ML20072K441

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Dry Storage of Nuclear Waste at Facility in Toledo,Oh
ML20072K441
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 08/14/1994
From: Rich Smith
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To: Selin I, The Chairman
NRC COMMISSION (OCM), NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
FRN-59FR28496, RULE-PR-72 59FR28496-00019, 59FR28496-19, NUDOCS 9408300068
Download: ML20072K441 (1)


Text

-

.u w co RULE hk 73 A ' SSN""'6'<VFR 2Pves occurT /9 N J IT INSURANCEAGENCf"ro Professionallnsurance Service 125 EAST FRONT STREET, PEMBERVILLE. OHIO 43450 PHONE (419) 287-3220 W E 17 P3 :21 0FFb , t ' --- - . .

08-14-94 DOCHE l;,. ~ :,O!

s i-l,,ij '

Mr. Ivan Selin U.S.N.R.C.

ATT. Docketing and Service Branch Washington, DC 20555

Dear Mr. Selin:

I am writing in regards to dry storage of nuclear waste at " Davis Bessie" in Toledo Ohio.

To my knowledge the plan is to contain the waste material in a dry storage above ground. After contemplating the method that would be used, I feel that this option is dangerous.

The exposure of such containment is great to such perils as tor-nados, aircraft crashes, air strikes and possibly earthquakes.

I understand that this storage method passes all rules with the N.R.C., however, I also know it is one of the least expensive methods. U.S. citizens and a vital fresh water resource could be at great risk. It would seem to me that a different location or a more expensive storage method is worth lives, resources and property.

Please reconsider a safer solution.

Thank you ff Si f7d p

// '

/

Rob B. Smith 83 068 940sj4 72 59FR28496 pyg jg founded in