ML20196D493

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Repts 50-266/99-08 & 50-301/99-08 on 990411- 0527.No Violations Noted.Operator Crew Response to Equipment Induced Challenges Generally Good.Handling of Steam Plume in Unit 1 Turbine Bldg Particularly Good
ML20196D493
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/18/1999
From: Lanksbury R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Reddemann M
WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER CO.
Shared Package
ML20196D497 List:
References
50-266-99-08, 50-266-99-8, 50-301-99-08, 50-301-99-8, NUDOCS 9906240288
Download: ML20196D493 (2)


See also: IR 05000266/1999008

Text

. -

June 18, 1999

t

Mr. M. Reddemann

Site Vice President

Point Beach Nuclear Plant l

6610 Nuclear Road l

Two Rivers, WI 54241

SUBJECT: POINT BEACH INSPECTION REPORT 50-266/99008(DRP); 50-301/99008(DRP)

I

Dear Mr. Reddemann:

1

This refers to the inspection conducted from April 11 through May 27,1999, at the Point Beach  !

Nuclear facility. j

l

During the inspection period, secondary system equipment failures and malfunctions  !

challenged plant operators. Response to these failures placed a burden on the resources of

the facility. Resources thus diverted were not available to address long-term equipment and .

program upgrades. As you indicated at the exit meeting for this report, routine plant I

engineering and maintenance efforts should be focused on identifying vulnerabilities and

preventing failures, so that other resources are not diverted from safety significant equipment

and program upgrade projects. j

i

Operator crew response to equipment-induced challenges was generally good. The handling of

a steam plume la the Unit 1 turbine building was particularly good. The crew responded to tne

abnormal condition by placing the plant in a safe condition in accordance with the symptom-

based emergency operating procedures and a conservative operating philosophy. This

response effectively ensured that the public health and safety could not be affected by the ,

'

observed condition, regardless of the initiating equipment failure.

in accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its

enclosure will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

Sincerely,

/s/ R. IarAsbury

Roger Lanksbury, Chief

Reactor Projects Branch 5

Docket Nos. 50-266; 50-301

License Nos. OPR-24; DPR-27

Enclosure: Inspection Report 50-266/99008(DRP);

50-301/99008(DRP)

Spe Attachtsd Distribution

DOCUMENT NAME: G:\POIN\ pol 99008.DRP

To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box:"C" = Copy without enclosure "E"= Copy with enclosure"N" gy

DFFICE Rlli l6 Rlli lN l l

NAME Kunowskik;jp55I b Lanksbury R.h L

DATE 06/is/99 06/8/99 ~

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

9906240288 990618

PDR ADOCK 05000266

G PDR

.Z

>

., ,e

' s :. ... .

[H.;.

., i, 'i: i a

'

h  ?'

3 , . I

<

+ . M. Reddemann

'

-2 . '

,

)

i

9

cc w/ encl
: R. Grigg, President arid Chief

Operating Officer, WEPCO l

M. Sellman, Senior Vee President, l

Chief Nuclear Officer .  ;

R. Mende, Plant Manager ]

' . O'Neill, Jr., Shaw, Pittman,

J  !

Potts & Trowbridge l

. K. Duveneck, Town Chairman -

Town of Two Creeks

B. Burks, P.E., Director I

<

Bureau of Field Operations l

J. Mettner, Chairman, Wisconsin  !

Public Service Commission

S. Jenkins, Electric Division

Wisconsin Public Service Commission

State Liaison Officer

. Distribution:

CAC (E-Mail)

RPC (E-Mail) -

Project Mgr., NRR w/enci

'

J. Cakhvell, Rlli w/enci

B. Clayton, Rlli w/enci

SRI Point Beach w/ encl

jf

.

/

DRP w/enci ,

DRS w/enct 1

. Rlli PRR w/enci ,

'

'

PUBLIC IE-01 w/enci

Docket File w/enci

GREENS

. LEO (E-Mail)

DOCDESK (E-Mail)

1

l

&l00.1 C

l

l

l

l

J