ML20114A551
| ML20114A551 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 01/22/1985 |
| From: | Hiatt S OHIO CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE ENERGY |
| To: | Bright G, Gleason J, Kline J Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| CON-#185-258 OL, NUDOCS 8501280271 | |
| Download: ML20114A551 (17) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:M$ y. January 22, 1985 EIE{JU James P. Gleason, Chairman Atomic Sofety and Licensing Board *e5 EY 25 t'n S; 513 Gilmoure Drive Silver Spring, MD 20901 Dr. Jerry R. Kline Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Mr. Glenn O. Bright Atomic Sorety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Re Cleveland Electric Iluminating Co. (Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2), Docket Nos. 50-440 ond 50-441(){ Gentlemen: By this. letter intervenor Ohio Citi= ens for Responsible Energy ('OCRE') is informing the Licensing Board and porties that it does not oppose Appliconts' Motion for Summary Disposition or Issue 14. OCRE would otso take this opportunity to comment upon the schedule proposed by Applicants in their January 18, 1985 letter to the Board. Applicants propose February 5 05 the lost doy for filing motions for summary disposition, including on Issue N16, on diesel generotors. OCRE believes that it connot respond in o meaningful manner to o summary disposition motion on Issue M'16 filed on that date withi.n the clotted time because of the great
. Volume of materials to be reviewed and analyzed on that issue.
Much documentory material is owed to us by Applicants on Issue N16 through discovery, e.g., the Perry OR/QR report. Appliconts have committed to provide OCRE with a copy of this and other . documents in their response to OCRE's recent motion to reopen discovery. We have no ideo when these items will be supplied, or how Voluminous they Will be. It obviously t o'k e s time to analy:e these complex technical materials. Of course, any deioy resulting therefrom is entirely attributoble to Appliconts, as they have generally failed to
- Update their discovery responses in a timely fashion.
We would otso note the impropriety of moving for summary, disposition of a safety issue before the issuance of the Stoff*S Safety Evoluotion Report on that issue. Duke Power Co. (Wm. B. McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2), LBP-77-20, 5 NRC 680, *g 681 (1977). SER Supplements addressing the remaining safety , issues have not yet been issued. Applicants next propose March 18 os the date for filing 9 PDR t
Page 2 This is 41 days ofter, February 5, the lost day for testimony. fi7ing Summary disposition motions.. Twenty-five of these days must.be clotted for responses to summary disposition motions. ,
~(This assumes that Applicants' first date. February 5, has y ,
validity. For the reasons outlined above, We believe otherwise,I This leaves just 16 days for the Board to rule on the' summary
= disposition motions, for the porties to receive and onoly e the'
' Board's orders, and for the porties to prepore testimony I .oddressed to*the' genuine issues of fact identified in the Board's Orders. This is obviously unreasonable.
Applicants finally propose that the hearing stort on April 2, fifteen days ofter the filing of testimony. While this is the , minimum period allowed by regulation (10 CFR 2.743(b)). OCRE Would remind the Board that Applicants themselves once sought on extension of time between the Filing of direct testimony ond the stort of the hearing, stating that 15 days is insufficient time to review and onolyre the prefiled testimony, esPecially When the testimony would be in the mail for several of those 15 days. See APPliconts' Motion to Amend Memorandum and Order (Concerning Scheduling) of September 16, 1982, dated September 21, 1982, de 3. OCRE ogrees that this period should be lengthened. OCRE believes that Issues 8 and 16 cannot be disposed of through summary disposition and Will require evidentiary hearings. Because of the complexity of these 2 issues and the resultant substantial pre- and post-heoring work involved, We would propose that hearings on these issues be separated by at least 60 days. OCRE is presently contacting prospective expert witnesses on
'these 2 issues. Any hearing schedule, of course, would have to take into adcount the availability of'these persons.
There is also much discovery left undone on Issue M8, and possibly on Issue M16, depending on the results of the DR/QR report and tests and inspections of the Perry diesel engines. OCRE ond Appliconts have agreed to defer further negotiations on OCRE's 13th Set or Interrogatories, pending the outcome of motions for dismissal or summary disposition of Issue M8 Which Applicants and Stoff have promised to file. Once the Board denies these motions, the discovery disPG 6a Will have to resume. In view of these uncertainties, We doubt that either' Issues 8 or
- g 16 could be ready for hearing before June, ,
For your information, we have enclosed on estimate of the date of full power license authori otion for Perry 1 (Apr.il 6, 1986) Which Chairman Pollodino provided to the House Subcommittee on " 1
O. Page 3
' t h 8
1 p ' ' Energy 'and the Environment. It thus does not appear that the f J'~fmore reasonable hearing date suggested by OCRE would result i n s i. , 4 ,
'ony.horm to Applicants. ~ c- '
v
,?5incerely,
, ; i.
-5usan L. Hiatt '
< OCRE Representative 8275 Munson Rd.
Mentor. OH 44060 (216) 255-3158 Enclosure os stored cc Service List s 6 6 l p$
'$ hy k.2))W p
M %qg%." "Ts%p- es M Web *cW :e] im )m%vl 1 1 ,
- q?
e.ua MMi 9'
" Nil -
Ag!y$w.i
~a hm W
f nw .m u y.ng $c. [ p$fi ' f NUCLEAR REGULATORY COBIBIISSION BUDGET
- hMh{
Mhi h%4 GMN{d m/u REQUEST FOR FISCAL YEARS 1984 AND 1985 ,
.:en$g$$di e e qet g yi b
h;p. ,.6.ma yv = .pgwp M ' y QfunNiy W)O D.hhj-@jhwh@yg t g 9 h.;@er 0 jy hrMO s I rylcr jifg 1 OVERSIGHT HEARINGS. . k.474 2 W f.d:s;pI[
.f .
i L t p'g!.: [ stroas ras SUBCOMMITTEE ON
. 5) g' f
$@jj!(e< m i ENERGY AND THE ENVHt0NMENT Pk',}jp% &j-
;g orras @ t.tf ghj h' {0 st S .
.[ COMMITTEE ON ?$1 w
. $/!$. .v.,$p.INTERIOR k3 7>M L. 'sW,L i AND INSULAR AFFATRS' . tiW.wih
- 6 $.Ml!4 .:yE4 .
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES LMM. p w .1
'i
. . NINETY-EIGHTH CONGRESS "7;[.wfgy ' '
.@t c...J4, FIRST AND SECOND SESSIONS gM' m p&,l"';;
n '
- '?
. .;.b.fhii yd [M' ' ' ' * :$'If.I MDi$' f 3
- b. t.W I 1 h
=
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BUDGET REQUEST FOR FISCAL ..o
- L - ic!-;p {/ !j Ji/1 YEARS 1984 AND 1985 J Yqf,, .i i
j'
.yy. . !pyf y;'W e -
#pr$pN['
Why(d; il (l-i i. j .g.{j g g i' HEARINGS HELD IN WASHINGTON. DC
' W @y pJh, FEBRUARY 22, 1983 AND FEBRUARY 9,1984 5 f;A i ! ~
5 c ' $.g A. - Serial No. 98-31 fm#.34:m,I-
.O'l.'.0
@3;pl3p.c !$p\
d p.i. . . sM j f) 3, Printed for the use 9f the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs jv. ": fe
$%f)h iew
- 5 'd,l..
JMM.! " pd."i? 4 ,.[]. g@;f. 4 ;
, :c 7b.t :gq v v
~u,ws
. o..
a.d.m9;t p%. 9 Me n .i N 6.' l kj.
.:;;de.;$,l.hnsa geyg4 Nh g hbhD:
khW 45&ye?q$ 38m
,4th;qp % n..s, o
....---,-,--a mm-rou : nu ,
gmJ m %.M.. m
',m. 44s gn . ~
h
'. .W
. ?. W ;.%- $p.
. . .. . +c.
nu.s y%ghgN 4 ih'.. :
. [ jf( 'h gSMdIEkk' , l 'fkIh t, J, ff f r
e t k 4 I. e
%y e' i & :.1 h aN r mM. ?" 4,
" .f. , 'o
',.W t 723 Wh Mf;M e . . _ , yn[mTh .i
-======= ""*** !g
-bsh jt ,
a 6.ma"'La. _ d
; en tittag policy and 3 e '
- T. se e.u. e cme y ksi Mf v ,e L*.*"."".*.?
a't 3'*
.4 b' A E*".O*.,*.'."
" O C'*** :~~;.:-== =* COMMITTEE ON INTERIOR AND INSULAR AFFAIRS
-a=* ,; pe,}r;f.,
4fl. 1
- .t:: ( 1.e d ta av; case t3 ne a ' " ' ,
- i" E,i, 0 "
k' O.*.
- "O*O* u.s. ieouss os avessammes **d*~*.*.*.'"a i v .'
{ Y+;; *ah}g'j;d. " kurv:e t ea. surely.
'! r ," g,
".:3
"/ OM" OF# wAswueGroes, s.c. 3 mis
. cisati:s thee shelter. p ' J '. ( ,
'fl *
.. r..r, ,1. ,,.. ,
t who we act n m/
=
l",,*".*'.*.; i .I wI-3f,O L, L J
, f' "J"".~. J. l 'e . C.
Intitl2 assessment. l" ,*"" starth pr: gram, and - N' .'" , l"O .
/,,2 ,
l l
,rJ
.f # };}
i P=f..,;@d The citirmattve will ; ._ O ",=."0,7.
. '[ g ,a==*=* p.
, . 4 Y e 2,
t * * ?.h , h I h.f.' r , . i (. A ' I
'Y '
. (
;a 1a- If h,R';y' ri e marr untributor .
?
h 11 the statenest - b;
/ n. nonorant umte r itaatno 6 b ' i.-
Chairman /, Q.L eM Ff :112 that 11) in the . United States Nuclear Regutatory Commission . L}t), ( i N
,*h
[d h
'jv Washington. D.C. 20555 f f risk. se m se the 0 :*- " o _ .
E.'1 .! , I ,. P. 28PCc11117 la the Dear Mr. Chairman P P rebd ilittic k l WE. At tha bettee
- (,i On behalf of the Subconusittee on Energy and the Environment, gj Q '
* . ;", . q y '
- Sta of one tetident let me thank you and the other members of the Nuclear Degu*
, rnal this grxsly
*),
' latory CommissLon for participating in our February 9, 1984 i
' y j;a, df '. g .
hearing on the NRC'S budget for fiscal years 1984 and 1985, a.i ,i' y ti it set tnetra a f As you may know, the record compiled at that hearing will t ,q' "> u , , * teet:4 11km the provide a basis for the interior Committee to make [ lf 'opert1Msti ti the eit twerch ceasua.
'T recommendations to the Mouse Rudget Committee regarding the funding level which Congrese should approve for the l d;' [I 3. q, Commission. To help the Subcommittee complete its record in a I
.,,y'/..) j [Qe tv*rttres riik se to timely manner. I ask that the Commission provide written this answers by March 2,1984 to the questions enclosed with j
jy [q.d'j *
- d. .;/ ?l f :
f raa esa sore likely i *
' ' letter. ..p'I
=Ph asis en 14rge toCA , 6
' - 1; le sos og ?21u-143g ' I appreciate your prompt attention to this matter, and I look ll 31'f e ,i an1 thar:by 3's. forward to the Commission's response. " o a ttm ..
s. Fbree u li tel: d. sincerely,
- j. y, 3 s
1 , ., - hata. rnd would be ' j r t a :vs. ~.re.. .,, r e.u
. . ,. ,..r..,
.h .h b,k.hd-at Chairman
~
j
,/
2
. Mc]e~ y. a. ;
, A.' pr it j,;U..,
4
. f p. H Enclosure 3'.p.,'
'.w . .N. 6 M't,lju s ,
% o '. . ' f, ,
', ';
- 8 l j'
, 14[ .7 -
'f j, l' qu C 4 0 g;
w. p g'.
* . . i.
.' @ . g ; 5, '{ p, e,e * , ( t h.
,t} J II M-Ql[ a %, f a! ,, } :
l, ,i\ tM
' > 4 a' e ' [II r, .
3 . f ' [
- A . .* ,t' ...
f .
/
9.W'
/
.A h[t
- 1 . -. . - s_. f (, u__
,e.m%,sJ3llpuasuw~.. reamum L
* > I .,
fty ; Mt. , q, . " w]i,G !? . ' vu - 2.f ' [0? 1 7 2/21/94 Hy' $ 0 js-1 1 4: oursrtows ron in cowerssrow . - 3 s . 1' i grJ:::,;* "n:r:g.,rn,:g en:Ja,rnJr-ib . . :l i;'J 5
- ~ _
jN[. i
'" 'n;"';d"; '"""'" "" " "'" ' "'"" " "'"'"
ji3;J hh&[ f' ! h
535:E3 5i$50553 biff?INEN JNe l :y!I ' I 'UE~""'
jf ' ::: M,.: 1.... J ::.r.n.,':.u..:n::.;./..:a:: J u :: : ::i n:':::,,':: 1! 1 au # !! y9.;
,;"::: :R":J:0.!";";n:n:".0 y
.i s ill '
l:J::.r'
;;"::"m au :":J';;":"t*: :#:ritJ":;.1:'an"'
kl ! i ds :::::::::'!, J:0,'::::.",:r.:..crJ,'.:n."..:u::.'.J:"" u ..u - m, x4 .,n. a .. . .-i. - n y4 [i - 5- r.;;it:J::.*:rt:" :;;;' a:J;.;":,'!'"n;:';;:J"ti
""a=""'""" o.
I. ' g :,;;;;" " " a " 4 " " ' n84 9 ., m
'- lrJ!nJ" J"'";id;i "" 'r!u:".9.0:Jt*:iI',
k N My 'b -
"";"u:'o;:n!"rn!":JM"' "* *""'""" '""""' .
fi - <
?" ';g 'J' "*j:'"!",t*"*:J:"""j""0"i;."" " '
%g:i k' ',y
- M@M.E6 p, :
0:n",::"'HJ:;'J::::!n:." ":ri.* *i!!"" :U" NihIMp jE ::::":"r::
"" :n:J:n": ::::":::r J"::unna:
tu pp _.L,u. ~ ' uNMn aur':
'- Ar:J":d :yu:::n,9n,':;.gg.p:::gy::. in:'.
"PC :J"ti'Jr:,:";":,": **:0,*l/;::in, n:'in'"
I'99/y$;i $ "' bv 6v l0"O.!::"r:J!:inid*;;;Jr;"i";/un:n
/$Mhil 15<
. 1..
kA a'
, Y'm
~'t
^
I ' k- a Yh ' yh/,
;}Fw'!E4Wy
+ .m.
mDM." il m'ybwG : f %gqu ' y$[b{di% E"~$J.$! gdh!3d.O 3A@p@ dft? f k t 4h W
;l q 4!
h.b$ hh
~u, %
w,$ , 2 s
,e a6' )q.'
i, q. f iid , m ' " 4 [d l ha ad$h
?h
.'& A Y-{ 3
~
- ' " ~
C i sh [,[Ma c h" t & t [C . f[$' %QP%hl{ $
?
if 725 t j . wh h NjIid
,i 7 f! I
- 9. on page 5 of Attachment A to the Commission's written ' -
..g ; g statement you say:
^
l di MN ,h . i. F
'The Commission cone'.udes that emergency fr -
/'!
"~
preparedness is adequate for (Three Mile Island Unit, .gh
'h I I
(d. ])
* , /; gc ,
- 1) restart, subject to certification by the NRC staff that the various conditions relating to emergency ,f al
"' 'gg:y
, f ' g] dg ,.
, , i f-
' g .T *f planning imposed by the Licensing and Appeals soards have been satisified.'
gaph pgf N Mg!'ij.j P l l
.f k
,,P.,.. 'Pki tv7 P *4 hm;.h, ,( . j i i N f '. (tb Now is the Commission's position on the adequacy of TM! Ef emergency preparedness affected by the February 8, 1984 4,
% 'd .
report f rom FEMA to NRC that TME emergency preparednest la *
"'[1 )].' .".S.t.
adequat e?
; e .
( .
, $'d On page 3 of the Commission's written testimony, you say {2
' 'G 10.
*we have strengthened our inspectLon program by adding 77 ,
I, * - [ k . T(s
.,; M 4 ft ll staff and $17 million.' To what entent should the. .%
i% additional cost of inspection and enforcement be passed g . . rg,-(t..,3}ff J, on to Itcensees as a part of thele llconsing fee?
,iP- { IT,N
'. i, h 11. With the termination of the Clinch River Breeder projet, y t?
]
how does the Commission intend to use funds previously earmatted for CR8R licensing and regulatory restatch?
,}
Q.,,, gldyd ~, jf[' N. M ' 8 j MM 4-
.P y - )i p
- 12. What is the current status of the Commission's d w,4" #' h b., di
[d *bactittting* rule? What is the view of the Commission ne gf 8N on the effectiveness with which that rule is being
, [$,
If i o a awa g:'yggg{py'g MD n A
.1, i
' /9 13. On page 11 of Attachsen't A, on the subject of Cleanup of e
- g, M e ,b -
Three Mile Island Unit 2, you say there is *1pereasing
- q',
L d, - u 6* potential for unforeseen problems arising.' Does this 4.y Q1l [3.4):'
'*;l ' .,
% , , is j,' mean you think there is increasing hasard to public health and safety? What is the speelfic nature of g i..
i'
- unforeseen problems *.that could arise7 g g 9 h [.jb4 m,'jj,,
,y
- 14. On page 2 of Attachment A you note that t>e potential for Licensing delays which lead the Congress to grant NRC k, . %* 4t'ch t.m st. j
- i. Y 5 Dh 44 oqi . I I. t authority to issue Temporary Operating Licenses (TOLs) $b JN i
," /
- continues to esist today." As you know, Congress . . '
.i granted TOL authority because of TM1-related activities 5' y dN'jr'f s
J..f3,' }t; O..')I'..
,I (g h 1h t h e r',? t! b
.' I(
'! ,I that had interfered with routine licensing efforts.
Among the TM! activities was the assignment of 'foc9.,"4.;!,
/',
77x 1 ( '? substantial staff resources to *T4! Lessons Learned
- tasks. Does the current request citing tne previous pl y, ' / N by *'J' e.I. t il s
Congressional rationale for Tot,'s mean that the temporary MfH iQf .d th!/ ' - 's 1 f y, reassignment of NRC's licensing staff to *TMt. Lessons-Learned
- taste continues to affect the reviev h . d; 6 l* '
9 f:k schedule for near term operating licenses? Please 1
, a h*jy.
., 1 O '.
].i9'.} }" ,
s>>.
.!p elaborate? l f
- kv4Q,
- f .
- 15. If Temporary Operating License authority were in effect, ) t jif f ,j,--!,[(,,; ;;
t C ./ how might it apply in a case line syron-17 4'u, . I, L g;y ; .1
,s
.?T Y slb.o @l . F h
c. b ( kh. @K r i d$ . g?@ %pl.x n .- 2 s '. h n O I! ' s %3M,'j D QM j. " p' ) ! 1: f'4{+% h MMth n; hyt m'! h ]{. / 3 .I.i I!h
$N ),v M,d p 'y
;j
.c ' . N x )i i . V I
.i t h. , .
': - k; ,,r fM '4 s: 4,p).' p J1 ; > :, m
!:.j:
f y p sd [' d. M; .,Vs, h, f.h I. n b.y n W . ** y' 4 p!)ph !f u t , I{ '
. Nh k$$&$$&&&f&&h hhh
. j< ,s
- E ' ' *--
^ - ""*
- d[MbhCN710,4dNM& .
i
.. m t. ' ~
~ . ,
NN N YM kI[th 'M-m- .- ; -- u..' dim " W eqIl 0j! d (ft 11 4- lp,f t, y 726 f hd h i
.i 19. In the P $
a g l _. hf For all nuclear plants with valid Coretruction Permite.please* provide a, table.j. .i
* ,,, g re cor.t s coego
- 16. but no Operating License as yet,
, i. which contains the fo110 wing informations t l !
.~ q y h l j ll .
date of filing of report ofr.. thetr.. f Y a A.v esory C _ itt.. on ...ct.r ..f. ..r.. u
.y + #.-f h _ secuen lean of the Atomte energy Act of us4, to J. I ) l ;, F[ ;' ' tar.
I ja * (Il* c) (estimated) date* of filing of Itcensee's Final amendeds i *
~
di tu!LOM"tu. ;;*' rasn> inn, by of the the intuat safety f */? 20. rinally I ll fdl h.'
? svaluation of flun, of aNRCu msta.rtuppienents, jn o. m.e.co
[ ' ei issumated,Reportn om iesum.ied, date,ienon date ...
- Ifof the Y inte.,ated Cosa.ei n s
) , e, s. Design InspectLon conducted by NRC's Office of , a l.f'J u,g g g g o,
,4-l , l , , . .
- f. Inspection and Enforcements g)- (estimatedl completion date of NRC's Construction
-q' /l, $
= r e t.n.
were cas
- pres are<
(} Assessment Team review 8 estimate of completion date of , p'f , e y'o.' p ; rate ini h 'y h) Ltcensee's current '. , >
- fj hot functionalcettmate testingt of complotton date of hot
;( Y.s < e tace 3, %)
f ha; tonger i tu 'j+ ' , . , 11 4RC's current 'O ,"II.h":/ , curp
- tpf 61 ' functional testings I
.t t..
compv u , 9
/'
j), Licensee's current eettmated date of fuel loading .t r."
't {.' f'j Itcense
'h;?'
? ;; d i- ,If k) NRC's current estimated date of fuel loading ( ,
\s fd *)',f.t g; 1) licenses Issuance of low power licenses Itcensee's current ]; j' hi f (. Jg- 3 7 estimated date? MRC'e current estimated Itcensee's date) '
'y .
m) Issuance of fuit power ItcenseNaC's current estimated , f
! current estimated date?
f y
, g,r
'.Y . 4 h' licensee's a
5 y d. n )s encement of commercial operationsNRC's current e$timated k& ' l' current estimated date? . i, 4'. N date?
-N ?' ,f
- N fi ,
figieh ja -(t.
, ;e , g 0) NRC's Standard Assessment of License Performance
($ ALP) f or 1991,,194 2 and 199 3. f E lg. j
"*"*"'""**'"*"*""""' d&
(
.y[i) . y .hgY what are the key reasons why r ,' In the Commmission's view, M 17.
the Grand Cutf 1 nuclear plant, which received a low 14 v' 4Kd . ? power Ltcense in June 1982, as yet the time the has not received low power Itcensea was W],- Uh - b80 3,f i t tuli power Itc.nse? Atextent were the techntcal spectitcations p ., i
; d.8$[ y >/
; % 4 Lesued, to what applicable to Grand Cult 1 appropriate for the plant's
'; ? ,,
design? Please enumerate which, if any, violations of i l d'4%!.,fgh t
]gf the technical specifications have occurred to date as e f .l j L' . f, result of there having been inappropriate technical
. . T' i
.'t J r. f f))'f'Idy!S$
f >A{b {m - t...T ;, f-
"k.d spectitcatLons at the time of assuance of the low power Itcense?
g, if ; N 1, heig,.,g .,lpi' s In the Cometeston's response te question 3 feo'ntained la O'
;f' * *M Y
- 18. Attachment el you note that the NRC has informed (
f *l ' t l '
- t M,f*i .f. l I,' Loutstana Power 6 Lt4ht *of 'the need for further
'l'$ Lm M l*a*NNUsE derIa$"i UNa'N'Mu N'N'$6 ; ;U,1, "
EUlTM . > of tne ucensee s responeer M;pMag. % d ,' a w y.4 <; 4'
.- 5 pH+, ,. hw.e.dtpo+ol a .
s %w."> f . %,. h } wf,1
.w i h , , s Q
$ p.g.a i M g,TTQf d .,, e dl .O -
< &; +-
TC%.y~s nm ; u.1 ( '
.e*m%}y d i t, 4
me yj A" # :
# 6.WI p i il n.
;'..#s/,]8gMp h.*tn .gN , "
e 7. y
' qhr 1 .)
y,:f.' bp. V, s,4 ' 1 A a jN [. h f!
) ' j !' '
- L. ' . . , %6 kg h IJ, I
! $'6 f, f.. ;
/ 6' t M k , c, ,, j i ,t* p. j y t [,Y p 4.r - . c N ' q, &&&m l.sl:,. ,
$ ${Y! , /
- T;. ,
h* ' a
. U5.hh Y' 05 ' * -
4 *J N #'?? % W .4.deJ h ht Y h W." pa l f+ h, 'Y?s if.f, h[', i y ,"J D.wy M.U'. W $ { .. \,d "!h',,TMiC*ffT* t g.'UJ tJ 7S &t.
,0 f i & , h & @)6'yll' $
&p$%&%, b40&..t& f $] f
?
$&di dlh'JMbbi[,f h#$$MS$lMM@&lfM,f,': n M $ M $(Ed" $ a G.
d p a y .d,i '; I[I i a i i i l Stt 4-}V p . , 'l'+ v . ' j.
N'i g Q j h,%.j't
, g b '
t kW' g
,h', 'ig.4 M' tb !., ,i.** -4.y
'pnpXyp @ df.ga #r t ,cW W . -. , m i UE
.e
; . / ;, ', r t .. I '. {. ,
, d ,,; 19, In the Comission's response to question 3 (contained in hp) er A g 3 t . '"
- f .,' . f q Attachment al, you refer to an ongoing NRC investigation a .
' -g', of alleged "falstitcation and inaJequacy records at the waterford plant.' In itg%t of t ts e of construction j,l pf,,', f lf* t Qe 2
. . t ; g ';j 4. >
l !*' efj tit!@h a
,/ i d Commission being unncertain as to tne date of completion il I e.d.f' l 5
/ #((.' '
d, . of the NRC investigation with regari to falsification Cf a , N-c%- h'W,,33{w'1 w.; ' t records, w is tne basis for the Comission's following . stat...nt, hat J i
,,1, ygf[.p&
J 2 f,l t fM oj p- ;, f *y
...e "The NUC staff reviews and actions with regard ,
n
;.] : i. 4.)'Agk.h.i
;ig. ,
ev ' to the adequacy of construction records, now are ir
*, targeted for completion in a hance of the applicant's W @4s 24 nI [ gd Q['y[
. 6 4 'l '
current fuel loss date (Say 31, 1984).* *
- i. ;
16 , g, ,.,s t." Ogh";j, f' ; 6
'l r Finally, let me retterate the question raised in my tb
'i< 3* l g- ' {p
,;,,./
ty
- 23.
Decemcor 4,1963 letter to the ;omLasion ter wnic5 I at
'j l*
k$3ig 4 ',.h 8,
' i yet have not receLved a response. On J,aly 14, 1983, tre
*p I f*MJf ,'.
4 ntse * '!.:( ) .- , Co etssion informed ee that it dLd not ifitend to mate a , l
'N g!.g % %' O l'
decision en T91-1 maaageee9t competencya u til tre e
, s J
' " relevant portions
- of tre TML-2 lean rate investigation .
fM M h'(, * " , / ' , '
- ton ,
were complete. Now tre Commission ma)Crity seems t .l l /. ; , , , * , , prepared to allow restart pricr to co*pletion of tee lean ,1 , of cate investigation. Please explain what has hagrerad l h. dd t,v ! since last J41y to mate it e s.c 9 tSat the Comiss ton ts ,'gDj]I
;.'f g). '
?,
et longer believes that the less rate investiqation ,'eeds to ** .
- be coeplete prior to a decision on TMI-1 m.nnagement f ,t '
' i mj ccmgeten:y?
gl.'S M.,' '; * -
,ent 1
u.
.: n ,m, t, .N;.
. n f, . -
1, * ,..
. ;. . 'r; -
. . .'; [a' ;,9 . .
reJ , I 't
- i j
A na,7~n - 5 '. J, ee's :
- a '
m fag(h d.O n 'c a J.w.:.Q'. r. s iau@.,i.h..
!b :f*. . T)
, p. ,. v ay -
id.,, i
@$@i $r,s . ,.
l' 4.m. 3 2, .,. $.'d.ml'.,t c i . . <
, I 5
I h:. N.go- ~. @k ' . [l 9
; %,,.g . . , s .u .. , .
-r ,, '
,qim;q:s \ ? , '
3'.: P.'o, . t: > ;,,, . .
.ib pi A s d i 1 in fiE'Q'.f'. ' .i
' ,, e at4s
%)d.y,W i th'. '
1n u ,
' t
},.o.'.,,
y' i. , , *
. t
'Jf I A ,$', '
p f Ul' ,, t . fl
- v.iht} *J .
@fQdl.ec ,
l r , ri. 4,f..%"it,,'."1 .
.t i A
-4 *l )
1 aN f . N.ij$
' , f,g n,
,, . ,j l4 ,y I
?
> d U ,.i sk i..\,,, *y' !
i d,
- e, g, i t h,,V t [ * ?
6 _l
, it r d451f lR '
W/ * *
.s
- I ll 4 [Y eg 's . )
M t.,: . ; j %,r
, e l;.,,- ,
5 sf~ N[J_ f '"a
. - - . . ~ . . .
,T- ' vMi d.;1 W.h .i c '
5 fY14 % 'h ;
., . 1, 6
I [* ** ud&bk, r%% ~ Th ! 1
?W 728 p h,pk h Si? i 9 t
- f. e '. ih .
r.1, 's - um'm. $d$ f w <N -, .. o
,. . S. .
L ***"ld."';^21"l.,f."''"', 34, , [ 3 i; J ,. [ ) .., n . nu '.; e . .- g .p.
\ ,' o /
y 9 .a ;g ., jj'Q [;$f ,1 1 J
- jA It 40-7 %g., cen.mu k
Q $ '""" *
$ f: 1::a:::;;;P."*i:",,T:!Me". .. . .
l .,1 ~ .
'Y'.9 1! ':O;",it..;"
fn M.u"e"u"s"a'w*r
..or. i .. o c '.;;. aus :P ,0,'"u!! d!!:'" ~
'7 , . sg c 2 t1 4 [l 3 s, a ....,.o.,,_,
'^ " *
- I Ei4EtId'.I,'I*tI.E.Tr'tilIl$.NNhI'e$. ,3.#*Y r is$if -
'p .) f .l.:
.! ip, r.::n.r::',::atit":,::: "" " ""~," -""- " " - .? A a "" t
- pdhg{p, h pb c: W u .. o , , ,, u . . ., ,, , o . . . . . . . . . ,i . o . i . . ..
si.u ,.i,,
? f,.""*o""
0 oiscusun w DM. c-Pl fij 7 p p h' M
-( ,' - wouto cotcr i
- t w h tj bAjp
', sto, m m b
i g!
' a~io . e.naia kky.qg@b@jh'h r
3 if t n i:q:n::: come eu.s c - .n T hje .
,, ,,,. ... ., t.,.. .' u^"s - t*
2p '.- Ng~ bgg," Ik ,'b .
.! ,y' er m nec
@@id " l:
- i. W $n
"*b !th:.'t}e,s S : .-
' . il.
. f, . C0W '%S bpif,!:P8l;$)yi l; Qi y , 'e l
'J 1 Atm wita a uu.ane m
.?'
! ., MGNigl3} $ ,,.ur. .
,(' l$.
H,Mhp!f(.j$f$ gF f
,', mTi WMat?ARO W;1 D '
'Y.
,') ?,[, ,
y
<d - ., n.
if,'dk}[u 6 3h T ' fi ,. ,. ,t;u . mO u 9-l[phjjp; :
' . '4 b .w. i (?;
G :'rN i 7T ify{)i,L tlfr
'! D, }
+,
,v ,
i 7') f3.e@JhW3paffi n fgi u o nsuip]$qp$p 'L c,' ; [' A M[Mh'Y$iNif }$g i hf1, ,, tV T
.R . 5 .) .
y%iGQ'?[l' $kr . h,j4 gg h ! S 4 j Uj
.( ] r,.jWg g jdh 3 ,
I.
i w w m sehd 4 wen d b.#..a h'a m. e n;c y N:!j; r m.,d - l6;g{% I 1 767 QgQ
., , . ~ . s
) ,j j gESTION 16 . FOR ALL NUCLEAR PLANTS WITH VAllD CONSTRUCTION
' i. r. . a%< . .,.,i #, '
bPE0VER, IT IS WORTH ^
..f If.hh '
S A POSSIBLE. CANDIDATE'
#h.'
l - . 1T CONSTRUCTION HAD'
'" " 'OI YE RECEIVED A TEMPORARY' ^ ^
Uf f';f;r [ ADVISORY CCMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS y Et0MMEND ATION. THE . j e.l . *' EVELATION UF RECU! RED BY SECTION 182B CF THE ATCMIC , . 2* .ENER
'7/; f.
SY THE HEARING PRCCESS ' j:! ' ' UR REGULATORY PROGRAM, (C) (ESTIMATED) DATE FOR FILING OF LICENSEE'S (:J; FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT , , ' .. , v (ESTIMATED) DATE OF FILING OF THE INITIAL (D) y'id,'t *$ SAFETY EVALVATION REPORT (SER) BY THE NRC y?
..: p ,
STAFF y ;; (E) (EST! MATED) DATE OF FILING OF ALL SER ,; '; SUPPLEMENT $l '
.s (F) (ESTIMATED) COMPLETION DATE OF THE INTEGRATE ,
DESIGN INSPECTION CONQUCTED BY NRC'S OFFICE' I' > a OF INSPECTION AND ENF0itCEMENT; ! 's- * (ESTIMATED) COMPLETION DATE OF N9C'S ..f. (G) [;',W h -
' r [.. ) , ,
CONSTRUCTION ASSESSMENT TEAM REVIEH1 (H) LICENSEE'S CURRENT ESTIMATE OF COMPLETION ii > a
,l, DATE OF HOT FUNCTIONAL TEST!NG; f' '
' i D,,'[i:,'
(!) NRC's CURRENT EST! MATE OF COMPLET!CN DATE ' '
, HOT FUNCTIONAL TESTING; ' '
(J) LICENSEE'S CUDPENT ESTIMATED DATE CF FUEL e LOADING LICENSE; L
.g tW e
I. ( l.,f. * . e J f....:.,
, ,W' .'.'
fi*
. lj ' 5.
l .< :
~-
- . ~. - me-o
-- ~~~gg g' ,%, {>
- g. - .. .- .g@y,,,3-- - - - ~
;$b$bb5kS:hM?NXrG'Yk%fM:fea*n2y. < . .cn 5:
7fg j [i . 4& $ ^ (C)' (ESTIMATED) F R- l (x)' NRC'S. CURRENT: ESTIMATED DATE OF FUEL
$ j) (FSAR) - Colui LOADING LICENSE; j
{ y , (L) ISSUANCE OF LOW POWER LICENSES LICENSEE'S
'i
! (D) (ESTIMATED) F l
I CURRENT EST! MATED DATE? NRC'S CURRENT (SER) - Cotus
' ' ~
1 d , ESTIMATED DATE7-
/,'! .
(M). ISSUANCE OF F ULL POWER LICENSE: LICENSEE',
.E)';-(5ST!
( MATED)F f ,, kt >
' CURRENT ESTIMATED DATE7 ;NRC'S CURRENT
/ q*,) - Mi 1AND TIMING OF
' ' e
[ N
.l (N)
ESTIMATED DATE COMMENCEMENT OF COMMERCIAL OPERATIONS: l* i IS NOT P9EDIC [M '. - LICENSEE'S CURRENT EST! MATED DATE? NRC'S
; 0, Y (H) llCENSEE'S C CURRENT ESTIMATED DATE?'
l ,'
' TEST [NG COLUr l
f h . (0) NRC's STANDARD AS'5ES$ MENT OF l!CENSEE ]h[g )')h 4 [ip - PERFORMANCE-(sal.P) FOR 1981, 1982 AND l983. I
. .c ! ,
t ;,
,i . ' ;.%,.g h .
I 8 (J, K AND L)
.. 4 ANSWER, TABLE I CONTAINS MOST OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED ASouNm m
&f.lK,8f '} f [gs; !J'f
,m S, m tu eueR u Mt
$nt <. PLANT NAME - COLUMN 1. NOT INCLUDED IN THIS TABLE ARE LOADING AND (A) h.)
CANu u ED eu - S ui = . aiu R SEND 2 - a m ,S l e au Sec_s e, n7
;pHd%gh) p 2, iNx ,iNi - x ,n uD eu NTS (s m S - E A-1 ANo A.2), (. COL
, ch ['P IZYr.fi
, -m '.0 WNP-1,-YELLOW CREEX 1 AND 23 AND RECENTLY ABANDONED 1
(M) PLANTS (MARBt.E HILL 1 AND 2), . .- llCENSEE't) nM4 Jhy6 t' ISSUAWE CF tr IB) (EST! HATED FILING DATE'0F ACRS REPORT - COLUMN 2 . i:M@ytigs V l'l :, '
,U. t gm )
GENERALLY 5
.d u%,i i
. g. guy
;1
.i fj!
PQ r t ) I Nynf!l)c.f yy N .
,1 M AM !.'
m.9[gif.i. r
'..MlQ@;fm,A p
b BRERERBER[h$
t
.)
i h,n w $[d@L
, ?pi wi w u a ~
(,{ $,@f.h(.4j 769 N,p 6 37 j,. ; fj+My)ig;f@ ljt . :t E OF FUEL- ', (C) (ESTIMATED) FILING DATE OF FINAL SAFETY' ANALYSIS REPORT y h .
f ; (FSAR) - COLUMN 3 I L.,r;(M e .yd}
SEl LICENSEE'S ,t hIN
!;g'h,Igh.k'I[
QD! L S CURRENT y
~
(D) (ESTIMATED) FILING DATE'0F INITIAL SAFETY EVALUATION ' REPORT h k [ 'Yfb
.Ij j
'. (SER) - COLUMN 4 i
yjtT@tt .s'4@j c,': J dSE: LICENSEE'S ;~6..p S CURRENT (E) (ESTIMATED) FILING DATES OF AL'l SER SUPPLEMENTS ... L'
.A - hTHE h$
'f W 6NUM , .y}/
p M j [M i
^L- AND TIMING OF SER SUPPLEMENTS VARIES FROM PLANT TO PLANT AND ' I PERATIONS: $ IS NOT PREDICTABLE. '
I DATE? NRC'S
'I !;jmg x.x;d:;
(H) LICENSEE'S CURRENT ESTIMATE FOR COMPLETION OF HOT FUNCTIONAL j*j ,(; , LICENSEE
, fWk.h. j ., .
TESTING COLUMN $. gQ
', i g t,',a 2, -
1 1982 AND 1983, TLy ki l
* (I) IHE NRC STAFF DOES NOT SEPARATELY ESTIMATE HFT COMPLETION. hl.[. ,'.k 5;;;f/.. l, .G l !
i hv q . % REGUESTED AS I (J, K AND l) y~3 , llCENSEE AND NRC STAFF EST! MATES OF FUEL LOADING LICENSE AND L siih,k' ?! './ ; ; LOW POWER LICE' SE DATES. IN PRACTICALLY ALL CASES FUEL 7ABLE ARE LOADING AND LCn POWER LICENSE DATES ARE THE SAME (IT IS ALSO
..f '
O 2 AND HARRIS , SYNONYMOUS WF H CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION). LICENSEE DATE -
.h ' - AND A-2), '
COLUMN 6, NRC STAFF DATE - COLUMN 7 , 4 CONED I [ i* im y,,E '.sf 1 PAST , I ,k [ ,h,[ h,,; (M) LICENSEE'S AND NRC STAFF FULL POWER LICENSE DATES. , y m. 4 . n .- t . EXPERIENCE INDICATES THAT ABOUT 3 TO 7 MONTHS ELAPSE BETHEEN if N ISSUANCE OF AN OPERAT!NG LICENSE LIMITED TO LOW POWER AND .. . tr ; o
+ FULL POWER AUTHORIZATION. THE LICENSEE AND NRC STAFF 00 NOT j, ,g', '. r .
GENERALLY SEPARATELY ESTIMATE FULL POWER AUTHORIZATION DATE. l a..,[..
} * ,
; M.H : L ,
h.').h .' ;; *. i $ $ha d .' ' ' h.b5$l& m t. n. - I hl 9 j E , k MM;, ' ,
.).$GQQ*nj.,
- s. me t. , e : - ;!
I $ el . l
?!M
- .r.%' ,'. ,' a .. . . .,
e $$ $ n t o 1 g,ff$phW j.t dh*).i,M; if , b,-), 6i M
?q ]1if, w ;
? i @.*
[ M.RC.4?PSWyfijrrliT.NArW,f, % M/d$p K ,jy3$g5,T,kihg)h rr b fp . ,,
~~
n R4 [ $'5 gt fy f.0 [i . 770
~
THE RESPONSES TO THE FOL1,0NING ITEMS ARE INCLUDED !N TABLES 2, 3, {3 fy 4 AND 5. ~ 23 c, I i iUlj ,g.i, '( y
! (F) (ESTIMATED) COMPLET!ON DATES OF THE INTEGRATED DESIGN p;,g r ,
' g , ,',
,f INSPECTION (IDI) - IABLE 2 L' ,,d Y Pts O I
.ji .'
l :-' (ESTIMATED) COMPLET!ON DATES OF CONSTRUCTION APPRAISAL TEAM q'
- h. , l (G)
I' , ii . i REVIEW - TABLE 3 , W y qi b ., g g NRC'S SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF llCENSEE% L{, e : 1 L PERFORMANCE
,jg t (0)
$2 ' "'(SILP)
- FOR 1981, 1982, 1983,'- TABLE f4 ,
f., , , y ,. f, $ gg~) a [' , (P) PARTIES ADMITTED TO PUBLIC HEARINGS - TABLE 5
- t ',
f "i .g .. , dj : g$ 1q - . id u a
.. em
' I '
ty
! r,.g
! Mi uc -
9;;'fbiW'
)MM }
- I h
%glggf{
W4 MTg l i. lfq W 1 ill t ~;
%@Jll$4 h) j ;saN $a -rg t l ' - -
16I
' l ffM,3id S !l]
Tf
%i ,gh
$se#y u' a
& B, mipefiefg$f}
h kfi
$ lr "
w$..,; % li! r aD' o
. u.
a'
m S b $ Q _ . . .-- m m o 2 m u -
,iC
.g ( _s 7j.
- q. -- - ..- : < -
a 2-. z r ys.%_p.. ~. .- -r ... ;.c. ,,.-' .. . 3 y ,o n t3 F m H
.dea p, -_ g,. , ; -9 g.
z u g r> > M > v=, , . _ ' u .m'A- - - . . m to b-
- 4#.9 3 --z' O I m
m d 9 IU4-A
- 4. r.f2 M1'eAr .E '*v T. (. 3,4
..w.. (;*
m p r-
. ,u.. yP' t-%:*J. *% . tis*
'f
-4 '4 r,--
2 m ' ;. U+M-# y. V O**%.' -
' Qh1%.~ N)M r . M.r
,W* - )C.
e - W C*,h I
,.. y- . yrb .
e
- 4 m),,g>g-%.w..% 4p +,.e e ,- s
?
. . . , . . r-w~.s
. a
^
5 ?s,,Q.s 14Pm-6..w.Q.x~n-m;gMN3$.Y* k'*R$LY o.. U1 **C' .
- t MvGew%e. g .
bA.m, TABLE 1 k.% y*,qr e N;- FRS TSAR SER hFI LICENSIF NRC SIAff L Q. ,,h 7* k'*;[ F't Am t NAMt; Ptfew1* Darc* DATE* Dart
- L yinjt D A T F, ' t K f NM . C A Tj_ *
.,W. ,.-g. . . _ _ ,
%e ~ ~ w .-
nravtu VA:ttv 2 10/% C 9/84 9/85 6/86 04 06/36 , ,M. b..a r g.a.aa ,4. M,
.,w r g . ;~ m ... . -
BI t t t t omit I 3/87 C 2/87 3/87 - 10/87 10-12/87 y..
,WI-
..,.(.-p. b9.. %rpy Ef t t t f 0 Nit 2 3/87 C 2/87 7/89 1/90 8/85 10-12/89 M: D , $ -c;"2 W: -Cf -
paso oop 1 5/84 C C 3/85 01-05/86 ,.w F.e%.CD,JU.( . % BPAIDWOOD 2 5/84 C C 9/85 8/86 01-09/37 b 8YRON I C C C C 7/84 07-09/84 $,
,[wg'.s.
,C. .p. m~'.'-AC,..s a~ - 'A BvRon 2 C C C 2/85 10/85 10-12/85 W A M.. ~Ps a.
l cat t away i C C C" C 5/8ti 04-G6/64
'TM.u w -[. 5.*.
,9,.7f[#7 V r-n Catawsa 1 C C C C 6/84 07-09/84 re m; g1,i.
p w, . CAIAWRA 2 C C C 6/86 10/86 10-l?/E5 d
~ w fCNBt""!- I Ns '.-. ; Ctinion I C C C N/A 1/86 01-03/EG -Qg,'f-ij '
Comanche PtaK 1 C C C C 9/84 07-09/84 2 M.*,*,*?jy"~ L .. . .'- CenancHE Pt At 2 C C C NIE 1/86 10-12/86 T 8/84 07-09/84
%~ + W.-9*%.
'., S
.b.s.';.
.'2E.r.
Dianto Canvou / C C C C .'W.p% s p SQ % #. ..- n 9/84 07-09/84 M,-c.%m% FERMt 2 C C C N/A .w W ,- l Gramp Gute 2 C C C N/A N/S N/E [1,d:.,Y_M. . . . . .?. 6/85 10-12/S5 D. %<.-.p. 1 HARRIS 1 C C C 1/85 r . . M.~ ". .
. M h- ,.
1 HOPE CRE EK I 11/84 C 10/84 N/A 1/86 04-06/E6 C C N/A 8/84 01-05/85 ['~.: N@L*) cc b ; x. -*- Limatcx 1 C Nc:1* L l MF R I C K 2 C C C N/A 2/90 y N/E ,:4yy c 4* " p' ;,- ,
.>%W r?W.'. \s A-.t%
*MkN
.h.<.3*T'l5h*3 ,.:.;
%r c,$~d w'eq..,h f 4 ^-
Lf.*!?-f>
-w ':
efi*
'94.D^,,'.'a.
*.t W if >. .t , a . m D. ~ N 'CZ.C.
]& *
~
.', 'J Q ' _GA . .-nee na .
,; :y..g- Iw, ;; is-:' %
- N$..
~
#~*** -
c;
~^
n.
" ' ' '~ ~
L
~
fQ(~??. W ~q' . j[.*
$ hf: A ~- p';*m.s'S r y ;. -
. . ~
- nq -.'.g'. f.'
- s _ .- ~.:_. %.-'..
.,,: ,d *
' x.4.= .u. Y-.se.
y_~
,a ff.'r.:m' w; :Q5 'rei j4,G. w+ ,.Q : '.
~1=~. 4 ,:~
s; . _ . . _m3 -
.s.. w 4. .,:. : -.
eg .:... *. ~<u-: m:.
- Ow h.n:
..- ww; : .
m n
.*g;7 *
.*g.
. ' ' *.- s
' w*
. . ~.s.
, *7. ,-~.* r e T* .
.-l,~~~
' '
- w .n , w%.f,,a,.
-- . ;*.:r . ' . I M ;^ * . L j , , -. v . .L.f ff.y -%.--
, -' ~ sk - . , 7. ~;.
- 4. ;.c - ,. __ .7 *
.'.- I'{,i , , ,
g - ' . ' + { ~' ' f [ 1.- [. ' - (Qj f ; N.- ' ; - . 2..
- . _r- .
J
'' ^ . " . . , , _
.-. - m .. %
- e a.. . . . . . . _ * '
" ..we- -=-e * . ,_4
,,-_.{-*.e. , , , *. . *
--- v.
-- . ~ :. e.. . _.: a_ . r.. ;.zQ, ; ... L -m.~
=xy; ; ~$Ei'N -W
'^;--=.; W..' =?..-c.. ~r .*^;M..M W :2=.. =. =c='t. y~y.m+~<>.----,-
~ ~
fe&. m:%:'*: T 'T. &.,2~~ - .xc- '. =-1'
- -2a .
. a.
. f 5D W 7Y["^
- i -d}"_ NNNb.N* iM(. AM:df**T D_4-g, . p,1hN'6DM}*W A',30
.y e M' * : M -+h'b.E i' n*: ~%
G[.w-%' a.[.f-@i-i M; -4.3 4%:O$~$ FM :E," Y.I
-$ XbM ih:w*kNi[h-i;
+#/* WiM :.
f ~ ~ % R ' L'A'i? &? Q 8 A. % 0 V%'*
- N,h il[ % . N M hj$}$ M. *N [ wema7[g;v:=hy ptffC /:c-7 9 w .i-e. w +.m .m..m.2 =:.re &;-y'
- 9 %
w p wJ cw##-$rh.t, Nh ~" Id ' {$ he. p(h.p'h;Il YANd[*qw( F W ;/f., 39((1$.[M7'.' fin'* h MIk$ a k < y p$ p$.Y m
$Y$$$ru h hhhh hhh hYh?gi jf d gg h5 g.., ,_
- N
, . _ ; -; - : * , u - ~_W . --T~ , _
- 9. . > ,,_. ,._, ~. gg =. .-~ ~._ . .-
_ ._ ._- m-
~. ~ -__ 7 ' _- - -- ~s- - -
l
. -. ~.- - . -_,- . ._ ,wnn ._ , . _ ,_
-_m
_ _ . _. 7 : r4% .. p ..._ .e. , $5c iff' g y
~.' 'ir 1 -
j p... TABLE 1 te [Lia"-gm,'u M , m, SER NFT LICENSEE NRC STAFF ACRS FSAR LICENSE DATC* L1ctust DATE* kw _Pt r N T N AME pgqqJ* . DATE* DATE*. DATE* N/E 2/85 .N/E-
; 'g MiDtAuD 1 C C 'C 7/86 07-09/86
!,;,Qg.;-- .;.g C C C N/E , crw MIDtAND 2 t m# N. j'J -
@t. 7/84 6/85 11/85 04-06/86 MittsToNE 3 8/84 C h $ 1/85 C 12/84 9/86 2/86 10-12/86 NINE M3tE Po!NT 2 h
o% w h PAto VERDE 1 C C C C 3/85 01-03/85 I'l* Cc4b. ' yi PAto VERDE 2 C C C 1/85 12/85 10-12/85 C 6/86 3/87 01-03/87 C C ~ iato VERDE 3 5 C C C N/A 12/84 04-06/86 JLNM'%.fr e
- #* ?'t. % q.aw-:$ W PERay 1 PEasy 2 C C C N/A 5/87 ~07-09/88 m# hMP.) 6/84 C- 4/84 5/85 4/85 04-M/86 h h)' D_N,,
RIVER BEND 1 C C C 8/84 12/85 10-12/86 SEAsRooK 1 s - ; Ji C 2/87 4/87 NIE 2 C C 3 .. Stacaoor 2 C N/A 3/84 07-09/8ti ?a- 9,,.
. y. .
SHoREHAM C C 12/85 10/86 12/86 10-12/87
- ",y. ,
+ SOUTH TEXAS 1 1/86 C t* 12/85 4/88 12/88 10-12/88
%q W '.* SouT'H TEXAS 2 1/86 C C TL[~ . Y' #s4NE SusoutitANNA 2 C C C N/A C 4'4.8 00,4-
-**?
e 7/85 C 6/85 7/86 9/86 04-06/87
] y, g& !-
V0GTLE 1 VoGTLE 2' 7/85 C - F/85 2/88 3/88 0J-09/88 N/E -r .l M"errM [ h.g - WASHINGTON NUCLEAR 3 9/84 C 8/84 NIE 6/87'
'M C C :, ','C 'C #~
5/8ti' 7 07-09/8tl E '
' WATtRroRD 3 Y C<
- '~
b 1 M M,:. .
~
i* , '
. - . +-
3 QM %, =--
-5kWy
% m
%, e * -.
'~ '
^
. , -'-.( ', T '- -' , ~ - ?;- v-c 44'-~ [~-.f~?
~'~-**~.-:
-: m
. .w_
~- s-
--(_
}.'%.qn 1m*=; _
- ,;- n- , .. .
mg
.;w%y w ..
' - ~ -
- ;;, n n J- 3 .i 5., TABLE I D*% - Q h_ - ,
.. o ,
NDC $TAFF
- .;'jt? IgRfk &
, ACRS ISAR SER .' l!FT DATE*
- Licensee LICEnst DATE* 1 M oqt CATE*
bd. - DAll* . E81L* PLM_Tdfd 'FFPORT*
.6/84 C4-06/84 gg-F. .. ._'Zppy!_~
- a ., WATis IAR I C C
- C C
* '+ ' W
_ / rr c-C 'C 4/E5 12/85 10-12/85 a WTit lw 2 C __ . _ . , ~ ', C C 5/64 9/84 C9-S !85
.u r C n t t. 1 C
&e ... L .:~. _
- g. __ __
wami ,T en N.,c t : u 3 9/D C 8/84 N/E 6/37 N/E g - - , . - s. WAnuce 3 C C C C 5/84 09/84 2 s_g. f.j
$.4- ;-p : . ire;.:
- u m X T'-- 'L ~.:h x-Q* -
a% 4DN L. - W b..... m n',.~,,/ M9,7 u . b4'1PT l' g N T h. , ' _4
.u. w.w y n. , V . ..
.w g&. m,, m W.
- ~
M S. J.A.g [ 4",,L
-A-w
.,,,3 p~@r.W?w r . . -w;.m.;w,M .V:r Mg-'c * ,w - - -
IABLE 1 _ QW++'iQ.-9,:&*" 5 -: SFR HTT i ntastt NRC $1AFF
.7- $ ,
ACRS FSAR (J MM A T(,., p, AN T NAME PEPORT* DAT(* Da"E* DATJ' ! K(NSE D_A T [,* [ *, g hi BAR I -C C C C 6/84 04-06/84 l-{;,.-1k,M;
- p. vomg -
WAITS BAR 2 C C C 4/85 12/85 10-12/85 y y C {ls wotr (utn l' C C C 5/84 9/84 04-06/85 ~g g'y. ff g W, .,,,.y m. W,p.;d{
- .e. s...., r %.,
3
- r. -
- . .: g. , b .a :.~
> t. M . , -
' *' p: .3~.'.:i.* cr .
.F%w.xe- ..g. ,,..~ .. .w.? , -
[ c. g ,'.;,,'.;e"', .?, **l,fl - . r.v ,.e .-
. e L ,.l;- At ;:;s 2 7.-
.cp . .,s~p. r: x.,
4 e, -tw.g - .yy ._.
\p-Wn <..~..
4 QW 't.em 4.a 4 - -
*C - foMPL E TE c.3 . t.-
N/E - No LST jMATE N/S - Nnr S W DULED t@,,**,'> N['.!c;..m " qb y
.m+,.. 7f., , .w.g.
.r r ,
N/A - NJT AFPLICABLE .. .. l7 ,'*:*,*"-. .w. J. ,,}p9 e. ' M.* y <. ** *
,p. &'A
-AO-- % .r y
,.a.
,sys.
==.-. its. G.e ..s~g.-.
g.-w.mg.q . g.
,.5=..
*.s*-,
%'. .% ". J::sp;. ,~yL .'
h.- ^..
- Q*[ ga ,e
<t.W" u
md %<:J
- e .
. .p- -n o.7.*.f. ' -
t +.4; .2. ~2.',-Wf.
,. .; L..> '~
. v . e
.%#,'h.': 5 D.--,"&.- *.-
,,.. .* m +e-. %
1 g.p%-gh.~"Z - -. C J ;.;E e p.M*- sM.,*a- w. ,.O . .c a, g *-: W1
; %=~.-
- y ap-=*S. n [%%',-
- ~g. . ~%,,e .
,,ic f~.. .s.;
.,,/ '
W4.':M - ks,: s- . y
\g.er.s,s
~
. g. r -. nfe.?
g,.f.VM_j w -
,9 4 t yff=t d *$._ -.?'
.W CW,;,r%:.'.W-@'..y;x: z-2.';g y -- o W:,w w:x,,p.5n c .,y2~. . . , , n yy m m, .,n
} 4 Mph &p.wyx hb= TMSMM h b h$$ #hb;.m.Y$ E k ih $gk Yk gh kib 'k - .
Mm% i n.Y{ k iiniEQ?nKQm@MW.iM.Y, . m,w. w- ._wn. ,.. n $?$?b h!$W;%DMRMEEEnEMW2iSMiWMn w ae m w*w. ;. - ;y%w,.,;w.n.u. .
=m%a.v ..,w.,.g
.a.. ,,. , .w, . , >, ,;w. ~.
# c
,a
+
...- s:."
n.,y.c
. ._ f m,.n c. s, .w.-.
r g D-. .g.s,s..'
. .~ .e L..-. ~6. a. . w,,.3v,.
r., . .,% ._e v,. . v .c w..
-. . . .-. - .' :im, y.,
. .Y.,m.n..
t. s
. f.:.
s c ?m.. ., __.
,c*T.g:.'.;.
,.a.
.m..
.- 4
.%. .,-='.,.w.m. ,. .c. .j ;m.
. ,;f*s. , y.: ;.wy. v ., <..
- . . . .f . . ,-
n s
.t, Y. ,-,;-.'.~.r;~., ., .., ., 9:. ,. .'.c.'. ~ .w. .m:.
7
, sQ,, , v.*3.- ,.vh * . ' . - . ~, w g. t. a, Z. .*' -~g"n.w.,a r. L.4 &.u<,":' y:
., v'
. J.".~.= . . w. .~.~.<~r-
. * .2
. ~ ' '
y,t,_ 5. .
,g T m..{; ,. .
;. r. ,
,n,-.1,4 % ,. ; ~ ,- % - , _ _ . .
+. . .y:,. a- ..
.- ,,__.7..i',..;..;*a'],*',,~%* v .s,a qi,,
. _ . - . ; 7*, ;.- . _ 'n . ,:.. . T.4
- v. y
..-?- .__-....V, < . .*
- y,_
*e.
, , r. f . .. ,,- ..,_,...'.s.,.._.;
- d.. . . o.p e. ....g.6.,'
- ,g, ,'sa, _ ;.,
.,y,*,.,
..n...N...~ .
g' ;-- i...N.,.oM..-4..s._.,.,
* < ; ,,J
- h 3._..,..'.
- .a . .
..w " ,. , ..~. _ . _ , ,
,.-w. - ,
. ,., ,.t.. .. ,
m.- ~, ,
# *
- 3# %b.. .W- .g ,e
~
w s-* - .
,...L
..v., + m. . ' .-
., q' '-g ., ., m."a , . +r: .. .c., . , ;. g . ___ y .f a ._. , . - -
_{;
-m- 7_ - . v. - _
# s I
. _ . - - . . . . ._ '. ..** _ - -.-.1..m,.
m .. J ', .fg., g 3 . ,'l.
*~;}}