ML20195G470
Text
-
6t cd v
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g
.i.8 REGION IV
- J 8
611 RYAN PLAZA rRIVE, SUITE 1000
,8 ARLINGTON. eEXAS 70011 January 10, 1986 Memorandum For:
L. Constable, Chief, Reactor Project Section C 1
F, rom:
R. Cooley, Chief, Operator Licensing Section
SUBJECT:
SALP INPUT FOR WATERFORD 3 LICENSED OPERATOR TRAINING During the period from 12/84 to 12/85, the NRC only administered one set of licensing examinations.
Twenty-two (22) candidates took thase examinations and nine (9) passed. All failures were on the written examination.
This performance is poorer than in the previous SALP evaluation period.
In the previous evaluation period, a total of seventeen (17) candidates were administered initial license examinations and only one (1) candidate failed.
The table below gives a performance breakdown for the written examinations for this and the previoJs SALP evaluation period.
REACTOR OPERATORS Date No. Candidates Category -
1 2
3 4
Total 01/24/84 5
87.04 84.46 89.44 80.72 85.42 10/16/85 12 73.26 75.77 76.75 93.86 79.91 I
(2)
(2)
(6)
SENIOR REACTOR OPERATORS Date No. Candidates Category -
5 6
7 8
Total 01/24/84 8
87.58 84.25 81.73 87.18 85.16 (1)
(1) 06/26/84 5
90.68 77.6 87.88 90.4 86.66 10/16/85 10 89.62 69.81 91.24 76.56 81.81 (5)
(2)
(7)
The values shown are average scores for each category of the written examination and an average total score.
The numbers in parenthesis indicate the number of failures on a specific examination by category and overall. Where the overall number of failures is greater than the sum of the category failures it indicates that candidates scored less than 80% overall but did not fail any one category, 8806200009 000615
~
" ^ co ~ r aun
-