ML20093D931: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 13: Line 13:
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| page count = 25
| page count = 25
| project =  
| project = TAC:55500, TAC:55501
| stage = Request
| stage = Request
}}
}}
Line 28: Line 28:


D-
D-
   .c Mr. H. R. Denton                              July 6, 1984 Also, it should be noted that in the Wisconsin Electric letter to the NRC dated August 20, 1982, and the subsequent response letter from the NRC dated March 29, 1984, the designator for the second weld of relief request RR-1-5 is incorrect. The correct designator is AC-10-RHR-1006-8 vice AC-10-RHR-1006-25. The designator is correct on the isometric drawings which were includr;d with the Wisconsin Electric letter dated August 20, 1982.
   .c Mr. H. R. Denton                              July 6, 1984 Also, it should be noted that in the Wisconsin Electric letter to the NRC dated August 20, 1982, and the subsequent response letter from the NRC dated March 29, 1984, the designator for the second weld of relief request RR-1-5 is incorrect. The correct designator is AC-10-RHR-1006-8 vice AC-10-RHR-1006-25. The designator is correct on the isometric drawings which were includr;d with the Wisconsin Electric {{letter dated|date=August 20, 1982|text=letter dated August 20, 1982}}.
In Wisconsin Electric's January 13, 1983 letter to the NRC, relief requests for both Unit 1 and Unit 2 were submitted.
In Wisconsin Electric's {{letter dated|date=January 13, 1983|text=January 13, 1983 letter}} to the NRC, relief requests for both Unit 1 and Unit 2 were submitted.
Response has been received on all relief requests submitted except relief request RR-1-9 for Unit 1. This relief request is identical to RR-2-9 for Unit 2 which was granted in the NRC letter dated March 29, 1984. Please review and respond to relicf request RR-1-9 for Unit 1.
Response has been received on all relief requests submitted except relief request RR-1-9 for Unit 1. This relief request is identical to RR-2-9 for Unit 2 which was granted in the NRC {{letter dated|date=March 29, 1984|text=letter dated March 29, 1984}}. Please review and respond to relicf request RR-1-9 for Unit 1.
In your March 29, 1984 letter, relief requests RR-1-1 and RR-2-1, which relate to visual examination of the reactor vessel interior surfaces for Units 1 and 2, were denied. These requests were denied on the basis that the removal of the core i
In your {{letter dated|date=March 29, 1984|text=March 29, 1984 letter}}, relief requests RR-1-1 and RR-2-1, which relate to visual examination of the reactor vessel interior surfaces for Units 1 and 2, were denied. These requests were denied on the basis that the removal of the core i
barrel is not necessary to adequately perform the inspection.
barrel is not necessary to adequately perform the inspection.
I We understand this to mean that a visual inspection (VT-3) of the vessel interior surface above the core barrel during a normal refueling outage is adequate to satisfy your requirements.
I We understand this to mean that a visual inspection (VT-3) of the vessel interior surface above the core barrel during a normal refueling outage is adequate to satisfy your requirements.

Latest revision as of 00:23, 25 September 2022

Requests Inservice Insp Relief for Second 10-yr Insp Interval.Supportive Info for Relief Requests from Specific ASME Section XI Code Requirements Encl
ML20093D931
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/06/1984
From: Fay C
WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER CO.
To: Harold Denton, John Miller
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
TAC-55500, TAC-55501, NUDOCS 8407170309
Download: ML20093D931 (25)


Text

,

lHsconsin Electnc rom cowa 231 W. MICHIGAN, P.O. BOX 2046. MILWAUKEE, WI 53201 July 6, 1984 Mr. H. R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Washington, D. C. 20555 Attention: Mr. J. R. Miller, Chief Operating Reactors, Branch 3 Gentlemen:

DOCKET NOS. 50-266 AND 50-301 ASME SECTION XI, RELIEF REQUESTS POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 In accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a (g) (5) (iii) , Wisconsin Electric Power Company (licensee) requests inservice inspection relief for the second ten-year inspection interval for Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2. Attachment 1 provides the supportive information for the relief requests from specific ASME Section XI code requirements for Unit 1. Attachment 2 provides the supportive information for the relief requests from specific ASME Section XI code requirements for Unit 2.

In addition, amplifying discussion is provided concerning previously granted relief as documented in Mr. Miller's letter to Mr. Fay of March 29, 1984. In that letter, relief was granted for Units 1 and 2 from the requirement to perform surface examinations of three piping-to-penetration cap weld; in the auxiliary coolant and cafsty injection systems provided that the first weld in the process pipe outside containment be subject to the required ASME code examination. The NRC staff evaluation of these relief requests (RR-2-5 and RR-1-5) states that assurance of the weld's structural integrity must be provided. Upon review of the relief request evaluation, it was determined that the buried welds inside the penetration are shop welds. Additionally, the first welds outside containment were determined to be shop

.. elds on some of the' lines in question and field welds on others. Since the shop weld outside containment on a line will more closely match the buried weld in welding process and manufacturing conditions than the field weld, we feel that the representative weld is the first shop weld outside contain-ment. Therefore, Wisconsin Electric will inspect the first shop weld outside of containment in the system to meet the requirements of the granted relief.

  • l I

B#07170309 840706 (

PDRADOCK05000g-G -

D-

.c Mr. H. R. Denton July 6, 1984 Also, it should be noted that in the Wisconsin Electric letter to the NRC dated August 20, 1982, and the subsequent response letter from the NRC dated March 29, 1984, the designator for the second weld of relief request RR-1-5 is incorrect. The correct designator is AC-10-RHR-1006-8 vice AC-10-RHR-1006-25. The designator is correct on the isometric drawings which were includr;d with the Wisconsin Electric letter dated August 20, 1982.

In Wisconsin Electric's January 13, 1983 letter to the NRC, relief requests for both Unit 1 and Unit 2 were submitted.

Response has been received on all relief requests submitted except relief request RR-1-9 for Unit 1. This relief request is identical to RR-2-9 for Unit 2 which was granted in the NRC letter dated March 29, 1984. Please review and respond to relicf request RR-1-9 for Unit 1.

In your March 29, 1984 letter, relief requests RR-1-1 and RR-2-1, which relate to visual examination of the reactor vessel interior surfaces for Units 1 and 2, were denied. These requests were denied on the basis that the removal of the core i

barrel is not necessary to adequately perform the inspection.

I We understand this to mean that a visual inspection (VT-3) of the vessel interior surface above the core barrel during a normal refueling outage is adequate to satisfy your requirements.

This is based on the fact that, normally, the core is not completely unloaded during a refueling outage which limits the vessel interior accessible surface to the area above the core barrel. If, for reasons other than inservice inspection, the fuel is unloaded during the refueling outage for.which the vessel interior surfaces visual inspection is scheduled, an-evaluation of accessibility- to other areas- of vessel interior surface will be made. If there are-other accessible areas at that time, the scope of the examination area will be. increased to include those areas.

Wisconsin Electric requests the Commission's acceptance of our proposed implementction of your alternatre requirements.

In addition, we also request NRC's approval of the ASME Section XI relief requests as presented above and in Attachments 1 and 2.

I u.

s .,

o Mr. -- H . .R. Denton July 6, 1984 Please contact us if additional information is needed.

Very truly yours, 1 -

h0 Vice President-Nuclear Power C. W. Fay Attachments Copy to NRC Resident Inspector l

1

c r

L' .

1 ATTACHMENT 1 UNIT 1 RELIEF REQUESTS Relief Request No. Description i RR-1-10 Residual Heat Removal Heat Exchanger Primary Side Nozzle to Shell Welds RR-1-ll Regenerative Heat Exchanger Nozzle Inside Radius Sections e

e I .

l-

- ~

_h______ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . - _ _ . . _ - _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _

i .

/

RR-1-10

[ Component Residual Heat Removal Heat Exchangers Exam Area

! Primary Side Nozzle-to-Shell Welds RUR-A-N1 RHR-A-N2 RHR-B-N1 RHR-B-N2 Isometric or Component Drawing Figure 1 Westinghouse Electric Corp. 4836-2 Figures B-4 and B-5 ASME Section XI Category C-B ASME Section XI Item Number C2.20 ASME Section XI Examination Requirement A surfaca and volumetric examination of each nozzle-to-shell weld every 10 years.

Alternative Examination A surface examination will be performed on the entire reinforcing plate weld every 10 years. In addition, a visual (VT-2) examination for leakage will be conducted each inspection period during the system pressure test.

Reason for Limitation The volumetric examination is not po.asible due to the reinforcing plate

. configuration and inaccessibility to the vessel interior. The reinforcing plate is welded to the nozzle and shell and completely covers the nozzle-to-shell weld. Figure 1 shows the details of the nozzle-to-shell weld and welded reinforcing plate. The welded reinforcing plate by its i size and space next to the nozzte outside diameter, prevents adequate l Ur coverage of the nozzle-to-shell weld. An ultrasonic signal transmitted at the plate surface would shnply be reflected by the plate's backwall. The diameter of the reinforcing plate is such that i

1

/ l RR-1-10 (cont.) l c l l

l an ultrasonic wave propagated from the nearest shell or nozzle surface would not provide adequate coverage of the nozzle-to-shell weld.

The best surface from which to examine the nozzle-to-shell weld is the inside surface of nozzle. But this area is not accessible without disassembly of the heat exchanger requiring approximately 40 man-hours of effort in a general area radiation field of 50-100 mrem per hour.

The actual examination of the nozzle-to-shell weld from the inside surface of the RHR heat exchanger would require approximately 1 man-hour of effort in a radiation field of 35 Rem per hour for the "A" RHR heat exchanger or 12 Rem per hour for the "B" RHR heat exchanger.

Based upon these configurations, the examination of the nozzle-to-shell weld by ultrasonics is impractical and contrary to ALARA concepts.

O

l SHEET 3 CF I CALCULATl3N SHEET FILE No.

"'CJ E CT kESIDOAL bDW b/OOVAL FAT Excnw uw o y >d o ,,, 6/a/n N O 2 7- M hEk ~

l G= U S 6 b CHKD.BY DATE w

$NL ,

(Cin CYbn} f kP.

y lJe4.=ha.IIia+eAc.e(a.4adad) k '

m ie I

t

-~~ ~

&ct.

5555

}4

- ., g h a [s gg .,,

!,$$!5 j , 3 n: { g orit

.>.!!N$!hliilhN

[' $  ?( 33 p  ! j z! a

.jp; !.

bei L c.

4l-

%pmq. g. ;Jir mtn i

) i:

.e ,:.

e g ,

4 g

ji! $ #

5.!! II'$ 5k!

![II 9@g iij !

I!' !3  !  ! i: >

b, .If * ' ' '

h j [}N '

k' I iih.0 .. h 3

,lT.J.jil!!! $ 4 33

  • jD.. fl 'T . '_ s
1 .ffr0 3. ljl 5,,  !, i!.

p ,. . .

  • 4 4eu.
t. . u ,1 p. t!

v{.0 *t.i s  ! .i  :,

3:!l rib 'D; g{ tm N !g h -*  ! . [-l .is e.g c 7 * 'j$!M.!Ein-n N.y nit

,d q i*

i I..%i: W.-

'4 l1 5 y , .. :. w.

! ,.,,E.k: ~mv .

'- '-'"*5" l I .* -

.I g'( h 'f W '5$..' cNf. M h-'

k,n. il! "c1 f ..

)'l..l~ -

,y t i

6 b

Q '

C I -

~ *1r t.* **

i iW.auts

'u t Wo% '

~',;,--- y ~, -

,, 3 yd.

g,-

-)

4

. 13,* /

,43 e[ ,

d; ) .$ -

.dh"... ,9,7.. '

-lv} j . ,, s::32 l w.v u llin.g A- y' b4 g. ., ..

u 1 (

II i! eM4 '

\t d le Y ,

j. . /s/$"$!; 1  ; ". :!.{

s t ,

n.f J s

"@ ~ W '.J f,$ 4 bl i j

(;gh l h[j;'y~ * *' C j 'd di y -

hh[ .k/ '

y.

f. j5 l 78 d *lhf 6h:h'p.i.')/'/'

W i

'; i 8 g ;j!( 'l t

!.{ h -a .fi 4 'w Y

,d 5 ll .. -

6

--, 4

,h

!P 1.3 1 lsi )

8 I .

l ' .* -

lj{l

)gi al 6 11 1 i!$;8 @lS 1  : D g 1.- ,

' ' Khg*gf8 ,

Sl{$

11 lts *N fri !E t L' ".

  • O 'p g ,1 3;1 l' d MMfgh%.'.'Y

~

. J -

itad Gi $ l' <'

__ ag .

'f3

. !H fi ii

/e '

.s,%. .- MW W-- .S. idi3P#, ...

M

gJ i3 >

aI i

!!! .i i.Ij n S.

of

[

,q

.<, *T5

. -T -! u. a .=

. t... i g i - r-7 7.

>*~~-i'YFh!i9 _. ,

G h, g{h g[ ic 4 f, ~r ..f *G[d[I' r [hg

% w$ %zum.

t

( ,}

a d!iil.A > -a l;

e r#%a.

--f'~

/ ' f f i I!g( I 1 7% if IT .I-*

  • I 3 ! ' '5 8 7

'8-3  !.'. k

,j( i$ $

2

{ @ 2j1 1, !g -h jM t -

(~

e ---

' .- d! .i N

d rj q r.:. r. . . . C' Jh B l

POINT SEACM UNIT l

' RHR- A-N2 SUPPORT LEG N2 4 ' N SUPPORT LEG N9 I it J i .

' N s /-

w*

SUPPORT LEG N9. 3 - - N SUPPORT LEG Na 2 R HR-A-NI b

s

)

OLA 5 3 I b l .

}-- - - - - - - -

.RH R -A-2 RHR- A-Ni & 2

, RHR-A-1 l l ,s ,

\

RESIOU AL HEAT REMOVAL HEAT E XCHANGER "A"

(

I FIGURE B-4 l

B-4

/

\

  • RHR-8 -N2 SUPPORT LEG NA 4 #

~~'

s N SUPPORT LEG N2 I f

SUPPORT LEG N9. 3-SUPPORT LEG Na 2 R M R-3 -Ni M~

r C. . .

CLA?S 3 l

qwn.g.2 RHR-8 -Ni & 2 -

RHR-8-1 i

R ES IOU AL NEAT REMOVAL HEAT E XCHANGER *3

l

\

l FIGURE B-5 s

1 i

I B-5 l

2a - .

V , 'N s , l RR-1-ll

),

Component Regenerative Heat Exchanger '

Exam Area Nozzle inside radius sections -(IRS)

RHE-N1-IRS 5 RHE-N4-IRS ~'

RHE-NS-IRS RHE-N8-IRS . , ,

RHE-N9-IRS

, " ,' RHE-N12 IRS O A

Isometric or Component Drawinrs s

Sentry Equipment Corp. dO4195-A10-4' *-

g Figure B-3

[,1 ASME Section,XI Category .

i N ,

I, B-D ' ' 'i

\ i

! s "t .

- - -ASMESectioNXIItemNumbed y B3.160 t'

\

ASME Section XI Examirktion Requirement ',. ,

A volumetric exa. tina iorilof each nozzle inside radius section every 10 years. ,

s Alternative Examination None Reason for Limitation The attached drawing depicts the regenerative heat exchanger (RHE) with cross-sectional views of the nozzle areas. The side view illustration shows that the vessel surface'is perpendicular to the nozzle axis. The end view illustration shows th) ralationship between the nozzle and the curved, vessel surface. Therefore, the angle between the nozzle axis and the vessel surface is not constant around the circumference of the nozzle. Because of this complex nozzle / vessel geometry, constantly changing angles and examination parameters would be required to direct sound into the inner radius area. Since the nozzle and vessel diameters are botn small, the changes in angl'es required would e

l RR-1-ll (cont.)

be great and continually varying as the examination surface (s' hell surface) varies while scanning about the nozzle. Access to the examination surface is also restricted by circumferential shell welds which limit the extent of the examination.

In addition to the geometric considerations, the radiation field associated with this component is significant. Contact readings at the surface of the RHE nozzles before removal of the insulation are approximately 4R/Hr. The radiation field at 18 inches is approximately 1.5R/Hr. Contact readings after removal of insulation have been as high as 7R/Hr.

Considering the complexity of the geometry and the limitations on access all within the high . radiation field associated with this component, the technique to conduct this exam would need to be so complex that unacceptable parannnal radiation exposures would result. Therefore, a volumetric examin-

    • 4a" ^# +baea nnezle IRS's is impractical.

l l

a -

1

.C N . l- 2 ** ,,

g='

- i:.1. d-

~

I e-

.f? '!lld: d**

mM443% (it y ? e.

A

'.1,,

  • mEs i J: , te p(b h1sj,! :;

., f ,

< (; }!WmiKi j;f g *Il s[ .;

l l l

4 4

  • H ',t a

_ d.l ':I J y!;W;h il  :; ,

c los. i d i 5 g, .1 b d.dN$ b g43 31 m,, g-

@ , 1j!; MNNiG !!

-i, +g

,, .,,' jd4 i

' '4 t

~,l '/ $2 t, m h l

[ '-

3 i I

= 'gi S DI (3

'i.

l k$ij 'N' 1

d Jl

$,lJ! .k >i t'.'a %

I

) I 4

a.

h w- iff jB3 .\ " I f

  • h. -

1=9 ..;

lj p, -

51m 1 l 1 h; T

[Ip r j. - ' l '

f

\'

[.,i j!d. [.A.

h. s l $ .5 h$  ?

N I .

N e!L.i ,4 -

! l -

~ lb  ;;

rp -

! hr .

E '*4 Jc L "

-~l _

% 7 l

k'* ') V b g, b

4

, .w ). C .*

N/ : c l;l L* 1 ': ) Y '

. 'N E.j y  !<

l 4% '

  • l

,d I  %

f,f .

l I ,Y .

i,l w

I -

Y ,, 8

' # 9',

  • g ,d4 J l} t.
  • N '

I l

.f O,p 4 5 I , ;NV M _

j f

)' N ')

g f

4D' N -

94 j* JJ

\,

e t

'#j4 Y . f

~

'4 -N. # _j.,Q PJ LLkS'- :) .3 g Y h5&&$65i T. ~

is gjt s: "

if E[yyc

"'" j ~ '

3., t. h ! .

  • ',il'd }

.'.; - .hi-

i i

.5,

.i j 4 lliYY  ?.  ;

ll l'l I I l l Ltil Q,' i Na>W6WA.. F.

a

l 1

o l

l' REF. SErrRY DWG.

A04195-A01-2 & A014 CVC-2-t.0-1002 1 '

CLASS 1 al- CLASS 2 l

l RHE-Nf 2 , RHE = N ll

[ RHE*9 i

RJH -ti }

l RH E-!O I

  • RHE-12 k *a SHELL SUPPORT NO. 4-a - ~

)

SHELL SUPPORT-=l p ORHg-N9 RHE-NIO No. 1 CVC-3-LO-1001 ali RHE*NS RHE-N7

.{3 ,

(

(

f RHE*5 RHE-6 RHE-7

  • )

- RHE-8 k e SHELL SUPPORT NO. S e )

SHELLSUPPORT-=j{iT RHE*NS O RME-NG No. 2 CVC-3-LD-1001 f'f~

RT-N4 .; ,

RHE-N3

'[~ gE-3 }

R -l RH pg l k a SHELL Supp0RT NO. 6--= - )

SHELL SUPPORT--* 3 RHE-Ng 'S RHg-N2 I

ti I

f I CVC 2-LC-1001 REGENERATIVE HEAT EXCHANGER t

FIGURE B-3 B-3 l

l

l ATTACHMENT 2 UNIT 2 RELIEF REQUESTS M ief Request No. Description

.RR-2-10 Residual Heat Removal Heat Exchanger Primary Side Nozzle-to-Shell Welds RR-2-ll Regenerative Heat Exchanger Nozzle Inside Radius Sections 0

3 i

4.

f 1

b v g N.w e w- gm. n ,. p 9 -e, m 4

. i i

RR-2-10

-Component Residual Heat Removal Heat Exchangers Exam Area Primary side nozzle-to-shell welds RHR-A-N1 RHR-A-N2 RHR-B-N1~

RHR-B-N2 Isometric or Component Drawing Figure 1 Westinghouse Electric Corp. 4836-2 Figures ~B-4 and B-5 ASME Section XI Category i- C-B l ASME Section XI Item Number C2.20

< ASME Section XI Examination Requirement A surface and volumetric examination of each nozzle-to-shell weld every-10 years.

Alternative Examination A surface examination'will be performed'on.the entire reinforcing plate weld every.10 years. In addition, a visuali (VT-2) examination for

. leakage will be conducted each inspection period during the system

. pressure test.

Reason for Limitation The volumetric examination is not possible due ' to the reinforcing plate configuration 'and ' inaccessibility to the vessel interior. The reinforcing.

plate.is welded to the nozzle and.shell and completely.' covers.the nozzle-

.to-shell weld. Figure 1 shows the details of the nozzle-to-shell weld -

and welded reinforcing plate. LThe welded reinforcing plate by its size and space next to the nozzle outside diameter prevents adequate.trr coverage-of the nozzle-to-shell weld. 'An ultrasonic signal transmitted at the plate surface would simply be reflected by the plate's backwall.

-The diameter of the' reinforcing plate is.such that an ultrasonic wave

. _ . . _. o . - . . , _ . . _

a 4

RR-2 (cont. )

propagated from the nearest shell or nozzle surface would not provide adequate coverage of the nozzle-to-shell weld. The best surface from which to examine the nozzle-to-shell weld is the inside surface of nozzle. .But this area is not accessible without disassembly of the heat exchanger requiring approximately 40 man-hours of effort in a general area radiation field of 50-100 mrem per hour. The actual examination of the nozzle-to-shell weld from the inside surface of the RIE heat exchanger would require approximately 1 man-hour of effort in a radiation field of 20 Rem per hour for the "A" RER heat exchanger or 25 Rem per hour for the "B" RHR heat exchanger. Based upon these considerations, the examination of the nozzle-to-shell weld by ultrasonics is impractical and contrary to AIARA concepts.

I

I CF I l . SHEET-CALCULATl!N SuBET i l

FILE M e_

  • tsBJECT kES I DO Al--- N MOYAL. EAT ExcuS3;w ... ,, >d ,,,, 6Aehy i Noawto- Am& -

Fi c-.ve e L Cuno. ,y ,,15 1

l w

)

i bL , &

=

. / (bnhet*C5n} f

~ '

p ids 4o hsllin+sekc.t {woh wldeb)

I i

\kA h l nots lC g

~

'"" M ve - g e

!*"4

* dpif tfil'h.,,,'.; .M7 8

,. f. N',,~~~ 4g-l t ydd P 's I - > - r* T'ik1 1 J j g p4 .

} $$ kf M

  • W
u. b s

.k* g n A e--

S

,.5 ,"

, e r %gm t-n'ed l1dh@N] psi y!D My.-! L"gn*'p'i sc hI f, - h. 4 : ::: p! 1! dl N i.w !M i z g r y

~ '

. o ny e i ., s .4  ! l-. --

b - -

dj 1 l-'-MJ

~'

,., , li 1 *14 .

-j I5.'@j$ Nip!d9YIII d ii$

8

.J.J I.9. t -' ,a 59 $ 3 @7.h

. g.. .,

3.hd. @r 'kg-h  !! d si

.

  • air jd p. m!

d- .ilJEIL: i*

y yd i.,S.I

, . . . . x. w -

,. ..; - m . ,- .

1 i l ti l1 i# - N *5

.l .

$.,e--,- W '_%%Vd@W'N_ N.'. Mk-_ _ l. _

.j l411i '21 .

.; - pt. j~

ftj.' ' J.' --

., .w' -

~

wn. ( .

E9hrtnes * .'Oa

.. . mHa g.

,g--

~

7. 3,, pwb.

b ./

d l I

Y5 .@ ..'

cm

.ha.8.-b FW2.; fr. . ,i(

I 4f ul i! t

-w

'" ' N4-l em *I -w.v e

\tx 4 1 9 li A,si I,...

f!kSU.'<8.j%

df. . /s.M I

,.. :!)

s L

g .

z.f _p k i /

j.d' y ~*, ' 4 Y5$ 61.

1 .

ij M . -lh

".P

  • H g,md;,

/'

t y$3 .g { .

( l i 18 i*
1. $1 5 4 j, . h.g ga ig w:W N-gh lii 1 ig 1 1 4 .- Y .* ig}

N Y;J I J s t il Ap f }!]N g fg} hj J

%'fiy"h]{iiligesg} I h. f *

                                                                                                                                                                                                                   .}v fm- s :,L,A- m                       .s              ~                    ..,,
                                                                                                                .-v-              .. -    - ..                    i                         : dq< .gt @si l

g ,*: S;i e,,, l' .l- ;i

                                                                                                     ~

at . I; :4 M

.r:;;                                                                  r ,-                              ,e     .      i'                       -
                                                                                                                                                                                                   '~

1,IisF#. ',' _ _ ag y v:":W.-cW

                         !q!                                         / 4,,                                                                                          --

A, gM

!p!4i.

i ii . ' .S ., .v.  :.

 'lf
                                                                 .i,
                                                                                          =
                         !!!                                                                                                     n                                                              +

l .'d A

   .s k
                                                  ,,,           .!.!.i
                                                                                                                                                                                    %@O                                           ,i            ~ .1 4

3.3

                                                  $                                                                                                                                                                                                              T
                                                                 *11                                        ~3                                                                                                      -

di

                                                                 .                                                                          g f,{ l--2-@ J"i W 4                                                        _              5 G     A$          f                                                                         g                          '*'/[y*g.,:'"'T Iie i k. OA
                                                                                                                  ' ~
 'E.'i'                                                                                          -                                                     4                                     ..j:                                          ,'         ?.~
  • g e r w' r[..:-q yL s. p. lp - fg [ m%e
%. $ $                     <=wf s j , g.~5U                     @! e --- 'g..              .

3

                                                                                                             '!.. __ ) -

i i

                                                                                                                                          ~
                                                                                                                                                         ~
                                                                                                                                                                      ~

14*%:j_ Il g - -- - n* t

                                                             'h%i W'l                                       y y.           T ;-
                                                                                                                                              .T7 g

1 l.f,. .

                     ~]                                -     -                i         :
                                                                                                                      -                 -                .-               .T , %-]j j i ] '-d d 5= *b)    }.          a

{

                                ' '?'

n.3 b M [J',7" 'A ,,,,

  • 7..). , Si r*----,.,.. . ,
                                                                                                                                            ; ,, . 6
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   ,. 4:p .,,- . ..

s e l l

                                                ' RHR- A-N2 SUPPORT LEG N2 4 '                            ^\ SUPPORT LEG N2 1

{Y Y

                                                                ~.          -

SUPPORT LEG N9. 3 " - K SUPPC RT LEG Na 2 RHR-A-Ni 8 l

                                               ; LASS 3 k                           ,,

h

                                                          ,--.- - - - - -                  RwR.A.2 RHR- A-N I- & 2 RHR-A-i
                                                                           . y,

_/~\\ _ l RESIOU AL MEAT REMOVAL HEAT E XC: A NGER "A" t r l l FIGURE B-4 l l B-4

i i l / RHR-8 -N 2

                                              ~

SUPP0AT LEG NA 4 # g N SUPPORT LEG N2 1

                                                         -4
                                                          )i
                                        \

i SUPPORT LEG N9, 3 --

                                    ~ w-SUPPORT LEG Na 2 RHR-g-N1 6

e CLATS 3 J, RHR-B-2 RHR-8 -Ni & 2 p,y g.g . l f-R ES IOU AL MEAT REMOVAL HEAT E XCHANGER *B" FIGURE B-5 B-5

i RR-2-ll L Component Regenerative Heat Exchanger Exam Area Nozzle inside radius sections (IRS) RHE-N1-IRS RHE-N4-IRS RHE-NS-IRS RHE-N8-IRS RHE-N9-IRS RHE-N12-IRS Isometric or Component Drawing Sentry Equipment Corp. A04195-A10-4 Figure B-3

                                         ~

ASME Section XI Category B-D ASME Section XI Item Number B3.160 ASME Section XI Examination Requirement A volumetric examination of each nozzle inside radius section every 10 years. Alternative Examination None Reason for Limitation The attached drawing depicts the regenerative heat exchanger (RHE) with cross-sectional views of the nozzle areas. The side view illustration shows that the vessel surface is perpendicular to the nozzle axis. The end view illustration shows the relationship between the nozzle and the curved vessel ~ surface. Therefore, the angle between the nozzle axis and the vessel surface is not constant around, the-circumference of the nozzle. Because of this complex nozzle / vessel geometry, constantly changing angles and examination parameters would be required to direct sound into the inner radius area. Since the nozzle and vessel diameters are both small, the changes in angles Y

9 ' RR-2-ll (cont.) be great and continually varying as the examination surface (s' hell surface) varies while scanning about the nozzle. Access to the exmmination surface is also restricted by circumferential shell welds which limit the extent of the examination. In addition to the geometric considerations, the radiation field associated < with + bis component is significant. Contact readings at the surface of the RHE nozzles before removal of the insulation are approximately 4R/Hr. The radiation field at 18 inches is approximately 1.5R/Hr. Contact readings after removal of insulation have been as high as 7R/Hr. Considering the complexity of the geometry and the limitations on access all within the high radiation field associated with this component, the technique to conduct this exam would need to be so complex that unacceptable rereennel rediation exposures would result. Therefore, a volumetric examin-

tien et there nozzle IRS's is impractical, e
                                                                                     'C a

l '. p :_ .. ,,

                                                                                                                                                                                                           ~

3

                                                                                                                                                                 .                  p5 i?fJ:                          l W         i5u du. .!!                          ~

d 1 j

4. - v-:: mA4:Q J.t. i ig fi[I
                                                                                                                                                                                    $1 ' si a pl;                                        l[

t > I I, f j f 4

                                                                                                       #             ^       . *!                 fihuP [                hjia                    i::            ~

l _iMac a - N s 1 pu I;; n,+ + ,.s t-vremmi

.e +:

4 ,4.jpl3}hi! ; e, di 4 2

                                                     ;      ? -' ' - -
                                                                                                                                     !)     p           4                s.      .s                 5 ir                       (4y'/

D. ,. 4/-~-d\ 114 ? ; a 1 , , - l i P 2, P 'i tjE ),. , D N .,xi 3 ,

                  }         l l                                                    j                     t t   #.I i%           , A .r
  • l \d {

4k~ 1,su zu.w d , BM w ~

                                                                                                                 \

i. e d;p t f,l u - Ijjig;j) e,

                                              -                      1 N4                        [-l
                  .. . )i- w 2 1..: .         -

i ' jLi.asi

                     --                                                    l i

N ~ N e-ja 3 , _ 0 f* n- - lh t r ll e )-.-

                                                                                                                                             "~

l k, *? @~~ !3

                                             .. a Y,l '

l V'

                                                                                                                                              '. a %. )c.,                '

ut , -)

                                        ,                         s           .

g g - 4  : l T

                                                                                                          -* / *
                                              -;        ,3           i       1  1  u,
                                               - <          a
                                                            .e n                    wm               /

u .t, ,

                                                                                                                                       )

W W f q l , *! % y A -

                                                                                                 <4th.~gr l                                          '.                                             4 s g o. i n
                                                                                                                             .. g
                                       ,             y<                                                      \ II4 d                                                           h                                    Tigj LL w a.                        +.i N                                                 M*                                       l MTrM??-#Mi i'
(~-- >; .

n' ) [d ' ' b 3,),, n$ d. ' ' ty 9.n e

  • e.

e n; i

       .                                                                    i                  .
                                                                                                                                                            .s . ,  .,

y. m.m -.

                                                                             ;                                                                             .!n:          h et        i V                                -

W e> A.Jl.L..+ . 4

             ~
            ?

e i i 4 REF. SCIT2Y DVG. I A04195-A01-2 & A01-i. CVC-2-LO- 2002 i CLASS 1 al- CLASS 2 l I RHE- N#2 RHE- N il [  ! RHE-ti 7

                                                                                                                                                                                       )

RH E-10 ME*9 - RHE-12 1

                                                \ m                                                                      SHELL SUPPORT NO. 4-a -                                 -=
                                                                                                                                                                                       )

SHELL SUPPORT--=lp. O nn g. g, = 3 <T R HE* N IO g CVC-3-LO. 2001

                                                                                                                                                        ;l.

l RHE*N8 g RHE*N7

                                                                                                                                                         -(3                j f        RHt-S                                                                                  ppg.s
                                                                                                                                                                        ) +RHE-7' )

I

                                               \        *                                                                                              -                    RHE-8
  • SHELL SUPPORT NO. 5 - -
                                                                                                                                                                                       )

RHE-NS

                                                                                                                                                                    '["h
                                                                                                                                                                    '             &  RHE-N6 SHELL No. 2SUPPORT- =                       g'a             CVC-3-LO- 2001                                                               .

i it 3-I RHE*N4 RHE N3 Il'  %-Q3 , , q [ RH E- f ewe-3

                                                                                                                                                                                       }
  • RH M RHE'4 l ,

( " SWELL 5"oocnT NO. 6 - -

                                                                                                                                                                                       /                                                                 l 7

3 RHE-Ni  % RHE-N2 SHELL No. 3 SUPPORT---7 1 ' I f CVC-2-LC- 2001 REGENERATIVE HEAT EXCHANGER . 1 FIGURE B-3 s B-3 _ . . _ . _ _.--__ __ _ _ . . - _ - . . . _ _ . . _ _ - . _ _ _ _ . - _ . _ _ _ . . _ _ - _ _ . . . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . - _ _ _}}