ML19325E525: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:L    *i Q                                                              ~
        ,'  ,e                                                                                                          j e                                                              aosnwansaw                                              I
                  ,                                          hignm Nuclear Ftwer statiori l
Rot 6 y Hill Road                                    i Plymouth, Masuchusetts 02360 1
naiph c. s6te                                                                                          !
Senior Vice President - Nuclear                                                                        i BECo 89 159              l U.S. Nuclear Regul0 tory Commission                                            October M,1989 Document Control Desk                                                                                  i Washington, DC .20555                                                                                  }
License DPR-35          i Docket 50-293            '
RESPONSE TO GENERIC LETTER 88-20. SU_PPLEMENT 1                        !
i This letter describes Boston Edison's program plan for completing an Individual                        !
Plant Examination (IPE) for severe accident vulnerabilities for the Pilgrim                            i Nuclear Power Station (PNPS).                                                                          t i
Boston Edison intends to perform a Level 1 Probabilistic Risk Assessitent (PRA)                        i based on current plant design and operation. The method will be consistent                            ;
with NUREG/CR-2300 "PRA Procedures Guide", and accepted PRA guidance                                  i documents.                Fault tree linking methodology will be used for the front-end              j systems analysis. The current plan is to use EPRI's CAFTA code for fault tree                        i analysis and the MAAP code for the determination of system success criteria                          i where appropriate. Previous effortt conducted on the performance of a                                  i preliminary PNPS Probabilistic Safety Assessment, based on NUREG/CR-2815,                            !
                    "Probabilistic Safety Analysis Procedures Guide", and an Individual Plant                            l Evaluation, based on the IDCOR methodology, will be incorporated into the PRA.                      '
I The IDCOR IPE methodology will be used in those areas where the NRC has found                        ;
the methodology useful and acceptable.                                                              ,
t The back-end containment analysis will be performed in accordance with the                            ;
guidai!:e provided in Appendix 1 to Generic Letter 88-20. " Guidance on the                            >
Examination of Containment System Performance", and Appendix A to NUREG-1335,                        i i,                  " Approach to Back-end Portion of IPE". MAAP will be used to simulate severe                        >
accident progression and better define the phenomena occurring during the                            [
L                  postulated severe accidents.
L                  The schedule for ccmpletion of the IPE is tieing developed in conjunction with                        !
,,                  our Long Term Program (LTP) integrated work management process and will be                            j i                  reported in the 1990 semi-annual LTP update.                                                          ,
f I                                                                                                                        i l                                                                                                                        ;
l G911070344 091027 PDR                                                                '
P    ADOCK 05000293 PNV                                      pq            [
                                                                                                            ,, e l
r
 
m DOSTON EDISON COMPANY O.i.1[uclea'r Yegulatory Commission Page Two l
l                                                                                                            j
  !          Implementation of containment performance improvements began at PNPS as part of                  l r
our self-initiated Safety Enhancement Program (SEP). Regarding the potential                    '
  ;          Mark 1 enhancements discussed in Generic 1.etter 88-20 Supplement 1, we have i
already installed a hardened vent path, modified existing structures to provide an alternate source of water injection into the vessel, < mplemented Revision 4                  ;
of the EPGs, and installed a backup nitrogen supply system to provide longer                    i term pneumatic control capability to the Automatic Depressurization System.                    i I
u(_ - -
R. G. Bird        j JDKlamm/3786                                                                                )  t Commonwealth of Massachusetts)                                                                  !
Ccunty of Plymouth                      )                                                      I Then personally appeared before me, Ralph G. Bird, who being duly sworn, did state that he is Senior Vice President - Nuclear of Boston Edison Company and                  i that he is duly authorized to execute and file the submittal contained herein                  '
in the name and on behalf of Boston Edison Company and that the statements in                  ,
said submittal are true to the best of his knowledge and belief.
My commission expires:                ddL;g /#g              ght                              !
DATE '  f            NOTARY'PUBLIC cc:    Mr. D. Mcdonald, Project Manager                                                        .
Division of Reactor Projects - I/II                                                    i Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation                                                    -
Mail Stop: 14D1                                                                        ;
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                                                    i 1 White Flint North                                                                    :
11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 02852                                                                    -
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission l                    Region I l                    475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406
,                    Senior NRC Resident Inspector                                                        [
Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station                                                        :
i
_ , _ _ . . . _ _  _.        , __._ __. .                            _}}

Latest revision as of 17:57, 18 February 2020

Responds to Generic Ltr 88-20,Suppl 1,describing Plan for Completing Individual Plant Exam for Severe Accident Vulnerabilities.Performance of Level 1 PRA Based on Current Plant Design & Operation Intended
ML19325E525
Person / Time
Site: Pilgrim
Issue date: 10/27/1989
From: Bird R
BOSTON EDISON CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
RTR-NUREG-CR-2300, RTR-NUREG-CR-2815 BECO-89-159, GL-88-20, NUDOCS 8911070344
Download: ML19325E525 (2)


Text

L *i Q ~

,' ,e j e aosnwansaw I

, hignm Nuclear Ftwer statiori l

Rot 6 y Hill Road i Plymouth, Masuchusetts 02360 1

naiph c. s6te  !

Senior Vice President - Nuclear i BECo 89 159 l U.S. Nuclear Regul0 tory Commission October M,1989 Document Control Desk i Washington, DC .20555 }

License DPR-35 i Docket 50-293 '

RESPONSE TO GENERIC LETTER 88-20. SU_PPLEMENT 1  !

i This letter describes Boston Edison's program plan for completing an Individual  !

Plant Examination (IPE) for severe accident vulnerabilities for the Pilgrim i Nuclear Power Station (PNPS). t i

Boston Edison intends to perform a Level 1 Probabilistic Risk Assessitent (PRA) i based on current plant design and operation. The method will be consistent  ;

with NUREG/CR-2300 "PRA Procedures Guide", and accepted PRA guidance i documents. Fault tree linking methodology will be used for the front-end j systems analysis. The current plan is to use EPRI's CAFTA code for fault tree i analysis and the MAAP code for the determination of system success criteria i where appropriate. Previous effortt conducted on the performance of a i preliminary PNPS Probabilistic Safety Assessment, based on NUREG/CR-2815,  !

"Probabilistic Safety Analysis Procedures Guide", and an Individual Plant l Evaluation, based on the IDCOR methodology, will be incorporated into the PRA. '

I The IDCOR IPE methodology will be used in those areas where the NRC has found  ;

the methodology useful and acceptable. ,

t The back-end containment analysis will be performed in accordance with the  ;

guidai!:e provided in Appendix 1 to Generic Letter 88-20. " Guidance on the >

Examination of Containment System Performance", and Appendix A to NUREG-1335, i i, " Approach to Back-end Portion of IPE". MAAP will be used to simulate severe >

accident progression and better define the phenomena occurring during the [

L postulated severe accidents.

L The schedule for ccmpletion of the IPE is tieing developed in conjunction with  !

,, our Long Term Program (LTP) integrated work management process and will be j i reported in the 1990 semi-annual LTP update. ,

f I i l  ;

l G911070344 091027 PDR '

P ADOCK 05000293 PNV pq [

,, e l

r

m DOSTON EDISON COMPANY O.i.1[uclea'r Yegulatory Commission Page Two l

l j

! Implementation of containment performance improvements began at PNPS as part of l r

our self-initiated Safety Enhancement Program (SEP). Regarding the potential '

Mark 1 enhancements discussed in Generic 1.etter 88-20 Supplement 1, we have i

already installed a hardened vent path, modified existing structures to provide an alternate source of water injection into the vessel, < mplemented Revision 4  ;

of the EPGs, and installed a backup nitrogen supply system to provide longer i term pneumatic control capability to the Automatic Depressurization System. i I

u(_ - -

R. G. Bird j JDKlamm/3786 ) t Commonwealth of Massachusetts)  !

Ccunty of Plymouth ) I Then personally appeared before me, Ralph G. Bird, who being duly sworn, did state that he is Senior Vice President - Nuclear of Boston Edison Company and i that he is duly authorized to execute and file the submittal contained herein '

in the name and on behalf of Boston Edison Company and that the statements in ,

said submittal are true to the best of his knowledge and belief.

My commission expires: ddL;g /#g ght  !

DATE ' f NOTARY'PUBLIC cc: Mr. D. Mcdonald, Project Manager .

Division of Reactor Projects - I/II i Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation -

Mail Stop: 14D1  ;

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i 1 White Flint North  :

11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 02852 -

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission l Region I l 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

, Senior NRC Resident Inspector [

Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station  :

i

_ , _ _ . . . _ _ _. , __._ __. . _