ML20099J370

Discusses NRC Re Eddleman 850301 Motion to Compel Discovery of NRC Staff.No Provisions of Code of Prof Responsibility or Commission Rule of Practice Relieve NRC of Obligation to Respond by Pleading.Related Correspondence

ML20099J370
Person / Time
Site:	Harris
Issue date:	03/14/1985
From:	Guild R GUILD, R.
To:	Barth C NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
References
CON-#185-125 OL, NUDOCS 8503190691
Download: ML20099J370 (1)

Text

. _.. _

WED CORRESPONDENCE i

ROBERT GUILD C: - E T E r Attorney at Law NN 21351s Devine Street Columbia, South Carolina 29201 g

Telephone 803 254-8132 CFFICb' 0F SEChtiArir 00CM lNGASggy;cy' March 14, 1985 BRANCH Charles A. Barth, Esquire

~

Counsel for NRC Staff l

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission l

Wsshington, D.C. 20555 In the Matter of Carolina Power and Light Company, et al.,

(Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant)

Docket No. 50-400 -dd.

Dear Mr. Barth:

I have your letter of March 8, 1985,regarding Mr. Eddleman's Motion to Compel Discovery of NRC Staff, served March 1, 1985, in this proceeding.

While I appreciate your solicitude for the protection of Mr. Eddleman's rights as protected by the Code of Professional Responsibility and your views j

regarding the Staff's response to the subject Interrogatories, no provisions of the Code or the Commission's Rules of Practice relieve you of your obligation to respond by formal pleading to Mr. Eddleman's Motion, as to which he retains full capacity to sign and file on his own behalf.

10 C.F.R. 2.708.

With kind regards, I am 4

m

'Very Arul

~y V

Robert Guild I

cc: Service List I

i 5

! [JC) 8503190691 850314 I

PDR ADOCK 05000400 C

PDR l-

.-.