IR 05000482/1985044: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
{{Adams
| number = ML20203B076
| number = ML20210L215
| issue date = 07/07/1986
| issue date = 04/07/1986
| title = Discusses Insp Rept 50-482/85-44 on 851202-05 & Forwards Notice of Violation & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in Amount of $40,000.Notice of Violation & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21)
| title = Partially Withheld Insp Rept 50-482/85-44 on 851202-05 (Ref 10CFR73.21).Violation Noted:Inadequate Physical Barrier
| author name = Martin R
| author name = Earnest A, Kelly J, Yandell L
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
| addressee name = Koester G
| addressee name =  
| addressee affiliation = KANSAS GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
| addressee affiliation =  
| docket = 05000482
| docket = 05000482
| license number =  
| license number =  
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| document report number = EA-86-084, EA-86-84, NUDOCS 8607170454
| document report number = 50-482-85-44, NUDOCS 8604290246
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO UTILITY, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| package number = ML20210L187
| page count = 3
| document type = INSPECTION REPORT, NRC-GENERATED, INSPECTION REPORT, UTILITY, TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS
| page count = 1
}}
}}


Line 18: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ _ _ _ _
{{#Wiki_filter:, -. s
s e
  .
JUL 71986 s
Docket No. 50-482 License No. NPF-42 EA 86-84 Kansas Gas & Electric Company ATTN: Glenn L. Koester Vice President - Nuclear P: 0. Box 208 Wichita, Kansas 67201 Gentlemen:
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND PROPOSED IMPOSITION OF CIVIL PENALTY (NRC INSPECTION REPORT N0. 50-482/85-44)
This refers to the inspection conducted on December 2-5, 1985 at the Wolf Creek Generating Station, Burlington, Kansas. This was a followup inspection to a security matter identified to the NRC by your staff on November 4, 198 An enforcement conference to discuss these matters was held on November 25, 1985, at the Region IV offices in Arlington, Texa As determined by your staff, the inspection confirmed that multiple uncontrolled access paths existed from the Owner Controlled Area (OCA) into the Protected Area (PA) and in two instances into Vital Areas (VA). It appears that this condition has existed since the storm drain system was installed, and the plant has been in violation of NRC regulations and its security plan since the operating license was granted on March 11, 1985. The causes for this situation included design oversight during the system planning stage, construction deficiencies which resulted in the failure to install some manway covers in accordance with the drawings, and the failure of the startup testing / surveillance program to identify these deficiencies. This violation demonstrates a weakness in the management oversight of coordination between the various organizational entities which may affect facility securit To emphasize the need to provide integrated management control of the security program, I have been authorized, after consultation with the Director, Office of Inspection and Enforcement, to issue the enclosed Notice of Violation and-Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in the amount of Forty Thousand Dollars ($40,000) for the violation described in the enclosed Notice. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions,"
10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1986) (Enforcement Policy), the violation described in the enclosed Notice has been categorized at a Severity Level II. The violation has been categorized at Severity Level II because two of the elements of access control, namely barrier and monitoring, were inadequate at both the protected area and vital area barriers. The basu civil-penalty for a Severity Level II violation is $80,000. The NRC Enforcement Policy allows for reduction CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED rnow?: rc: T/
5 g n SA75G1llKS IkV i.-
8607170454 860707 2; rv m /-*i:-
    '
      /
DH ADOCK 0000  _
 
  - -- . - - - . . . . - - - .  - - . - _ _ - _ . _- - --- . _ - _ _ _ - .
t        ,
!
  .
  .
*        l t .*
APPENDIX U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
!
;
I Kansas Gas & Electric Company  -
2-of a civil penalty under certain circumstances. In this case, the base civil i penalty is reduced by 50 percent because of your prompt identification and  -
l reporting of the incident as soon as you became aware of it, because of    L
: your prompt and extensive corrective actions, and because of your prior good
! performance in the security area. However, further mitigation is not warranted  8
        '
:
because of the severity of the violation, the multiple examples of pathways from l
outside the protected area into your facility, and because of the duration of
! these barrier degradation l
.
l You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions  .
specified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response. In your
        !
!
j response, you should document the specific actions taken and any additional
-
actions you plan to prevent recurrence. After reviewing your response to this
! Notice, including your proposed corrective actions, the NRC will determine
 
whether further NRC enforcement action is necessary to ensure compliance with  v NRC regulatory requirements, s
j The material enclosed herewith contains Safeguards Information as defined by
'
10 CFR 73.21 and its disclosure to unauthorized individuals is prohibited by i
Section 147 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. Therefore, the
! material will not be placed in the Public Document Roo ;


==REGION IV==
NRC Inspection Report: 50-482/85-44  License: NPF-42 Docket: 50-482  Category: A2 Licensee: Kangas Gas and Electric Company (KG&E)
P. O. Box 208 Wichita, Kansas 67201
~ .: .
Facility Name: Wolf Creek Generating Station (WCGS)
~
Inspection At: Woll Creek Site, Coffey County, Burlington, Kansas Inspection Conducted: December 2-5, 1985 Inspectors: ,' w o J.h.F.) Kelly,TeniorPhysic
_ Chea curity IDatehac-%
i
i
; The responses directed by this letter and the enclosed Notice are not subject  [
      -
; to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required j by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
Secjilist,EmergencyPrepaedessand Safeguards Pr ram ection 7 AM $ $
 
A. BWfcE TurnW, oWical S'ecurity Specialist Dat Emergency Preparedness and Safeguards Programs Section Approved: m Ox  _ 7 M '/6 L. A.' Yandell, Chief, Eaiergency Preparedness Date'
j     
and Safeguards Programs Section Inspection Summary Inspection Conducted December 2-5, 1985 (Report STN 50-482/85-44)
 
Areas Inspected: Routine, announced inspection of the detection aids protected area, assessment aids, lighting, communications, and access control protected are Results: Within the areas inspected, one violation was identified (inadequate physical barrier, paragraph 2).
Sincerely, i        !
j      ORIGINAL $1GNED BY j      ROBERT P. MARTIN l      Robert D. Martin
!      Regional Administrator
!
! Enclosure:
i Notice of Violation and l Proposed Imposition of
'
Civil Penalty
 
cc: Kansas Radiation Control Program Director
;
)
I
!
1; i
    ~~~-,-~- <
      ,
    ,. . ,, .~
    ,
9-
    . l .s s .
    + ri 9- p i
,


r
E:X:LOSURE C0t; TAD?S sim7JARDS Ir0c L'. TIO EN SEPARATIO3 ZIIS ADOCK 0 42 PJ.CG IS DEXTJTi':IL {DR m
    .
    .
Kansas Gas & Electric Company DISTRIBUTION bec w/o encl:
SECY CA JMTaylor, IE JLieberman, ELD LCobb, IE FIngram, PA JCrooks, AE00 BHayes, 01 SConnelly OIA DNussbaumer, OSP H. Denton, NRR    gu}fg IE:ES File    '/ tj IE:EA File BSumers, IE (ltr hd)
DCS /
          # DESIGNATED enzaryAI,  -
bec w/ encl:
JAxelrad, IE    e '
Certified 37
          -
          *
Enforcement Officers    '- ' ' W - c-i-RI, RII, RIII, RV J. Gibson, SSPD/NRR  "
RBurnett, NMSS RIV Distribution w/ encl:
R. Martin, RIV EP&SPS RIV Security Files DPowers RIV Distribution w/o encl:
Div. Director (DRSP)  C. Wisner Div. Director (DRSS)  R. Doda J. Gagliardo, RPB
          <
h IE:ES W
    ,
pro h4o'n EL JLieb rman R1 n ed IKb0 !
J(i RV((Imer T 6/g))86 6/7y 86  6K/86 86 6/g M6 6/
RI'   C:EP8 % D: I J    C E    C SP C:RPB E0 rap /o AE0 ' ;ap Je y;apLYandeTI[RLGnjart JJapdon JGagli  do DPowers RDMarti 3G //86 3  /86 3/ W 86 3/jf/86 3/,1b/06 3// // 6 [ J /86 1/7/86 SAPEGUARDSAu . ....
g., ,
        , , . . .
P t. 3. . . . . . .
_ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _  _ _ _ _ . _ . . . _ _
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 21:12, 3 December 2021

Partially Withheld Insp Rept 50-482/85-44 on 851202-05 (Ref 10CFR73.21).Violation Noted:Inadequate Physical Barrier
ML20210L215
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation icon.png
Issue date: 04/07/1986
From: Earnest A, Joseph Kelly, Yandell L
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20210L187 List:
References
50-482-85-44, NUDOCS 8604290246
Download: ML20210L215 (1)


Text

, -. s

.

.

APPENDIX U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION IV

NRC Inspection Report: 50-482/85-44 License: NPF-42 Docket: 50-482 Category: A2 Licensee: Kangas Gas and Electric Company (KG&E)

P. O. Box 208 Wichita, Kansas 67201

~ .: .

Facility Name: Wolf Creek Generating Station (WCGS)

~

Inspection At: Woll Creek Site, Coffey County, Burlington, Kansas Inspection Conducted: December 2-5, 1985 Inspectors: ,' w o J.h.F.) Kelly,TeniorPhysic

_ Chea curity IDatehac-%

i

-

Secjilist,EmergencyPrepaedessand Safeguards Pr ram ection 7 AM $ $

A. BWfcE TurnW, oWical S'ecurity Specialist Dat Emergency Preparedness and Safeguards Programs Section Approved: m Ox _ 7 M '/6 L. A.' Yandell, Chief, Eaiergency Preparedness Date'

and Safeguards Programs Section Inspection Summary Inspection Conducted December 2-5, 1985 (Report STN 50-482/85-44)

Areas Inspected: Routine, announced inspection of the detection aids protected area, assessment aids, lighting, communications, and access control protected are Results: Within the areas inspected, one violation was identified (inadequate physical barrier, paragraph 2).

E:X:LOSURE C0t; TAD?S sim7JARDS Ir0c L'. TIO EN SEPARATIO3 ZIIS ADOCK 0 42 PJ.CG IS DEXTJTi':IL {DR m