ML20005E538

From kanterella
Revision as of 15:45, 17 February 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Provides Update of Status of Implementation of Resolution of Human Engineering Discrepancies Documented During Dcrdr. Lighting Intended to Document Deficiencies Per NUREG-0700, Eleven Human Engineering Discrepancy Computers Resolved
ML20005E538
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/27/1989
From: Fay C
WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
CON-NRC-89-167, RTR-NUREG-0700, RTR-NUREG-700 VPNPD-89-679, NUDOCS 9001080090
Download: ML20005E538 (11)


Text

-

4h p O! ,jf

,&. ' eq 3

] : ,

R-j i.

y.  :=J' ^^

W' s WISCONSIN Electnc POWER COMPANY 234 W Michiocm, Ro Box 2046, Milwoukee.WI 53201 (414)221-2345 y ' VPNPD- 8 9.- 67 9 9l ' 'NRC-89-167-K Y

$. /.c 1 December 127,-1989

% 1 n

Document. Control, Desk 3 1 j-U. S._ NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

, Mail 4 Station Pl-137 Washington, D.C.-

~

20555 h

i Gentlemen:

DOCKET NOS.-50-266 AND 50-301 1

N OF UPDATED INFDRRATION ON DCRDR N NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2-This letter is being written to provide you with-an update on the 1 status of the implementation of' resolutions to' Human Engi"eering

' Discrepancies-(HEDs)-documented during the Detailed Control Room

Design Review (DCROR)fperformed at Point Beach Nuclear Plant (PBNP).

fan HED resolution.' schedule,'along with all of the UEDs, was submitted'

_ twith thelPBNPiDCRDR' Summary Report on March 31, 1987'. The resolution

? - schedule;and-selected HEDs were revised and submitted'in response-to the NRC audit'of the Point 4 Beach DCRDR on March-29, 1988 (VPNPD-88-186 and NRC-88,033). This submittal provides information on the status of-

.the implementation'of HED.' resolutions and includesa revised resolu-1, tion schedule; Also being provided is information on HED resolutions that:have changed since-the last submittal;in 1988.

The: attached information has been organize'd by HED resolution tcategory.; All HEDs were categorized by the~ general form of.their

. resolution and the resolution schedule was then based on these

~

categories.. The attached Table 1 provides a summary.of the status of

,
each of the different categories, based on the total number of HEDs in

< :each category. Although. dealing with riumbers of HEDs does not really give a: c] ear picture of the amount of work completed because (1) the l scope.of a HED can vary'significancly, and (2) the same discrepancy

'may be repeated ~on several HEDs, the table does give an indication

'that' substantial work'has been accomplished in each category.

. Detailed information regarding the resolution status in each category

_- is provided in Ittachment A.

a Oh. yg27 g ne6 i

e ,

't

'a.' .

uw,,,a_m, a,,,na,,

m_ bL M t

ve

. . , , , . J Y)2 gjo.1 ',4

, <t .R a-re s :

. .g ..

~ NRC, Document: Control Desk' December: 27,'1989  ;

s 'Page 2 '

We would be pleased to answer any questions you may have regarding the

+

'above information.: .

O.

, very truly yours,

. .,L ./

/

- [*kM' ..

'C.;.W F y ^ '

iVice.P esident-  :;

Nuclear Pswer'-  ;

Attachments.'

Copies'to _-NRC Regional Administrator, Region.III

, L 'NRC Resident Inspector s

P 3:

t

?

t f

b I

I

)

i i .. 1

'f.+

u

]-.

1 i f

f

_: j

yy m,n + = - -

3 7- g, s

.M;

%. i TABLE 1

~ ~

g,i .

. Scheduled HEDs Revised Completion y's

, Resolution. -Completion Resolved /- Date.for. Remaining

Category 4 Date -Total HEDs(1) HEDs f l Light'ing 12/31/88: 9/11 12/31/91 F

= Computer, 12/31/88 11/14; 12/31/91 LTrainingL 12/31/88 24/31 '12/31/90

h. Procedura1' Change 12/31/89(2) 101/112 12/31/90 i

Enhancement 12/31/89 21/34 12/31/90 W Annunciator _

. . 12/31/89 19/30 12/31/90' F '

1 Instrument Air ModL 12/31/89- 7/7 12/31/89

?

Labeling 12/31/89 50/86 12/31/90 4 '

, Relocation' _

12/31/90: 5/8 12/31/90.

Control Room Mod -12/31/90 18/28 12/31/90.

1 Meter' Face Mod 12/31/90 1/58 l'2/31/91 D  ; Communication- 12/31/90 2/121 12/31/90 1New-Instrumentation 112/31/91(3) 9/43 12/31/90(3)

Control Mod 12/31/93(4) 25/41 12/31/93(4)

? LTotal 302/515 NOTES

=(1) Total numbers used are as of:3/29/88,.the.date of our latest ~

DCRDR submittal.

9 (2) ; Procedural changes were expected to be implemented by 12/31/88 -

,with the exception of a possible change which requires an electrical' loading study to-be completed. The loading study and

, fassociatedsprocedure change 1were: expected to be completed by the-

'endtof 1989 (see HED No. 457). >

+

1(3) -New Instrumentation was expected'tonbe installed by 12/31/90 with

-the exception 1of-controls and instrumentation for the modified -,

13.8 10/ system (see HED Nos. 290, 295 and 355). However, the 13.8 kV system modifications have been completed and all New t LInrt.mmentation HEDfresolutions should be implemented by-the end y of 1990. ,

i (4)L Control modifications aresexpected to be implemented by 12/31/90  :

with the exception of_. installation of instrument bus static

{

+

trano.er switches (see HED No. 321). j i

Y <

)

i s e-I U

n -

w s

. , A: d Ev . Dec mber 27, 1989 i '

ATTACHMENT'A F'

[ ' STATUS OF DCRDR HED RESOLUTIONS POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 n

y-Lighting The basic: intent of the Lighting HEDs was-to document any deficiencies (based on NUREG-0700) -in normal and/or emergency-

' lighting levels-at= control room work areas. The survey performed during the initial review indicated that lighting-levels were below NUREG-0700 levels in-just about all work areas. An 4 additional survey' performed just prior to submission of the DCRDR Summary Report indicated that; acceptable levels could be attained ,

.in all work areas by insertion of additional lighting tubes in existing fixtures. This led us to: state in the Summary Report that wi expected to have all Lighting HEDs resolved by the end of 1988.

A followup survey was performed by our human factors consultant in January 1988 to ensure that the ne lighting arrangement satisfied NUREG-0700. Levels were acceptable in all locations but in front of the Auxiliary Safety Instrumentation Panels (ASIPS). This new arrangement seemed to be acceptable to all of the operators. In July 1989, an additional survey was performed by WE personnel. The results of this survey showed the lighting-levels to.be.slightly below NUREG-0700 minimum levels, although we are fairly certain that the lighting arrangement did not change. Aftar this latest survey, lighting levels were increased to bring them above NUREG-0700 minimum levels. A two-week trial of this arrangement was judged by the operators to cause excess glare, eye fatigue, and headaches. ,

As a result of the operator feedback, we are going to keep the normal lighting levels as:they are-now, with the exception of the areas in front of the ASIPs.' We are planning to install addi-tional fixtures in front of the ASIPs,-which was an unanticipated addition to DCRDR workload, by the end of 1991. In addition, we

' intend to power a string of fixtures from the second emergency diesel generator (one string is already powered from an EDG) to improve emergency lighting levels. We expect to complete this modification by the end of 1991 as well.

Computer Eleven of the 14 computer HEDs have been resolved. Further action will be taken on the following HEDs:

o HED 786: requires additional software changes, which are scheduled for completion in early 1990.

g- - = ^-

E ,.

lYi *'

h ', .o' HED 793: requiroa softwcra changro that could not ba k ' * *:

  • completed unti1Jthe annunciator data' base was recently .

E; *.

final.ized. We-expect this to be completed by the end of 1990..

o HED 794: requires hardware changes, which will be handled with the changeout-of computer consoles in 1991.

Training  ;

'l Thirty-one HEDs were categorized as Training. Twenty-four have-been' satisfactorily resolved. Of the remaining seven.HEDs:

o' HED 655 should have been categorized as Procedural Change.

.It will be addressed with the other remaining Procedural Change HEDs.

o. .The need for or scope of training for six HEDs has not been resolved to the satisfaction of the DCRDR team. These HEDs are. expected to be fully resolved by December 1990. ,

i Procedural Change <

A total of 112 HEDs were categorized as Procedural Change.

Resolutions to 101 HEDs have been implemented satisfactorily.

However, the remaining HEDs were either not completely-resolved by the' associated procedure changes, or require the results of an ,

electrical loading study, which has been delayed into 1990. We expect that the rest of the HED resolutions will be implemented by December 1990.

v Enhancement Prior to this submittal, there'were 34 HEDs in the Enhancement

, category. -After the Summary Report was submitted, the following changes were made:

o The resolution of HED 339 was changed from enhancing the existing C67 ventilation control panel to fabricating a new

. panel. Fabrication of this new: panel, which was an unanti-cipated addition to DCRDR workload, . will not be able to be completed until the end of 1991.

o -HEDs 10, 563, and 766 would be more appropriately categor- I

-ized as Meter Face Modification HEDs and will be handled as  !

'such, with completion expected in 1991. l Of the remaining 30 HEDs, nine have not been resolved. Of these nine, eight address the control board mimics. Resolution of these HEDs has been delayed because of the PBNP simulator, which is currently under construction. Because the simulator vendor could not match some of the existing mimic colors, it was decided that some new colors would be used and the existing control room mimics would be totally replaced. Resolution of mimic HEDs will be handled along with mimic replacement in 1990. The ninth 5

i t

y ~

n% .,

, l

$R.1 unrStolved-Enh0nc',m:nt'HED rcquirca come 'dsmnrcotion around_four

' control _ switches and will be; installed in early 1990. i U

c J

Annunciators-E .As1of March 29, 1988, the date of our previous submittal, there t were130 HEDs in the Annunciator' category. Since then, the following changes have.been made: l o The" resolution and category of HED 229 were changed after it  !

was decided that no further action was necessary'(a copy of

~

4 ,

HED'229 is-included in Appendix-1 to this attachment). 't I

o .The categories of HEDs 293,'327, and 353 were changed to ,

Control' Room Modifications because the resolutions of the e

HEDs primarily concern plant modification such as control circuitry changes,: cable. pulls, etc., with the associated changes in the annunciator tiles being relatively minor  ;

parts-of the overall modifications.

Of the' remaining 26 HEDs, eight will not be. resolved _by the end. -

of 1989. All'eight of these HEDs are to be resolved by the  :

replacement of'the existing annunciator tiles. Replacement has been delayed because of several' revisions to the annunciator tile legends data base and an additional delay in annunciator tile fabrication. We expect to have the new tiles in place by

, December 1990.

. Instrument Air Modification All seven' Instrument Air HEDs_were to have been addressed by MR 85-243, a modification request initiated in 1985 and expected to be. completed by the end of this' year. This modification was >

completed on schedule, so these HEDs are resolved.

. Labeling Eighty-six~HEDs were categorized as Labeling.- Resolutions to 50

=HEDs have been or will be' implemented by'the end of 1989 with the essential' completion of thefcontrol room' relabeling project. The project included a review of the contents of all component labels to ensure the use of a consistent format, accurate and consistent nomenclature, and standard abbreviations. Essentially all component labels'(approximately 1500) were or will be replaced by the end of the year. A' hierarchical labeling scheme was also installed. Regarding the'HEDs whose resolutions have not yet been implemented:

o_ Nine HEDs address meter face legends and are more properly categorized as Meter Face modifications. These will be resolved with the implementation of new meter faces by 1991.

o Seven HEDs address mimic labeling and will be resolved when new mimics are installed in 1990.

Q'?;b'uYs c;

qb 1

,s

.* ) 8

-1

{' 3lp y ~

p"pijD e y

$D '

C Un . .

4 1

-o .Seven-HEDs-call forfthe implementation of operator aids:

(administratively controlled-information;1abels),:which was- .

not part of the relabelingfproject.- These should be ,

resol ~vedJin 1990.

L Five J HEDs" document .locationsLwhere . permanent -labels are .

4 - o: 6 y .

recommended to be installed.. These-labels were not included.

f "'

D 'in0the relabeling project. data base.. Labels for these.

locations ~will be fabricated and-installed in11990.  :

V, o Three HEDs documentDoperator comments on existing labels that were;not included in:the-relabeling ~ project data base.

-The applicable labels will be revised and installed in 1990. .q

-o Two HED; .aidress annunciator' tile type styles and are more-

~

Appropriately categorized-as' Annunciator-HEDs... These will

, be rescit. red when the new annunciator tiles are installed in '

1990 =

o One'HED will be resolved when modifications involvirgi Y ':elocation of iteam generator controls are completed in 19 P 0..

o .One PED notes;that e 7d 'cLution" label should be yellow.

This HED wi.11 be resolved in 1990.

E -o _One.HED calls for the placement of labels indicating-which Ji power supply or' supplies serves every. control.= For a~ .

. majority of controls,'this:has been accomplished by the incorporation of power" supply information into the new

componentilabels. -However,.~the; required information for all o ,

Tof.the applicable controllers has not yet been obtained. We expect to completely resolve ^this HED in 1990.

Relocation t'

, Eight HEDs were categorized as-Relocation. Resolutions-to-five-

,;, of=,these HEDs have alreadyfbeen implemented, and we expect all

= resolutions to'be implemented by the.end of 1990, as originally scheduled.

- Control Room Modification

' Twenty-eight HEDs were categorized as. Control Room Modifications..

- Resolutions to 18 HEDs have already been implemented, and we

. expect all resolutions will be implemented by the end of 1990, as originally scheduled.

iMeter Face Modifict -

t. Fif ty-eight. ! Er, o :e o.' nally categorized as Meter Face Modi-fication. R <v sne HED has already been implemented.

Resolutaan o one 2 sv er the HEDs will not be completed until the.end of 1991. Resolution of these HEDs involves the replacement of every meter face on the main control boards.

1

m%

~~

+--

1 e  ;

e

' Finalizing of the new meter face legends and scale designs took longer than; originally anticipated. Difficulties were then encountered 1 1n finding a-legend type size that was satisfactory s- to'WE and that was'available from the meter facesmanufacturer.

. .To date, we-have obtained meter faces that are not all suitable for installation. Higher priority work has also precluded personnel from developing installation' procedures and, in some L" cases, instrument loop modification or recalibration procedures, that are necessary for this work. For these reasons, resolution .

of meter. face HEDs has been delayed until-1991..

Communication

. Twelve HEDs.were categorized as Communication. Resolutions to two HEDs have already been-implemented, and we expect all remaining resolutions will be implemented by the.end of 1990, as  !

originally scheduled. i New-Instrumentation Forty-three HEDs were categorized as New Instrumentation.

Resolutions to nine HEDs have already been implemented, and we still expect to meet our proposed schedule for the remaining 34 HEDs.

Control Modification i Forty-one HEDs were categorized as Control Modification.

Resolutions to 25 HEDs have already been implemented, and we  !

expect all remaining resolutions will be implemented by the end .

of 1990, as originally expected.

l l

t

c:

u&- W.1 .,-

-jgi ,< ' ,

Dec:mber 27, 1989~ d 0 - ATTACHMENT ~l-  :

i

J: 4 F7?' Jl , HED 229 - RESOLUTION. CHANGED TO "NO ACTION" k POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT,' UNITS 1-AND'2 )

.)

i n .:

I i

--i',

4

'I

,-1:

j s .

E i d a

?

I' l'

l ?"

1 \', {

f=,

I - .

-L s

m 8

4 I a 5

4 5 6 i

(

A

,0 fI

$ l' k

) f 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - _ . - - - - - - _ - . - _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ - - _ - _ . . - . _ - _ _ _ - _ . - _ - _ _ - - - - - - - - - - _ _ - - - - - _ _ . - - - - _ _ . _ . - - - _ - _ _

g. .. -- -- . . _

t ) i

.h i

~*

s,.

  • g l. ,

1 IIUM AN ENGINEERINO DISCRIIPANCY RECORD t 4

1 -

POINT BEACH NUQ,EAh PLANT ..;

, HED NO.: 229' l h!

1. IDENITFICATION: ' Deee of Primous: 12/2049 ORIOIN: CONIROL ROOM SURVEY . NURIKI 0700 l a i

?OUIDl!LINFBIIRCKLIST NOA 6.3.2.lF.

OUIDELINE AREAt ANNUNCfATOR WARNINO SYSTEMS

- PROBLI!M CA11tOORY: AUDTTORY ALERT SUBSYS11!M -

PROBLEM SUB.CA11100RY: SIONALDETDC110N -

" LOCA110N t .

CONIROL ROOM AREA: MAIN CONTROL ROOM I PAN!!Le NUTLOCATION APPLICABLE

h ' SYSTEM: ANNUNCIATOR -

BQUIPMENT: ANNUNCIATORS f 1

, Df!SCRll'rlON OF DISC 1tEPANCY: .

o l 11IE ANNUNCIATOR SYS111M DOES N(7r PROVIDE SEPARATE AUDTTORY ALERT SiONALS FOR DIFIERENT WORK STATIONS. '  ;

l p c l

PREPARIID BY: SCIIMIDT DATE: 06/2645

l.  ? PROPOS!!D RI!SOLtrTION: ..

I' 11IERE ARE CURRENTLY 2 SIONALS IN 11IE CONIROL ROOM. ONE ON TIIE UNrr i SIDE AND  ;

. ONf! ON 11tB UNIT 2 SIDE. BECAUSE OFTIIBIR DitTERENT LOCA110NS, OPERATORS CAN

? 11111 WillCll SiONAL HAS SOUNDED. PBNP WOULD RATHER HAVE OPERATORS SCAN ALL

'K" BOARDS -(SEE HUTES") . 3 el l0 l-r e i

. RECOMENDATION BY: CRDRTEAM V '

l IL EVALUATION ,

IIED EXPf!RIENCED BEPORE7 NO ACCIDENT RELA 11!D7 NO

. IEGINICAL SPECIFICATIONS 7 NO ERROR RECOONrflON / RECOVERY EXPECTED 7 YES SUBJECTIVE PRIORrrY RA11NO: 7.5 l

IDID PRIORrrY:9 IIED CATEGORY: NO ACTION

. REVIEWED AND APPROVED.CRDR1EAM:[.hMTE#ha'tf l

NUIES' WilEN AN ALARM COMES IN INSTEAD OF RELY ON AUDTTORY SIONALS. NO SIONIFICANT l

V

~.-..

.T A..._.- ..-~ - _----

w - . . - _ _ -

m;. -s, ,.. E

i_q, .'j +
a;! ; ,
f

.yy_- yz

' ;;'G ^

g s , , 4- .

. HUMAN ENGINEERNO DISCREPANCY RECORD'

@ $*k; . POINT BEACllNUCMAR PLANT l c ;- HRD NO.: 229 COVrINURD

, .6 :

ic -

s'

, PRO 92M8 IIAVE BRIN EXPHIUENCHD IN RELATION TO11tlS ISSUE AND NO FURTIIER I s- ACrlON WILL DB TAKEN, (* PROPOSED RESOLttflON" AND TED CATBOORY" REVISED 11/I449); [

a

?

l' s A

I

s h

r h 2- S n'  ;.

.i U l) - y ,

e t g

iI

's tr

.3

-\

il( i 1 i

(

l I

i

'1

( -

1 l

l l

. !: r.

9,

<%v - a