ML20012A126

Forwards Completed Questionnaire in Response to Generic Ltr 90-01, Request for Voluntary Participation in NRC Regulatory Impact Survey.

ML20012A126
Person / Time
Site:	Hatch
Issue date:	03/01/1990
From:	Hairston W GEORGIA POWER CO.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
GL-89-01, GL-89-1, HL-986, NUDOCS 9003080342
Download: ML20012A126 (26)

Text

. .. . .- . .-

ce o*a s one. Ctnes,i i .5 0 323 E*3'TirAt A<c5st Atte",a Geo+g a ?C ??3 legho ,e 404 is yg5 ve ,; Anm 43 :nem cew No.a.

l fDt* c% t bDe 1;?b -

e mye Ana- m;r 7e+cvc 20! K6 f.LU

", 4 W. c. Hairston, iii se'vot Vice Pret cem Nscies' Ope'ams HL-986 000292 i

March 1, 1990 l

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN:: Document Control Desk 1' Washington, D.C. 20555 PLANT HATCH - UNITS 1, 2 NRC DOCKETS 50-321, 50-366 OPERATING LICENSES DPR-57, NPF-5 l GENERIC LETTER 90-01  !

VOLUNTARY PARTICIPATION IN NRC REGULATORY IMPACT SURVEY Gentlemen: {

On January 18,' 1990, the NRC issued Generic Letter 90-01, " Request for Voluntary Participation in NRC Regulatory Impact Survey". The generic ,

letter requested that- utilities, on a voluntary basis, complete the  ;

questionnaire provided in the enclosure to the letter. The purpose of this information is to provide the NRC with insight on the time which key j

managers spend in responding to various inspections and audits. The completed qtutionnaire is provided as an enclosure to this letter..

1 L

In agreement with the views presented by INP0 in their letter to the NRC dated February.7, 1990. Georgia Power Company (GPC) has not included the time spent by managers during INPO assistance visits. GPC agrees that such visits should not be categorized as an imposition, but-rather a L response to a utility's request for assistance in a particular area.

'Please recognize that the hput provided for upper management involvement only reflects the time spent for Plant Hatch, even though the

" Chief Nuclear Officer," and one of the two " Corporate Vice Presidents"  :

-also have responsibilities for other plants within the Southern Company.

l i.

9003000342 900301 ['

PDR ADOCK 05000321

P PNV f [f

/// -

I l Georgia Power A U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission March 1, 1990 Page Two If you have any questions in this regard, please call this office at any time.

Sincerely, n/d /kV W._G. Hairston, III JKB/eb

Enclosure:

NRC Regulatory Impact Survey Questionnaire c: Georaia Power Comoany Mr. H. C. Nix, General Manager - Nuclear Plant Mr. J. D. Heidt, Manager Engineering and Licensing - Hatch

! GO-NORMS 1'

U.S. Nuclear Reaulatory Commission. Washinoton. D.C.

Mr. L. P. Crocker, Licensing Project Manager - Hatch U.S. Nuclear Reaulatory Commission. Reaion-II i Mr. S. D. Ebneter, Regional Administrator Mr..J. E. Menning, Senior Resident Inspector - Hatch l

l l

I 000292 i

l h

i k

ENCLOSURE  ;

E. I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT  !

NRC Regulatory Impact Survey .

Questionnaire Sheet j

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: NRC Team Insoections i

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is i this activity conducted? Normally twice a year

3. Operations / Construction areas covered: Emeroency Operatino Procedures.

Operational Performance Assessment. Maintenance Team Inspections Safety .

System Functional Insoections of EDG. Quality Verification. Balance of j Plant

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) _10 Insoectors a

for two weeks

5. Approximate manhours (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the .

activity described in Item #1. [

a. Plant Department Heads 640 (number involved) 12 ,

b. Plant Manager 35

c. Corporate Department Heads 420 (number involved) 6

d. Corporate Vice Presidents 70 (numberinvolved) 2 .

e. Chief Nuclear Officer 8

f. Other Supervision 1000 (numberinvolved) 42 NOTE: Times are given in total manhours.

000301 1

,-m

L ENCLOSURE E. I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT NRC Regulatory Impact Survey Questionnaire Sheet

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: Other NRC Resident.

Reaional and Headouarters Insoections/ Audits.

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted? Resident insoections - Once Der month:

Reaional and Headauarters - Every Two Weeks

3. Operations / Construction areas covered: All areas of Plant Ooeration and Emeraency Preparedness

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) Resident -

Two Inspectors. 21 days per month. Reaional and Headouarters - One insoector for 5 days once every two weeks

5. Approximate manhours (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item #1.

a. Plant Department Heads _195_ (numberinvolved) 12

b. Plant Manager 62

c. Corporate Department Heads 770 (numberinvolved) 6

d. Corporate Vice Presidents 250 (numberinvolved) 2

e. Chief Nuclear Officer 24

f. Other Supervision 1450 (numberinvolved) 42 NOTE: Times are given in total manhours.

000301 2 ,

i ENCLOSURE a e E. 1. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT NRC Regulatory Impact Survey Questionnaire Sheet

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: INPO Evaluation

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted? Once per year

3. Operations / Construction areas covered: Plant Safety. Manaaement Systems.

Technical Support. Plant Operations Maintenance. Quality Proarams.

t Radioloaical Protection Practices

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) 15 to 20 Evaluators for 10 days.

y S. which the following managers l

Approximate must spend in manhours (on an annual direct involvement before, basis)during, and in response to the activity described in item #1.

a. Plant Department Heads _192_ (numberinvolved) 12

b. Plant Manager 60

c. Corporate Department Heads _llD_ (numberinvolved) 6 ,

d. Corporate Vice Presidents 100 (numberinvolved) 2

e. Chief Nuclear Officer 16

f. Other Supervision 800 (numberinvolved) 42 NOTE: Times are given in total manhours. ,

l 00030) 3

^

l l

ENCLOSURE E. 1. HATCH WUCLEAR PLANT NRC Regulatory Impact Survey Ouestionnaire Sheet

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: Insurers (ANI) Insoections. [

Audits or Evaluations

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is  !

this activity conducted? Normally twice per year

3. Operations / Construction areas covered: Radiation exoosure. containment Leakaae Testina. Records Retention. Effluent Monitorina. Comouter Software Control. Ooerations Turnover Practices. etc.

1

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) 3 Inspectors for seven days i

(

5. Approximate manhours (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item #1.

a. Plant Department Heads 80 (numberinvolved) 8

b. Plant Manager 5 c.. Corporate Department Heads __11_ (number involved) 4

d. Corporate Vice Presidents 15 (number involved) 2

e. Chief Nuclear Officer 0

f. Other Supervision 50 (numberinvolved) 15 NOTE: Times are given in total manhours.

000301 4

i

?

1 ENCLOSURE E. I. HATCH NUCLEAR Pl. ANT NRC Regulatory Impact Survey Questionnaire Sheet

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: EPA ,

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is ,

this activity conducted? No EPA Inspections in Recent History i

3. Operations / Construction areas covered:

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long)

I

5. Approximate manhours (on an annua'l basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item #1. .

a. Plant Department Heads (numberinvolved)

b. Plant Manager

c. Corporate Department Heads (number involved)

d. Corporate Vice Presidents (numberinvolved)

e. Chief Nuclear Officer

f. Other Supervision (number involved) __.

NOTE: Times are given in total manhours.

000301 5

P ENCLOSURE E. I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT >

NRC Regulatory Impact Survey Ouestionnaire Sheet

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: OSHA Audits  :

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is  ;

this activity conducted? Last audit in 1986. none since then.

This activity is included in routine NRC insoection activity.

3. Operations / Construction areas covered:

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long)

5. Approximate manhours (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in item #1.

a. Plant Department Heads (numberinvolved)

b. Plant Manager

c. Corporate Department Heads (number involved) 1' l- d. Corporate Vice Presidents (number involved) 1 i e. Chief Nuclear Officer 1

i f. Other Supervision (number involved) l-1 l

NOTE: _ Times are given in total manhours, l

1 I

000301 6 l

I .'

. j ENCLOSURE  !

E. I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT NRC Regulatory Impact Survey l Questionnaire Sheet i

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: DOT

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted? No insoections in recent history.

3. Operations / Construction areas covered:

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) r

5. Approximate manhours (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item fl.

a. Plant Department Heads (number involved)

b. Plant Manager

c. Corporate Department Heads (number involved)  !

d. Corporate Vice Presidents (numberinvolved)

! e. Chief Nuclear Officer l -- f. Other Supervision (number involved)

NOTE: 1) Times are given in total manhours.

000301 7

i e

l ENCLOSURE E. I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT NRC Regulatory impact Survey Duestionnaire Sheet ,

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: State and local  ;

Authorities j

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is  !

this activity conducted? Normally twice per year l

3. Operations / Construction areas covered: State Environmental Protection i

Division (EPD) Solid Waste Landfill Insocction. National Pollutant Discharae Elimination System Permit Inspection. Elevator Insoection.

Fire Protection. etc.

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) One Insoector for ,

half a day ,

5. Approximate manhours (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item #1.

1 '

a. Plant Department Heads 12 (numberinvolved) 3

b. Plant Manager 1

c. Corporate Department Heads 0 (numberinvolved) 0

d. Corporate Vice Presidents 0 (number involved) 0

e. Chief Nuclear Officer 0

f. Other Plant Supervision 50 (numberinvolved) 9 .

l t

NOTE: Times art given in total manhours. .

000301 8

ENCLOSURE E. I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT NRC Regulatory Impact Survey Questionnaire Sheet

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: 0A (Technical Soecifications)

Audits reauired by NRC

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often'is >

this activity conducted? 53 Audits for 1989. Averaaed anoroximately 57 audits /vr. for cast 5 years.

3. Operations / Construction areas covered: Trainina. Limitoraue Actuators.

Emeraency Prepareness. Desian Modifications. Refuelina Outaae Activities Health Physics. ISI Proaram. etc.

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long)

Averaae aooroximately 2 peoole for 8 days per audit.

I

5. Approximate manhours (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item #1.

{ a. Plant Department Heads 1320 (number involved) 12

b. Plant Manager __15

c. Corporate Department Heads _i2Q_ (numberinvolved) 6 l

l d. Corporate Vice Presidents 180 (numberinvolved) 2

e. Chief Nuclear Officer 8

f. Other Supervision 2000 (number involved) 42 NOTE: Times are given in total manhours.

000301 9

I ENCLOSURE l E. I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT NRC Regulatory impact Survey Ouestionnaire Sheet

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: Self-As sessment s Resultina from External Commitnents i

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is -

this activity conducted? Assessments associated with Confiauration Manaaement Proaram and Trainino

3. Operations / Construction areas covered: Maintenance. Operations.  ;

Enaineerina. Nuclear Safety & Comoliance. Health Physics. Chemistry.

General Suocort. Trainina. Outaae Manaaement. Security. Desian Enaineerino .

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) Averaae of 5 peoo19 for 3 months for each assessment I

5. Approximate manhours (on Lan annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item #1.

a. Plant Department Heads 325 (number involved) 12

b. Plant Manager 75

c. Corporate Department Heads _192_ (number involved) 6

d. Corporate Vice Presidents 15 (number involved) 2

e. Chief Nuclear Officer 0

f. Other Supervision 2500 (number involved) 30 NOTE: Times are given in total manhours.

000301 10

i l

ENCLOSURE E. I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT NRC Regulatory Impact Survey Questionnaire Sheet E

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: Other: Plant visits by NRC Uoner Manacement. ,

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is

.this activity conducted? Acoroximately two to three Der year

3. Operations / Construction areas covered: Plant Manaaement 4 Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) 2 oeoole for 1 day P

5. Approximate manhours (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Itein #1.

a. Plant Department Heads 36 (number involved) 9

b. Plant Manager 5

c. Corporate Department Heads __1Q_ (number involved) 6

d. Corporate Vice Presidents 16 (numberinvolved) 2 i

e. Chief Nuclear Officer 8

f. Other Supervision 25 (numberinvolved) 2 -

l NOTE: Times are given in total manhours.

1 000301 11 L

g

Georg a Pwer Comnan,

- - .' 333 Pocmom A<ense

{

• - AtaNa ceo pa 30306 h>eD50ne 404 526 3195 i

, 1 M akng M c'ess

• .)

4D irvemess Ceme' Pa4 6ar l Pec CP'ce Bo.1295  ;

B.em ap* am Aabama 35001 '

It'rD % nt 205 008 550* '

t w..; e . . . u. l W. G. Hairston, lli l

Senof Vce Fren otN ,

Nsnea* 0nera , ens l

HL-986  :

000292 March 1, 1990 f I

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 i PLANT HATCH - UNITS 1, 2 NRC DOCKETS 50-32), 50-366  :

OPERATING LICENSES DPR-57, NPF-5  :

GENERIC LETTER 90-01 VOLUNTARY PARTICIPATION IN i NRC REGULATORY IMPACT SURVEY l

Gentlemen:

On January 18, 1990, the NRC issued Generic Letter 90-01, ' Request for i Voluntary Participation in NRC Regulatory impact Survey". The generic  ;

letter- requested that utilities, on a voluntary basis, complete the questionnaire provided in.the enclosure to the letter. The purpose of this  ;

information 'is to provide the NRC with insight on the time which key managers spend in responding to various inspections and audits. The completed questionnaire is provided as an enclosure to this letter. ,

In agreement with the views presented by INPO in their letter to the NRC dated February 7, 1990. Georgia Power Company (GPC) has not included  !

the time spent by managers during INPO assistance visits. GPC agrees that such visits should not be categorized as an imposition, but rather a response to a utility's request for assistance in a particular area.

Please recognize that the input provided for upper management '

involvement only reflects the time spent for Plant Hatch, even though the i

' Chief. Nuclear Officer," and one of the two " Corporate Vice Presidents" also have responsibilities for other plants within the Southern Company. t i

s

_ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . _ ._. . < . _ ~ , - - ,_ _ _ , _ - . - , . v_ -.

)

i Georgia Poiver A l

. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  !

March 1,-1990 i Page Two j l

If you have any questions in this regard, please call this office at i any time.

Sincerely,  !

n/d //V W. G. Hairston, III l

JKB/eb

Enclosure:

NRC Regulatory Impact Survey Questionnaire c: Georaia Power Comoany Mr. H. C. Nix, General Manager - Nuclear Plant

• Mr. J. D. Heidt. Manager Engineering and Licensing - Hatch GO-NORMS ,

U.S. Nuclear Reaulatory Commission. Washinaton. D.C.

Mr. L. P. Crocker, Licensing Project Manager - Hatch U.S. Nuclear Reaulatory Commission. Reaion II Hr. S. D. Ebneter, Regional Administrator i Mr; J. E. Menning, Senior Resident Inspector - Hatch 1

1 o

l l

1-l' lr l

t f

i:

000292

.u m s.-m___..__ __u.__

i ENCLOSURE E. I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT NRC Regulatory Impact Survey [

Ouestionnaire Sheet

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: NRC Team Insnections

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted? Normally twice a year ,

3. Operations / Construction areas covered: Emeroency Doeratina Procedures.

Ooerational Performance Assessment. Maintenance Team Insoections. Safety System Functional Inspections of EDG. Quality Verification. Balance of Plant ,

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) 10 Insoectors for two weeks

5. Approximate manhours (on an anntial basis) which the following managers ,

must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item #1.

a. Plant Department Heads 640 (numberinvolved) 12

b. Plant Manager 35

c. Corporate Department Heads 12p_ (numberinvolved) 6

d. Corporate Vice Presidents 70 (number involved) 2

e. Chief Nuclear Officer 8

f. Other Supervision 1000 (number involved) 42 NOTE: Times are given in total manhours.

1 000301 1 l

L

ENCLOSURE  !

E. 1. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT  !

NRC Regulatory Impact Survey  :

Questionnaire Sheet '

3. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: Other NRC Resident.  ;

Reaional and Headauarters Insoections/ Audits. ,

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is '

this activity conducted? Resident Insoections - Once ner month:

Reaional and Headauarters - Every Two Weeks

]

3. Operations / Construction areas covered: All areas of Plant Ooeration and Eme sency Preparedness

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) Resident -

Two Insoectors. 21 days Der month. Reaional and Headauarters - One Insoector for 5 days once every two weeks S. Approximate manhours (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item fl.

a. Plant Department Heads E5_. (number involved) 12

b. Plant Manager 62 L

.c. Corporate Department Heads 770 (numberinvolved) 6

. d. Corporate Vice Presidents 250 (numberinvolved) 2 l

e. Chief Nuclear Officer 24

f. Other Supervision 1450 (number involved) 42 l

L L

NOTE: Times are given in total manhours.

l 000301 2 i

1

i

• l t

ENCLOSURE E. I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT NRC Regulatory Impact Survey  :

Questionnaire Sheet i

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: INPO Evaluation l

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is l this activity conducted? Once ner year  :

3. Operations / Construction areas covered: Plant Safety. Manaoement Systems. '

Technical Suonort. Plant Ooerations Maintenance. Quality Procrams. '

Radiolooical Protection Practices

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) 15 to 20 Evaluators for 10 days. _

5. Approximate manhours (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in resPase to the activity described in Item #1.

[ a. Plant Department Heads .lQD_ (numberinvolved) 12

b. Plant Manager 60 [

l c. Corporate Department Heads .llp_ (numberinvolved) 6

d. Corporate Vice Presidents 100 (numberinvolved) 2

e. Chief Nuclear Officer 16

f. Other Supervision 800 (number involved) 42 NOTE: Times are given in total manhours.

L 000301 3

.- - . = . -- - - -- . _ . . .

-l l ENCLOSURE E. I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT I NRC Regulatory Impact Survey Duestionnaire Sheet I

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: l surers (ANI) Insoections. l Audits or Evaluations

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted? Normally twice oer year l

j

3. Operations / Construction areas covered: Radiation exoosure. containment Leakaae Testino. Records Retention. Effluent Monitorina. Comnuter Software 1

Control. Operations Turnover Practices. etc.

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) 3 Insoectors for seven days l

t

5. Approximate manhours (on an annual basis which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before,)during, and in response to the activity described in Item #1.

a. Plant Department Heads __8L (number involved) 8

b. Plant Hanager 5

c. Corporate Department Heads ,_l l (number involved) 4

d. Corporato Vice Presidents 15 (numberinvolved) 2

e. Chief Nuclear Officer 0

f. Other Supervision 50 (number involved) 15 l

NOTE: Times are given in total manhours.

000301 4

.[ .

ENCLOSURE E. I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT NRC Regulatory Impact Survey Questionnaire Sheet

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: EPA

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted? No EPA Insnections in Recent History

3. Operations / Construction areas covered:

o

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) i 5. Approximate manhours (on an annual basis) which the following managers l must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item #1.

a. Plant Department Heads (numberinvolved) l

! b. Plant Manager

c. Corporate Department Heads (numberinvolved) ,

d. Corporate Vice Presidents (number involved)

e. Chief Nuclear Officer

f. Other Supervision (numberinvolved)

NOTE: Times are given in total manhours.

000301 5

l i

ENCLOSURE t E. I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT NRC Regulatory Impact Survey Questionnaire Shts,1 t

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: OSHA Audits

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is !

this activity conducted? Last audit in 1986 3one since then.  ;

This activity is included in routine NRC insnection activity.

3. Operations / Construction areas covered:

{

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) l 5. Approximate manhours (on an annual basis) which the following managers L must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the i activity described in Item #I.

a. Plant Department Heads (number involved) ,

b. Plant Manager

c. Corporate Department Heads (number involved)

d. Corporate Vice Presidents (numberinvolved)

e. Chief Nuclear Officer i

l- f. Other Supervision (number involved)

NOTE: Times are given in total manhours.

000301 6

t l

i ENCLOSURE  !

E. I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT NRC Regulatory Impact Survey  ;

Questionnaire Sheet >

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: DOT  !

[

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is 3 this activity conducted? No insoections in recent history.

9

3. Operations / Construction areas covered:

4

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) ,

i

5. Approximate manhours (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item fl. L

a. Plant Department Heads (number involved)

b. Plant Manager

c. Corporate Department Heads (numberinvolved)

d. Corporate Vice Presidents (number involved)

e. Chief Nuclear Officer l f. Other Supervision (number involved)

NOTE: 1) Times are given in total manhours.

000301 7 l

, , _ - . _ , _ . . . - _ , .,r...-. . , _ . , ,

l 4

ENCLOSURE E. I. HATCH NUCLE /.R PLANT NRC Regulatory Impact Survey Questionnaire Sheet ]

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: State and Local Authorities

)

2. Based on actual. experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted? Normally twice per year

3. ,0perations/ Construction areas covered: State Environmental Protection Division (EPD) Solid Waste Landfill Insoection. National Pollutant i Discharae E?imination System Permit Insoection. Elevator Inspection. ,

f_ ire Protection. etc.

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) One Insoector for i half a day l ,

l 5. Approximate manhours (on an annual basis) which the following managers 2 j must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item #1.

i

a. Plant Department Heads ,__12_ (numberinvolved) 3

b. Plant Manager 1

c. Corporate Department Heads 0 (number involved) 0

d. Corporate Vice Presidents 0 (number involved) 0 l e. Chief Nuclear Officer 0

f. Other Plant Supervision 50 (numberinvolved) 9 NOTE: Times are given in total manh'ours.

000301 8 9

ENCLOSURE  !

E. I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT NRC Regulatory Impact Survey ,

Duestionnaire Sheet ,

t

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: DA (Technical Specifications)

Audits reauired by NRC

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about hou often is '

this activity conducted? 53 Audits for 1989. Averaaed aooroximatelv 57 l

audits /vr. for cast 5 years.  :

3. Operations / Construction areas covered: Trainino. Limitoraue Actuators.

Emeroency Prepareness. Desian Modifications. Refuelino Outaae Activities

- Health Physics. ISI Proaram. etc.

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) s Averaae anoroximately 2 neoole for 8 days per audit.

5. Approximate manhours (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item #1.

a. Plant Department Heads .1320 (numberinvolved) 12

b. Plant Manager 55 i

c. Corporate Department Heads _420._ (number involved) 6

d. Corporate Vice Presidents 180 (numberinvolved) 2

e. Chief Nuclear Officer 8

f. Other Supervision 2000 (numberinvolved) 42 NOTE: Times are given in total manhours.

000301 9

1

(; ' .

t ENCLOSURE ,

L E. 1. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT l NRC Regulatory Impact Survey Duestionnaire Sheet -

i

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: Self-Assessment s Resultina from External Commitments

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is I this activity conducted? Assessments associated with Confiauration  !

Manaaement Proaram and Trainina

3. Operations / Construction areas covered: Maintenance. Ooerations. [

Enaineerina. Nuclear Safety & Comoliance. Health Physics. Chemistry. ,

General Suncort. Trainina. Outane Manaaement. Security. Desian Enaineerina

4. Exten,t of the activity (how many people, for how long) Averaae of 5 peoole for 3 months for ekch assessment

5. Approximate manhours (on an annual basis) which the following managers i must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in item #1.

a. Plant Department Heads .32L (numberinvolved) 12

b. Plant Manager 75 -

c. Corporate Department Heads _JDL (number involved) 6

d. Corporate Vice Presidents 15 (number involved) 2

e. Chief Nuclear Officer o

f. Other Supervision 2500 (numberinvolved) 30 NOTE: Times are given in total manhours.

000301 10

1

.~. . .

ENCLOSURE E. I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT NRC Regulatory Impact Survey Questionnaire Sheet

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: Other: Plant visits by NRC Unner Manacement.

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted't Anoroximately two to three ner year ,

3. Operations / Construction areas covered: Plant Manacement

[

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) 2 neoole for 1 day

5. Approximate manhours (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item #1. .

5

a. Plant Department Heads 36 (numberinvolved) 9

b. Plant Manager 5

c. Corporate Department Heads _ 1D_ (number involved) 6

d. Corporate Vice Presidents 16 (number involved) 2

! e. Chief Nuclear Officer 8 l

f. Other Supervision 25 (number involved) 2 i

l NOTE: Times are given in total manhours.

l 000301- 11 l

1 - .