ML20127J364: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML20127J364
| number = ML20127J364
| issue date = 06/28/1976
| issue date = 06/28/1976
| title = Submits Status Rept of Responses to 750821 Ltr Re Atws. Results of Studies Discussed in Util 751223 Ltr,Proposed Course of Action & Schedule for Implementation Will Be Available by 760901
| title = Submits Status Rept of Responses to Re Atws. Results of Studies Discussed in Util ,Proposed Course of Action & Schedule for Implementation Will Be Available by 760901
| author name = Mayer L
| author name = Mayer L
| author affiliation = NORTHERN STATES POWER CO.
| author affiliation = NORTHERN STATES POWER CO.
Line 11: Line 11:
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| document report number = NUDOCS 9211190311
| document report number = NUDOCS 9211190311
| title reference date = 08-21-1975
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 1
| page count = 1
Line 22: Line 23:
Division of Operating Reactors
Division of Operating Reactors
                                                                                                                                         ',                . %. ?
                                                                                                                                         ',                . %. ?
U S Nuctsar Regulatory Cousnission Washington, DC    20555 DearHegiomann MONTICELLO NUCLEAR CENERATING PIANT Docket No. 50-263 License No. DPR-42 Status Report of Responses to AuRust 21. 1975 Letter our December 23, 1975 letter stated that two studies were under way in response to your August 21, 1975 letter on Anticipated Transients Without Scram (AWS).
U S Nuctsar Regulatory Cousnission Washington, DC    20555 DearHegiomann MONTICELLO NUCLEAR CENERATING PIANT Docket No. 50-263 License No. DPR-42 Status Report of Responses to AuRust 21. 1975 Letter our {{letter dated|date=December 23, 1975|text=December 23, 1975 letter}} stated that two studies were under way in response to your {{letter dated|date=August 21, 1975|text=August 21, 1975 letter}} on Anticipated Transients Without Scram (AWS).
At the time our letter was written, a final submittal was expected to be avail-cble by June 30, 1976                                                                                                                                                                ,
At the time our letter was written, a final submittal was expected to be avail-cble by June 30, 1976                                                                                                                                                                ,
An evaluation of the consequences of AWS for Honticello is esentially complete.
An evaluation of the consequences of AWS for Honticello is esentially complete.

Latest revision as of 04:22, 22 August 2022

Submits Status Rept of Responses to Re Atws. Results of Studies Discussed in Util ,Proposed Course of Action & Schedule for Implementation Will Be Available by 760901
ML20127J364
Person / Time
Site: Monticello Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/28/1976
From: Mayer L
NORTHERN STATES POWER CO.
To: Ziemann D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 9211190311
Download: ML20127J364 (1)


Text

_ _ - - _ - _ _ _ _

'~~~'*** ~ ~ . * ~ . . . . __ . , ,

wgym ajjjG NORYMEMN STdTES POWER COMPANY MINNE APOLIS. MINNE SOTA 95400 June 28, 1976 I

. ..n o N' .s Mr D L Ziemann, Chisf Operating Reactors Branch f 2 ,,.. a n ll ' . ~

Division of Operating Reactors

', . %. ?

U S Nuctsar Regulatory Cousnission Washington, DC 20555 DearHegiomann MONTICELLO NUCLEAR CENERATING PIANT Docket No. 50-263 License No. DPR-42 Status Report of Responses to AuRust 21. 1975 Letter our December 23, 1975 letter stated that two studies were under way in response to your August 21, 1975 letter on Anticipated Transients Without Scram (AWS).

At the time our letter was written, a final submittal was expected to be avail-cble by June 30, 1976 ,

An evaluation of the consequences of AWS for Honticello is esentially complete.

Design modifications assumed in the analysis which would mitigate the consequences cre presently being evaluated. We expect the design modifications installed as a result of the analysis vill include a trip of the reactor recirculation pumps.  ;

Progress on the consequence analysis has been retarded by the recent work losd '

placed on key vendor personnel to respond to generic matters regarding AWS for  !

category B plants. Probability evaluatiors for an ATWS event having serious con- I sequences are in progress, but will not be available for some time. l Ve presently anticipate that the results of these studies, our proposed course I of action, and a schedule for implementation vill be available by September 1,1976.

Yours very truly, sto.

L 0 Mayer, P Manager, Nuclear Support Services MMQTE

(([j"LQ [ L

.b. u 3G LCHh0!V/ deb cc J G Keppler G Charnoff HPCA g .

Attne J W Forman OlSTRIBUTION OF THIS MOUMENT IS UNUMITED 9211190311 760628  %

PDR ADOCK 05000263 P PDR W

.c,%

- _, s ,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - -