ML20209F666

From kanterella
Revision as of 07:05, 5 December 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of 861205 Rev 6 to Site Emergency Plan,Sections 3-6.Omission of Table 4.1 Re Emergency Action Levels Inconsistent w/10CFR50.54(q).Plan Will Be Revised to cross- Ref Levels in Emergency Implementation Procedure EI-1
ML20209F666
Person / Time
Site: Palisades Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 01/27/1987
From: Shafer W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Buckman F
CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
References
NUDOCS 8702050165
Download: ML20209F666 (2)


Text

, .,

J AN 27 88T Docket No. 50-255 Consumers Power Company ATTN: Dr. F. W. Buckman Vice' President Nuclear Operations 212 West Michigan Avenue Jackson, MI 49201 Gentlehlen:

This is to acknowledge receipt of your letter dated December 5, 1986 which transmitted changes to the Palisades Plant Site Emergency Plan, specifically, Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6 of Revision 6. We have reviewed these changes to the plan and determined that one of these changes is not consistent with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(q) and would decrease the effectiveness of your plan if put into effect. Specifically, we are concerned about the omission of Table 4.1, Section 4.0, listing initiating conditions and the corresponding Emergency Activation Levels (EALs) for each emergency classification.

This omission of the EAL' tables from Section 4.0 of the plan was discussed by telephone on January 16, 1987, with Mr. James R. Brunet, Emergency Planning Coordinator, at the Palisades Plant. He has agreed to again revise the plan to include Table 4.2 of Section 4.9 and cross reference it with Emergency Implementation Procedure EI-1, which also contains EAL tables. Please submit this proposed revision to the Site Emergency Plan for our review within 60 days of the date of this letter.

Please be reminded that 10 CFR 50.54(q) requires prior NRC approval of any c

changes to your plan which may decrease the effectiveness of the plan.

However, if your safety review assures no decrease in emergency preparedness effectiveness, then changes to the plan may be made and implemented without prior NRC approval. In all cases, you must furnish copies of each proposed change to the NRC in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q). Also, any changes to the Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures should be made in accordance with i the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section V (Implementing j Procedures).

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of this letter will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room.

8702050165 870127 PDR ADOCK 05000255 F PDR ~

/

i{N jo a

Consumers Power Company 2 J/\ N 2 719ED' If you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact Mr. James P. Patterson of my staff at (312) 790-5536.

Sincerely, jh 'dWhf W. D. Shafer, Chief

. Emergency Preparedness and

. Radiological Protection Branch cc: Mr. Kenneth W. Berry, Director Nuclear Licensing J. F. Firlit, General Manager DCS/RSB (RIDS)

Licensing Fee Management Branch Resident Inspector, RIII Ronald Callen, Michigan Public Service Commission Nuclear Facilities and Environmental Monitoring Section W. Weaver, FEMA, RV D. Matthews, OIE, EPB R. LaFreniere, RIII 9

RIII , RIII R II j 9 C,S v &::I Patters n/mnj S ell r Shafer

$ wkess Onl0

. a