ML19330A275: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:-
                  ~
                                                                                  ^
.    ,        ,                                3                                      00CM i iU:,4!:1R P.fl0D. & UllL. TAC, bO M/,$
e          O>
e                          /    McD niexoTT. Wii.r. & EN Eur 9
LUCZEiE3                      IM WCM MONHOC M R C CT S              E3df3                      CHICAGO. ILLir4015 60603 2      MAY 241971
* 1                          m-~~~~~~o
                                            '                                                  caou 4=uss Off es of ..he serrtery                                                              *'"#
                %,Z'*8'                              I.'ay 20,, 1971 A            tilD cu          g Arthur U. Murphy, Esq., Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensinr3 Board Columbia University School of Lau Box 38, 435 West 116th Street I!eu York, New York                  1002' Re:    AEC Docket I!os. 50-329 50-330
 
==Dear Chairman Murphy:==
 
We enclose herewith a Motion by the Intervenors whom I represent in connection with the taking of deposi-tions and for an order requiring that the hearing not proceed until the AEC and ACRS have responded to discovery.
We have attached a supporting affidavit and you will' note that in connection uith the discovery prob 1cm it in the only factual affidavit before the Board.
In the event that there are any further pre-hearing conferences in this proceeding, we nhould apprc-ciato consideration being given to holding then in Chicago.
Chicago'is more convenient chan Ucu York for a great number of norsons participating in this procccding and the e:: pense of tr:1ps to Ucu York is at times prohibitive to my clients.                                  ,
Uith respect to Mr. Roisman's let,ter of May l'f, 1971, uith which he enclosos an offer of proof on behalf of ED7, the Intervonors uhom I represent t.-ish to adopt that offer of proof.                  In addition, we would also be prepared to demonstrate that evidence secured through the Palisades hearings tends to indicate that Conswacrs Pouer Company's electrical forecasting is not supported by the. evidence.
In the Palisades hearings, Mr. Jack Mosely, uho is in charge of such clectrical forecasting for Consumern,                                                    I I
attcupted to testify about pouer noods remrding Consumers THIS DOCUMENT CONTMNS POOR QUALITY PAGES 80 0.71510 bQ{
 
. I c q                              m Arthur W. Murphy, Esa.,
IIay 20,1971 page tuo Pouer Company's electrical forecast. On cach occasion Mr. Moccly's testimony nac stricken fro:a the recor:1 ac not supported by evidence.
eco ctfully your ,
b G
1    n/ M. el '
                                              )
ICIC:ck cc:    Dr. David 3. Hall Dr. Clark Goodman
                !!r. Stanley T. Robinson, Jr.
All Counsel of Record                                  l e
f e}}

Latest revision as of 19:51, 31 January 2020

Forwards Intervenors' 710520 Motion & Affidavit Requesting Taking of Depositions & Preventing Hearing Until NRC & ACRS Respond to Discovery
ML19330A275
Person / Time
Site: Midland
Issue date: 05/20/1971
From: Cherry M
MCDERMOTT, WILL & EMERY
To: Murphy A
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML19330A276 List:
References
NUDOCS 8007151077
Download: ML19330A275 (2)


Text

-

~

^

. , , 3 00CM i iU:,4!:1R P.fl0D. & UllL. TAC, bO M/,$

e O>

e / McD niexoTT. Wii.r. & EN Eur 9

LUCZEiE3 IM WCM MONHOC M R C CT S E3df3 CHICAGO. ILLir4015 60603 2 MAY 241971

  • 1 m-~~~~~~o

' caou 4=uss Off es of ..he serrtery *'"#

%,Z'*8' I.'ay 20,, 1971 A tilD cu g Arthur U. Murphy, Esq., Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensinr3 Board Columbia University School of Lau Box 38, 435 West 116th Street I!eu York, New York 1002' Re: AEC Docket I!os. 50-329 50-330

Dear Chairman Murphy:

We enclose herewith a Motion by the Intervenors whom I represent in connection with the taking of deposi-tions and for an order requiring that the hearing not proceed until the AEC and ACRS have responded to discovery.

We have attached a supporting affidavit and you will' note that in connection uith the discovery prob 1cm it in the only factual affidavit before the Board.

In the event that there are any further pre-hearing conferences in this proceeding, we nhould apprc-ciato consideration being given to holding then in Chicago.

Chicago'is more convenient chan Ucu York for a great number of norsons participating in this procccding and the e:: pense of tr:1ps to Ucu York is at times prohibitive to my clients. ,

Uith respect to Mr. Roisman's let,ter of May l'f, 1971, uith which he enclosos an offer of proof on behalf of ED7, the Intervonors uhom I represent t.-ish to adopt that offer of proof. In addition, we would also be prepared to demonstrate that evidence secured through the Palisades hearings tends to indicate that Conswacrs Pouer Company's electrical forecasting is not supported by the. evidence.

In the Palisades hearings, Mr. Jack Mosely, uho is in charge of such clectrical forecasting for Consumern, I I

attcupted to testify about pouer noods remrding Consumers THIS DOCUMENT CONTMNS POOR QUALITY PAGES 80 0.71510 bQ{

. I c q m Arthur W. Murphy, Esa.,

IIay 20,1971 page tuo Pouer Company's electrical forecast. On cach occasion Mr. Moccly's testimony nac stricken fro:a the recor:1 ac not supported by evidence.

eco ctfully your ,

b G

1 n/ M. el '

)

ICIC:ck cc: Dr. David 3. Hall Dr. Clark Goodman

!!r. Stanley T. Robinson, Jr.

All Counsel of Record l e

f e