ML20126K856: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 14: Line 14:
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, LEGAL/LAW FIRM TO NRC
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, LEGAL/LAW FIRM TO NRC
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
| project =
| stage = Request
}}
}}



Latest revision as of 09:18, 22 August 2022

Discusses Util Response to W Eddleman 850619 Request That Documents Be Made Part of Record in Proceeding,Per Board 850715 Order.Util Application for Withholding Untimely by Terms of 10CFR2.790.Related Correspondence
ML20126K856
Person / Time
Site: Harris Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/26/1985
From: Guild R
EDDLEMAN, W., GUILD, R.
To: Bright G, Carpenter J, Kelley J
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
CON-#385-978 OL, NUDOCS 8507300500
Download: ML20126K856 (2)


Text

. -_ _ ____ __

b wv o 4

" . dlohtiw eb ot thguon'noitamrofni eht gnilif fo omit eht ta duttimhun ub 11nho tivadiffa dna taht noriuqer hcihw )1()h( 097 2 noitceS tiw rof noitacilppa l

noitacilppa eh)T("yb ylemi,tnu ni gnidloh,02 yaH fo smret ticilpxe eht

.tneserp n'L&PC 5-2 .pp ruttol ,5891 .ronovretnI

! ot orunoicsid rieht tnevorp ot ortuod a dna noitnetnoc dettimda eht ot ecnavcier rieht ot noitcejbo na ylno tub

! ogolivirp on datrenna L&PC,atnemucod onoht fo noinnimbun nO 12.P .unnopauR ,5891 9 yluJ .noitamrofni inicremmoc degulivirp dna initnedifnoc gniniatnoc"na tropoR kcehC ytilauQ dna2 tropeR ot )1()b(

RFC 01 lenaP weivuRuht eht no fo drnoil otunoicnid eht dlohtiw" tep yldutniob 097 fo ytirohtun L&PC acod ,orunoicsid rof tneuqer A10F ruo retfa noiti, won ylnO p 5891 ,51 yluJ fo redrO .ylper ot namriahC draoD uht yb ytinutroppo na detnarg urow'uw dna n atisoppo ni dadnopuor L&PC .tcA noitamrofnI fo modoorF eht dna

! ecitcarP fo neluR noinnimmoC eht ot tnaunrup nu bt desolcsid eb dna gnideecorp aiht ni drocer uht fo trap a odam eb L&PC yb i

JraoB uht ot dettimbuu noob dah hcihw tnalP rewoP rnoicuN nirrall notnuhS eht fo ytufnu eht ot d n .4 drnoD eht erotub nuunni eht

ot tnavuler eb ot devolleb utnemm od nintroc taht dutneuqer aamelddE alleW ronovretnI ,5691 ,91 onuJ fo ruttul yd snugduJ tnoD ~ l LQ 004-05 .oN tekcoD

)tnalP rewoP tnulcuN uirrall nornehS(

.la te ,ynapmoC thgiL & rewoP aniloraC fo rettaM eht nI t

55502 .C.D ,notgnihsaW noissimmoC yrutniugeR rnoicuN .S.U f

drnoil gniuneciL dna ytef aS cimot A rotnopenC .!! uomaJ egduJ Si502 .C.D ,notgnihnaW notsalumoC 55502 .C.D ,notgnihuaW yrotniuguR rnoicuN .S.U noianimmoC yrotniugoR rnoicuN .S.U draoB

  • denon gniuneciL dna ytuf aS cimot A gni.sonciL dna ytefaS cimotA . namriahC yelluK .L numaJ egduJ LW MS .O nnelG egduJ i aivpH A 4 dhCOD .

. s,f1 m u S m t g i p 5891 62 yluJ l 2 31 H- 4 5 2/ oHPtLET '  !

01:21P 92 LJJ 56

'l 21492 ANILOHAC HTUOS ,NOIGLLHAHC

! DET t;g3 1J'021 X00 LCHFO TSOP l i wu in e acna

)1.lluG Ttl:illO(l ACNEDSmM*MNOC DETALEH

i i

j * *. .

1 e

j -

Judges Kolley, Bright and Carponter .

{

July 26, 1985 page 2 I

The Court of Apponis for the Savonth Circuit, further, i

recognized that to permit a withdrawal of a document sought i

under the FOIA, as CP&L argues here, "would cortninly viointo the spirit, and maybe oven the lotter of the Froodom of Information Act (cientions omitted)." The NRC itself apparently agreos.

i 3

Genornt E1cetric_ Company v. NRC, 750 F.2d 1394, 1399 (1984).

l It would be equally anomoloun to permit the NRC to "roturn" n document sought under the FOIA under authority of Section 2.790 J

(b)(5), no argued in the nitornativo Sy Cp6L. July 9, 1985, l

Rosponso, p.2. Even no, it. is the rolovnnce of thoso documents

} .to this Board's decision or at least the correctness of its -

! actions which romnins in issue.

Thoso documents nro agency records which woro " submitted to the agoney for une in carrying out its dution." Conoral Elect-'e, nuprn, 750 F.2d at 1400. Cp6L nimply cannot be credited i

j nny legitimacy to its cinim of competitivo harm which is critieni to the nppliention of the no-eniled "trado necrot" TOIA exemption 4:

. . . competitive harm in the FOI A context . . . (is) limited to harm flowing fron the affirmativo uso ,

l of propriotary information by competitorn.

Competitive harm nhould not be taken to menn I

nimply any injury to compntitive position, na might flow f rom customer or employeo disgruntlemont '

i j

of from the embarranning publicity attendant i

upon public revointions concerning, for examplo,

)j 111ogni or unethicni pnyments to government officinin or violations of civil rights, j onvironmental or safety inwn.

j j fnb1te_Clttr.en llentth Renenrch Croup v. ,rg , 70', r.2d 1280,1291 in 30. (D.C. Cir. 1981).

Intervonor Wolls Eddioman nubmits that thone documents which are holieved to contain important information concerning the offectivenenn of the Qun11ty Annurance progenm at the '

llarria plant nhould be mndo n part of the record in this proceeding nnd dtncioned an requented.

. 'll i n e ' c e l y , s] s

\ (y ,k c^t-V(

s )

Itobert Culld ,

ces tiervice lini Director, Of( Lee of Adminint rnt ion