ML18018B948

From kanterella
Revision as of 05:19, 18 June 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC 850312 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-400/85-04.Corrective Actions:Conduit 16101V-SA Reinspected for Separation Violations & Inspector Counseled
ML18018B948
Person / Time
Site: Harris Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/10/1985
From: Parsons R
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: Grace J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML18018B945 List:
References
CON-NRC-347 NUDOCS 8505210508
Download: ML18018B948 (3)


See also: IR 05000400/1985004

Text

Exhibit 3 P.O.Box IOI New Hill, North Carolina 27562 April l0, l985 Dr.3.Nelson Grace Jnited States Nuclear Regulatory

Commission

Region II 101."Aarietta

Street, Northwest (Suite 2900)Atlanta, Georgia 30323 NRC-347 Dear Dr.Grace: ln reference to your letter of March 12, l985, r ferring to RII: GFM,'RLP 50-000/85-0v-OI, the attached is arolina Power 2 LightŽompany's reply to the violation identified

in Enclosure l.It is considered

that the corrective

action taken is satisfactory

for resolution

of the item.Thank you for your consideration

in this matter.Yours very truly,+~7 W~R.M.Parsons Project General Manager Completion

Assurance Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant RMP:sae A ttachment cc: Messrs.G.Maxwell/R.

Prevatte (NRC-SHNPP)

Mr.B.C.Buckley (NRC)XE X-se7/I-OS5

Dr.3.Velson Grace 2 VR-3<7 bcc:.'v1r.H.R.Banks Mr.T.A.Baxter (Shaw, Pittman, Potts 2 Trowbridge)

Mr.C.S.Bohanan Mr.H.W.Bowles Mr.C.Carmichael

(2)Mr.V 3.Chiangi Mr.A.B.Cutter Dr.T.S.Elleman Ms.S.F.Flynn Mr.G.L.Forehand Mr.3.F.Garibaldi CZbasco)Vlr.3.L.Harness Mr.P.C.Hopkins Dr.3.D.E.3effries Mr.I.A.3ohnson Mr.L.I.~oflin Mr.R.E.Lumsden Mr.R.L.Mayton, 3r.Mr.S.McManus Mr.C.H.Moseley, 3r.Mr.D.L.iVordstrom (LIS)Mr.R.M.Parsons Mr.G.A.Sinders Mr.M.Shannon (Westinghouse)

Mr.Sheldon D.Smith Vlr.M.F.Thompson Mr.A.C.Tollison Mr.E.3.Wagner Mr.R.A.Watson Mr.3.L.Willis File: HI/A-2D File: H-X-0500 se7/2

Attachment

to CPM.Letter of Response to NRC Report RII: GFM/RL Re rted Violation:

10 CFR 50.55(f)(l)

requires CPRL to implement the quality assurance program described or referenced

in the Preliminary

Safety Analysis Report.Section 1.8.5.10 of the PSAR (versus the Quality Assurance Program, as stated in the Votice of Violation)

requires that measures be established

to ensure that inspections

are conducted in accordance

with documented

instructions, procedures

and drawings.ontrary to the above, on 3anuary 24, 1985, the inspector identified

an electrical

separation

problem between electrical

safety-related

conduit 16101V-SA and non-safety

electrical

cable trays X1700 and X1701 at plan points 3002 and 3004 in the reactor auxiliary building at elevation 286'.The installation

had been previously

inspected and accepted by Construction

Inspection

personnel and the separation

problem had not been identified.

Construction

inspection

procedure T?-02, paragraph 3.5.0 specifically

requir s that this attribute be inspected and documented.

This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement

II).Denial or Admission and Reason for the Violation:

The violation is correct as stated.,The raceway inspector inadvertently

failed to recognize the separation

violation between Conduit 16101V-SA and Non-Safety

Trays XI700 and X1701 (plan points 3002 to 3000).Corrective

Ste s Taken and Results Achieved;Conduit 16101V-SA has been reinspected

for separation

violations

and the card now documents that there is a separation

violation.

A supervisory

review'f the inspectors

qualifications

and work performance

was conducted.

Based on this review, the violation is considered

to be an isolated case.Corrective

Ste s Taken to Avoid Further Noncom liance: The inspector was counseled about this occurrence

and it was determined

that he was fully cognizant of the separation

requirements

at the time of the subject inspection.

The inspector admits that in this case, he inadvertently

overlooked

the separation

violation.

The separation

requirements

were reiterated

to the inspector during this counseling.

In addition, the importance

of thorough inspections

for required electrical

separation

has been re-emphasized

to the electrical

raceway Construction

Inspectors.

Date When Full Com liance%as Achieved: Full compliance

was achieved on April 10, 1985.se7/3