|
|
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 3: |
Line 3: |
| | issue date = 09/02/1986 | | | issue date = 09/02/1986 |
| | title = Requests Change to QA Program as Described in Jul 1986 Updated Fsar.Change Would Allow Condition Repts to Be Segregated by Significance.Approval by 861001 Requested. Current & Proposed Updated FSAR & Problem List Encl | | | title = Requests Change to QA Program as Described in Jul 1986 Updated Fsar.Change Would Allow Condition Repts to Be Segregated by Significance.Approval by 861001 Requested. Current & Proposed Updated FSAR & Problem List Encl |
| | author name = ALEXICH M P | | | author name = Alexich M |
| | author affiliation = INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG | | | author affiliation = INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG |
| | addressee name = KEPPLER J G | | | addressee name = Keppler J |
| | addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) | | | addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| | docket = 05000315, 05000316 | | | docket = 05000315, 05000316 |
| Line 14: |
Line 14: |
| | document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC | | | document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC |
| | page count = 5 | | | page count = 5 |
| | | project = |
| | | stage = Other |
| }} | | }} |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:0~~eINDIANA8MICHIGANELECTRICCOMPANYP.O.BOX16631COLUMBUS, OHIO43216'September 2,1986AEP:NRC:0847J DonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnitNos.1and2DocketNos.50-315and50-316LicenseNos.DPR-58andDPR-74REQUESTFORCHANGEINQUALITYASSURANCE PROGRAM10CFR50'4ANDUPDATEDFSARREVIEWOFCONDITION REPORTSDESIGNATED ORIGINALMr.JamesG.Keppler," | | {{#Wiki_filter:0 |
| RegionalAdministrator U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission RegionIII799Roosevelt RoadGlenEllyn,Illinois60137II
| | ~ ~ |
| | e INDIANA 8 M ICHIGAN ELECTRIC COMPANY P.O. BOX 16631 COLUMBUS, OHIO 43216 |
| | 'September 2, 1986 AEP:NRC:0847J Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-315 and 50-316 License Nos. DPR-58 and DPR-74 REQUEST FOR CHANGE IN QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESIGNATED ORIGINAL 10 CFR 50 '4 AND UPDATED FSAR REVIEW OF CONDITION REPORTS Mr. James G. Keppler," Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 II |
|
| |
|
| ==DearMr.Keppler:== | | ==Dear Mr. Keppler:== |
| Thisletterconstitutes arequestforchangetotheQualityAssurance Programasdescribed intheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUpdated(July,1986)FinalSafetyAnalysisReport(UFSAR),Section1.7.16.2.2.
| | |
| Thisrequestissubmitted toyouinaccordance with10CFR50.54(a)(3).
| | This letter constitutes a request for change to the Quality Assurance Program as described in the Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Updated (July, 1986) Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR), Section 1.7.16.2.2. |
| ThecurrentUFSAR(reference Attachment 1)couldbeinterpreted tomeanthatallCondition ReportswillbereviewedbythePlantNuclearSafetyReviewCommittee (PNSRC)andNuclearSafetyDesignReviewCommittee (NSDRC).ThePNSRCandNSDRCarethesafetyreviewgroupsaddressed inourTechnical Specifications.
| | This request is submitted to you in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(a)(3). |
| Condition Reportsareusedtodocumentmanyconcerns, bothsignificant (e.g.,violations) andnonsignificant (e.g.,minormaintenance). | | The current UFSAR (reference Attachment 1) could be interpreted to mean that all Condition Reports will be reviewed by the Plant Nuclear Safety Review Committee (PNSRC) and Nuclear Safety Design Review Committee (NSDRC). The PNSRC and NSDRC are the safety review groups addressed in our Technical Specifications. Condition Reports are used to document many concerns, both significant (e.g., violations) and nonsignificant (e.g., |
| TheproposedchangewouldpermittheCondition Reportstobesegregated bysignificance.
| | minor maintenance). The proposed change would permit the Condition Reports to be segregated by significance. The segregation would effectively reduce the number of condition reports reviewed by the PNSRC and NSDRC to those which only address significant conditions adverse to quality. This reduction in required reviews would provide management more time to spend on significant activities. Concurrently (commencing October 1, 1986), the new Corrective Action Plan (CAP) would assure adequate management attention to all concerns documented in Condition Reports'he CAP has been discussed with Region III and NRR in meetings on April 30, 1986, May 8, 1986, and May 23, 1986. The CAP (1) defines those problems which shall be designated as significant and (2) provides examples of significant problems. Attachment 2 to this letter provides examples of those problems which will be treated as significant and thereby require review by the safety review groups. |
| Thesegregation wouldeffectively reducethenumberofcondition reportsreviewedbythePNSRCandNSDRCtothosewhichonlyaddresssignificant conditions adversetoquality.Thisreduction inrequiredreviewswouldprovidemanagement moretimetospendonsignificant activities.
| | Two additional features of the CAP which will assure adequate management attention of all problems (whether or not designated as significant) are: |
| Concurrently (commencing October1,1986),thenewCorrective ActionPlan(CAP)wouldassureadequatemanagement attention toallconcernsdocumented inCondition Reports'he CAPhasbeendiscussed withRegionIIIandNRRinmeetingsonApril30,1986,May8,1986,andMay23,1986.TheCAP(1)definesthoseproblemswhichshallbedesignated assignificant and(2)providesexamplesofsignificant problems. | | (1) All problems documented on condition reports will be reviewed by a management group (Problem Assessment Group) within a few days after a report is generated to make assignments for resolution and confirm renortability obligations are being met. |
| Attachment 2tothisletterprovidesexamplesofthoseproblemswhichwillbetreatedassignificant andtherebyrequirereviewbythesafetyreviewgroups.Twoadditional featuresoftheCAPwhichwillassureadequatemanagement attention ofallproblems(whetherornotdesignated assignificant) are:SEP8>9.""O(1)Allproblemsdocumented oncondition reportswillbereviewedbyamanagement group(ProblemAssessment Group)withinafewdaysafterareportisgenerated tomakeassignments forresolution andconfirmrenortability obligations arebeingmet.8610280042 Bbio21..jPDR@DOCK.0500O315' Mr..JamesG.Keppler-2-AEP:NRC'0847J (2)Recurring problemswillbeaddressed asanadversetrendwhichisconsidered significant. | | Bbio21 ..j 8610280042 .0500O315' PDR @DOCK 8 SEP >9.""O |
| Significant problemswillbereviewedbythePNSRCandNSDRCinaccordance wi:ththeTechnical Specification requirements. | | |
| WebelievetheCAPwillbeconsistent with10CFR50AppendixBCriterion XVI,whichstates,inpart"...Theidentification ofthesignificant condition adversetoquality...shall bedocumented andreportedtoappropriate levelsofmanagement."
| | Mr.. James G. Keppler AEP:NRC'0847J (2) Recurring problems will be addressed as an adverse trend which is considered significant. Significant problems will be reviewed by the PNSRC and NSDRC in accordance wi:th the Technical Specification requirements. |
| TheCAPclarifies howwewilldetermine ifanadversecondition issignificant ornot,andassuresappropriate management attention.
| | We believe the CAP will be consistent with 10 CFR 50 Appendix B Criterion XVI, which states, in part "...The identification of the significant condition adverse to quality...shall be documented and reported to appropriate levels of management." The CAP clarifies how we will determine if an adverse condition is significant or not, and assures appropriate management attention. |
| Attachment 3includestheproposedrevisions toSection1.7.16.2.2 oftheJuly,1986UFSAP.,whichwouldeffectthisQAprogramchange.Inaddition, thecurrentUFSARdiscusses Noncompliance Reports(NCRs)whichareusedbyAEPSCpersonnel anddiscusses reviews,initiated bytheNuclearOperations | | Attachment 3 includes the proposed revisions to Section 1.7.16.2.2 of the July, 1986 UFSAP., which would effect this QA program change. |
| : Division, of(plant)Condition Reports(CRs).Neitherofthesepractices wouldcontinueorbeneededaspartofthenewCAP.AEPSCpersonnel wouldberequiredtouseaCondition ReportratherthananNCR.AEPSCreviewsofplantinitiated CRswouldbeinitiated, whenneeded,bytheD.C.CookProblemAssessment Group.TheproposedUFSAR(Attachment 3)addresses thesechanges.Thesechangesandothereditorial changestotheUFSAR,resulting fromtheapprovalofthisproposal, willbeincorporated intotheUFSARbyournormalUFSARsubmittal.
| | In addition, the current UFSAR discusses Noncompliance Reports (NCRs) which are used by AEPSC personnel and discusses reviews, initiated by the Nuclear Operations Division, of (plant) Condition Reports (CRs). Neither of these practices would continue or be needed as part of the new CAP. |
| WerequestyourapprovalofthisproposedchangebyOctober1,1986.Asdiscussed inourpreviousmeetings, October1,1986isthetargetdateforimplementation ofourCorrective ActionPlan.Shouldyouchoosenottorespond,wewillassumethatourproposedchangeisacceptable 60daysfromthedateofthisletterasprovidedby10CFR50.54(a)(3)(iv).
| | AEPSC personnel would be required to use a Condition Report rather than an NCR. AEPSC reviews of plant initiated CRs would be initiated, when needed, by the D. C. Cook Problem Assessment Group. The proposed UFSAR (Attachment |
| Thisdocumenthasbeenpreparedfollowing Corporate procedures whichincorporate areasonable setofcontrolstoinsureitsaccuracyandcompleteness priortosignature bytheundersigned.
| | : 3) addresses these changes. These changes and other editorial changes to the UFSAR, resulting from the approval of this proposal, will be incorporated into the UFSAR by our normal UFSAR submittal. |
| MPA/cmAttachment Verytrulyyours,/lM.P.AlexchVicePresidene
| | We request your approval of this proposed change by October 1, 1986. |
| ~)>)&cc:JohnE.DolanW.G.Smith,Jr.-BridgmanR.C.CallenG.Bruchmann G.CharnoffNRCResidentInspector | | As discussed in our previous meetings, October 1, 1986 is the target date for implementation of our Corrective Action Plan. Should you choose not to respond, we will assume that our proposed change is acceptable 60 days from the date of this letter as provided by 10 CFR 50.54(a)(3)(iv). |
| -BridgmanDocumentControlDesk,USNRC-Washington, D.C. | | This document has been prepared following Corporate procedures which incorporate a reasonable set of controls to insure its accuracy and completeness prior to signature by the undersigned. |
| ATTACHMENT 1AEP:NRC:0847JUFSAR,Section1.7.16.2.2 (July,1986)Condition Reportsprovidethemechanism forplantpersonnel tonotifymanagement ofconditions adversetoquality.Investigations ofreportedconditions adversetoqualityareassignedbymanagement. | | Very truly yours, |
| Theinvestigation reportisusedtoidentifytheneedforchangestoinstructions orprocedures, theinitiation ofadesignchangetocorrectsystemorequipment deficiencies, ortheinitiation ofjoborderstocorrectminordeficiencies.
| | /l M. P. Alex ch Vice Presidene ~)>)& |
| Further,Condition Reportsareusedtoidentifythoseactionsnecessary topreventrecurrence ofthereportedcondition. | | MPA/cm Attachment cc: John E. Dolan W. G. Smith, Jr. - Bridgman R. C. Callen G. Bruchmann G. Charnoff NRC Resident Inspector - Bridgman Document Control Desk, USNRC - Washington, D.C. |
| Condition Reportsarealsousedtoreportviolations tocodes,regulations andtheTechnical Specifications. | | |
| Condition ReportsarereviewedbythePNSRCforevaluation ofactionstakentocorrectthedeficiency andpreventrecurrence. | | ATTACHMENT 1 AEP: NRC: 0847 J UFSAR, Section 1.7.16.2.2 (July, 1986) |
| Noncompliance Reports(NCRs)providethemechanism forAEPSCpersonnel toidentifynoncompliances. | | Condition Reports provide the mechanism for plant personnel to notify management of conditions adverse to quality. Investigations of reported conditions adverse to quality are assigned by management. |
| Investigation ofreportedconditions areassignedtotheresponsible individual. | | The investigation report is used to identify the need for changes to instructions or procedures, the initiation of a design change to correct system or equipment deficiencies, or the initiation of job orders to correct minor deficiencies. Further, Condition Reports are used to identify those actions necessary to prevent recurrence of the reported condition. Condition Reports are also used to report violations to codes, regulations and the Technical Specifications. |
| NCRinvestigation requiresthedetermination ofthecauseofthecondition andidentification ofimmediate actionandactiontakentopreventrecurrence.
| | Condition Reports are reviewed by the PNSRC for evaluation of actions taken to correct the deficiency and prevent recurrence. |
| TheAEPSCNuclearOperations DivisionreceivescopiesofCondition Reportsfordistribution, onaselectedbasis,tocognizant engineering departments forreview.TheAEPSCNuclearSafetyandDesignReviewCommittee reviewsCondition Reports,NCRs,NRCInspection ReportResponses, 10CFR21itemsandQAandNSDRCauditsforindependent evaluation ofthereportedconditions andcorrective actions.TheQADepartment periodically auditsthecorrective actionsystemsforcompliance andeffectiveness.
| | Noncompliance Reports (NCRs) provide the mechanism for AEPSCpersonnel to identify noncompliances. Investigation of reported conditions are assigned to the responsible individual. NCR investigation requires the determination of the cause of the condition and identification of immediate action and action taken to prevent recurrence. |
| t10II~~ATTACHMENT 2SIGNIFICANT~
| | The AEPSC Nuclear Operations Division receives copies of Condition Reports for distribution, on a selected basis, to cognizant engineering departments for review. |
| PROBLEMSREUIRINGPNSRCREVIEWAEP:NRC:0847J 1.ALLNRCREPORTABLE EVENTS.VIOLATIONS OFTECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS, CODES,REGULATIONS, ORDERS,ORLICENSEREQUIREMENTS.
| | The AEPSC Nuclear Safety and Design Review Committee reviews Condition Reports, NCRs, NRC Inspection Report Responses, 10 CFR 21 items and QA and NSDRC audits for independent evaluation of the reported conditions and corrective actions. |
| A.ALLSIGNIFICANT VIOLATIONS OFTHEFIREPROTECTION PROGRAM.B.ALLSIGNIFICANT VIOLATIONS OFTHERADIATION PROTECTION PROGRAMC.ALLSIGNIFICANT VIOLATIONS OFTHERADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM.D.ALLSIGNIFICANT VIOLATIONS ORREFUELING PROCEDURES. | | The QA Department periodically audits the corrective action systems for compliance and effectiveness. |
| E.ALLRECOGNIZED INDICATIONS OFASIGNIFICANT UNANTICIPATED DEFICIENCY INSOMEASPECTOFDESIGNOROPERATION OFSAFETY-RELATED STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS,ORCOMPONENTS. | | |
| 3.SIGNIFICANT VIOLATIONS OFTHESECURITYPLAN.4.SIGNIFICANT VIOLATIONS OFTHEEMERGENCY PLAN.5.SIGNIFICANT VIOLATIONS OFTHEPROCESSCONTROLPROGRAM.6~SIGNIFICANT VIOLATIONS OFTHEOFF-SITEDOSECALCULATION MANUAL.7.UNPLANNED AND/ORUNMONITORED RELEASESOFRADIOACTIVE MATERIALTOTHEENVIRONSTHATEXCEEDTECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CRITERIA. | | tI 10 ATTACHMENT 2 AEP:NRC:0847J I |
| 8.SIGNIFICANT VIOLATIONS OFTHEQAPROGRAMFOREFFLUENTANDENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING ORSIGNIFICANT VIOLATIONS OFAPPENDIXBTECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS. | | ~ ~ |
| 9.SIGNIFICANTOPERATING ABNORMALITIES ORDEVIATIONS FROMNORMALANDEXPECTEDPERFOR1ANCE OFPLANTEQUIPMENT THATAFFECTNUCLEARSAFETY.10.DEFICIENCIES INESTABLISHED TRAININGPROGRAMSSUCHTHATASIGNIFICANT PROBLEMCOULDORDIDOCCUR.11.SIGNIFICANT DEVIATIONS FROMSAFETY-RELATED DESIGNDOCUMENTS (E.G.,DRAWINGS). | | SIGNIFICANT~ PROBLEMS RE UIRING PNSRC REVIEW |
| 12.NRCINSPECTION FINDINGS. | | : 1. ALL NRC REPORTABLE EVENTS. |
| 13.ADVERSETRENDS--UNACCEPTABLE LIMITSWILLBEREACHEDWITHOUTACTIONTAKEN.SIGNIFICANT ISDEFINEDAS:TOAFFECTTHERESULTSOFIMPLEMENTED PROCEDURES, PLANTOPERATIONS, ORPLANTEQUIPMENT TOTHEEXTENTTHAT:(1)AVIOLATION OFTHEPLANTLICENSE(INCLUDING TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS) | | VIOLATIONS OF TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS, CODES, REGULATIONS, ORDERS, OR LICENSE REQUIREMENTS. |
| ORREGULATORY REQUIREMENT (10CFR)OCCURREDORWOULDHAVERESULTED; (2)THEACTUALPLANTSTATUSORCONFIGURATION WASDIFFERENT THANTHATWHICHWOULDHAVERESULTEDWITHOUTTHEPROBLEM;OR(3)THEACTIONSOREVENTSSPECIFIED BYTHEPROTECTIVE PROGRAMSLISTEDINSECTION6.8OFTHETECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS WERENOTORWOULDNOTHAVEBEENACCOMPLISHED.
| | A. ALL SIGNIFICANT VIOLATIONS OF THE FIRE PROTECTION PROGRAM. |
| )'I~I~)~~ATTACHMENT 3AEP:NRC:0847J UFSARSection1.7.16.2.2 (Proposed) | | B. ALL SIGNIFICANT VIOLATIONS OF THE RADIATION PROTECTION PROGRAM C. ALL SIGNIFICANT VIOLATIONS OF THE RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM. |
| Condition/Problem Reportsprovidethemechanism forplantandAEPSCpersonnel tonotifymanagement ofconditions adversetoquality.Condition/Problem Reportsarealsousedtoreportviolations tocodes,regulations andtheTechnical Specifications. | | D. ALL SIGNIFICANT VIOLATIONS OR REFUELING PROCEDURES. |
| Investigations ofreportedconditions-adverse toqualityareassignedbymanagement. | | E. ALL RECOGNIZED INDICATIONS OF A SIGNIFICANT UNANTICIPATED DEFICIENCY IN SOME ASPECT OF DESIGN OR OPERATION OF SAFETY-RELATED STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS, OR COMPONENTS. |
| TheCondition Report/Problem Reportisusedtodocumenttheinvestigation ofaproblem;andtoidentifytheneedforchangestoinstructions orprocedures, toidentifytheneedforadesignchangetocorrectsystemorequipment deficiencies, ortoidentifytheneedfortheinitiation ofjoborderstocorrectminordeficiencies.
| | : 3. SIGNIFICANT VIOLATIONS OF THE SECURITY PLAN. |
| Further,Condition/Problem Reportsareusedtoidentifythoseactionsnecessary topreventrecurrence ofthereportedcondition. | | : 4. SIGNIFICANT VIOLATIONS OF THE EMERGENCY PLAN. |
| Significant | | : 5. SIGNIFICANT VIOLATIONS OF THE PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM. |
| : problems, whicharesodesignated onCondition/Problem Reports,arereviewedbythePNSRCforevaluation ofactionstakenorbeingtakentocorrectthedeficiency andpreventrecurrence.
| | 6 ~ SIGNIFICANT VIOLATIONS OF THE OFF-SITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL. |
| TheAEPSCNuclearSafetyandDesignReviewCommittee isresponsible forassuringthatindependent reviewsofviolations (asspecified intheTechnical Specifications) areperformed.
| | : 7. UNPLANNED AND/OR UNMONITORED RELEASES OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL TO THE ENVIRONS THAT EXCEED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CRITERIA. |
| Theseviolations areconsidered significant problemswhicharedocumented onCondition/Problem Reports.Thereviewswillprovideanindependent evaluation ofthereportedproblemsandcorrective actions.TheQADepartment periodically auditsthecorrective actionsystemsforcompliance andeffectiveness.}}
| | : 8. SIGNIFICANT VIOLATIONS OF THE QA PROGRAM FOR EFFLUENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING OR SIGNIFICANT VIOLATIONS OF APPENDIX B TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS. |
| | 9 . SIGNI FICANT OPERATING ABNORMALITIES OR DEVIATIONS FROM NORMAL AND EXPECTED PERFOR1ANCE OF PLANT EQUIPMENT THAT AFFECT NUCLEAR SAFETY. |
| | : 10. DEFICIENCIES IN ESTABLISHED TRAINING PROGRAMS SUCH THAT A SIGNIFICANT PROBLEM COULD OR DID OCCUR. |
| | : 11. SIGNIFICANT DEVIATIONS FROM SAFETY-RELATED DESIGN DOCUMENTS (E.G., |
| | DRAWINGS). |
| | : 12. NRC INSPECTION FINDINGS. |
| | : 13. ADVERSE TRENDS--UNACCEPTABLE LIMITS WILL BE REACHED WITHOUT ACTION TAKEN. |
| | SIGNIFICANT IS DEFINED AS: |
| | TO AFFECT THE RESULTS OF IMPLEMENTED PROCEDURES, PLANT OPERATIONS, OR PLANT EQUIPMENT TO THE EXTENT THAT: |
| | (1) A VIOLATION OF THE PLANT LICENSE (INCLUDING TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS) OR REGULATORY REQUIREMENT (10 CFR) OCCURRED OR WOULD HAVE RESULTED; (2) THE ACTUAL PLANT STATUS OR CONFIGURATION WAS DIFFERENT THAN THAT WHICH WOULD HAVE RESULTED WITHOUT THE PROBLEM; OR (3) THE ACTIONS OR EVENTS SPECIFIED BY THE PROTECTIVE PROGRAMS LISTED IN SECTION 6.8 OF THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS WERE NOT OR WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ACCOMPLISHED. |
| | |
| | ) 'I ~ |
| | I |
| | ~) |
| | ATTACHMENT 3 AEP:NRC:0847J |
| | ~ ~ |
| | UFSAR Section 1.7.16.2.2 (Proposed) |
| | Condition/Problem Reports provide the mechanism for plant and AEPSC personnel to notify management of conditions adverse to quality. |
| | Condition/Problem Reports are also used to report violations to codes, regulations and the Technical Specifications. Investigations of reported conditions-adverse to quality are assigned by management. |
| | The Condition Report/Problem Report is used to document the investigation of a problem; and to identify the need for changes to instructions or procedures, to identify the need for a design change to correct system or equipment deficiencies, or to identify the need for the initiation of job orders to correct minor deficiencies. |
| | Further, Condition/Problem Reports are used to identify those actions necessary to prevent recurrence of the reported condition. |
| | Significant problems, which are so designated on Condition/Problem Reports, are reviewed by the PNSRC for evaluation of actions taken or being taken to correct the deficiency and prevent recurrence. |
| | The AEPSC Nuclear Safety and Design Review Committee is responsible for assuring that independent reviews of violations (as specified in the Technical Specifications) are performed. These violations are considered significant problems which are documented on Condition/Problem Reports. The reviews will provide an independent evaluation of the reported problems and corrective actions. |
| | The QA Department periodically audits the corrective action systems for compliance and effectiveness.}} |
Similar Documents at Cook |
|---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARML20217J4721999-10-15015 October 1999
Forwards NRC Physical Security Insp Repts 50-315/99-27 & 50-316/99-27 on 990920-24.Two Violations Noted & Being Treated as Ncvs,Consistent with App C of Enforcement Policy. Areas Examined Exempt from Disclosure,Per 10CFR73.21
IA-99-379, First Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Documents Listed in App a Being Released in Entirety1999-10-0808 October 1999
First Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Documents Listed in App a Being Released in Entirety
ML20217D9241999-10-0808 October 1999
First Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Documents Listed in App a Being Released in Entirety
ML17335A5511999-10-0707 October 1999
Forwards LER 99-023-00, Inadequate TS Surveillance Testing of ESW Pump ESF Response Time. Commitments Identified in LER Listed
ML20217D9361999-09-30030 September 1999
FOIA Request for Document Re Section 9.7 of SE by Directorate of Licensing,Us Ae Commission in Matter of Indiana & Michigan Electric Co & Indiana & Michigan Power Co,Dc Cook Nuclear Plan,Units 1 & 2
ML17326A1541999-09-20020 September 1999
Provides Notification of Change in Senior Licensed Operator Status.Operating Licenses for CR Smith,License SOP-30159-4 & Tw Welch,License SOP-30654-2 Are No Longer Required & Should Be Withdrawn
ML17326A1441999-09-17017 September 1999
Submits Trace on Second Shipment of Two Plant,Unit 2 Steam Generators.Info Re Shipment Submitted
ML17326A1261999-09-17017 September 1999
Forwards LER 99-022-00 Re Electrical Bus Degraded Voltage Setpoints Too Low for Safety Related Loads.Listed Commitment Identified in Submittal
ML17326A1531999-09-16016 September 1999
Submits Info Pertaining to Plant Proposed Operator Licensing Exam Requirements Through Yr 2003.NRC Form 536, Operator Licensing Exam Data, Which Provides Required Info Encl
ML17326A1101999-08-27027 August 1999
Forwards LER 99-021-00, GL 96-01 Test Requirements Not Met in Surveillance Tests. List of Commitments Identified in LER Provided
ML17326A0991999-08-26026 August 1999
Forwards LER 99-020-00,re EDGs Being Declared Inoperable. Commitments Made by Util Are Listed
ML17326A1221999-08-23023 August 1999
Forwards Revised Page 2 to 1998 Annual Environ Operating Rept, for DC Cook Nuclear Plant,Correcting Omission to App I
ML17326A0981999-08-23023 August 1999
Forwards fitness-for-duty Program Performance Data for Period of 990101-0630 for DC Cook Nuclear Plants,Units 1 & 2,per 10CFR26.71(d)
ML17326A0891999-08-16016 August 1999
Forwards LER 99-019-00,re Victoreen Containment High Range Monitors Not Beign Environmentally Qualified to Withstand post-LOCA Conditions.Commitments Made by Util Are Listed
ML17326A0811999-08-10010 August 1999
Notifies NRC of Changes in Commitments Made in Response to GL 98-01,supplement 1, Yr 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys Ar Npps, Dtd 990623
ML17326A0821999-08-0606 August 1999
Informs That Util Is Submitting Encl Scope & Objectives for 991026 DC Cook Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan Exercise to G Shear of NRC Plant Support Branch.Exercise Will Include Full State & County Participation
ML17326A1451999-08-0404 August 1999
Requests Withholding of WCAP-15246, Control Rod Insertion Following Cold Leg Lbloca.
ML17326A0751999-08-0404 August 1999
Forwards LER 98-029-01, Fuel Handling Area Ventilation Sys Inoperable Due to Original Design Deficiency. Supplemental Rept Represents Extensive Rev to Original LER & Replaces Rept in Entirely.Commitment Listed
ML17326A0721999-07-29029 July 1999
Forwards LER 99-018-00 Re Refueling Water Storage Tank Suction Motor Operated Valves Inoperable,Due to Inadequate Design.Listed Commitments Were Identified in LER
ML17326A0711999-07-27027 July 1999
Responds to 980123 RAI Re NRC GL 87-02, Verification of Seismic Adequacy of Mechanical & Electrical Equipment in Operating Reactors,Unresolved Safety Issue (USI) A-46.
ML17326A0601999-07-22022 July 1999
Forwards UFSAR, IAW 10CFR50.71(e) & Rept of Changes,Tests & Experiments as Required by 10CFR50.59(b)(2) for DC Cook Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.Without UFSAR
ML17326A0631999-07-22022 July 1999
Forwards LER 98-014-03, Response to High-High Containment Pressure Procedure Not Consistent with Analysis of Record. Revised Info Marked by Sidebars in Right Hand Margin. Commitments Made by Util,Listed
ML17326A0311999-07-0101 July 1999
Forwards LER 99-004-01 Re Failure to Perform TS Surveillance Analyses of Reactor Coolant Chemistry with Fuel Removed. Commitments Made by Util Are Listed
ML20196K5961999-06-30030 June 1999
Ltr Contract:Task Order 40, DC Cook Extended Sys Regulatory Review Oversight Insp, Under Contract NRC-03-98-021
ML17326A0281999-06-28028 June 1999
Provides Response to 981116 & 960228 RAIs Re GL 92-01. Revised Pressurized Thermal Shock Evaluation Based on New Weld Chemistry Info & Copy of W Rept WCAP-15074, Evaluation of 1P3571 Weld Metal from Surveillance Programs... Encl
ML17326A0241999-06-23023 June 1999
Responds to GL 98-01,Suppl 1, Y2K Readiness of Computer Sys at Nuclear Power Plants. Y2K Readiness Disclosure for Plant & List of Commitments Encl
ML17326A0121999-06-18018 June 1999
Forwards LER 99-014-00 Re Requirement of TS 4.0.5 Not Met for Boron Injection Tank Bolting.Commitments Identified in Submittal Listed
ML17326A0111999-06-11011 June 1999
Provides Response to NRC RAI Re GL 97-01, Degradation of Crdm/Cedm Nozzle & Other Vessel Closure Head Penetrations.
ML17325B6281999-06-0101 June 1999
Forwards LER 99-S03-00,re Nonconforming Vital Area Barriers.Commitments Made by Util Are Listed
ML17325B6401999-06-0101 June 1999
Forwards LER 99-013-00 Re Safety Injection & Centrifugal Charging Throttle Valve Cavitation During LOCA Could Lead to ECCS Pump Failure.Listed Commitments Identified in Submittal
ML17325B6331999-05-28028 May 1999
Forwards LER 99-S02-00,re Vulnerability in Safeguard Sys That Could Allow Unauthorized or Undetected Access to Protected Area.Commitments Made by Util Are Listed
ML17265A8201999-05-24024 May 1999
Forwards LER 98-037-01,representing Extensive Rev to Original LER & Replacing Rept in Entirety.Listed Commitments Identified in Submittal
ML20207A9201999-05-21021 May 1999
Ack Receipt of 990319 Response to Notice of Violation & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty .On 981124, Licensee Remitted Check for Payment of Civil Penalties. Licensee Requests for Extension for Response,Granted
ML17325B6111999-05-21021 May 1999
Forwards Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for 980101-1231 for DC Cook Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2. Transmittal of Submittal Was Delayed Due to Administrative Error in Regulatory Affairs Dept
ML17325B6031999-05-21021 May 1999
Provides Response to NRC GL 98-04, Potential for Degradation of ECCS & Containment Spray Sys After LOCA Because of Const & Protective Coating Deficiencies & Foreign Matl in Containment.
ML17325B5971999-05-20020 May 1999
Forwards LER 99-012-00,re Auxiliary Building ESF Ventilation Sys Not Being Capable of Maintaining ESF Room Temps post-accident.Commitment,listed
ML17335A5281999-05-12012 May 1999
Forwards DC Cook Nuclear Plant Fitness for Duty Program Performance Dtd for six-month Period of 980701-1231,IAW 10CFR26.71(d).Info Was Delayed Due to Administrative Error in Regulatory Affairs Dept
ML17335A5271999-05-11011 May 1999
Forwards Details Re Sources & Levels of Insurance Maintained for DC Cook,Units 1 & 2,as of 990401,per 10CFR50.54(w)(3). Info Was Delayed Beyond Required Date Due to Internal Oversight
ML17325B5841999-05-10010 May 1999
Forwards LER 99-002-00 Re TS 4.0.5 Requirements Not Being Met Due to Improperly Performed Test.Commitments Identified in Ler,Listed
ML17325B5871999-05-0707 May 1999
Forwards Current Revs of Expanded Sys Readiness Review (Essr) Implementing Procedures,For Info Purposes to Support Current NRC Insps.Current Esrr Schedule Provided for Info Purposes,Reflecting Revised Target Dates
ML17325B5791999-05-0404 May 1999
Forwards LER 99-011-00,concerning Air Sys for EDG Not Supporting Long Term Operability.Commitments Made by Util Listed
ML17325B5821999-05-0404 May 1999
Provides Addl Background,Description & Clarification of Previous & Revised Commitments Re UFSAR Revalidation Effort. Commitment Change Involved Alignment of UFSAR Revalidation Program Methodology to Strategy Contained in Current Plan
ML17325B5741999-05-0303 May 1999
Forwards LER 99-010-00 Re RCS Leak Detection Sys Sensitivity Not in Accoradnce with Design Requirements.Listed Commitments Identified in Submittal
ML17325B5631999-04-22022 April 1999
Forwards Results of Independent Chemical Evaluations Performed from Sept 1997 Through Feb 1999,re Resolution of Issues Related to License Amend 227
ML17325B5561999-04-16016 April 1999
Forwards LER 99-006-00, Fuel Crane Loads Lifted Over SFP Could Impact Energies Greater than TS Limits, IAW 10CFR50.73.Submittal Was Delayed to Allow for Resolution of Questions.Commitment Made by Licensee,Listed
ML20205P0591999-04-14014 April 1999
Ninth Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents.App Records Already Available in Pdr.Records in App T Encl & Being Made Available in Pdr.App U Records Being Released in Part (Ref FOIA Exemption 7).App V Records Withheld Entirely
ML17325B5451999-04-12012 April 1999
Forwards LER 99-009-00 Re as-found RHR Safety Relief Valve Lift Setpoint Greater than TS Limit.Commitments Identified in Submittal Listed
ML17325B5301999-04-0707 April 1999
Forwards LER 99-S01-01, Vulnerability in Locking Mechanism of Four Vital Area Gates, Per 10CFR50.73.Commitments Made by Util,Listed
ML17325B5241999-04-0505 April 1999
Forwards Revs 0 & 1 to Cook Nuclear Plant Restart Plan, Dtd 980307 & 0407.Rev 5 Is Current Cook Nuclear Plant Restart & Supercedes Previous Revs in All Respects
ML17325B5121999-04-0101 April 1999
Forwards LER 99-007-00, Calculations Show That Divider Barrier Between Upper & Lower Containment Vols May Be Overstressed. Commitments Made by Util Are Listed
1999-09-30
[Table view]
Category:INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML17335A5511999-10-0707 October 1999
Forwards LER 99-023-00, Inadequate TS Surveillance Testing of ESW Pump ESF Response Time. Commitments Identified in LER Listed
ML20217D9361999-09-30030 September 1999
FOIA Request for Document Re Section 9.7 of SE by Directorate of Licensing,Us Ae Commission in Matter of Indiana & Michigan Electric Co & Indiana & Michigan Power Co,Dc Cook Nuclear Plan,Units 1 & 2
ML17326A1541999-09-20020 September 1999
Provides Notification of Change in Senior Licensed Operator Status.Operating Licenses for CR Smith,License SOP-30159-4 & Tw Welch,License SOP-30654-2 Are No Longer Required & Should Be Withdrawn
ML17326A1261999-09-17017 September 1999
Forwards LER 99-022-00 Re Electrical Bus Degraded Voltage Setpoints Too Low for Safety Related Loads.Listed Commitment Identified in Submittal
ML17326A1441999-09-17017 September 1999
Submits Trace on Second Shipment of Two Plant,Unit 2 Steam Generators.Info Re Shipment Submitted
ML17326A1531999-09-16016 September 1999
Submits Info Pertaining to Plant Proposed Operator Licensing Exam Requirements Through Yr 2003.NRC Form 536, Operator Licensing Exam Data, Which Provides Required Info Encl
ML17326A1101999-08-27027 August 1999
Forwards LER 99-021-00, GL 96-01 Test Requirements Not Met in Surveillance Tests. List of Commitments Identified in LER Provided
ML17326A0991999-08-26026 August 1999
Forwards LER 99-020-00,re EDGs Being Declared Inoperable. Commitments Made by Util Are Listed
ML17326A1221999-08-23023 August 1999
Forwards Revised Page 2 to 1998 Annual Environ Operating Rept, for DC Cook Nuclear Plant,Correcting Omission to App I
ML17326A0981999-08-23023 August 1999
Forwards fitness-for-duty Program Performance Data for Period of 990101-0630 for DC Cook Nuclear Plants,Units 1 & 2,per 10CFR26.71(d)
ML17326A0891999-08-16016 August 1999
Forwards LER 99-019-00,re Victoreen Containment High Range Monitors Not Beign Environmentally Qualified to Withstand post-LOCA Conditions.Commitments Made by Util Are Listed
ML17326A0811999-08-10010 August 1999
Notifies NRC of Changes in Commitments Made in Response to GL 98-01,supplement 1, Yr 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys Ar Npps, Dtd 990623
ML17326A0821999-08-0606 August 1999
Informs That Util Is Submitting Encl Scope & Objectives for 991026 DC Cook Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan Exercise to G Shear of NRC Plant Support Branch.Exercise Will Include Full State & County Participation
ML17326A1451999-08-0404 August 1999
Requests Withholding of WCAP-15246, Control Rod Insertion Following Cold Leg Lbloca.
ML17326A0751999-08-0404 August 1999
Forwards LER 98-029-01, Fuel Handling Area Ventilation Sys Inoperable Due to Original Design Deficiency. Supplemental Rept Represents Extensive Rev to Original LER & Replaces Rept in Entirely.Commitment Listed
ML17326A0721999-07-29029 July 1999
Forwards LER 99-018-00 Re Refueling Water Storage Tank Suction Motor Operated Valves Inoperable,Due to Inadequate Design.Listed Commitments Were Identified in LER
ML17326A0711999-07-27027 July 1999
Responds to 980123 RAI Re NRC GL 87-02, Verification of Seismic Adequacy of Mechanical & Electrical Equipment in Operating Reactors,Unresolved Safety Issue (USI) A-46.
ML17326A0601999-07-22022 July 1999
Forwards UFSAR, IAW 10CFR50.71(e) & Rept of Changes,Tests & Experiments as Required by 10CFR50.59(b)(2) for DC Cook Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.Without UFSAR
ML17326A0631999-07-22022 July 1999
Forwards LER 98-014-03, Response to High-High Containment Pressure Procedure Not Consistent with Analysis of Record. Revised Info Marked by Sidebars in Right Hand Margin. Commitments Made by Util,Listed
ML17326A0311999-07-0101 July 1999
Forwards LER 99-004-01 Re Failure to Perform TS Surveillance Analyses of Reactor Coolant Chemistry with Fuel Removed. Commitments Made by Util Are Listed
ML17326A0281999-06-28028 June 1999
Provides Response to 981116 & 960228 RAIs Re GL 92-01. Revised Pressurized Thermal Shock Evaluation Based on New Weld Chemistry Info & Copy of W Rept WCAP-15074, Evaluation of 1P3571 Weld Metal from Surveillance Programs... Encl
ML17326A0241999-06-23023 June 1999
Responds to GL 98-01,Suppl 1, Y2K Readiness of Computer Sys at Nuclear Power Plants. Y2K Readiness Disclosure for Plant & List of Commitments Encl
ML17326A0121999-06-18018 June 1999
Forwards LER 99-014-00 Re Requirement of TS 4.0.5 Not Met for Boron Injection Tank Bolting.Commitments Identified in Submittal Listed
ML17326A0111999-06-11011 June 1999
Provides Response to NRC RAI Re GL 97-01, Degradation of Crdm/Cedm Nozzle & Other Vessel Closure Head Penetrations.
ML17325B6401999-06-0101 June 1999
Forwards LER 99-013-00 Re Safety Injection & Centrifugal Charging Throttle Valve Cavitation During LOCA Could Lead to ECCS Pump Failure.Listed Commitments Identified in Submittal
ML17325B6281999-06-0101 June 1999
Forwards LER 99-S03-00,re Nonconforming Vital Area Barriers.Commitments Made by Util Are Listed
ML17325B6331999-05-28028 May 1999
Forwards LER 99-S02-00,re Vulnerability in Safeguard Sys That Could Allow Unauthorized or Undetected Access to Protected Area.Commitments Made by Util Are Listed
ML17265A8201999-05-24024 May 1999
Forwards LER 98-037-01,representing Extensive Rev to Original LER & Replacing Rept in Entirety.Listed Commitments Identified in Submittal
ML17325B6111999-05-21021 May 1999
Forwards Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for 980101-1231 for DC Cook Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2. Transmittal of Submittal Was Delayed Due to Administrative Error in Regulatory Affairs Dept
ML17325B6031999-05-21021 May 1999
Provides Response to NRC GL 98-04, Potential for Degradation of ECCS & Containment Spray Sys After LOCA Because of Const & Protective Coating Deficiencies & Foreign Matl in Containment.
ML17325B5971999-05-20020 May 1999
Forwards LER 99-012-00,re Auxiliary Building ESF Ventilation Sys Not Being Capable of Maintaining ESF Room Temps post-accident.Commitment,listed
ML17335A5281999-05-12012 May 1999
Forwards DC Cook Nuclear Plant Fitness for Duty Program Performance Dtd for six-month Period of 980701-1231,IAW 10CFR26.71(d).Info Was Delayed Due to Administrative Error in Regulatory Affairs Dept
ML17335A5271999-05-11011 May 1999
Forwards Details Re Sources & Levels of Insurance Maintained for DC Cook,Units 1 & 2,as of 990401,per 10CFR50.54(w)(3). Info Was Delayed Beyond Required Date Due to Internal Oversight
ML17325B5841999-05-10010 May 1999
Forwards LER 99-002-00 Re TS 4.0.5 Requirements Not Being Met Due to Improperly Performed Test.Commitments Identified in Ler,Listed
ML17325B5871999-05-0707 May 1999
Forwards Current Revs of Expanded Sys Readiness Review (Essr) Implementing Procedures,For Info Purposes to Support Current NRC Insps.Current Esrr Schedule Provided for Info Purposes,Reflecting Revised Target Dates
ML17325B5821999-05-0404 May 1999
Provides Addl Background,Description & Clarification of Previous & Revised Commitments Re UFSAR Revalidation Effort. Commitment Change Involved Alignment of UFSAR Revalidation Program Methodology to Strategy Contained in Current Plan
ML17325B5791999-05-0404 May 1999
Forwards LER 99-011-00,concerning Air Sys for EDG Not Supporting Long Term Operability.Commitments Made by Util Listed
ML17325B5741999-05-0303 May 1999
Forwards LER 99-010-00 Re RCS Leak Detection Sys Sensitivity Not in Accoradnce with Design Requirements.Listed Commitments Identified in Submittal
ML17325B5631999-04-22022 April 1999
Forwards Results of Independent Chemical Evaluations Performed from Sept 1997 Through Feb 1999,re Resolution of Issues Related to License Amend 227
ML17325B5561999-04-16016 April 1999
Forwards LER 99-006-00, Fuel Crane Loads Lifted Over SFP Could Impact Energies Greater than TS Limits, IAW 10CFR50.73.Submittal Was Delayed to Allow for Resolution of Questions.Commitment Made by Licensee,Listed
ML17325B5451999-04-12012 April 1999
Forwards LER 99-009-00 Re as-found RHR Safety Relief Valve Lift Setpoint Greater than TS Limit.Commitments Identified in Submittal Listed
ML17325B5301999-04-0707 April 1999
Forwards LER 99-S01-01, Vulnerability in Locking Mechanism of Four Vital Area Gates, Per 10CFR50.73.Commitments Made by Util,Listed
ML17325B5241999-04-0505 April 1999
Forwards Revs 0 & 1 to Cook Nuclear Plant Restart Plan, Dtd 980307 & 0407.Rev 5 Is Current Cook Nuclear Plant Restart & Supercedes Previous Revs in All Respects
ML17325B5121999-04-0101 April 1999
Forwards LER 99-007-00, Calculations Show That Divider Barrier Between Upper & Lower Containment Vols May Be Overstressed. Commitments Made by Util Are Listed
ML17325B5141999-03-30030 March 1999
Forwards Rept on Status of Decommissioning Funding.Attached Rept Includes Amount of Decommissioning Funds Estimated to Be Required Pursuant to 10CFR50.75(b) & (C)
ML17325B5191999-03-29029 March 1999
Forwards LER 99-001-00,re Degraded Component Cw Flow to Containment Main Steam Line Penetrations.Commitment, Listed
ML20204F6401999-03-19019 March 1999
Responds to NRC 981013 NOV & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty.Violations Cited in Subject NOV Were Initially Identified in Referenced Five Insp Repts.Corrective Actions: Ice Condensers Have Been Completely Thawed of Any Blockage
ML17325B4751999-03-18018 March 1999
Forwards LER 99-004-00,re Failure to Perform TS Surveillance Analyses of Reactor Coolant Chemistry with Fuel Removed. Commitment Made by Util,Listed
ML17325B4721999-03-18018 March 1999
Forwards LER 99-005-00,re Reactor Trip Breaker Manual Actuations During Rod Drop Testing Not Previously Reported. Listed Commitments Identified in Submittal
ML17325B4641999-03-17017 March 1999
Withdraws Response to Issue 1 of NRC Cal,Dtd 970919. Comprehensive Design Review Effort in Progress to Validate Resolution of Issue for Future Operation
1999-09-30
[Table view]
Category:UTILITY TO NRC
MONTHYEARML17328A4481990-09-21021 September 1990
Requests Withdrawal of Mode 6 Proposed Tech Spec Change Since Issue Currently Being Addressed by New STSs
ML17328A4331990-08-27027 August 1990
Informs of Preliminary Assessment of 900713 Electrical Contact Accident at Facility.Investigation Concludes That No Safety Rules Violated
ML17328A4001990-08-24024 August 1990
Responds to 900725 Ltr Re Commitments Made in Response to Generic Ltr 88-14 on Instrument Air Supply Problems Affecting safety-related Equipment.Simulator Training to Be Provided as Stated
ML17334B3781990-08-24024 August 1990
Forwards Info to Certify Plant Simulator Facility.Results of Evaluation of Dual Unit Simulation Facilities Demonstrate That Plant Simulator Performance Compares Favorably W/Units
ML17328A4231990-08-21021 August 1990
Forwards Under Separate Cover,Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for Jan-June 1990
ML17328A3901990-08-17017 August 1990
Responds to NRC 900720 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Onsite Audit of Spds.Corrective Actions:Apparent Disparity in Selection of Reactor Trip & Sys Capacity or Anticipatory Values Rectified
ML17328A3891990-08-15015 August 1990
Forwards Performance Data Sheets for Plant fitness-for-duty Program for Period Jan-June 1990,per 10CFR26.Encl Includes Statistics on Various Categories of Testing,Substances Tested for & cut-off Levels Used
ML17328A3571990-08-0202 August 1990
Responds to Open Items in Safety Evaluation of Util Response to Unresolved Issues on post-fire Safe Shutdown Methodology. Open Items 1 & 21 Will Be Closed by Implementing Plant Procedures Providing Equivalent Degree of Protection
ML17328A3431990-07-23023 July 1990
Requests Withdrawal of 890830 Proposed Tech Spec Changes Re Sections 3.0 & 4.0.Util Will Resubmit Generic Ltr 87-09 Recommended Improvement Items on Case by Case Basis
ML17328A3421990-07-23023 July 1990
Provides Results of Offsite Dose Calculation for Reactor Coolant Pump Locked Rotor Event for Facility Cycle 8.Util Identified Previously Issued SERs Addressing Short Term Containment Analysis & LOCA Containment Integrity
ML20055G7551990-07-18018 July 1990
Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-315/90-10 & 50-316/90-10.Corrective Actions:Required Review Performed & Updated Procedure 12 Mhp 5021.019.001 Revised & Issued
ML17328A3191990-07-12012 July 1990
Responds to NRC 900601 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-315/89-31 & 50-316/89-31.Corrective Actions:Electrical Testing Techniques Improved & Surveillance Procedures for Feedwater Pumps Will Be Rewritten
ML17328A3181990-07-0909 July 1990
Responds to Generic Ltr 90-03,Suppl 1, Relaxation of Staff Position in Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 2.2,Part 2, 'Vendor Interface for Safety-Related Components.' Licensee Will Contact safety-related Vendors on Annual Basis
ML17328A3111990-07-0303 July 1990
Provides Certification of Funding Plan for Decommissioning of Plant,Per 10CFR50.33 & 50.75
ML17328A2961990-06-25025 June 1990
Forwards Response to Generic Ltr 90-04 Re Closeout of Generic Safety Issues.Util Supports Concern & Desire to Close long-standing Generic Safety Issues
ML17328A2921990-06-22022 June 1990
Forwards WCAP-12483, Analysis of Capsule U from American Electric Power Co DC Cook Unit 1 Reactor Vessel Radiation Surveillance Program.
ML20044A3521990-06-22022 June 1990
Submits Info Re Sensitivity Study Performed on Number of Fuel Axial Intervals,Per Topical Rept, American Electric Power Reactor Core Thermal-Hydraulic Analysis Using Cobra III-C/MIT-2 Computer Code.
ML17328A2821990-06-15015 June 1990
Submits Ltr Re Proposed Control Room Habitability Tech Spec Changes & Supporting Analyses,Per 900521 Discussion.Revised Calculations of Control Room Thyroid Doses Will Be Submitted within 60 Days of Receipt of Proposed Generic Ltr
ML17328A2741990-06-12012 June 1990
Submits Followup,Per 900205 & 0308 Ltrs & Provides Update Re Inoperable Fire Barrier.Fire Seal Repaired & Restored to Operability on 900419
ML17328A2551990-06-0505 June 1990
Forwards Addl Info Re Util 900126 Revised Response to NRC Bulletin 88-002,per NRC 900509 Request
ML17328A7361990-06-0101 June 1990
Forwards Addl Info Re 890825 & 1212 Applications for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,per Request.Amends Make Changes to Administrative Controls
ML17328A7331990-05-29029 May 1990
Forwards Nonproprietary WCAP-12577 & Proprietary WCAP-12576, Westinghouse Revised Thermal Design Procedure Instrument... Methodology for American Electric Power DC Cook Unit 2 Nuclear Power Station, Per 900419 Commitment
ML17328A7321990-05-24024 May 1990
Responds to NRC Bulletin 90-001, Loss of Fill Oil in Transmitters Mfg by Rosemount. No Rosemount Model 1153 Series B or D or Model 1154 Transmitters Installed at Facility.Transmitters Purchased as commercial-grade Units
ML17328A6991990-05-0909 May 1990
Provides Suppl to 900103 Response,Certifying That Fitness for Duty Program Implemented at Plant.Change Also Clarifies When More Stringent cut-off Levels Adopted at Plant Program Apply
ML17328A7001990-05-0909 May 1990
Responds to NRC 900406 Ltr Re Inadequacies of Spds,Per Audit on 900221-22.Corrective Actions:Software Mod Will Prevent User from Accessing Displays Other than Iconic Displays from SPDS Dedicated Terminal
ML17328A7071990-05-0707 May 1990
Forwards Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1990 & Corrected Rept Mar 1990 for Donald C Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1
ML17328A7031990-05-0707 May 1990
Forwards Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1990 & Corrected Rept for Mar 1990 for DC Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 2
ML17328A6951990-04-30030 April 1990
Certifies That Training Programs for Initial Licensing & Requalification Training of Operators & Senior Operators at Plant Accredited by Inpo,Per Generic Ltr 87-07
ML17328A6861990-04-30030 April 1990
Forwards Annual Environ Operating Rept,Jan-Dec 1989, & DC Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 & 2 Operational Radiological Environ Monitoring Program 1989 Rept Jan-Dec 1989.
ML17328A6801990-04-23023 April 1990
Responds to NRC Bulletin 88-004, Potential Safety-Related Pump Loss. Study Planned to Evaluate Alternative Actions to Be Taken for Protecting RHR Pumps
ML17328A6771990-04-23023 April 1990
Forwards DC Cook Nuclear Plant 1990 Annual Emergency Preparedness Exercise. Exercise Scope & Objectives & Detailed Scenario Documentation Encl
ML17334B3641990-04-11011 April 1990
Responds to NRC 900301 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-315/89-31 & 50-316/89-31.Corrective Actions:Reliability Centered Maint Program Initiated
ML17328A6601990-04-11011 April 1990
Forwards Updated QA Program Description for Cook Nuclear Plant, Incorporating Editorial,Organizational & Position Title Changes
ML17328A6551990-04-0909 April 1990
Responds to NRC 900309 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-316/90-08.Corrective Actions:Procedure for Steam Generator Stop Valve Operability Test Revised to Require That MSIV Be Declared Inoperable After Failing Stroke Test
ML17334B3601990-04-0606 April 1990
Forwards Revised Figures for Loss of Load Event Previously Submitted in Attachment 4,App B of Vantage 5 Reload Transition Safety Rept Supplied by Westinghouse in Jan 1990. Update Is Editorial in Nature
ML17334B3621990-04-0606 April 1990
Forwards 1989 Annual Rept & Projected Cash Flow
ML17328A6341990-03-30030 March 1990
Forwards Application for Renewal of Plant NPDES Permit,For Info,Per Section 3.2 of App B to Plant Tech Specs.W/O Encl
ML17328A6331990-03-30030 March 1990
Responds to NUMARC 900104 Request for Addl Info Re Station Blackout Submittals.Target Reliability for Emergency Diesel Generator of 0.0975 Established for 4 H ac-independent Coping Category Will Be Maintained
ML17328A6321990-03-30030 March 1990
Forwards Response to Generic Ltr 90-01, NRC Regulatory Impact Survey. Util Ack Recommendation by NUMARC
ML17328A6221990-03-27027 March 1990
Responds to 900226 Ltr Transmitting Notice of Violation & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in Amount of $75,000. Corrective Actions:Flow Retention Circuitry Setpoints Set to Compensate for Missized Process Flow Orifice
ML17328A6191990-03-27027 March 1990
Forwards Payment in Amount of $75,000 for Civil Penalty Imposed Through Notice of Violation Issued in Insp Rept 50-316/89-02 on 891016-20,24-26 & 1204.Response to Violation & Corrective Actions Provided in Separate Submittal
ML17328A6161990-03-20020 March 1990
Responds to Generic Ltr 89-19 Re Safety Implications of Control Sys in LWRs (USI A-47).Both Units Have Steam Overfill Protection Sys That Would Automatically Prevent Water Carryover Into Steam Lines If Control Sys Failed
ML17328A6121990-03-13013 March 1990
Forwards Monthly Performance Monitoring Rept,Jan 1990.
ML17325B3901990-03-0606 March 1990
Forwards Annual Rept to NRC Per 10CFR50.54(W)(2) Re Nuclear Property Insurance
ML17325B3921990-03-0606 March 1990
Modifies Application for Amend to License DPR-74 Re Cycle 8, Per 900228 Telcon
ML17325B3781990-02-28028 February 1990
Forwards Response to NRC Info Notice 89-056 Re Questionable Certification of Matl Supplied to Dod by Nuclear Suppliers. Matl Capable of Performing Design Function & Acceptable for Continued Use
ML17328A5971990-02-27027 February 1990
Withdraws 890203 Application for Amend to License DPR-74, Modifying Tech Spec Table 3.2-1 Re DNB Parameters to Express RCS Flow Rate on Volumetric Rather than Mass Basis
ML17334B3511990-02-22022 February 1990
Submits Annual Rept of Changes to or Errors in Acceptable LOCA Evaluation Models or Application of Models for Plants. Wflash Analyses Will Be Superceded by Notrump Analyses for Unit 2,Cycle 8 Reload
ML17328A5881990-02-21021 February 1990
Responds to NRC 890914 Request for Addl Info Re Safe Shutdown Methodology.App R Fire Barriers Being Maintained & Surveilled Under 3/4.7.10 for Units 1 & 2
ML17328A5861990-02-16016 February 1990
Provides Revised Comments in Response to NRR Comments During 891213 Telcon Re Allowable Stresses for Piping & Piping Supports
1990-09-21
[Table view] |
Text
0
~ ~
e INDIANA 8 M ICHIGAN ELECTRIC COMPANY P.O. BOX 16631 COLUMBUS, OHIO 43216
'September 2, 1986 AEP:NRC:0847J Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-315 and 50-316 License Nos. DPR-58 and DPR-74 REQUEST FOR CHANGE IN QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESIGNATED ORIGINAL 10 CFR 50 '4 AND UPDATED FSAR REVIEW OF CONDITION REPORTS Mr. James G. Keppler," Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 II
Dear Mr. Keppler:
This letter constitutes a request for change to the Quality Assurance Program as described in the Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Updated (July, 1986) Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR), Section 1.7.16.2.2.
This request is submitted to you in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(a)(3).
The current UFSAR (reference Attachment 1) could be interpreted to mean that all Condition Reports will be reviewed by the Plant Nuclear Safety Review Committee (PNSRC) and Nuclear Safety Design Review Committee (NSDRC). The PNSRC and NSDRC are the safety review groups addressed in our Technical Specifications. Condition Reports are used to document many concerns, both significant (e.g., violations) and nonsignificant (e.g.,
minor maintenance). The proposed change would permit the Condition Reports to be segregated by significance. The segregation would effectively reduce the number of condition reports reviewed by the PNSRC and NSDRC to those which only address significant conditions adverse to quality. This reduction in required reviews would provide management more time to spend on significant activities. Concurrently (commencing October 1, 1986), the new Corrective Action Plan (CAP) would assure adequate management attention to all concerns documented in Condition Reports'he CAP has been discussed with Region III and NRR in meetings on April 30, 1986, May 8, 1986, and May 23, 1986. The CAP (1) defines those problems which shall be designated as significant and (2) provides examples of significant problems. Attachment 2 to this letter provides examples of those problems which will be treated as significant and thereby require review by the safety review groups.
Two additional features of the CAP which will assure adequate management attention of all problems (whether or not designated as significant) are:
(1) All problems documented on condition reports will be reviewed by a management group (Problem Assessment Group) within a few days after a report is generated to make assignments for resolution and confirm renortability obligations are being met.
Bbio21 ..j 8610280042 .0500O315' PDR @DOCK 8 SEP >9.""O
Mr.. James G. Keppler AEP:NRC'0847J (2) Recurring problems will be addressed as an adverse trend which is considered significant. Significant problems will be reviewed by the PNSRC and NSDRC in accordance wi:th the Technical Specification requirements.
We believe the CAP will be consistent with 10 CFR 50 Appendix B Criterion XVI, which states, in part "...The identification of the significant condition adverse to quality...shall be documented and reported to appropriate levels of management." The CAP clarifies how we will determine if an adverse condition is significant or not, and assures appropriate management attention.
Attachment 3 includes the proposed revisions to Section 1.7.16.2.2 of the July, 1986 UFSAP., which would effect this QA program change.
In addition, the current UFSAR discusses Noncompliance Reports (NCRs) which are used by AEPSC personnel and discusses reviews, initiated by the Nuclear Operations Division, of (plant) Condition Reports (CRs). Neither of these practices would continue or be needed as part of the new CAP.
AEPSC personnel would be required to use a Condition Report rather than an NCR. AEPSC reviews of plant initiated CRs would be initiated, when needed, by the D. C. Cook Problem Assessment Group. The proposed UFSAR (Attachment
- 3) addresses these changes. These changes and other editorial changes to the UFSAR, resulting from the approval of this proposal, will be incorporated into the UFSAR by our normal UFSAR submittal.
We request your approval of this proposed change by October 1, 1986.
As discussed in our previous meetings, October 1, 1986 is the target date for implementation of our Corrective Action Plan. Should you choose not to respond, we will assume that our proposed change is acceptable 60 days from the date of this letter as provided by 10 CFR 50.54(a)(3)(iv).
This document has been prepared following Corporate procedures which incorporate a reasonable set of controls to insure its accuracy and completeness prior to signature by the undersigned.
Very truly yours,
/l M. P. Alex ch Vice Presidene ~)>)&
MPA/cm Attachment cc: John E. Dolan W. G. Smith, Jr. - Bridgman R. C. Callen G. Bruchmann G. Charnoff NRC Resident Inspector - Bridgman Document Control Desk, USNRC - Washington, D.C.
ATTACHMENT 1 AEP: NRC: 0847 J UFSAR, Section 1.7.16.2.2 (July, 1986)
Condition Reports provide the mechanism for plant personnel to notify management of conditions adverse to quality. Investigations of reported conditions adverse to quality are assigned by management.
The investigation report is used to identify the need for changes to instructions or procedures, the initiation of a design change to correct system or equipment deficiencies, or the initiation of job orders to correct minor deficiencies. Further, Condition Reports are used to identify those actions necessary to prevent recurrence of the reported condition. Condition Reports are also used to report violations to codes, regulations and the Technical Specifications.
Condition Reports are reviewed by the PNSRC for evaluation of actions taken to correct the deficiency and prevent recurrence.
Noncompliance Reports (NCRs) provide the mechanism for AEPSCpersonnel to identify noncompliances. Investigation of reported conditions are assigned to the responsible individual. NCR investigation requires the determination of the cause of the condition and identification of immediate action and action taken to prevent recurrence.
The AEPSC Nuclear Operations Division receives copies of Condition Reports for distribution, on a selected basis, to cognizant engineering departments for review.
The AEPSC Nuclear Safety and Design Review Committee reviews Condition Reports, NCRs, NRC Inspection Report Responses, 10 CFR 21 items and QA and NSDRC audits for independent evaluation of the reported conditions and corrective actions.
The QA Department periodically audits the corrective action systems for compliance and effectiveness.
tI 10 ATTACHMENT 2 AEP:NRC:0847J I
~ ~
SIGNIFICANT~ PROBLEMS RE UIRING PNSRC REVIEW
- 1. ALL NRC REPORTABLE EVENTS.
VIOLATIONS OF TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS, CODES, REGULATIONS, ORDERS, OR LICENSE REQUIREMENTS.
A. ALL SIGNIFICANT VIOLATIONS OF THE FIRE PROTECTION PROGRAM.
B. ALL SIGNIFICANT VIOLATIONS OF THE RADIATION PROTECTION PROGRAM C. ALL SIGNIFICANT VIOLATIONS OF THE RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM.
D. ALL SIGNIFICANT VIOLATIONS OR REFUELING PROCEDURES.
E. ALL RECOGNIZED INDICATIONS OF A SIGNIFICANT UNANTICIPATED DEFICIENCY IN SOME ASPECT OF DESIGN OR OPERATION OF SAFETY-RELATED STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS, OR COMPONENTS.
- 3. SIGNIFICANT VIOLATIONS OF THE SECURITY PLAN.
- 4. SIGNIFICANT VIOLATIONS OF THE EMERGENCY PLAN.
- 5. SIGNIFICANT VIOLATIONS OF THE PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM.
6 ~ SIGNIFICANT VIOLATIONS OF THE OFF-SITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL.
- 7. UNPLANNED AND/OR UNMONITORED RELEASES OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL TO THE ENVIRONS THAT EXCEED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CRITERIA.
- 8. SIGNIFICANT VIOLATIONS OF THE QA PROGRAM FOR EFFLUENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING OR SIGNIFICANT VIOLATIONS OF APPENDIX B TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS.
9 . SIGNI FICANT OPERATING ABNORMALITIES OR DEVIATIONS FROM NORMAL AND EXPECTED PERFOR1ANCE OF PLANT EQUIPMENT THAT AFFECT NUCLEAR SAFETY.
- 10. DEFICIENCIES IN ESTABLISHED TRAINING PROGRAMS SUCH THAT A SIGNIFICANT PROBLEM COULD OR DID OCCUR.
- 11. SIGNIFICANT DEVIATIONS FROM SAFETY-RELATED DESIGN DOCUMENTS (E.G.,
DRAWINGS).
- 12. NRC INSPECTION FINDINGS.
- 13. ADVERSE TRENDS--UNACCEPTABLE LIMITS WILL BE REACHED WITHOUT ACTION TAKEN.
SIGNIFICANT IS DEFINED AS:
TO AFFECT THE RESULTS OF IMPLEMENTED PROCEDURES, PLANT OPERATIONS, OR PLANT EQUIPMENT TO THE EXTENT THAT:
(1) A VIOLATION OF THE PLANT LICENSE (INCLUDING TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS) OR REGULATORY REQUIREMENT (10 CFR) OCCURRED OR WOULD HAVE RESULTED; (2) THE ACTUAL PLANT STATUS OR CONFIGURATION WAS DIFFERENT THAN THAT WHICH WOULD HAVE RESULTED WITHOUT THE PROBLEM; OR (3) THE ACTIONS OR EVENTS SPECIFIED BY THE PROTECTIVE PROGRAMS LISTED IN SECTION 6.8 OF THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS WERE NOT OR WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ACCOMPLISHED.
) 'I ~
I
~)
ATTACHMENT 3 AEP:NRC:0847J
~ ~
UFSAR Section 1.7.16.2.2 (Proposed)
Condition/Problem Reports provide the mechanism for plant and AEPSC personnel to notify management of conditions adverse to quality.
Condition/Problem Reports are also used to report violations to codes, regulations and the Technical Specifications. Investigations of reported conditions-adverse to quality are assigned by management.
The Condition Report/Problem Report is used to document the investigation of a problem; and to identify the need for changes to instructions or procedures, to identify the need for a design change to correct system or equipment deficiencies, or to identify the need for the initiation of job orders to correct minor deficiencies.
Further, Condition/Problem Reports are used to identify those actions necessary to prevent recurrence of the reported condition.
Significant problems, which are so designated on Condition/Problem Reports, are reviewed by the PNSRC for evaluation of actions taken or being taken to correct the deficiency and prevent recurrence.
The AEPSC Nuclear Safety and Design Review Committee is responsible for assuring that independent reviews of violations (as specified in the Technical Specifications) are performed. These violations are considered significant problems which are documented on Condition/Problem Reports. The reviews will provide an independent evaluation of the reported problems and corrective actions.
The QA Department periodically audits the corrective action systems for compliance and effectiveness.
