ML20195G470

Discusses Licensing Exams for SALP Period of Dec 1984 - Dec 1985.Performance Rated Poorer than Previous SALP Evaluation Period.Table Shows Performance Breakdown of Exams

ML20195G470
Person / Time
Site:	Waterford, 05000000
Issue date:	01/10/1986
From:	Cooley R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:	Constasble L NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
Shared Package
ML20195F814	List: IA-87-830, Forwards Assessment of Radiologicals Controls Program at Facility for Period from 860501-1031.W/o Encl IR 05000397/1987006 ML20195F804 ML20195F826 ML20195F838 ML20195F862 ML20195F871 ML20195F876 ML20195F906 ML20195F930 ML20195F934 ML20195F947 ML20195F960 ML20195F973 ML20195F980 ML20195F989 ML20195G000 ML20195G018 ML20195G039 ML20195G167 ML20195G189 ML20195G205 ML20195G239 ML20195G370 ML20195G448 ML20195G457 ML20195G466 ML20195G470 ML20195G474 ML20195G480 ML20195G492 ML20195G500 ML20195G544 ML20195G555 ML20195G563 ML20195G572 ML20195G583 ML20195G593 ML20195G617 ML20195G629 ML20195G645 ML20195G650 ML20195G655 ML20195G734 ML20195G751 ML20195G773 ML20195G780 ML20195G793 ML20195G798 ML20195G955 ... further results
References
FOIA-87-830 NUDOCS 8806280009
Download: ML20195G470 (1)

Text

-

cd 6t v UNITED STATES

, g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

J REGION IV

.i.8

,8 8 611 RYAN PLAZA rRIVE, SUITE 1000

% , ,' ARLINGTON. eEXAS 70011 January 10, 1986 Memorandum For: L. Constable, Chief, Reactor Project Section C ,

1 F, rom: R. Cooley, Chief, Operator Licensing Section

SUBJECT:

SALP INPUT FOR WATERFORD 3 LICENSED OPERATOR TRAINING During the period from 12/84 to 12/85, the NRC only administered one set of licensing examinations. Twenty-two (22) candidates took thase examinations and nine (9) passed. All failures were on the written examination. This performance is poorer than in the previous SALP evaluation period. In the previous evaluation period, a total of seventeen (17) candidates were administered initial license examinations and only one (1) candidate failed. The table below gives a performance breakdown for the written examinations for this and the previoJs SALP evaluation period.

REACTOR OPERATORS Date No. Candidates Category - 1 2 3 4 Total

, 01/24/84 5 87.04 84.46 89.44 80.72 85.42 10/16/85 12 73.26 75.77 76.75 93.86 79.91 I (2) (2) (6)

SENIOR REACTOR OPERATORS Date No. Candidates Category - 5 6 7 8 Total 01/24/84 8 87.58 84.25 81.73 87.18 85.16 (1) (1) 06/26/84 5 90.68 77.6 87.88 90.4 86.66 10/16/85 10 89.62 69.81 91.24 76.56 81.81 (5) (2) (7) l The values shown are average scores for each category of the written examination and an average total score. The numbers in parenthesis '

indicate the number of failures on a specific examination by category and overall. Where the overall number of failures is greater than the l sum of the category failures it indicates that candidates scored less I than 80% overall but did not fail any one category,

~

8806200009 000615 .

aun

- " ^ co ~ r i

... -