ML20195G544
Text
e c/
N.
UNITED STATES
[.<-
1 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION f
REGION IV "c
611 RYAN PLAZA ORIVE. SUITE 1000 4,,,,e ARUNGTON, TEXAS 76011 January 22, 1987 In Reply Refer to:
50-313/368 / OL_87-SALP 1
MEMORANDUM FOR:
D.
Hunter, Chief, Reactor Project Section 8 FROM:
R.
Cooley, Chief, Operator Licensing Section
SUBJECT:
ANO SALP INPUT ON OPERATOR LICENSING During the SALP reporting period of July 1, 1985 to December 31, 1986, two (2) sets of replacement examinations were administered for Arkansas Nuclear One (ANO) - Unit 1 and three (3) sets were administered for ANO - Unit 2.
The replacement results are presented below.
In summary, replacement examination performance was excellent in all aspects.
Replacement Examination Performance (Pass / Fail / Total)
Docket 313 313 368 368 386 TOTAL Date 9/85 3/86 12/85 5/86 7/86 R0 0/0/0 7/1/8 10/0/10 0/0/0 0/0/0 17/1/18 SRO 1/0/1 0/0/0 5/1/6 2/0/2 7/0/7 15/1/16 32/2/34 1
Requalification program performance was audited at both units during the reporting period.
Both unit's programs were found to be satisfactory.
For further information, copies of the Requalification Program Evaluation Reports are enclosed.
Summarizing, ANO performance in all aspects measured by the Operator Licensing section were satisfactory.
If you need additional information concerning operator licensing activities at ANO, contact me at (817) 860-8147 or FTS 728-8147.
j
&c.] ( 0, Ralp A.
Cooley, Ch r
Operator Licensing Section cc:
E.
Johnson J.
Gagliardo T.
Westerman W.
Johnson S. McCrory/
J.
P611et/
885 250042 800615 I3EEY 30 PDR
- ro~
e port 5 0-? 15/G-96-01 Requalification Program Evaluation Report Facility:
Arkansas Nuclear One Unit 1 Examiner:
- 5. L. McCrory j
Dates of Evaluation:
4/15/86 Areas Evaluated:
X Written Oral X Simulator Written Examination 1.
Evaluation of Examination:
SATISFACTORY 2.
Evaluation of Facility Examination Grading:
Oral Examination 1.
Overall Evaluation:
SATISFACTORY 2.
Number Observed:
Number Conducted:
11 Overall Program Evaluation Satisfactory:
X Marginal:
Unsatisfactory:
(Listmajordeficiency areas with brief Descriptive coments.)
The AN01 requalification training program is satisfactory.
Submitted:
Forwarded:
Approved:
0
]
s
~Lvimiifeb pect' ion Chief gf Branch Chief
(
+]
Fro" ~eport 5 0-3 ' F/C E-% -02 REQUALIFICATION PROGRAM EVALUATION REPORT facility; M ansas tNelear One Unit 2 Examiner:
n N.
Graves Date(s) of Evaluation:
5/13-15/86 Areas Evaluated:
yy Written xx Oral Simulator Examination Results:
R0 SR0 Total Evaluation Pass / Fail Pass / Fail Pass / Fail (S M or U)
Written Examination 1/1 7/0 8 /1 s
Operating Examination Oral 7/0 7 /0 4/0 s
Simulator NA NA NA NA Evaluation of facility written examination grading NA Overall Program Ey_aluation Satisfactory yy Marginal Unsatisf actory (List major defi-l ciency areas with I
brief descriptive comments) i Submitted:
Forwarded:
Approved:
k
==
o Examiner SeptionChief
~
' Branch Chief N
l
~ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-