ML20065H794: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 13: Line 13:
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| page count = 4
| page count = 4
| project = TAC:49449, TAC:49450
| stage = Other
}}
}}


Line 18: Line 20:
{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _            __
{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _            __
IMSCORSin Electnc m coww 231 W. MICHIGAN, P.O. BOX 2046. MILWAUKEE, WI 53201 September 29, 1982 Mr. H. R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Washington, D. C. 20555 Attention:            Mr. R. A. Clark, Chief Operating Reactors, Branch 3 Gentlemen:
IMSCORSin Electnc m coww 231 W. MICHIGAN, P.O. BOX 2046. MILWAUKEE, WI 53201 September 29, 1982 Mr. H. R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Washington, D. C. 20555 Attention:            Mr. R. A. Clark, Chief Operating Reactors, Branch 3 Gentlemen:
DOCKET NOS. 50-266 AND 50-301 ASME SECTION XI RELIEF REQUESTS POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 In Mr. Clark's letter dated August 31, 1982, the NRC transmitted to Wisconsin Electric Power Company license mmendments which revised the Technical Specifications for inservice inspection of safety-class components and granted relief from specific ASME Section XI Code requirements. During our review of this transmittal letter and the attached Technical Specification changes, we observed several inconsistencies. The first of these inconsistencies concerned two of the 10 CFR Section 50.55a reliefs granted in the letter for Point Beach Unit 1 but not for Point Beach Unit 2.                                                  In a telephone call to Mr. Tim Colburn and other members of your staff on September 14, 1982, we discussed this problem and requested that this letter be revised to grant these reliefs for both units. We also noted a second inconsistency between the letter and the Technical Specification revision concerning inservice testing of                                                          a pumps and valves. Mr. Colburn acknowledged these concerns and indicated they would be resolved in a revision to the license amendment transmittal.
DOCKET NOS. 50-266 AND 50-301 ASME SECTION XI RELIEF REQUESTS POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 In Mr. Clark's {{letter dated|date=August 31, 1982|text=letter dated August 31, 1982}}, the NRC transmitted to Wisconsin Electric Power Company license mmendments which revised the Technical Specifications for inservice inspection of safety-class components and granted relief from specific ASME Section XI Code requirements. During our review of this transmittal letter and the attached Technical Specification changes, we observed several inconsistencies. The first of these inconsistencies concerned two of the 10 CFR Section 50.55a reliefs granted in the letter for Point Beach Unit 1 but not for Point Beach Unit 2.                                                  In a telephone call to Mr. Tim Colburn and other members of your staff on September 14, 1982, we discussed this problem and requested that this letter be revised to grant these reliefs for both units. We also noted a second inconsistency between the letter and the Technical Specification revision concerning inservice testing of                                                          a pumps and valves. Mr. Colburn acknowledged these concerns and indicated they would be resolved in a revision to the license amendment transmittal.
(
(
During the September 14 telephone call, we also discussed Wisconsin Electric's letter to Mr. Denton dated February 23, 1982.
During the September 14 telephone call, we also discussed Wisconsin Electric's letter to Mr. Denton dated February 23, 1982.

Latest revision as of 19:56, 31 May 2023

Requests Relief from ASME Section Xi,Inservice Insp Requirements Re Frequency of Reactor Vessel Interior Exam
ML20065H794
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/29/1982
From: Fay C
WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER CO.
To: Clark R, Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
TAC-49449, TAC-49450, NUDOCS 8210050256
Download: ML20065H794 (4)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ IMSCORSin Electnc m coww 231 W. MICHIGAN, P.O. BOX 2046. MILWAUKEE, WI 53201 September 29, 1982 Mr. H. R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Washington, D. C. 20555 Attention: Mr. R. A. Clark, Chief Operating Reactors, Branch 3 Gentlemen: DOCKET NOS. 50-266 AND 50-301 ASME SECTION XI RELIEF REQUESTS POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 In Mr. Clark's letter dated August 31, 1982, the NRC transmitted to Wisconsin Electric Power Company license mmendments which revised the Technical Specifications for inservice inspection of safety-class components and granted relief from specific ASME Section XI Code requirements. During our review of this transmittal letter and the attached Technical Specification changes, we observed several inconsistencies. The first of these inconsistencies concerned two of the 10 CFR Section 50.55a reliefs granted in the letter for Point Beach Unit 1 but not for Point Beach Unit 2. In a telephone call to Mr. Tim Colburn and other members of your staff on September 14, 1982, we discussed this problem and requested that this letter be revised to grant these reliefs for both units. We also noted a second inconsistency between the letter and the Technical Specification revision concerning inservice testing of a pumps and valves. Mr. Colburn acknowledged these concerns and indicated they would be resolved in a revision to the license amendment transmittal. ( During the September 14 telephone call, we also discussed Wisconsin Electric's letter to Mr. Denton dated February 23, 1982. In this letter we provided the NRC with a detailed listing of all the examinations performed during the Point Beach Unit 1 first ten-year inspection interval. Enclosure 4 to that letter listed the areas where we did not comply with the inservice inspection program and identified the reasons for not meeting the program. During the ho o l 8210050256 820929 PDR ADOCK 050002gg 0

l '

     ^

I

                 .Mr. H..R. Denton                                                                                                                                  September 29, 1982 review of the August 31 NRC letter, we discovered that a relief request had not been filed for one of these items. As discussed in the February 23 letter,.this item concerns the frequency of the reactor vessel interior examination (Cat BN1) which was not practical at Point Beach Nuclear Plant. Relief requests were previously submitted to cover all the other items listed in the February 23 letter.

Accordingly, enclosed with this letter is a relief request from the frequency of the reactor vessel interior exami-nation (Cat BN1). This relief request.is applicable to Point Beach Units 1 and 2 for the first ten-year interval. It is our understanding that, with NRC acceptance of the relief requests previously submitted and herein provided, the first ten-year inservice inspection interval requirements for Point Beach Unit 1 are complete. It is expected that all the first interval inservice inspection requirements for Unit 2 will be completed during the spring refueling outage in 1983. Very truly yours, e l W

                                                                                                                                                                     /

Assistant Vice President C. W. Fay Enclosure Copy to NRC Resident Inspector

84 ATTACHMENT 1 UNITS 1 AND 2 RELIEF REQUEST COMPONENT Reactor pressure vessel. EXAM AREA Reactor vessel interior surfaces. ISOMETRIC OR COMPONENT DRAWING None. ASME SECTION XI CATEGORY BN1 (1974/S75) ASME SECTION XI ITEM NUMBER Bl.15 (1974/S75) ASME SECTION XI EXAMINATION REQUIREMENT A visual examination (VT) is required every 3 years of the accessible areas of the vessel interior surfaces during a normal refueling outage . ALTERNATIVE EXAMINATION A visual' examination (VT) of the reactor vessel interior will be performed when the core barrel is removed but not at a frequency greater than that specified in the Code. The core barrel will not be removed specifically for this examination. REASON FOR LIMITATION As can be seen from Figure 1, only a small portion of the reactor vessel interior surfaces are accessible with the core barrel in-place. There is approximately 10" of the vessel interior surface accessible from the top of the core barrel flange to the reactor vessel flange ~ during a normal refueling outage. A meaningful examination cannot be performed unless the core barrel'is removed. Removal of the core barrel requires a complete defueling of the reactor and significant ALARA impacts including' exposure and contamination problems. 54

 -u       i
                         .._m.__ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ _

e

              ',                                                                                          .                           e
 ,e 5                                                o r

I 4 Ob DF i bN~ l f- C0gTROL ROD DRfkt AECHAss$m

                                                                                      .' \

l\

                                                                                                                                         \                                                                      INSTR,LMtWTATiON
                                                                                                                                                                                                                 ~1
                                                                .s          'bs
                                                                                               ,              g  '

lsfissG Lug -- ~ ' i .

                                                                                                        !        .I

( N,, - CLOSURE NEA0 o f0 . ; { j% \0 A55EM8tv I w / (h, bhj.d.IN-!h

                                                                ..co. < ,% b. ccA                      c-s s.Y            .

YY.j

                                                                                                                                                 .; \                           g           --- rwRm satvt
                                           ,r teiRsee o              -

PLATE I j

                                                       =g< 'a g g c P:..'c :

Q ' :> 'm o y CONTRE ROD {_ t)  : m- o E q j {, O gypp0 i UCCl e ( + N '~-

                                                                                                                                                                                /                                          $ *'

N Q ' I N (GRO 8AReft [ ' l

                                                                                                                      ]4

_ 1/ .

                                                                                                                                                                              /                              AllChagNf pig
                                                /                                                        6
                                                                                                                                                                                                         -CONTROL R00 Cut 0E fust so..oRic - N                       y
                                   ~~~.~ l                                                                                                               ~

h h . { c0NtRon noo onut snus

                                                       -                  6                             b            d g%

CONIROL R0D CLU5ftR

        ~,o, sy ]            s                                                               *i ys                                                        swirw w wi..
                                                                    .;          _. , , - 7 ag                    ,

g p oo,,,, w , (g 'Q I [ u, y[, h.ihu y.M .; r m' 3 l . N

       <-is-0
                                              '                                                                                               f 4 ..,,a x                  '

4 j,!, ~ 4,.p _ / w 'uh h, iJh

0. mm " a ~~ s--,
                                                    .p' i sLv -

2 7~

      .cCrss o.i                                     e                !

i. i w!e',l f

n. .

j i g.. h%-X

                                                                                                                                            ,]   --
                                                                                                                                                                                             - o                          ' ,.
                                                ]);:..t;G                                                                                      ,
m. s. , ~ , .

j . f,;P.

                                                                         .,               3               .                .[g C        .*-      ..
                                                                                            'A e n                                        y., .
                                                                        'O f                              s a
                                     \\                       hl .)

6 h flow marf e piar,

    ,". s-,0" WP'o                \                       M .,'b                                              h, e.                                  /                                  - enRrtuepoRt nicuss Q 4 h.k'fin' j; . P !l .

u I i I -{ I1 .. srei m Aro,,,,,=eu

                                                                                                                                                                                                            ..,                                                i, I1-                             .-g 9,                                                                                                                                                     /

FIG URE~ l RMACTOR VESSEL INTERNALS - - FIGURE 3.2.3-2 - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _}}