ML20090L672

From kanterella
Revision as of 01:38, 13 May 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summarizes 840314 Telcon Decisions & Clarifies 840201 FOIA Request for Documents Re Facilities
ML20090L672
Person / Time
Site: Midland
Issue date: 03/15/1984
From: Rice C
KIRKLAND & ELLIS
To: Robinson L
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
Shared Package
ML17320B185 List:
References
FOIA-84-96 NUDOCS 8405260003
Download: ML20090L672 (3)


Text

KIRKLAND &. ELUS

......._,_...,,-..o_..

m ..,a. -

,n, so. , o. .

s, . N,';,Tp ..

in .w s, .o.o.

~

o~ggg= m. *an;;,%=

  • iOPAB March 15, 1984 Ms. Linda Robinson $

office of Administration Division of Rules and Records M?/-MA ,__ 2 d'

T United States Nuclear Regulatory " ', g VA Comission -a A wr * - *

O Ret FOIA 96

Dear Linda:

This letter summarises the decisions made in our con-ference call of March 14, 1984, and clarifies our FOIA request of February 1, 1984.

We agreed to the following:

Item 1 -

We will defer our request until we review the materials under roIA -

02-477 Item 2 -

You will contact William Paton to 1

determine if there are documents other than those in the Public Document Room ("PDR") .

Items 3,- The staf f members will review their 5, 6 files for all documents that are not in the PDR. Each staff member will decide whether he wishes to search his files or have us review his files. Mr. Kane and Mr.

Callagher stated that they would prefer us to review their materiale.

Item 4 -

The staff will determine if there are documents other than those in the PDR.

vitN6003 L . 6 o u, 040201 '.

MCCs-96 PDR :

KIRKLAND& ELLIS Ms. Linda Robinson

, March 15, 1984 Pace 2 Item 7 --

You stated that Mr. Ca11acher has retained only one box of Midland raterials which we may review.

You also informed us that Mr.

  • Maxwell did net retain any mate-rials other than the inspection report and that Mr. Phillip has retired.

Item 8 --

We will defer our request until we review the materials under the prior FOIA on these issues.

1 Iten 9 --

The staff will look for documents responsive to item 9(a) other s. cn correspondence between the NRC and Consumers Power Company. In addi-tion, the staff will look for all documents responsive to items 9(b)-

(d).

Item 10 -- The staf f will search for documents relating to the second and third SALP reports. We will review the prior FOIA materials on SALP I.

Items 11-- The staff will search for documents and 12 responsive to these requests.

Item 13 -- Withdrawn Item 14 -- We will defer our request insofar as it relates to doeurents internal to the NRC until we review docu-ments in the PDR and the NRC refor alates its position on this subject.

In addition, we made two supplemental requests whic.h '

you asked us to confirm in this letter. The requests ares (1) All documents relating to the actual or potential need for a management audit of Consumers Power Company, including but not limited to the NRC's consideration and decision to require such an audit, and

KRKLAND& ELUS Ms. Linda Robinson March 15, 1984 Pace 3 (2) All doeur.ents provided to or prepared in connection with any briefing of the NRC Conmissioners relating to the Midland Nuclear Plant and all documents, includ-ing memoranda and notes, prepared by any of the Comissioners.

You saio that you would resoond to us on March 16, 1984. We lock forward to that response.

Sincerely,

~

/ . )))

N/ 444._

Carol M. Rice O! Rack J