ML20104A039

Presubmittal Meeting Summary

ML20104A039
Person / Time
Site:	North Anna
Issue date:	04/21/2020
From:	Lauren Gibson NRC/NRR/DNRL/NLRP
To:	Stoddard D Virginia Electric & Power Co (VEPCO)
Lauren Gibson - NRR/DNRL 301-415-1056
References
Download: ML20104A039 (5)

Text

April 21, 2020 Mr. Daniel G. Stoddard Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Innsbrook Technical Center 5000 Dominion Blvd Glen Allen, VA 29060

SUBJECT:

PUBLIC MEETING

SUMMARY

OF PRE-SUBMITTAL MEETING FOR NORTH ANNA POWER STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2, SUBSEQUENT LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION

Dear Mr. Stoddard:

By letter dated November 9, 2017 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession Nos. ML17318A087), Virginia Electric and Power Company (Dominion, or the applicant), submitted a letter of intent to submit a subsequent license renewal application (SLRA) for North Anna Power Station, Units 1 and 2 (North Anna).

On April 9, 2020, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, or the staff) held a public meeting with Dominion to discuss the expected content of the upcoming submittal of the SLRA for North Anna Power Station, Units 1 and 2. The slides for the staff presentation are available at ADAMS Accession No. ML20099F299. The slides for the applicants presentation are available at ADAMS Accession No. ML20099F241.

The NRC staff began with a brief overview of the subsequent license renewal (SLR) process. It consists of two tracks, environmental and safety. This meeting focused on the safety aspects.

(An environmental pre-submittal meeting was held on October 22, 2019. The meeting summary may be found at ADAMS Accession No. ML19297F844). A tentative review schedule was shared. Assuming an application date of September 30, 2020, the final licensing decision is expected to be made in March 2022, which is 18 months after submittal.

Dominion then began their presentation with a description of the North Anna Power Station and its similarities to its sister station, Surry Power Station (Surry). (The SLRA for Surry is under review. The Safety Evaluation Report has been issued (ADAMS Accession No. ML20052F520) and a licensing decision is expected in June 2020.) The applicant noted that the same team that has been working on the Surry application is developing the North Anna application. Many of the Aging Management Programs (AMPs) will be the same, since both plants use the fleet AMPs. North Anna will have a higher level of aging management review line item consistency with the Generic Aging Lessons-Learned Report (GALL-SLR, Vol. 1 and 2, ADAMS Accession Nos. ML17187A031 and ML17187A204).

The applicant went into further detail on the aging management programs. North Anna is expected to have 48 AMPs. This includes seven that were not part of their initial license

D. Stoddard renewal. Five AMPs are expected to have exceptions. As for enhancements,12 are expected to be consistent with GALL and have no enhancements; 13 are expected to have approximately four or less enhancements; and 11 are expected to have greater than four enhancements.

Dominion will be sharing the breakdown of which AMPs are in which category with the agency.

The applicant suggested that those three groupings of AMPs should have different levels of staff reviews (in terms of hours spent, inclusion in audits, length of audit breakout sessions, requests for additional information, etc.) due to the differing levels of complexity and similarity with Surry.

The NRC stated that they are open to the idea but will independently determine the appropriate level of review for each AMP based on the content of the submitted application.

Building upon a discussion from a prior industry-wide public meeting (SLR Lessons Learned, held on April 7, 2020. The meeting summary is available at ADAMS Accession No. ML20107F699.), the applicant listed nine AMPs in which they plan to include the revisions to the GALL-SLR that are currently under development by the staff. The applicant indicated that they would like additional feedback on the three interim staff guidance (ISG) documents that are italicized on the slide. For those three, it appears that staff and industry have not yet aligned on an approach. Dominion underscored that it will be important to them that the staff keeps to its expected schedule for issuing the related ISG documents for use and comment.

Several technical issues were then discussed in detail, the first of which was the flow tolerance evaluation for reactor coolant system cast austenitic stainless steel. As a conservative measure, the licensee will be performing the flow tolerance evaluation using two different methods, one each for a delta ferrite for check chemistry less than and greater than 25 percent.

The North Anna Unit 1 crossover leg ferrite content for ladle and check chemistry conditions is 24.57 percent and 28.29 percent, respectively. The flaw tolerance evaluation for the piping will include an evaluation for the check-chemistry-based ferrite content (greater than 25%) in accordance with Appendix C of the 2019 Edition of American Society of Mechanical Engineers Code,Section XI.

For the reactor internals AMP, the licensee is planning to submit a supplement after the initial application. The supplement will include information from the planned refueling outage in the fall as well as insights from a pre-publication copy of MRP-227, Revision 2, which they expect to see in the first quarter of calendar year 2021. It is not anticipated that the original submittal will be substantially changed on the basis of the expected new information and insights.

The reactor vessel support steel configuration is substantially similar between North Anna and Surry. However, the loads on the supports for North Anna will be calculated based on the original break open time. The applicant noted that most of the supporting documents for the review are virtually identical to those submitted for Surry, with only slight differences. Given the similarities, the licensee inquired whether the review for North Anna would require an onsite audit in this area, as was the case for Surry. The NRC indicated that they would have to see the content of the actual application before making that determination.

An Equivalent Margins Analysis for Reactor Vessel Integrity will be completed by the Pressurized Water Reactors Owners Group (PWROG) and submitted to the NRC for review in May 2020. A plant-specific report will be submitted for North Anna. In response to a staff question, the applicant clarified that this will be a different report than the one submitted for Surry because the two reactor vessels have different fabricators.

The environmentally assisted fatigue will be addressed differently for components/vessels and piping. The components and vessels will use the methodology from NUREG/CR-6909 (ADAMS

D. Stoddard Accession No. ML16319A004). Unlike Surry, the cumulative usage factor values for North Annas piping were determined by different reviewers at different times. For all of the technical topics described above, please see the licensees slides for more information, including details.

The presentation then went on to discuss other plant-specific time-limited aging analyses (TLAAs). The applicant noted that three PWROG reports will generically address TLAAs; however, one of the three reports does not yet have an approved safety evaluation from the staff. Finalization of that PWROG report has been affected by the Coronavirus; nevertheless, it is expected by May. The next slide listed documents that are to be docketed with the SLRA.

The applicant considers three of these to be the heart of the review: WCAP18363NP, Rev. 1, North Anna Units 1 and 2 Heatup and Cooldown Limit Curves for Normal Operation, March 2020; WCAP18353NP, Rev 0, Reactor Internals Fluence Evaluation for a Westinghouse 3 Loop Plant with Two Units, October 2018; and WCAP18364NP, Rev. 1, North Anna Units 1 and 2 TimeLimited Aging Analysis on Reactor Integrity for Subsequent License Renewal (SLR), March 2020. The following slide listed previously docketed documents that will be referenced in the application.

The applicant then provided closing remarks. During those remarks, the applicant noted that their application is ahead of schedule and that the staff, for planning purposes, can expect to receive the application approximately 30 days earlier than the sample schedule provided in the NRC staff slides. It is expected in the third quarter of 2020.

The NRC staff then inquired if there were any topics from the SLR lessons learned public meeting of April 7 (two days prior to this meeting) that the applicant would like to discuss in relation to North Anna. The applicant indicated that they would like to have further discussions related to the potential streamlining of the Operating Experience audits.

In general, throughout this meeting, the NRC and the applicant expressed willingness to embrace potential process improvements. Which improvements will be enacted and exactly how they will be enacted will depend on additional staff consideration, the outcome of discussions through the lessons-learned public meetings and other related public meetings, and the content of the application once received.

If you have any questions regarding this issue, please feel free to contact me by phone at 301-415-1056, or by email at Lauren.Gibson@nrc.gov.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Lauren K. Gibson, Project Manager License Renewal Projects Branch Division of New and Renewed Licenses Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-338 and 50-339

Enclosures:

List of Attendees

D. Stoddard

SUBJECT:

PUBLIC MEETING

SUMMARY

OF PRE-SUBMITTAL MEETING FOR NORTH ANNA POWER STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2, SUBSEQUENT LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION DATED APRIL 21, 2020 E-MAIL:

PUBLIC RidsNrrDnrl Resource RidsNrrPMSurry Resource AWu, NRR/DNRL DAdams, OCA LGibson, NRR/DNRL RHannah, RII/OPA EOesterle, NRR/DNRL JLedford, RII/OPA RElliott, NMSS/REFS JPelchat, RII/ORA HGonzalez, NRR/DNRL ELea, RII/ORA MMitchell, NRR/DNRL CRead, RII/DRP SBloom, NRR/DNRL BCollins, RII/DRS ABradford, NRR/DNRL SBailey, RII/DRS BCaldwell, NRR/DNRL SDowney, RII/DRS EMiller, NRR/DORL PCooper, RII/DRS MMarkley, NRR/DORL JQuichocho, OEDO DRoth, OGC MMcCoppin. OEDO SBurnell, HQ/OPA KGamin, OGC DMcIntyre, HQ/OPA ADAMS Accession Number: ML20104A039 *via email concurrence OFFICE NRR/DNRL/NLRP/PM NRR/DNRL/NLRP/LA NRR/DNRL/NLRP/PM NAME LKGibson* SGreen* AWu*

DATE 4/13/2020 4/13/2020 4/14/2020 OFFICE NRR/DNRL/NLRP/BC NRR/DNRL/NLRP/PM NAME EOesterle* LKGibson*

DATE 4/10/2020 4/21/2020 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

List of Attendees All attendees participated remotely. Those with an asterisk (*) presented.

NRC Attendees: Christopher Sydnor Brian Allik George Thomas Steven Bloom John Tsao David Dijamco Lynnea Wilkins Carolyn Fairbanks Brandon Wise Bob Fitzpatrick Kent Wood James Gavula Angela Wu Lauren Gibson* George Wang Hipo Gonzalez On Yee Allen Hiser Mark Yoo Caroline Hsu Naeem Iqbal Dominion Attendees:

Steve Jones Paul Aitken*

Scott Krepel Eric Blocher*

Bryce Lehman John Disosway John Lehning Craig Heah*

Juan Lopez Jim Johnson Robert Lukes Keith Miller Tania Martinez Navedo Paul Phelps*

James Medoff Charles Tomes*

Seung Min Carol Moyer Public Attendes:

Duc Nguyen Joe Terrell (Duke Energy)

Eric Oesterle* Emma Wong (Electric Power Research Andrew Prinaris Institute, (EPRI))

David Rudland Additional unidentified attendees Mo Sadollah Enclosure