Letter Sequence Other |
---|
|
Initiation
- Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request
- Acceptance...
- Supplement
Results
Other: ML20076M966, ML20076M992, ML20138A211, ML20138A833, ML20138A863, ML20138E411, ML20138E443, ML20141H193, ML20141J293, ML20141J296, ML20141J352, ML20141J377, ML20141J384, ML20141J392, ML20141J401, ML20155E857, ML20155F634, ML20155G813, ML20195B451, ML20195B461, ML20195B561, ML20195B571, ML20195B841, ML20195B863, ML20195E855, ML20195F069, ML20195F083, ML20195F093, ML20197G705, ML20197G762, ML20198E208, ML20198E234, ML20198E325, ML20198J569, ML20198Q807, ML20198Q814, ML20198Q853, ML20198Q917, ML20198R025, ML20199E674, ML20199K964, ML20202F848, ML20202F877, ML20202G680, ML20202J825, ML20202J839, ML20203B345, ML20203B416, ML20203B646, ML20203D740... further results
|
MONTHYEARML20195F0831983-05-23023 May 1983 Criticizes Public Hearings as Outrageous Farce,Idioditic & fraudulent.Full-scale Criminal Investigation of NRC Long Overdue Project stage: Other ML20076M9921983-05-31031 May 1983 Disposal of Low Level Radioactively Contaminated Secondary- Side Clean-up Resins in Onsite Settling Basins at Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Project stage: Other ML20076M9661983-07-14014 July 1983 Forwards Disposal of Low Level Radioactively Contaminated Secondary-Side Clean-up Resins in Onsite Settling Basins at Davis-Bessie Nuclear Power Station Project stage: Other ML20090H4961984-07-18018 July 1984 Forwards Addl Info Re Application for Disposal of Low Level Radwaste,Per 840716 Telcon Between J Swift & Wh Mcdowell Project stage: Request ML20094B8961984-07-30030 July 1984 Forwards Addl Info Re Util 830714 Request for Approval for Alternative Onsite Disposal of Very Low Level Radioactively Contaminated secondary-side Cleanup Resins Project stage: Request ML20101T4071985-01-29029 January 1985 Forwards Response to NRC Three Addl Questions Re 830714 Request for Approval for Alternative Onsite Disposal of Very Low Level Radioactively Contaminated Secondary Side Cleanup Resins,Per 10CFR20.302 Project stage: Request ML20138E4431985-09-30030 September 1985 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re 830714 Request for Disposal of Low Level Radwaste.Proposed Action Will Have No Significant Impact on Human Environ Project stage: Other ML20138E4111985-10-15015 October 1985 Advises That 830714 Request to Dispose of Dredgings from Onsite Settling Basins on company-owned Land Acceptable. Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Encl Project stage: Other ML20133K9781985-10-15015 October 1985 Forwards Independent Mgt Assessment of Toledo Edison Davis-Besse QA Program & Rept of Assessment of Actions at Davis-Besse Resulting from 850609 Loss of Feedwater Event Project stage: Request ML20141J4011986-02-0101 February 1986 Expresses Concern Re Safe Operation of Facility,Moving Spent Waste from Plant,Earthquakes & Tornados Project stage: Other ML20202J8391986-02-17017 February 1986 Resolution 1986-12 Requesting That NRC Rescind Approval for Radwaste Disposal at Plant.Served on 860415 Project stage: Other ML20203A0021986-02-17017 February 1986 Resolution 86-10 Opposing Util Application to Bury Radioactive Sludge at Plant.Served on 860415 Project stage: Request ML20205K4951986-02-25025 February 1986 Notice of Appointment of Hf Hoyt as Presiding Officer to Conduct Informal Proceeding to Consider & Decide All Issues Re Util 830714 Request for Authorization for Onsite Disposal of Byproduct Matl,Per 860220 Order.Served on 860226 Project stage: Other ML20141J3921986-03-0202 March 1986 Requests to Make Limited Appearance Statement Re Onsite Dumping of Low Level Radioactive Sludge Project stage: Other ML20138A2111986-03-10010 March 1986 Memorandum & Order Directing That Petition to Participate in Hearing Re Licensee Request for Onsite Disposal of Product Matl Be Filed by SA Carter & Other Parties by 860414.Notice of NRC Participation Required by 860428.Served on 860311 Project stage: Other ML20138A8631986-03-17017 March 1986 Forwards Listed Documents in Response to 860310 Memorandum & Order (Notice of Informal Hearing & Opportunity to Become Party) Re Util Request to Dispose of Low Level Radioactively Contaminated Matls at Plant Site.W/O Encls Project stage: Other ML20138A8331986-03-17017 March 1986 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl Project stage: Other ML20202G6801986-04-0505 April 1986 Requests to Make Limited Appearance Statement Re Facility Radioactive Waste Landfill.Unrestricted Use of Land on Which Sludge Disposed Opposed.Identities & Amounts of Buried Radioisotopes Speculative.Served on 860411 Project stage: Other ML20205M3981986-04-0707 April 1986 Amended Emergency Resolution 29-86 Urging Governor of State of Oh to Aggressively Examine & NRC to Hold Formal Hearings on Burial of Nuclear Waste on Site.Served on 860414 Project stage: Other ML20202J8231986-04-0808 April 1986 Petition of G Zatroch for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing Re Radioactive Sludge Disposal at Plant Site.Served on 860415 Project stage: Request ML20205M4671986-04-10010 April 1986 Requests to Become Party in Proceeding Re Disposal of Byproduct Matl Onsite Under Terms of 10CFR20.302(a). Organization Intends to Perform Independent Analysis of Possible Impacts of Proposed Actions.Served on 860414 Project stage: Other ML20202J8251986-04-10010 April 1986 Requests NRC Consider Statement in Informal Hearing Re Disposal of Low Level Radwaste at Facility.Opposes Site for Ground Burial of Low Level Radwaste.Served on 860415 Project stage: Other ML20205M5431986-04-10010 April 1986 Forwards Author to Lakewood City Council & Resolution 6004-85,per 860310 Memorandum & Order.Submittal Serves as Author Official Notice of Intent to Intervene in Informal Hearing.Served on 860414 Project stage: Other ML20205M6091986-04-10010 April 1986 Requests to Make Statement at Hearing Re Disposal of Radwaste at Lake Erie Shoreline.Nrc Should Order Util to Find Offsite Facility to Hold Low Level Radwastes.Served on 860414 Project stage: Other ML20205M8201986-04-10010 April 1986 Comments in Opposition to NRC Approval of Amend to License NPF-3 to Permit Burial of Radioactive Sludge Onsite.Served on 860414 Project stage: Other ML20203A0261986-04-11011 April 1986 Petition of Citizens for Land & Water Use,Inc for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing Re Util Request to Bury Low Level Radioactive Dreggings Onsite.Served on 860415 Project stage: Request ML20203B6461986-04-14014 April 1986 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl. Served on 860417 Project stage: Other ML20203B4161986-04-14014 April 1986 Forwards Petition for Intervention & Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.W/O Encls.Related Correspondence Project stage: Other ML20203B3501986-04-14014 April 1986 Petition of Ef Feighan for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing Re Util Proposal to Store Low Level Radioactive Sludge Onsite.Served on 860416 Project stage: Request ML20210S2831986-04-14014 April 1986 Submits Resolution 13-86 Requesting NRC to Rescind Approval for Disposal of Radwaste at Davis-Besse Plant Site.Served on 860501 Project stage: Other ML20155E8571986-04-14014 April 1986 Petition of State of Oh for Leave to Intervene as Party. W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 860417 Project stage: Other ML20197G7051986-04-15015 April 1986 Resolution 19-1986 Opposing Application of Toledo Edison Co for Permission to Bury Radioactive Sludge at Facility & Declaring Emergency Project stage: Other ML20155F6371986-04-15015 April 1986 Resolution 86-11 Expressing Opposition to Util Application for Permission to Bury Radioactive Sludge at Facility.Served on 860421 Project stage: Request ML20203B3231986-04-16016 April 1986 Petition of Save Our State from Nuclear Wastes,Consumers League of Ohio,A Gleisser & Gs Cook for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing on Radioactive Sludge Disposal Issue. Served on 860416 Project stage: Request ML20203B3451986-04-16016 April 1986 Requests to Become Party in Matter of Util Burying Radwaste at Facility.Served on 860416 Project stage: Other ML20155F6341986-04-17017 April 1986 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl Project stage: Other ML20203D7401986-04-18018 April 1986 Raises No Objection to Treating RM Bimber Presenting Views on Burial of Very Low Level Radwaste,As Limited Appearance Statement.Bimber Fails Requirements to Be Party to Proceeding Project stage: Other ML20203D7501986-04-19019 April 1986 Provides Cover Ltr Inadvertently Omitted from . Forwarding of Notices & Correspondence to Stated Address Requested.Related Correspondence Project stage: Other ML20141J3771986-04-21021 April 1986 Comments in Opposition to Burying Low Level Radioactive Sludge Onsite.Recommends Public Hearing on Onsite Disposal. Served on 860425 Project stage: Other ML20141H1931986-04-22022 April 1986 Response Opposing Citizens for Land & Water Use 860411 Petition for Leave to Intervene.Petitioner Failed to Plead Admissible Contention to Identify Deficiencies in Licensee Method of Low Level Waste Disposal.W/Certificate of Svc Project stage: Other ML20203G1931986-04-23023 April 1986 Response Opposing G Zatroch 860408 Petition for Leave to Intervene.No Objection to Treating Ltr as Limited Appearance Statement.Petitioner Failed to Demonstrate Right of Standing.W/Certificate of Svc & Svc List Project stage: Other ML20141J2931986-04-23023 April 1986 Requests That Lj Lucas Re Burial of Very Low Level Radwaste Be Treated as Limited Appearance Statement Project stage: Other ML20141J2961986-04-23023 April 1986 Requests That League of Ohio Sportsmen Forwarding Resolution Addressing Burial of Very Low Level Radwaste Be Treated as Limited Appearance Statement Project stage: Other ML20141J3521986-04-23023 April 1986 Advises That Encl TC Brown W/Resolution Passed by City of Lakewood,Oh on 860106 Should Be Treated as Limited Appearance Statement & Not as Official Notice of TC Brown Intent to Become Party to Hearing.W/O Encl Project stage: Other ML20141J3841986-04-23023 April 1986 Response Opposing Petition of City of Ashtabula,Oh for Leave to Intervene.Certificate of Svc & Svc List Encl Project stage: Other ML20210L3791986-04-25025 April 1986 Requests That Councilwoman J Klein Intervening Statement Re Resolution 86-10 Be Treated as Limited Appearance Statement. J Klein Has Not Met Requirements to Become Intervening Party.Resolution Deficient in Citations & Supporting Data Project stage: Other ML20210K7421986-04-25025 April 1986 Requests That Councilman Kay 860210 Intervening Statement Be Treated as Limited Appearance Statement.Requirements to Become Intervening Party Not Met.Mayfield Heights,Oh,Too Far to Confer Standing.Related Correspondence Project stage: Other ML20210L3651986-04-25025 April 1986 Requests That Congressman Feighan 860414 Petition to Participate in Proceeding Be Treated as Limited Appearance Statement & Not as Petition to Intervene Per 10CFR2.714(d). Related Correspondence Project stage: Other ML20210K7511986-04-25025 April 1986 Response Opposing Petition of PE Dornbusch for Leave to Intervene.Suggests That Petition Be Treated as Limited Appearance Statement.Dornbusch Ltr Fails to Comply w/860310 Memorandum & Order.W/Certificate of Svc Project stage: Other ML20210N7121986-04-28028 April 1986 Responds Opposing Toledo Coalition for Safe Energy & SA Carter 851105 Petition for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing.Petition Should Be Treated as Limited Appearance Statement.W/Certificate of Svc Project stage: Request 1986-04-10
[Table View] |
|
---|
Category:FINDINGS OF FACT/CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
MONTHYEARML20210D8471986-09-16016 September 1986 Reply to Intervenors & State of Oh Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20214L4991986-09-0808 September 1986 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law in Form of Initial Decision on Disposal of Waste at Facility. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20214Q3681986-09-0808 September 1986 Finding of Facts Re Davis-Besse Hearing on Site Disposal of sludge-resin Low Level Radwaste.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20209G2061986-09-0606 September 1986 Submits Addl Conclusions of Law Re Insertion Into OL of Conditions Concerning Mgt of Waste Facilities.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20214L5041986-09-0606 September 1986 Supplemental Conclusions of Law Supporting NRC Authority to Insert Conditions Re Waste Mgt Facility Mgt Into OL ML20214L5921986-09-0606 September 1986 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Re Util Request to Dispose of Byproduct Matl Onsite.Commission Approval of Disposal Request Revoked.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20214L5241986-09-0505 September 1986 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Re Adequacy of Proposed Procedures for Disposal of Low Level Radwaste in Manner Consistent W/Environ,Geological & Topographical Concerns ML19319B2911976-08-30030 August 1976 Applicants Joint Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Substantiating That No Inconsistent Situation Is Created or Maintained Under Licenses.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19329A8881976-08-23023 August 1976 Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law of DOJ to Determine Whether Activities Under Licenses Would Create or Maintain Situation Inconsistent W/Antitrust Laws.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19329A8271976-08-23023 August 1976 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law & Brief in Support of City Request to Condition License of Applicant. Certificate of Svc Encl ML19319C3051975-04-25025 April 1975 Memorandum of Law for Special Master for Determination of Assertions of Privilege.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19326B0241973-08-22022 August 1973 Intervenors' Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Director of Regulations Should Be Authorized to Terminate Cp.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19329C6741973-08-14014 August 1973 Applicants' Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law in Form of Initial Decision Allowing CP to Remain in Effect. Certificate of Svc Encl ML19326A9301972-05-10010 May 1972 Toledo Edison Co & Cleveland Illuminating Co Proposed Findings of Fact,Conclusions & Order.Cp Should Not Be Suspended,In Whole or in Part Pending Completion of NEPA Review ML19340A2891971-03-0808 March 1971 Applicants' Reply to Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law of Coalition for Safe Nuclear Power,G Lau & Aec. 710220 Findings & Conclusions Should Be Adopted in Support of Issuance of CP ML19340A2821971-03-0505 March 1971 Preliminary Statement Re Proposed Findings & Conclusion in Opposition to Applicants' Findings.Issuance of CP for Facility Will Be Inimical to Common Defense Security,Health & Safety of Public.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19326B0301971-03-0404 March 1971 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Applicant'S Technical & Design Info Incomplete & R & D Program Inadequate.Plant May Endanger Public Health & Safety. Proposed Form of ASLB Order & Certificate of Svc Encl ML19326A9101971-03-0404 March 1971 Suppl to Applicants' Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Re 1969 Nepa.Public Disclosure Provisions of NEPA Have Been Observed by AEC in Proceeding 1986-09-08
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20198L1911998-12-21021 December 1998 Submits Comments Re Proposed Rule to Revise 10CFR50.59, Changes,Tests & Experiments ML20198L1361998-12-15015 December 1998 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50.65 Re Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint of NPP ML20217J2161998-03-27027 March 1998 Comment on Proposed Generic Communication Re Lab Testing of nuclear-grade Activated Charcoal ML20217F5361998-03-25025 March 1998 Comment Opposing Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1071, Std Format & Content for Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Rept ML20199J4651998-01-22022 January 1998 Comment Opposing Draft RG-1070, Sampling Plans Used for Dedicating Simple Metallic Commercial Grade Items for Use in Npps. RG Unnecessary Based on Use of EPRI Guideline & Excellent Past History of Commercial Grade Items at DBNPS ML20148M6421997-06-17017 June 1997 Comment on Proposed NRC Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1 Re Control Rod Insertion Problems.Nrc Should Review Info Provided in Licensee 970130 Submittal & Remove Statements of Applicability to B&W Reactors from Suppl Before Final Form ML20134L3401997-01-22022 January 1997 Resolution 96-R-85, Resolution Supporting Merger of Centerior Energy Corp & Ohio Edison Under New Holding Co Called Firstenergy ML20133B6941996-12-18018 December 1996 Submits Ordinance 850-96 Re Approval of Merger of Centerior & Oh Edison Into Firstenergy ML20132A8461996-12-0202 December 1996 Resolution 20-1996 Supporting Merger of Ohio Edison & Centerior Corp Under New Holding Company Called Firstenergy ML20134M6191996-10-28028 October 1996 Proclamation of Support by City of Sandusky,Oh Re Merger of Ohio Edison and Centerior Energy Corp ML20108D9571996-05-0303 May 1996 CEI Response to City of Cleveland 2.206 Petition.Nrc Should Deny Petition ML20097G5731996-02-13013 February 1996 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-63 Re Use of Potassium Iodide ML20097B8721996-01-23023 January 1996 Petition of City of Cleveland,Oh for Expedited Issuance of Nov,Enforcement of License Conditions & Imposition of Appropriate Fines,Per 10CFR2.201,2.202,2.205 & 2.206 ML20101B5841996-01-23023 January 1996 Motion of City of Cleveland,Oh for Partial Summary Judgement Or,In Alternative,For Severance of Issue & Expedited Hearing Procedures.W/Certificate of Svc ML20097B8911996-01-23023 January 1996 Motion of City of Cleveland,Oh for Partial Summary Judgement or in Alternative,For Severance of Issue & Expedited Hearing Procedures ML20096E9781996-01-0808 January 1996 Comment on Proposed Suppl to GL 83-11, Licensee Qualification for Performing Safety Analyses in Support of Licensing Actions ML20087J3611995-08-14014 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR2 Re Rev of NRC Enforcement Policy ML20086M8241995-06-29029 June 1995 Comment on Proposed Review of NRC Insp Rept Content,Format & Style ML20083M8701995-05-10010 May 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled Power Reactor ML20081C8841995-03-0303 March 1995 Comment Re NRC Proposed Generic Communication Suppl 5 to GL 88-20, IPEEE for Severe Accident Vulnerabilities. Util Ack NRC Efforts to Reduce Scope of GL 88-20,but Believes That Proposed Changes Still Overly Restrictive ML20077M5831995-01-0404 January 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & low-power Operations for Nuclear Power Reactors ML20072K3611994-08-16016 August 1994 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Plans for Storage of Sf at Davis Besse NPP ML20072K4411994-08-14014 August 1994 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Dry Storage of Nuclear Waste at Facility in Toledo,Oh ML20072K5261994-08-12012 August 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Addition of Standardized NUHOMS Horizontal Modular Storage Sys to List of Approved Sf Storage Casks ML20072B1581994-08-0909 August 1994 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR72 on List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks:Addition ML20029D8221994-04-19019 April 1994 Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Codes & Stds for Nuclear Power Plants;Subsection IWE & Subsection Iwl ML20062M4011993-12-28028 December 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-21-2 Re Commercial Grade Item Dedication ML20046A9561993-07-19019 July 1993 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171, FY91 & 92 Proposed Rule Implementing Us Court of Appeals Decision & Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery,FY93. ML20056C8951993-07-19019 July 1993 Order Extending Time within Which Commission May Rule on Petitions for Review of LBP-92-32.W/Certificate of Svc. Served on 930720 ML20045F8321993-06-22022 June 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mods to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements.Concurs W/Proposed Rule in Reducing Random Testing Rate of Licensees to 50% & Disagrees W/ Maintaining Random Testing Rate of 100% for Vendors ML20044E2781993-05-13013 May 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-58 Re VEPCO Petition to Change Frequency of Emergency Planning Exercise from Annual to Biennial ML20044E1561993-04-29029 April 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-58 Re Frequency Change of Emergency Planning Exercises ML20127L8781993-01-19019 January 1993 Comment Supporting Comments Submitted by NUMARC Re Draft Reg Guide DG-1020 ML20127A6171993-01-0606 January 1993 Order.* Time within Which Commission May Rule on Petitions for Review of Board Order LBP-92-32,dtd 921118,extended Until 930208.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930106 ML20126D5801992-12-23023 December 1992 NRC Staff Answer in Response to Petitions for Review Filed by Oh Edison Co,Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co,Toledo Edison Co & City of Cleveland.* W/Certificate of Svc ML20126F6501992-12-23023 December 1992 Answer of City of Cleveland,Oh,Intervenor,In Opposition to Petitions for Review of 921118 Decision of Aslb.* Petitioners Petitions for Review Should Be Denied. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20126D5171992-12-23023 December 1992 City of Brook Park Answer to Petitions for Review.* Opposes Applicants 921208 Petitions for Review Based on Fact That ASLB Decision in proceeding,LBP-92-32,adequately Addressed Issues Raised in Petitions.W/Certificate of Svc ML20126D5461992-12-23023 December 1992 Answer of Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co & Toledo Edison Co to Limited Petition for Review of City of Cleveland,Oh of 921118 Decision of Aslb.* Commission Should Deny City of Cleveland Petition.W/Certificate of Svc ML20126D5781992-12-23023 December 1992 Answer of American Municipal Power-OH,Inc in Opposition to Petitions for Review of Oh Edison Co & Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co/Toledo Edison Co.* W/Certificate of Svc ML20126D4761992-12-22022 December 1992 Alabama Electric Cooperative Answer to Applicants Petitions for Review.* Applicants 921208 Petitions for Review Should Be Denied.W/Certificate of Svc ML20126A5461992-12-10010 December 1992 Order.* Requests That Answers to Petition for Review Be Filed No Later than 921223.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 921210 ML20126A5751992-12-0808 December 1992 Petition for Review.* Requests That NRC Review LBP-92-32, 921118 Board Decision in Proceeding.Board Erroneously Interpreted Section 105(c) of AEA by Ignoring Fundamental Underpinning of Statute.W/Certificate of Svc ML20126A5871992-12-0808 December 1992 Petition for Review.* Requests That NRC Review ASLB 921118 decision,LBP-92-32.Board Erroneously Interpreted Section 105(c) of AEA by Ignoring Fundamental Underplanning of Statute.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20126A7651992-11-18018 November 1992 Limited Petition for Review of City of Cleveland,Oh of 921118 Decision of Aslb.* City of Cleveland Petition for Review Should Be Granted.W/Certificate of Svc ML20115E1771992-10-0808 October 1992 Comment Supporting Draft Mgt Directive 8.6,GL 92-05 ML20105C8971992-09-16016 September 1992 Comment Opposing Proposed Generic Communication Re Generic Ltr Concerning analog-to-digital Replacements Under 10CFR50.59 ML20114A8841992-08-17017 August 1992 Designation of City of Brook Park,Oh of Adopted Portions of Summary Disposition Pleadings.* Brook Park Not Advancing Any Addl Argument or Analysis in Connection W/Designation,Per 920806 Memorandum & Order.W/Certificate of Svc ML20099E1821992-07-28028 July 1992 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR20 & 61 Re LLW Shipment Manifest Info & Reporting ML20099A4051992-07-17017 July 1992 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR20 & 50 Re Reducing Regulatory Burden on Nuclear Licensees.Supports Rules ML20101R4831992-07-0808 July 1992 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Receipt of Byproduct & Special Nuclear Matl 1998-03-27
[Table view] |
Text
6 1@
y 00%' E,T,ED UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATOR'I COMMISSION BEFORE ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE HELEN F. HOIT, ESQ
~~
In the matter of: ) CFf 1 00C _
TOLEDO EDISON CO. and CLEVELAND )
ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. ) Docket No. 5$-h46k (Davis-Besse Nuclear Power )
Statica, Unit I ) )
}
DAVIS-BESSE BEARING ON SITE DIEPOSAL OF SLUDGE-RESIN LOW i.EVEL RADI0 ACTIVE WASTES FINDING OF FACTS:
- 1. In 1968-9 TEC traded the small Darby Marsh for the $54 acre Navarre Marsh.
- 2. TEC did not inform the Departmant of the Interior that the Navarre Parsh was part of the Ottowa County Wildlife Refuge Sanctuary and an International Bird Flyway.
- 3. TEC promised to use about 200 acres of the march for the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant and to preserve tne rest of the carst as a wildlife refuge, altcough TEC al-ready had plans to build 5 reactors on this site along Lake Erie shores.
- 4. TEC also promised at the construction license hearing that there would be no vaste disposal on the site. ' TEC's operating license (Docket No. 50-346---NFF-3) spears of the reprocessing of spent fuel and of plans to package and ship lcw level wastes to a licensed landfill within 300 miles. It also states there would te no effluent on site. Again these waste plans are stated in the Davis-Besse FSAR-1973 and also the FES-co-1973
- 5. In 1979 TEC nad applied for Limited Advance WorA Autacrity for Units II & III to be built just south of Unit I. These were cancelled in 1961,,but account for two of the'atsortment of ponds on tne site. TEC's borrow pits, numerous ponds, and drain-age aitch have a run-off into the Toussaint Eiver, wnich empties into Late Erie.
We wonder if the settling basin does too.
- 6. In 1965 we learn from the Federal Register (Oct ,9,1985) that T3C plannec a shallow site burial of its sludge-resin waste from its settling ponds--also that TEC already had received NRC permission since it was ruled as naving no sitnificant environmental impact. Tnis arrangement with the NRC was made by correspondence and telephone calls.
A6ain there was no mention of the special environmental issues. Ohio people were also shocked to learn that there was a E ettling pond on the Davis-sesse site am say auth-orized and operating.
- 7. Widespread objections of countless daio crganizations and individuals to this crude site disposal plan lea to Governor Celeste's request that tbe State of Ohio be an intervenor in the hearing throup;b the Office of tne Attorney General and the Ohio Department of Natural Rescurces.
- 8. The hearing was scheduled for the last ween :n June-1966, but TEC ;.as granted a deiay because of a strike among its employees. cince the Davis-Bess: piant had not been operating for over a year following the June-1985 serious calfunction, people thaught it a bit odd that employees would be strising for fringe benefits at this time. The hearing was rescheduled for the first week in August with a tour Aug.4 of the DEvis-Besse site for the intervenors.
8609240333 860919 PDR ADOCK 05000346 t c -
G PDR
\ 30
b 9. The tour incluced a view of the incredibly primitive settling ponds and of a field marked with red-flagged stakes to indicate the general location of the burial site.
Intervenors were provided no view of the dikes nor were they clearly labeled on the map. NBC's Judges Hoyt and Kline greeted the intervenors.
- 10. Ohioans objections to the site burial were many;
- a. Danger of further contamination of Lake Erie after 25 years of cleanup efforts.
- b. Danger to millions who depended on Lake Erie for water supplies and to north-western Ohioans whose essential ground water might be contaminated.
- c. Endangerment of Ohio's environmental resources, since this area had many profit-able industries which might be adversely affected--especially the recreational, such as camping, sport-fishing and boating.
- d. Destruction of state wildlife preserves from loss of vegetation and loss of wildlife habitats for many native species, including several birds on the en-dangered species list. Endangerment of migrating birts. Radiation in the food chain,
- e. Destruction of fish life since their spawning reefs are off-shore in this ,
, area. Reduction and contamination of fish with losses to the very profitable
, fish industry.
- f. Shock that the NRC would consider a marsh or floodplane area suitable for a low level waste dump and crude settling ponds. /
- g. Disgust that TEC is now pretending that the Navarre Marsh is only 400 acres east and north of the Davis-Besse site.
- 11. Our intervening group had been informed by area fisnermen that the Davis-Besse dikesj after years of pounding waves, were in very deteriorated condition. We made tuat one of our contentions. Fishermen later informed us that TEC had repaired and up-graded the dikes during tne summer, before the hearing but after our contentions had been received.
- 12. The first day of the hearing Mr. Anthony Celebrezze, Ohio Attorney General, and Mr.
Joseph Sommer, Director of the Ohio Department of Natural Resources, made very effec-tive presentations of the reasons for Ohio concerns. Then Mrs. Vir6 1 nia Aveni, Dep-uty Director of Ohio EPA explained the responsibilities of Ohio EPA with respect to TEC's plans.
- 13. The main issues debated in the hearing were naturally:
- a. The unsuitable geology and hydrology of the Davis-Besse site for a low level shallow vaste burial. The dan $er of both lake and groundwater contamination.
- b. The local threat to public health and the effect on the environment---the wild-life refuge, migrating birds, the loss of commercial enterprises and the loss of state recreational areas.
- c. The destructive effect of frequent violent storms, winds and flooding,'and l their effect on erosion of the burial site and consequent migration of its hazardous contents.
- d. The chemistry and durability of the resins used to absorb the radionuclides from the secondary desineralizing system. Tce possible reaction of other substances with the resins (Ex. kiln dust) and release of radionuclides into the environment.
~
- e. The lack of testing and necessary specifics to assure safety in the construc-tion and operation of theAcells.
barial
, l
1l 7 4
The State of Ohio was represented by 3 Deputy Attorneys General and Y witnesses from the Unio Department of Natural Resources, whose wort was very clearcht and effective.
TEC had 13 witnesses- all well renearsed- including several from its own staff. For most of the public present this was a first experience with an NBC hearing.
- 14. The State contended that TEC's geology studies were quite inadequate and revealed
, a limited understanding of indications of soil types, permeability, and water flow patterns at the Davis-Besse site. State also thought TEC should have made a thor-ough hydrology study.
- 15. Mr. Van Kley busily pried details out of TEC'c witnesses bit by bit until Mr. Hen-dron admitted that TEC's geology findings and hydrological observations were done
< in 1970 relating to the construction of the Davis-Besse nuclear plant.
j 16. Tne State testified that there had been a major advancement the last decaae in both 4
knowledge in the fields of both geology and hydrology and understanding of soil in-dications. Greatly improved instruments and equip.nent were in use witn aavanced tecnniques. Also the process of deep excavation in the past usually smeared evi-dence of sana and gravel layers, of. cracts, of soil pemeability, and of tiny water flow pathways. Bore logs were frequently deceptive where parts of the core were '
missing.
- 17. TEC contended that State's observations and references to studies of experts made
, their statements generic rather than specifically applica' ole to tne Davis-Besse
' area in both geology and hydrology. .
- 18. State pointed out the similarity of till, glaciolacustrine, I
clay and. sand putterns of soils for the whole Great Lakes area', and especially for Ottova County with its widespread marsh areas. State reviewed evidence of early glacial movements in soil patterns. State contended there was an upper till aquifer which, when saturated, drained into Lake Erie, the Navarre Marsh, and the Toussaint River. Also State cited indications of drainage pathways-some lateral and then down into the 6round water and bedrock lower aquifer. Mr. Pavey. insisted that by all indications, the water in tne glacial sealments connectea to the bedrock--that tne fluctuations were-there. State cited "Tne' Soil Survey of Ottowa County" by Gordon and huebner in sup-port of its findings of cracks, fractures, thin seams, lenses, and forc erstree root flow paths (from the early forests) to account for drainage down to the 6rdund water aquifer from the till above. Even one of TEC's own boring roles (B-125 from 1974--
ATEC Assn.,Inc.) documented the presence of sand layers.
- 19. TEc insisted there .as no upper aquifer and that layers of till and glaciolacustrine la'cked any remeability. State ci.ted inciequate TEC testing and tne deceptiveness of faulty tore cores with parts missing.
i 20.St$scontendedthatthewholeofnorthwesternOhiodependedonthesameground water bedrock aquifer system,, which included the entire Ottowa Marsh area. TEC s stated that well water in the Davis-Besse area was unpleasant from sulfur content.
Several systems for sulfur removal were said to be successfully in use amon6 those
{
[ ,
dependent on the well water.
.21. Both sides agreed the limestone-dolcaite bedrocs was highly pemeable. Also the i
ground water levels were responsive to weather, seasons, lake levels, river levels, and marshlands. When nigh northeast winds raised the Lake Erie water levels at the west end, the ground water levels also rose. After the stom, the flow of both was gradually reversed. TEC verified the extent of the groundwater system and its perm-
- eability from the vide radius affected by its dewatering procedures in early 1970's.
l State observed that ground water was released into Lake Erie tnrough the pemeabl'e
e i
bedrock that extended out into Lake Erie.
- 22. State challenged TEC's report of the average frequency of flooding incidents in the Ottowa area. When the number of incidents was averaged over a 25 year period, the problem appeared less menacing. This method hid the fact tnat with the present unprecedented high levels of Lake Erie, about 3/4 of the flooding episodes had occur-red during the preceding 6 or 6 years. In other words, flooding had markedly increased with high lake levels. Prognostications about future lake levels differed.
State's source anticipated a gradual continued level increase through 1994. TEC's witnesses are sure that lake levels will recede back to normal average levels by 1994. Time win tell. The Davis-Besse site was flooded in both 1972 and 1973 Also fonowing 4 northeast windstorms between 1968 and 1973, the Davis-Besse shore-line receded 20--60 feet. Shore property erosion is of major concern these days.
- 23. TEC plans 6 burial cells--a plan presented just before the hearing. The first is a triple cell unit, next a double unit, and finally a single cell about 162 by162 ft.
The cells are southeast of the plant and close to the easterly carsh, and not far from the Toussaint, which e.apties into Lake Erie. TEC plans to fill one cell every 5 years. Eacn will be shapea like a square bowl witn a 4 ft. liner composed of 2'6" of compacted clay, toen a plastic memorane liner, plus a foot of a leachate collec- .
tion layer topped with 6" of clay. The sloping sides will be supported by a clay dike with rip-rap. The burial depth win be about 81/4 ft. to hold approximately 34 000 ft.J of the 5 year accumulation of sludge-resin vaste. The topper win be 3
4 ft. of clay in the center tapering in a n directions to 2 ft. at the edges and overlapping the top of the outward sloping dike. The vaste is to be mixed with cement kiln dust, which should harden the waste to compact clay consistency.
- 24. We don't know how the wastes will be pumped out of the settling pond. Or what or how they'll dispose of the water tnat comes with it. We don't know how they plan to mix 34,000 ft.J of sludge with cement kiln dust or aecide how muca kiln dust is needed. We don't know the sind or tnickness of the membrane liner or whether it will split under the weight of a bulldozer or backhoe--even with large rubber tires, We don't know whether the clay liner will hold up either or wnether it will crack ween cried out.
- 25. TEC estimates 8 or 9 days to transfer the waste froa settling basin to burial ce H and mix it with kiln cust. Toen the waste will be exposed for a couple cays to the weather unile the cap is bein,e appliea. We don't know wnat tne chemical reaction will will be between tne kiln dust ana the resin or how muca radiation could be released from tne resin to migrate about the area. Wedon'tEnopheeffectofgroundor water-contained enemicals reacting witn the resin. We con't know how long the cell will remain intact under winds, storms, and flooding. We're not sure aoout the im-pulses of furry burrowing creatures. We don't know whether TEC is creating another
" BATHTUB EFFECT." Ohioans would be grateful if the NRC would call a halt to it.
Northern Ohioans would be eternally grateful also if tne NRC would tame a good hard look at the even more hazardous primitive settling casin on the Davis-Besse site to see if they honestly still think "no significant environmental impact."
Sept.8,1986 Respectfully submitted on behalf of Intervenors:
Original received oy Consumers League of Obio Judge Helen F. Hoyt Save Our State from Nuclear Waste Sept.8,1986 Arnold Gleisser by Federal Express Ge vieve S. Cook l
1/
~ nm n v
[, A',
1 -
h
4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Judge Helen F. Hoyt, Esq. Ohio Assistant Attorneys General Administrative Juage Jack A. Van Kley U.S. Duclear Re6ulatory Co:=nission Snaron Sigler Atomic Safety and Licensing Boani Edward Lynch 4350 East-West Highway---4th Floor Environmental Enforcement Section Bethesda, Maryland 20814 30 East Broad St.
Columbus, Ohio 43215 Jay E. Silberg Snaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge Terry J. Lodge 1800 M Street, N.W. 618 North Micnigan St. Suite 105 Washington, D.C. 20036 Toledo, Onio 43624 Charles A. Barth, Esq.
Office of Executive Legal Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Com:nission
- Washington, D.C. 20555 Docket & Service Section Office of the Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Coc: mission Washington, D.C. 20555 l
3
,