ML20197H659: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 13: Line 13:
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| page count = 1
| page count = 1
| project = TAC:54169, TAC:54433, TAC:54607
| stage = Other
}}
}}


Line 19: Line 21:
Georgia Power Cornpany 333 P:edmont Avenue At:anta Georgia 30308 Telephone 404 5266526 Mamng Mdress:
Georgia Power Cornpany 333 P:edmont Avenue At:anta Georgia 30308 Telephone 404 5266526 Mamng Mdress:
Post Offce Box 4545 Atlanta Georgia 30302                                                                        L Georgia Power L T. Gucwa                                                                the sournern er ectnc system Manager Nuclear Engineering                                                      NED-84-326 and CbM Nuclear Engineer June 15, 1984 Director of Nuclear Reactor Pegulation Attention: Mr. John F. Stolz, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 4 Division of Licensing U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Ccunission Washington, D. C. 20555 NRC DOCKEIS 50-321, 50-366 OPERATING LICENSES DPR-57, NPF-5 EIMIN I. HA'ICH NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1, 2 PROPOSED ATIS 'IECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS - ADDITIONAL INFOINATION Gentlenen:
Post Offce Box 4545 Atlanta Georgia 30302                                                                        L Georgia Power L T. Gucwa                                                                the sournern er ectnc system Manager Nuclear Engineering                                                      NED-84-326 and CbM Nuclear Engineer June 15, 1984 Director of Nuclear Reactor Pegulation Attention: Mr. John F. Stolz, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 4 Division of Licensing U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Ccunission Washington, D. C. 20555 NRC DOCKEIS 50-321, 50-366 OPERATING LICENSES DPR-57, NPF-5 EIMIN I. HA'ICH NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1, 2 PROPOSED ATIS 'IECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS - ADDITIONAL INFOINATION Gentlenen:
Following receipt of our June 14, 1984, letter which transmitted revised responses to NRC staff questions on proposed ATIS Technical Specification changes, the staff has asked for clarification of one sentence in our response to question 1-2.                %e _ sentence in question is repeated from our June 14, 1984, response:
Following receipt of our {{letter dated|date=June 14, 1984|text=June 14, 1984, letter}} which transmitted revised responses to NRC staff questions on proposed ATIS Technical Specification changes, the staff has asked for clarification of one sentence in our response to question 1-2.                %e _ sentence in question is repeated from our June 14, 1984, response:
                         "%e additional hardware associated with the RPS portion of the NI'IS systen is no more susceptible to failures than the non-ATIS associated with RPS."
                         "%e additional hardware associated with the RPS portion of the NI'IS systen is no more susceptible to failures than the non-ATIS associated with RPS."
he point of clarification requested by the NRC staff was whether this sentence meant that the additional hardware associated with the RPS portion of the ATIS systen "is no more susceptible to failures than the equipnent it
he point of clarification requested by the NRC staff was whether this sentence meant that the additional hardware associated with the RPS portion of the ATIS systen "is no more susceptible to failures than the equipnent it
         - replaced." 7n fact, that statsnent                "... is no more susceptible to failure
         - replaced." 7n fact, that statsnent                "... is no more susceptible to failure
         - than the equipt.ent it . replaced"            -
         - than the equipt.ent it . replaced"            -
is a subset of the more encczopassing response provided in' our June 14, 1984 letter which also addressed other equipnent in the RPS systen.
is a subset of the more encczopassing response provided in' our {{letter dated|date=June 14, 1984|text=June 14, 1984 letter}} which also addressed other equipnent in the RPS systen.
Very truly yours, hySlbw L. T. Gucwa
Very truly yours, hySlbw L. T. Gucwa
         -n xc: .J.      T. Beckham, Jr.
         -n xc: .J.      T. Beckham, Jr.

Latest revision as of 21:24, 8 December 2021

Submits Addl Info Re Proposed Tech Spec Changes,Per NRC Request.Hardware Associated W/Atts & non-ATTS Sys Discussed
ML20197H659
Person / Time
Site: Hatch  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 06/15/1984
From: Gucwa L
GEORGIA POWER CO.
To: Stolz J
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NED-84-326, TAC-54169, TAC-54433, TAC-54607, NUDOCS 8406190105
Download: ML20197H659 (1)
v • d • e


Text

-

Georgia Power Cornpany 333 P:edmont Avenue At:anta Georgia 30308 Telephone 404 5266526 Mamng Mdress:

Post Offce Box 4545 Atlanta Georgia 30302 L Georgia Power L T. Gucwa the sournern er ectnc system Manager Nuclear Engineering NED-84-326 and CbM Nuclear Engineer June 15, 1984 Director of Nuclear Reactor Pegulation Attention: Mr. John F. Stolz, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 4 Division of Licensing U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Ccunission Washington, D. C. 20555 NRC DOCKEIS 50-321, 50-366 OPERATING LICENSES DPR-57, NPF-5 EIMIN I. HA'ICH NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1, 2 PROPOSED ATIS 'IECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS - ADDITIONAL INFOINATION Gentlenen:

Following receipt of our June 14, 1984, letter which transmitted revised responses to NRC staff questions on proposed ATIS Technical Specification changes, the staff has asked for clarification of one sentence in our response to question 1-2. %e _ sentence in question is repeated from our June 14, 1984, response:

"%e additional hardware associated with the RPS portion of the NI'IS systen is no more susceptible to failures than the non-ATIS associated with RPS."

he point of clarification requested by the NRC staff was whether this sentence meant that the additional hardware associated with the RPS portion of the ATIS systen "is no more susceptible to failures than the equipnent it

- replaced." 7n fact, that statsnent "... is no more susceptible to failure

- than the equipt.ent it . replaced" -

is a subset of the more encczopassing response provided in' our June 14, 1984 letter which also addressed other equipnent in the RPS systen.

Very truly yours, hySlbw L. T. Gucwa

-n xc: .J. T. Beckham, Jr.

H. C. Nix, Jr.

J. P. O'Reilly (NRC- Region II)

Smior Resident Inspector 8406190105 840615 PDRADOCK05000g

" h M

-

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20197H659&oldid=3341339"