20195F989
Text
,, *.,
a Orgy
[n
- o UNITED STATES E4 3 s. c (',i NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i
j REGION V 0,
f 1450 MARIA LANE. SulTE 210
%, '...../
WALNUT CREE K. CALIFORNI A 94596 OCT 2 41985 MEMORANDUM FOR:
J Crews, RV I Chaffee, RV R. Dodds, RV D. Pereira, RV S. Richards, RV G. Kellund, RV R. Scarano, RV T. Novak, AD/L:NRR L. Lazo, Project Manager, NRR L. Norderhaug, RV H. North, RV R. Fish, RV P. Qualls, RV FROM:
D. Kirsch, Acting Director Division of Reactor Safety and Projects, RV
SUBJECT:
SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE (SALP)
(
FOR TROJAN NUCLEAR PLANT (PERIOD NOVEMBER 1, 1984 THROUGH OCTOBER 31, 1985)
References:
(1) h7C Manual Chapter 0516 (2) Proposed changes to the SALP process, J. M. Taylor Memorandum dated June 27, 1985 (3) Region V Instruction 0701 (4) SALP Board Schedule, J. B. Martin Memorandum dated 3
August 22, 1985 Pursuant to references (1), (2), (3) and (4) above, the regional SALP Review Board meeting for Trojan Nuclear Plant is scheduled to convene at the Region V Walnut Creek office on December 12, 1985, at 8:30 a.m.
The board members will consist of the above addressees and myself who will serve as chairperson.
This assessment will cover the 12 month period from November 1,1984, through October 31, 1985. The evaluation period will include recent events through October 1985.
Information in this re:ctd was c in accordance with b Fre:xn cf N;rmaten (U
O b
(
pC d je c
y 8906270190 88061b PDR FOIA BOL.EYB 7-P30 PDR 3
i
2 Members of the Trojan Nuclear Plant SALP Board are herewith provided a review guidance package to be used in preparing performance analyses of the various functional areas. This paskage consists of the following:
-~
Description of functional areas (Attachment 1)
Evaluation criteria (Attachment 2)
Attributes for the evaluation criteria (Attachment 3)
Performance categories (Attachment 4)
SALP evaluation matrix (Attachment 5)
Sample SALP functional area perfore ice analysis (Attachment 6)
Supporting Data and Summaries (Attat ';unent 7)
The following is the anticipated outline of the Trojan SALP report, along with the individuals assigned lead responsibility for preparing input for each sectiCn.
i I.
Introduction Pereira II.
Criteria Pereira III. Summary of Results Pereira IV.
Performance Analysis 1.
Plant Operations Richards 2.
Radiological Controls North 3.
Maintenance Richards 4.
Surveillance Richards 5.
Fire Protection Qualls 6.
Emergency Preparedness Fish 7.
Security and Safeguards Norderhaug 8.
Refueling Kellund 9.
Quality Programs and Administrative Controls Affecting Safety Richards 10.
Licensing Activities Lazo 11.
Engineering and Construction Crews /Richards 12.
Training Richards V.
Supporting Data and Summaries Pereira (Including tables)
Each person assigned lead responsibility for a functional area shall prepare a performance analysis and submit it to D. B. Pereira by C.O.B. November 22, 1985. Each perf ormance analysis shall be prepared as follows:
1.
Assess the licensee's performance in the functional area based upon inspections performed, available data and observations of the licensee's performance during the SALP period. Obtain inputs from others who had inspection responsibilities in the functional area.
In assessing the licensee's performance, use the guidance in through 4.
3 1
2.
Prepare a performance analysis for the functional area following the format of Attachment 6.
If possible, discuss the trend of the licensee's performance since the previous SALP period.
The analysis should reference pertinent data, enforcement items or events, when appropriate, but should be principally a quantitative analysis of the licensee's performance in the area (depending upon the level of activity, approximately one to one and one-half page in length when si-gle space typed).
3.
Include recommendations for licensee actions related to the functional area.
4.
Provide a copy of the SALP evaluation matrix (Attachment 5),
assigning a performance category for each evaluation criterion.
By copy of this memorandum, the Director, Office of Investigations, San Francisco Field Office, is requested to provide a summary of major investigative activities and results involving Trojan, by November 22, 1985.
In addition, by copy of this memorandum, the offices of NMSS and AEOD are requested to provide performance analyses by November 22, 1985.
I D. F. Kirsch SALP Board Chairman i(
Acting Director, Division of Reactor k
Safety and Projects
Enclosures:
As Stated cc:
J. Davis, htSS R. Seyfrit, AEOD
- 0. Shackleton, OI/SFF0 J. Carter, NRR i
F. Wenslawski, RV
{
l l
O s