IR 05000482/1989009

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Rept 50-482/89-09 on 890313-17.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Liquid & Gaseous Radwaste Mgt Programs & Occupational Radiation Exposure Control Program
ML20245E932
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation icon.png
Issue date: 04/13/1989
From: Baer R, Nicholas J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20245E925 List:
References
50-482-89-09, 50-482-89-9, NUDOCS 8905020196
Download: ML20245E932 (13)


Text

!

.

.,

.

.,  !

APPENDIX B

.

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION <

REGION IV

NRC Inspection Report: 50-482/89-09 Operating License: 'NPF-42 Docket: 50-482 l

Licensee: Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation (WCNOC) j P.O. Box 411 i Burlington, Kansas 66839 Facility Name: Wolf Creek Generating Station (WCGS) l Inspection At: WCGS Site, Burlington, Kansas

Inspection Conducted: March 13-17, 1989

'

-

Inspector: i 4) *'///zk9 V/B. Nicholas, Senidr Radiation Specialist Date :

Facilities Radiological Protection Section 1 Approved: . 4//

f R: E. B'aer, Chief, Facilities Radiological Date 1 protection Section Inspection Summary j Inspection Conducted March 13-17,1989 (Report 50-482/89-09)

Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of the licensee's liquid and gaseous radioactive waste management programs and occupational radiation exposure control program, j Results: The NRC inspector determined that the licensee was implementing the radioactive waste effluent program (RWEP) in accordance with the Radiological- l Effluent Technical Specifications (RETS) and Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM). The quantities of radionuclides released in the radioactive l waste effluents were within the limits specified in the RETS, Offsite doses had been calculated using methods specified in the ODCM and were within Technical Specification (TS) limits. The licensee's ventilation systems had I been tested in accordance with TS requirements. Quality Assurance (QA)

surveillance and audits had been performed as required and were technically comprehensive. The licensee had submitted their Semiannual Effluent Release Reports as per TS requirement ,

Within the areas inspected, three violations were identified: (1) failure to !

perform exit whole body counts, (2) overexposure to the skin of the whole body, and (3) failure to complete TS surveillance test (see paragraphs 4, 5, and 6, i respectively). No deviations were identified. One icensee Event Report (LER) i was closed. Onenewopenitemindiscussedinparag[raph '

.

a  !

. _ _ ._- .-- - - -__-_-_- __- _- - -

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _

. .

,

. .

.

DETAILS Persons Contacted WCNOC

  • R. M. Grant, Vice President Quality
  • G. D. Boyer, Plant Manager
  • L. F. Breshears, Supervisor, Health Physics (HP)/ Dosimetry M. D. Charlton, Superv!sor, Supplier and Material Support
  • D. L. Dees, Surveillance Coordinator-Operations
  • R. D. Flan *,igen, Manager, Nuclear Support Engineering
  • S. F. Hatch, Supervisor, Quality Systems

"C. J. Hoch, QA Technologist -

  • J. L. Houghton, Supervisor, Operations B. O. McKinney, Manager, Operations
  • R. K. Lewis, Supervising Results Engineer
  • W. M. Lindsay, Manager, QA
  • R. L. Logsdon, Chemist
  • V. J. MacTaggart, Supervisor, Results Engineering

"T. S. Morrill, Manager, Radiation Protection

  • W. B. Norton, Manager, Technical Support
  • C. L. Palmer, Radwaste Chemistry Supervisor
  • C. E. Parry, Manager, Site Quality
  • G. J. Pendergrass, Licensing Engineer
  • K. R. Peterson, Supervisor, Licensing
  • J. Potter, Manager, Supplier and Material Quality
  • G. Williams, Manager, Plant Support R. T. Wright, Supervisor, QA Audits NRC J. E. Bess, Senior Resident Inspector, South Texas Project Unit-1
  • 'anotes those individuals present during the exit interview conducted on March 17, 198 . Open Items Identified During This Inspection An open item is a matter that requires further review and evaluation by the NRC inspector or licensee. Cpen items are used to document, track, and ensure adequate followup on matters of concern to the NRC inspecto The following open item was identified:

Open Item '

Title Paragraph 482/8909-04 Monitoring of Ventilatic, 6 System Operating Hours

- - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - _ - _ . _ _ _ _

.

.

,

.,

. Followup on LFR (92700) I (Closed) LER (482/88-028): Personnel Overexposure Due to Hot Particle Contamination - The event the LER described involved an individual receiving a radiation overexposure to the skin of the whole body in excess ;

of 10 CFR Part 20.101 dose limits. This overexposure is discussed in paragraph 5 of this report and is the subject of a Notice of Violation issued with this repor (482/8909-02) Occupational Exposure Control (83750)

The NRC inspector reviewed the licensee's implementation of the health physics dosimetry program dealing with personnel whole body counting. The l NRC inspector reviewed selected personnel exposure history files of !

individuals who had been issued a thermoluminscent dosimeter (TLD) at WCGS and had been terminated from employment at WCGS~during the period July 1, i 1988, through February 28, 198 {

l Technical Specification (TS) 6.11 requires, " Procedures for personnel radiation protection shall be prepared consistent with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 20 and shall be approved, maintained, and adhered to for all operations involving personnel radiation exposure." The licensee's health physics dosimetry program is implemented by Administrative Procedure ADM-03-100, " Health Physics Dosimetry Program," Revision 6, dated Octcber 27, 1987. Paragraph 4.1.3.1 requires that, individuals who have been issued a TL'D at WCGS will receive a termination whole body coun It further requires that, if an individual terminates without obtaining an exit whole body count, an attempt will be made to contact the individual to request they return to WCGS or another mutually acceptable f acility for a whole body count. A record indicating the attempted contact will be placed in the individual's exposure history file. The NRC !

inspector reviewed 20 personnel exposure history files of individuals who

. had been terminated from employment at WCGS and had not received an exit whole body count upon termination. It was determined on March 14, 1989, that 7 individuals of the 20 reviewed had left the WCGS site without receiving an exit whole body count and no record was included in their indiviaual exposure history file indicating that an attempt had been made to contact the individual to request they return to ',l CGS or another mutually acceptable facility for a whole body count. The failure to attempt to contact an individual to request an exit whole body count upon termination from WCGS is a violation of TS 6.11 and the licensee's implementing procedure, ADM-03-10 (482/8909-01)

No deviations were identified.

l Control of Radioactive Materials and Contamination, Surveys, and

Monitoring (83750j The NRC inspector reviewed selected portions of the licensee's radioactive materials and contamination control program including the hot particle contamination control progra . . . - -- - -

.' .

i

!

10 CFRlPart 20.101(a) requires, in part, that ". . . no licensee shall possess, use, or transfer licensed material in such a manner as to cause !

any individual in a restricted area to receive in any period of one calendar quarter,from radioactive material and-other sources of radiation a total occupational dose in excess of . . .. (7.5 rems per calendar-quarter to the. skin of the whola body)."

(

In LER 482/88-028, dated January 6, 1989,.the licensee identified to th NRC the facts surrounding and the subsequent evaluation of the overexposure to the skin of the whole body of an employee on December.9, i 1988. The employee received an occupational dose of approximately 1 12.5 rems to the skin of the whole body. 'The employee came in contact with '

the hot particle while working in the area of the polar crane inside the containment building. The licensee. suspended work in the area and conducted hot particle surveys in the area. The.se surveys identified one additional hot particle. A review of previous radiological surveys-conducted in this area indicated that this incident was an isolated case and that there had not been previously identified hot particles in the are No unusual radiation levels or evidence of abnormal contamination :

had been previously detected in-the polar crane are ,

,

The licensee has had previous cases of contarrination incidents involving hot particles; however, there had not been any previous incidents which resulted in an overexposur The licensee has, for the most part, i maintained personnel exposures ALARA as a result of their hot particie j control program, which is implemented by Administrative Procedure ADM-03-20 The NRC inspector reviewed the licensee's analysis and root cause of the' j incident. Based on the analysis and nuclide composition'of the two hot i particles detected in the area, the licensee has concluded that the two i particles had originated several years-ago and probably as a result of a pressurizer spray valve leak in April 1986, which caused high contamination in the containment building and high radiation levels in the polar crane area at that time. The licensee reviewed their hot particle contamination control program and did not identify any necessary programmatic change I The exposure to the skin of the whole body of an individual of 12.5 rems is a violation of 10 CFR 20.101(a). (482/8909-02) 1 No deviations were identifie l Radioactive Liquids and Gaseous Waste Systems (84750, 84524)

The NRC inspector reviewed the licensee's liquid and gaseous radioactive waste effluent programs including: waste system (instruction and ,

installation, waste sampling, process and effluent monitors, procedures

,

i l ,.

.

  • *

. . ,

, ,

for waste and effluent systems, air cleaning systems, and audits an surveillance to determine adherence to commitments in Chapters 9, 11, and 17 in the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) andLthe requirements in Sections 3/4.3.3.10, 3/4.3.3.11, 3/4.7.6, 3/4.7.7, 3/4.11.1, 3/4.11.2, 6.5, 6.8, and 6.15 in the T The NRC inspector reviewed the licensee's implementation of the RETS and ODCM to ensure agreement with analysis sensitivities, reporting limits, analytical results, sampling requirements, surveillance tests, RWEP operating procedures, offsite dose results from effluents, and'

functional checks and calibrations of equipment associated with the RWE Selected documents and records listed in Attachment 1 to this report were reviewe The NRC inspector reviewed current approved revi_sions of WCGS procedures governing the release of liquid and gaseous radioactive waste. These effluent release procedures provide for the following: sampling of radioactive waste; radionuclides analysis prior to release; calculation of effluent release rate, projected offsite radionuclides concentrations, and offsite doses prior to release; verification of effluent radiation monitor setpoints and testing of effluent isolation valvec prior to release; and verifying discharge flow rates and effluent volume discharge The NRC inspector reviewed selected liquid and gaseous release pe:mits for the period January 1988 through December 1988. It was determined that quantities of radioactive nuclides released in the liquid and gaseous effluents were within the limits specified in the RET Offsite doses had been calculated according to the ODCM and were within the TS limits. The NRC inspector determined that processing, sampling and analysis, and approval and performance of the radioactive effluent releases were conducted in accordance with WCGS procedures, except for the performance and documentation of the respective process radiation monitoring system source checks and valve strokes associated with the various radioactive effluent release type ;

.

TS 3/4.3.3.10, Table 4.3-8 and TS 3/4.3.3.11, Table 4.3-9 require that process effluent radioactivity monitors, which provide an alarm and automatic termination of release, be source checked prior to each releas The licensee's System Operating Procedure SYS HB-125, " Waste Monitor Tanks-Operation," Revision 4, dated July 26, 1988, paragraph 4.6.2 states,

" Ensure all applicable sections of STS SP-001, Process Radiation Monitoring System Source Check and Valve Stroke, have been completed." In addition, similar references to the performance of Surveillance Procedure STS SP-001 prior to each batch release are made in SYS HF-200,

>

" Secondary Liquid Waste System Operations," Revision 5, dated May 20, 1988, paragraphs 4.4.3.3, 4.5.2.12, and 4.9.5; SYS GT-120, " Containment Mini Purge System Operations," Revision 8, dated November 8,1988, ,

paragraph 3.5; and SYS HA-204, " Gaseous Radwaste System Decay Tank Release i Procedure," Revision 4, dated August 30, 1988, paragraph 3.8.

i

, _._ . .- m._., -.

' ' '


__.__m-- - _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ __m..-___ _ _m_..__- _.__ __-__

) * -

.

,

.

.,

.

Contrary to the above, the NRC inspector. determined on March 15, 1989, !

that only 25 out of 203 liquid effluent batch releases, one containment purge out of 51 containment releases, and none of the seven gas decay tank releases conducted in 1988 had completed STS SP-001 surveillance test results in the WCGS records vault documenting the performance of the process radiation monitoring system source check and valve stroke surveillance test prior to each radioactive effluent batch releas The failure to complete Surveillance Procedure STS SP-001 and document such performance prior to each radioactive effluent batch release is considered a violation of TS 3/4.3.3.10, Table 4.3-8 and TS 3/4.3.3.11, Table 4.3- (482/8909-03)

The NRC inspector determined that no design changes had been made to the liquid and gaseous radioactive waste systems since the previous NRC inspection conducted in January 198 The NRC inspector reviewed functional checks, calibrations, and setpoint procedures and records for radioactive waste effluent monitors which showed that the frequency of functional channel checks and calibrations met TS requirements. The monitor calibrations and setpoint determinations were verified to have been performed according to approved procedure The NRC inspector reviewed the licensee's procedures, surveillance tests, and selected records and test results for maintenance and testing of air cleaning systems which contain high efficiency particulate air (HEPA)

filters and activated charcoal adsorbers. The NRC inspector verified that the licensee's procedures and surveillance tests provided for the required periodic functional checking of ventilation system components, evaluation of HEPA and activated charcoal adsorbers, and replacement and in place filter testing of filter systems. The NRC inpsector reviewed selected ,

records and test results for the period May 1986 through March 1989 for i the control room emergency ventilation and the auxilary building emergency (<haust air cleaning systems. The in place filter testing and activated charcoal laboratory tests had been performed in accordance with approved procedures by a contract laboratory and all test results were verified to be within TS limits. The NRC inspector noted that the TS requirement for testing the various ventilation systems' activated charcoal adsorber material af ter every 720 hours0.00833 days <br />0.2 hours <br />0.00119 weeks <br />2.7396e-4 months <br /> of operation was being tracked by the licensee's results engineering section. However, the tracking of ventilation system operating hours between sampling and laboratory testing of the activated charcoal adsorber material was being performed informally J using data collected weekly from the control room major equipment monitoring log. The licensee had not developed a procedure or surveillance test to periodically monitor and. control the various J ventilation systems' operation hours so as not to exceed the 720 hour0.00833 days <br />0.2 hours <br />0.00119 weeks <br />2.7396e-4 months <br /> operation criteria between testings of the activated charcoal adsorber material as specified by TS. This item was discussed with the licensee during the inspection and at the exit interview on March 17, 1989. The licensee agreed to evaluate the NRC inspector's concern and take the necessary action to establish a procedure to formally monitor the operating hours of the various ventilation systems requiring TS testin This is considered to be an open item (482/8909-04) pending completion of the licensee's evaluatio ;

i

  • *

.

.

,

., ,

.The.NRC inspector determine'd that the licensee was perf'orming their own q in place filter testing program on the various station ventilation systems-

~

and that a contract laboratory was: performing the activated charcoal adsorber analy'ses as required by TS. The licensee had performed a l QA program audit on the contractor performing the laborttory analyses o the station ventilation systems and had placed the contractor on the WCGS qualified. supplier's. lis The NRC inspector reviewed audit and surveillance schedules for.1988 and j the first and second quarters of 1989 and the qualifications of QA l auditors. Surve111ances and audit reports of QA activities performed j during 1988 in the area of RWEP were reviewed for scope, thoroughness of j program evaluation, and timely followup of identified deficiencies. The ;

NRC inspector also reviewed the audit report of the contractor laboratory l used to perform tests.on the station ventilation. systems. The NRC inspector determined that the QA surveillance and audits had.been performed in accordance with WCGS QA procedures and schedules and had not identified any significant problems. The documents which were reviewed

,

j are listed in Attachment I to this repor ]

No deviations were identifie . Reports of Radioactive Effluents (84750)

The NRC. inspector reviewed the licensee's reports concerning radwaste systems and effluent releases to determine compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50.36(a)(2) and Sections 6.9.1.7, 6.14, and 6.15 in the T The NRC inspector reviewed the licensee's semiannual effluent release reports for the periods July I through December'31,1987; January 1 through June 30, 1988; and July 1 through December 31,.1988. These i reports were written in the format described.'in NRC Regulatory Guide 1.21 ]

and contained the information required by T ;

No violations or deviations were identifie ! Exit Interview (30703)- i (

The NRC inspector met with the licensee representatives denoted in paragraph I at the conclusion of the inspsetion on March 17, 1989. The i NRC inspector summarized the scope and findings of the inspection and discust?d the details of the violations and open item. The licensee-representatives stated at the exit interview that they would evaluate the NRC inspector's concern expressed as an op3n ite '

.

l i

,

l

!

'

?. . .

..- .

ATTACHMENT 1

.

Wolf Creek Generating Station NRC Inspection Report: 50-482/89-09'

Documents Reviewed- ,j i

)

Title Revision Date ' Administrative Procedures- j ADM-04-006, Preparation of the Monthly " Preliminary 3 '01/31/89 Report:on. Radioactive Releases" and the

" Radioactive Effluent Releases" Portion of the Semiannual Operating Report

~

ADM-04-019, ODCM Contro /04/85-ADM-04-020, Chemistry Surveillance Program -15 01/24/89 1 J

.'

ADM-04-020, Appendix.1, WCGS Technical Specifications '(g)

Surveillance Report ADM-04-020, Appendix 2, WCGS Technical Specification- '(c) t Surveillance Report (Cumulative Doses and Projected Doses)

ADM-04-020, Appendix 4, Table-4.11-2 Surveillance (b)

Report

!

ADM-04-020, Appendix 5, Table 4.11-1' Surveillance (b) l Report-  !

ADM-04-023, Radioactive Releases 1 /28/88 4

ADM-04-023, Appendix I, Radioactive Liquid Release ,10- 06/28/88 i Permit -l ADM-04-023, Appendix II, Radioactive Gas Release 10 06/28/88 Permit ADM-04-023, Appendix III, Shift Chemist Liquid  ;'10 06/28/88

-

Release Checklist j ADM-04-023, Appendix'IV, Shift Chemist Gaseous- 10: 06/28/88- j Release Checklist

.! ' Chemistry Manual Procedures CHM-01-002, Sampling of the Liquid Release 4 05/02/88 Batch Tanks  !

!

. . - . ..~.-.-----,..:- ;..- .

  • -

. .

., .,

.

CHM-01-003, Sampling of the Waste Gas Decay Tanks 3 08/03/88-CHM-01-004,' Sampling Containment Atmosphere for 7 07/06/88 Radioactive Gases and Tritium CHM-01-005, Exchange of Unit and Radwaste Vent 7 09/22/87 Particulate and Iodine Filter Cartridges'

~

-l

CHM-01-006, Sampling of Containment' Atmosphere for' 3 09/02/87-Particulate and Iodine Concentration CHM-01-007, Sampling of the Unit and Radwaste Vent 4 07/14/87 for Radioactive Gas and Tritium CHM-01-009, Sampling of the_ Spent Fuel Building _ Vent 5 07/06/88

'for Radioactive Gases and Tritium ui

-

.

!

CHM-03-011, Liquid Scintillation Counter Operations 4' 01/09/89- .1 CHM-03-021, Gamma Isotopic Analysis 10 11/14/88 CHM-03-040, Tritium Analysis -(Liquid Sample) 9 12/28/88 i CHM-03-042, Gross Alpha Measurement 0 04/06/84 j CHM-03-043, Airborne Tritium Analysis 4 01/18/89 CHM-03-050, Determination of Strontium 89-90 2 03/02/88-CHM-03-054, Waste Gas Analyzer 0 01/03/8 j CHM-03-140,-Preparation of Radioactive Release 6 11/08/88 l Permit  ;

CHM-03-145, Composite Preparation of Liquid 4 01/16/89 ;

Releases CHM-03-150, Use of.the ND6700 tRW/GRW System for .- 7 - -11/08/88 Liquid Radioactive Releases  :

CHM-03-151, ND6700 Midrelease Update 2 11/05/87--

CHM-03-152, Use of the ND6700 LRW/GRW' System '10 07/06/88

'

for Containment Purges.-

CHM-03-153, Use of the ND6700 LRW/GRW System 8 08/01/88 for Gas Decay Tank Releases CHM-03-154, Use-of the ND6700 LRW/GRW System 7- 05/29/87

'for. Unit Vent and Radwaste Building Continuous Releases

__ .

_ - _ - _ _ - _ _ . _ - - -

,

' *

. . .

,

s, 4

.

.

CHM-03-155, Instructions for Use of the ND6700 0 11/09/84 for Generating Radiological Reports CHM-03-156, Updating the ND6700 System with 2 03/07/88 Isotopic Composite Results

CHM-03-160, Preparation of Waste Gas Release Permit 4 09/09/88 CHM-03-161, Preparation of Radioactive Gas Release 5 07/06/88 .

Permit for Containment Purges i

!

CHM-03-162, Preparation of Vent Release Permit 2 06/16/87 3. Surveillance Tests

~

STS-CR-001, Control Room Daily Logs 6 06/02/87 q STS-CH-010, Calibration of Liquid Process and 1 11/25/86 f Effluent Monitors STS-CH-011, Calibration of the Particulate Detector 2 04/26/86 ,

for Gaseous Monitors STS-CH-012, Calibration of the Iodine Detector for 2 04/26/88 Gaseous Monitors STS-CH-013, Calibration of the Gaseous Detector for 1 12/02/86 Gaseous Monitors STS-CH-014, Calibration of Monitors GT RE-21A 2 04/26/88 and GT RE-218 STS-GG-001A, Emergency Exhaust Filtration System 6 08/09/88 j Train A 10 Hour Operability Test STS-GG-001B, Emergency Exhaust Filtration System 6 08/09/88 i Train B 10 Hour Operability Test j STS-GK-001A, Control Room Emergency Vent System 7 02/16/88 4 Train A Operability Test l

STS-GK-001B, Control Room Emergency Vent System 7 02/16/88 Train B Operability Test STS-IC-256, Analog Channel Operational Test Liquid 5 09/20/88 Radwaste Discharge Radiation Monitor HB RE-18 STS-IC-257, Analog Channel Operational Test Steam 5 09/20/88 Generator Blowdown Discharge Radiation Monitor BM RE-52

~

_ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ __ - l

  • '

.

,

. .

STS-IC-258, Analog Channel' Operational Test, Turbine . 5 09/27/88 . :

Building Drain Radiation Monitor LE RE-59 I STS-IC-259, Analog Channel Operational Test Secondary 5 09/27/88 Liquid Waste System Radiation Monitor

~

i; HF RE-45 i'

STS-IC-270A, Analog. Channel Operational-Test-Inlet 3 02/20/86-and Outlet Gaseous Radwaste Hydrogen /

0xygen Analyzers, Train A STS-IC-2708, Analog Channel Operational Test-Inlet 2 04/01/86 ,

and Outlet Gaseous Radwaste Hydrogen / -l 0xygen Analyzers, Train B 1

'

~

STS-IC-274A, A.nalog Channel Operational Test' Unit 2 03/07/86 Vent Radiation Monitor GT RE-21A STS-IC-274B, Analog Charinel Operational Test Unit 3 .03/07/86 Ventilation System Radiation Monito GT RE-21B STS-IC-275A, Analog Channel Operational Tes /09/88 Containment Purge System Radiation 1 Monitor GT RE-22 STS-IC-2758, /.nalog Channel Operational Test 6 08/16/8 Containment Purge System Radiation  ;

Monitor GT RE-33 J l

STS-IC-2768, Analog Channel Operational Test 3 03/07/86 Radwaste Bldg. Vent System Radiation Monitor GH RE-10B STS-IC-456, Channel Calibration Liquid Radwaste System 2 12/13/84 -l

, Discharge Radiation Monitor HB RE-18  :

STS-IC-457, Channel Calibration Steam Generator 2- 12/15/84 Blowdown Effluent Radiation Monitor-  !

BM RE-52  ;

'

STS-IC-458, Channel Calibration Turbine Building 4- 07/02/85 Effluent Radiation Monitor LE RE-59 STS-IC-459, Channel Calibration Secondary Liquid Waste- 2 12/15/84 ,

Radiation Monitor HF RE-45

,

STS-IC-474A, Channel Calibration Unit Vent 3 03/04/86 Radiation Monitor GT RE-21A

'l STS-IC-4748, Channel Calibration Unit Ventilation 3 03/07/86'

System Radiation Monitor GT RE-21B

!

!

i

___________._.m_.____________ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ . . _ . . _ _ _ _ _ . _ .

- _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ ._

-

  • .

,

W STS-IC-475A, Channel Calibration Containment Purge 4 02/04/86 System Radiation Monitor GT RE-22

'

STS-IC-4758, Channel Calibration Containment Purge 3 '02/11/86 System Radiation Monitor GT RE-33 STS-IC-476A, Channel Calibration Radwaste Building 4 03/07/86 Vent Radiation Monitor GH RE-10A STS-IC-4768, Channel Calibration Radwaste Building 3 03/07/86 Vent Radiation Monitor GH RE-10B  !

STS-MT-006, Hydrogen Recombiner Visual. Inspection 2' 05/23/85 STS-PE-001, Filter /Adsorber Unit Vent Inspectiom 0 01/14/86 Safety Related Units STS-PE-002, . Filter /Adsorber Unit Charcoal Adsorbent 1 03/01/88 Bed Sampling Safety Related Units STS-PE-003, Emergency Exhaust System Flow Rate and 4 10/20/88 Combined Pressure Drop Test STS-PE-004, Auxiliary Building and Control Room 6 10/20/88 Pressure Test STS-PE-005, HEPA Filter :n-Place Leak Test safety 1 06/28/88 Related Units STS-PE-006, Charcoal Adsorbers In-Place Leak Test 1- _06/28/88 Safety Related Units q STS-PE-009, Control Room Filtration and Pressurization 2 10/20/88 Systems Flow Rate and Combined Pressure l Drop Test 4. Quality Assurance Surveillance and Audits i 1987 Revised Third and Fourth Quarter Audit and 1 .10/12/88- i Surveillance Schedule j

\  ;

.

i 1989 First and Second Quarter Audit and Surveillance 1 10/24/89- )

Schedule R QA Surveillance Report TE:53359 S-1687, Duratek Operation of the-EVR ;

System, dated November 11, 1988 QA Surveillance Report TE:53359 S-1715, Liquid / Gaseous Effluents, dated, February 9, 1989

.

'

l

.

l

, i l

.

QA Surveillance Report TE:53359 S-1717, Technical Specifications Chemistry Surveillance Testing, dated February 9, 1989 l QA Surveillance Report TE:53359 S-1723, Processing of Liquid Radwaste, dated March 10, 1989  ;

i

'

QA Audit Report TE:50140-K206, Technical Specification and License Condition Adherence, dated May 5, 1988

QA Audit Report TE:50140-K218, Offsite Dose Calculation Manual, l dated August 24, 1988 1 QA Audit Report TE:50140-K219, Surveillance Testing and Inspection, dated August 16, 1988 QA Vendor Audit Report TE:58367-K001, NCS Corporation, j dated September 11, 1987 j Wolf Creek Generating Station Semiannual Effluent Release Reports j

!

July 1 through December 31, 1987 January 1 through June 30, 1988 l July 1 through December 31, 1988 l

l

i l

l

!

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _