ML20195F980
Text
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. -_
4 9 s* C vq
. f /t 6 d l [ h ; ',*, g G UNITED STATES
[';)v..([%h NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION V
%,'b'[/.8 1450 MARIA L ANE,sutTE 210 f
WALNUT CREEK, CALIFoRNI A 94S96 DEC 2 1987 Docket No. 50-344 Report No. 50-344/87-41 MEMORANDUM F0h J. Crews, RV A. Chaffee, RV R. Zimmerman, RV M. Mendonca, RV D. Pereira, RV S. Richards, RV J. Elin, RV R. Ba'rr, RV G. Suh, RV R. Scarano, RV T. Novak, AEOD/DSP T. Chan, Project Manager, NRR/PD5 L. Norderhaug, RV C. Hooker, RV R. Fish, RV C. Ramsey, RV K. Prendergast, RV R. Marsh, 01/SFF0 FROM:
D. Kirsch, Director Division of Reactor Safety and Projects, RV
SUBJECT:
SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE (SALP) FOR TROJAN NUCLEAR PLANT (PERIOD NOVEMBER 1, 1986 THROUGH l
NOVEMBER 30, 1987)
References:
(1) NRC Manual Chapter 0516, SALP Program, dated July 25, 1986 (2) Region V Instruction 0701 (3) SALP Board Schedule, J. 8. Martin Memorandum dated July 25, 1987 Pursuant to references (1), (2), and (3) above, the regional SALP Review Board i
meeting for Trojan Nuclear Plant is scheduled to convene at the Region V Walnut Creek of fice on January 5,1988, at 8:30 a.m.
The board me:rbers will l
consist of the above addresses and myself who will serve as :hairperson.
David Pereira will serve as the Board Secretary.
The projected date for a SALP meeting with the licensee (if deemed appropriate) is tentatively scheduled for February 4, 1988 (this has not been discussed with the licensee).
This assessment will cover the 13 month period from November 1, 1086 through November 30, 1987.
The evaluation period will include recent events through l
November 1987.
IrformMica in it.is tc:cd us Mete.i i
9 n accordance ra: b Fr(ccom of Informdit ;
Oh 6g eeosa70m esosm wh.s h
em es s An- " _p - l -
x e
BOLEV87-830 3a '
, As 7
DEC 2 MR7 2-I Members of the Trojan Nuclear Plant SALP Board are herewith provided a review guidance package to be used in preparing performance analyses of the various-functional areas.
This package consists of the following:
Description of functional areas (Attachment 1)
Evaluation criteria (Attachment 2)
Attributes for the evaluation criteria (Attr..nment 3)
Performance categories (Attachment 4)
SALP evaluation matrix (Attachment 5)
Sample SALP functional are6 performance analysis (Attachment 6)
Supporting Data and Summaries (Attachment 7)
Consistent with reference (1), the anticipated outline of the Trojan SALP report is indicated below, along with the individuals assigned lead responsibility for preparing i.1put for each section:
1.
Introduction Pereira II.
Criteria Pereira III. Summary of Results Pereira IV.
Performance Analysis 1.
Plant Operations Barr/5uh 2.
Radiological Controls Hooker 3.
Maintenance Barr/Suh
(,
4.
Surveillance Barr/Suh
(
5.
Fire Protection Ramsey 6.
Emergency Preparedness Prendergast 7.
Security Norderhaug 8.
Outage Barr 9.
Quality Programs and Administrative Barr/Suh Controls Affecting Quality 10.
Licensing Activities Chan
- 11. Training and Qualification Barr/Elin*
1 Effectiveness V.
Supporting Data and Summaries fIncluding Tables) Pereira
- Provide written input addressing observations during the SALP period.
The Board Secretary will consolidate these into one section.
Each person assigned lead responsibility for a functional area shall prepare a performance analysis and submit it to D. B. Pereira by C.O.B. December 18, 1987.
Each performance analysis shall be prepared as follows:
1.
Assess the licensee's performance in the functional area based'upon inspections performed, available data, and observations of licensee performance ducir.g the St' P oeriod.
Obtain inputs from others who had inspection responsibilities in the functional area.
In assessing the licensee's performanco, use the guidance in Attachments 1 through 4.
i n.
DEC 2 1987 s
2.
Prepare the licensee's performance analysis for the functional area following the format of Attachment 6.
If appropriate, discuss the trend of the licensee's performance since the previous SALP period (refer to ).
The analysis should reference pertinent data, enforcement items, or events when appropriate, but should be principally a qualitative analysis of the licensee's performance in the area (depending upon level of activity, approximately one-half page to a page and a half in length when typed single-space).
3.
Include recommendations for _ licensee actions related to the functional area.
4.
Provide a copy of the SALP evaluation matrix (Attachment 5), assigning a performance category for each evaluation criterion.
5.
Separately, identify appropriate reccmmendations for NRC actions (e.g.,
increase or reduce inspection resources).
These recommendations will not t:e included in the SALP report, but will be a part of the Board Chairman's memorandum which transmits the report to the Regional Administrator.
For RITS reporting purposes, time expended for this Trojan SALP effort should be charged to Report No. 50-344/87-41, f(
By copy of this memorandum, the Director, Office of Investigations, San Francisco Field Office is requested to provide (by December 18, 1987) a summary of major investigative activities involving Trojan and thrsir results.
In addition, by copy of this memorandum, the offices of HMSS and AE0D are requested to provide performance analysis information by December 18, 1987.
D. F. Kirsch, Director Division of Reactor Safety and Projects SALP Board Chairman
Enclosures:
As Stated cc w/ enclosures:
J. Davis, NMSS R. Marsh, 01/SFF0 J. Carter, NRR F. Wenslawski, RV M. Schuster, RV J. Martin, RV R. Scarano, RV R. Fish, RV r
r,-
- -