ML20141J352

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Advises That Encl TC Brown W/Resolution Passed by City of Lakewood,Oh on 860106 Should Be Treated as Limited Appearance Statement & Not as Official Notice of TC Brown Intent to Become Party to Hearing.W/O Encl
ML20141J352
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 04/23/1986
From: Doris Lewis
SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE, TOLEDO EDISON CO.
To: Hoyt H
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
CON-#286-906 ML, TAC-60875, NUDOCS 8604280106
Download: ML20141J352 (3)


Text

- ,

SHAW, PITTMAN, PoTTs & TROWBRIDGE A.A.,,E,.. .. CLuO.~a ore..c=*LCO- C. Arc ~.

1800 M STREET. N. W.

ynasmgN. D. C. 20036 mg (, ,s c, 'I ME hNETH J M AUTM AN DANY p='Ub ahNhmTEM LahDER NAM.av S TE ua O.

ny PO,vve.. P C. C, g p TT . AN MAN. O S Cy.(tem am - Dav'O L awRE NCE MsaEN Op

" "B S-c . TELECOP P L p.wa=" ~

E EP.O DOTT. F C. 'C. v N **E #

  • A- c m .,, e.. .'E R .m. . . raen.:te o
=2g Ya;"m onb Y ev41' EEL'"JJ"!

F#EO A. Lev et E, P C.

C.

j,"u s8N.7,{Q.%;C; C

n. go

'@0 24 46aF4c.a ~. f4!!;.:.

"^*'#^*

(=Om za en

.gEw' EGO.,

  • MiCHAE L - MADDEN aat;; A LA;,',pa.sa.

M. :EEF"EENs'-A~

DAv50 m LE wit

  • ^ '."'c" '!E ,."la." "'

n."2E"w"E'u.'.k LE UE A haC OL ON. # '."6E JR-. P C. 3,1"'

> ghgy"1.1,.'a M GLA.='ea *'EGEL _ w&m% A,. E . a. L et .E pt. AN

  • h "f"E" t."E".'d.%"'  !"R"tJ " #122.""'c" yEu,Y o "At V'n" oc'A 1""'. ?E ,. ...

eye.mMas, Samtama h..

cEO=oEv AuE .sa mO.

Offt.PCg mAu.L Ev J

r. ne.*.CR.EYii *E RoLEto AeEv ..ee.2 (smwspw w. )

c.scw';am.D

,s .

o.a E c .AOc,E. es p A.o s.

rw^o*;a8pa aitahet Oavwa=& .- ~o v0= u UA"".ThiE** "*'!E"d sm, Eg*pC. *

. n C. Casit".'wl. caw *f,",.t .'Jg,l'a yo,,,,, .'. Qa".fiUA4ECa'M*""*"

SU"'.E*g"+o.I^t'*' to

- CPt.'An'i E a

  • 7^";.W't.?t4"s" *. C. $2"L"-)oe, A -

a ."/., .~* forint a YOhbE CA#LETON .somt. p C, f e,E mgg O GN e v'#GtN8A Orr.CE PavL A [gOL'IC LsOTA g

  • Som e. e a u E
50. ramma CBEDs? D8WVE wNDE\ .[Ir 'LEcmi g V u

i Ch".T G*J.la'r.% C. {!;"YP1 "'" D"$I',"iI.E" "not.

gfS".e^;'11';2 4 asst. ...

ac's Aa. viao'a'A er'on

= stit.qst"' .am. .~, n=" o4 ~ *

. n. E!. :"sEmac. :eB'"re.=nts.

.A"427!.?

C ;'"#t"Alk.i.... e.- o 81?"o f E m"Ot"' da "

O 1,8 u ",."1!.*/ t?eti .

C"2!!"E'/.*?E"."...

L ..C s^c^ ^ "oarr-E .. "c'*" I' N I.^.o".*a ti:'"L'Ci * /",.*Pn 8?*E.A S Cru- "?. '.5".' ..

LIAC'Ja/ "#.!O't'Nc' WAME.S.HAMuh PC.

dh.E A" ::?lA'a^",

DE L...A A #80G*AV Ek"'"A ".

WEFF#EYR t'a.?.JE"C-

.YDER*

'a::/"'.la"'""at..

8.;u.'2fE1

.AN C. LONG.TME E Y.

F.Eoo.a. E. .,...E.

,0 r.otaLv. -E.----

..C A.o . .Earry I.OeE RT E. COM Couh.EL

..,E.....EC,..AL u..E.

April 23, 1986 822-1063 Helen F. Hoyt, Esquire Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 In the Matter of Toledo Edison Company, et al.

(Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1)

Docket No. 50-346-ML

Dear Judge Boyt:

Toledo Edison Company has received an April 10, 1986 let-ter from Thomas C. Brown, a Councilman At Large for Lakewood, Ohio, to'NRC Docketing and Service. Attached to the letter is a resolution (No. 6004-85) passed by the City of Lakewood on January 6, 1986. Mr. Brown states that his letter "will serve I

as an official notice of [his] intent to become a party to the informal hearing as a representative of Lakewood. . . . "

8604280106 860423 PDR ADOCK 05000346

, G PDR c- -

- b (,) b -

SH Aw, PITTMAN,' PoTTs & TROWBRIDGE A PamTNER5eep 6NCLuOswG PmOFESS'OkAL CO#PO4AT104s Helen F. Hoyt, Esquire Administrative Judge April 23, 1986 Page 2 ,

t Toledo Edison Company does not object to the letter and resolution being received as a limited appearance statement.

However, to the extent that Mr. Brown seeks to participate as a party representing Lakewood, Toledo Edison submits that the standards for intervention have not been met. Lakewood is on the western outskirts of Cleveland and is approximately 66 miles from the Davis-Besse site. This distance is too far to confer standing even in an reactor operating license proceed-ing. See Tennessee Valley Authority (Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2), ALAB-413, 5 N.R.C. 1418, 1421 n.4 (1977);

Philadelphia Electric Co. (Limerick Generating Station, Units 1

& 2), LBP-82-43A, 15 N.R.C. 1423, 1433 (1982). It is therefore certainly too far to confer standing in a materials licensing proceeding. See Rockwell International (Energy Systems Group Special Nuclear Materials License No. SNM-21), CLI-83-15, 17 N.R.C. 1001, 1005 (1983) (greater proximity should be re-quired in a materials licensing proceeding); Boston Edison Co.

(Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station), LEP-85-24, 22 N.R.C. 97, 99 (1985) (residence 43 miles from a facility held too far to con-fer standing in a proceeding addressing spent fuel storage).

Mr. Brown's lack of standing as a representative of Lakewood would be no different if 10 C.F.R. S 2.715(c) applied.

10 C.F.R. 5 2.715(c) permits an " interested" municipality to participate in a formal reactor licensing proceeding. If none of its citizens has a cognizable interest that might be affected, a municipality cannot be considered " interested."

Toledo Edison knows of no instance in a reactor operating license proceeding where a municipality located more than 50 miles from a site was permitted to participate under 10 C.F.R. i S 2.715(c). i Furthermore, neither the resolution nor the letter identifies with specificity alleged deficiencies in any of Licensee's reports describing and evaluating the disposal of very low level radioactive waste. They provide no citations, no detailed discussion, and no supporting data, materials, or references. The letter and resolution therefore fail to ccm-port with the instructions in your March 10, 1986 Memorandum and Order. For this reason too, Mr. Brown and the City of Lakewood should not be admitted as a party.

I 1

l l

l l

E. _

SH AW, PITTM AN, PoTTS & TROWBRIDGE A PARTNERSmp eNCLUDemo rnoMSSioMA6 coRPORATeoms Helen F. Hoyt, Esquire Administrative Judge April 23, 1986 Page 3 Accordingly, Toledo Edison respectfully submits that Mr.

Brown's letter and the attached resolution should be treated as a limited appearance statement.

Sincerely, Jay E. Silberg, P.C.

David R. Lewis Counsel for The Toledo Edison Company et al.

cc: Docketing & Service Branch Charles A. Barth, Esquire Mr. Thomas C. Brown