ML18018B947: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ML Exhibit ll"aroima Power&L.icnt omoan>P.O.Box 101 New Hill, North Carolina 27562 April 11, 1985 Dr.3.Nelson Grace Jnited States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 131'.larietta Str et, Vorthw st (Suite 2900}.Atlanta, Georgia 30323 VRC-339
{{#Wiki_filter:ML                                           Exhibit     ll "aroima Power & L.icnt omoan>
P. O. Box 101 New Hill, North Carolina 27562 April 11,   1985 Dr. 3. Nelson Grace                                                                         VRC-339 Jnited States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 131 '.larietta Str et, Vorthw st (Suite 2900}
.Atlanta, Georgia 30323


==Dear Dr.Crace:==
==Dear Dr. Crace:==
In reference to your letter of March 12, 1985, referring to Rll: GFM/RLP 50-000/85-04-02, the attached is Carolina Power 2 Light Company's reply to the violation identified in Enclosure l.It is considered that the corrective action taken/planned is satisfactory for resolution of the item.'hank you for your consideration in this matter.Yours very truly, R.M.Parsons Project General Manager Completion Assurance Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant RMP/sae Attachment cc: Messrs.G.Maxwell/R.
Prevatte (NRC-SHNPP)
Mr.B.C.Buckley (NRC)'eI'E X-se7/1-OS 5


Dr.3.'~elson Grac'I<<C-339 bcc: Mr.H.R.Banks~~~Mr.T.A.Baxter (Shaw, Pittman, Potts 4 Trowbridge)
In reference to your letter of March 12, 1985, referring to Rll: GFM/RLP 50-000/85-04-02, the attached is Carolina Power 2 Light Company's reply to the violation identified in Enclosure        l.
Mr.C.S.Bohanan Mr.H.W.Bowles Mr.C.Carmichael (2)Mr.N 3.Chiangi Mr.A.B.utter Dr.T.5, Elleman'.Is.S.F.F!yni 4lr.3.L.Harness'vlr.P.C.Hopkins Or.3.D.E.3effries Vlr.I.A.3ohnson Mr.L.I.Loflin Mr.R.E.Lumsden Mr.R.L.Mayton, 3r.Mr.S.McManus Mr.C.H.Moseley, 3r.Mr.D.L.Nordstrom (LIS)Mr.R.M.Parsons Mr.G.A.Sinders Mr.M.Shannon (Westinghouse)
It is considered        that the corrective action taken/planned is satisfactory for resolution of the item.
Mr.Sheldon D.Smith Mr.M.F.Thompson Mr.A.C.Tollison Mr.E.3.Wagner Mr.R.A.Watson Mr.3.L.Willis File: HI/A-2D File: H-X-0500 se7/2 Attachment to CPRL Letter of Response to NRC Report RII: GFM/RLP 50-000/85-00-02 Re rted Violation:
        'hank you for your consideration in this matter.
10 CFR 50.55(f)(1) requires CPRL tc implement the quality assurance program described or referenced in the Preliminary Safety Analysis Report.Section 1.8.5.3 of the PSAR (versus the Quality Assurance Program, as stated in the Notice of Violation) requires that measures be established and implemented for the selection and review for suitability of application of materials, parts, and equipment that are essential to the safety-relaxed functions.
Yours very truly, R. M. Parsons Project General Manager Completion Assurance Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant RMP/sae Attachment cc:    Messrs. G. Maxwell/R. Prevatte (NRC-SHNPP)
Contrary to the above, on 3anuary 28, l985, the Inspector identified an undersized electrical c ble in DC panei D.-IASA.This cable (No.10$21A-SA)'vas a xwo-condo-x r (/IO AWG that has a maximum ampere rating of 20 amps.It was protected by a 100-ampere circuit breaker and supplied power to Auxiliary Transfer Panel lA-SA which had a loading of approximately 100 amps.This cable had been installed and inspected in accordance with approved design documents and this unsatisfactory condition had not been identified.
Mr. B. C. Buckley (NRC)
This is a Severity Level Y violation (Supplement II).Denial or Admission and Reason for the Violation:
                                                                                    'eI'E X-se7/1-OS        5
The violation is correct as stated.As complete information on load was unknown, an arbitrary size was chosen by HPES Electrical and was input into the cable routing system in order to assure an adequate route was available for the subject cable.The cable card was inadvertently released xo the field prior to final verification.
 
Corrective Ste Taken and Results Achieved: The subject/710 AWG conductor was replaced with a/72 AWG conductor per Field Change Request (F CR-E-0052).
Dr. 3. '~elson Grac                                         'I <<C-339 bcc: Mr. H. R.~ Banks
Corrective Ste s Taken to Avoid Further Noncom liance: Administrative instructions have been issued to HPES Electrical personnel to ensure closer monitoring and control of cable sized by HPES.In addition, a formal guideline procedure to place adequate control and verification requirements on cable sized by HPES is scheduled for issuance by April 30, 1985.Date Vhen Full Com liance Vill Be Achieved: It is currently projected that full compliance will be achieved by April 30, 1985.se7/3}}
            ~ ~
Mr. T. A. Baxter (Shaw, Pittman, Potts 4 Trowbridge)
Mr. C. S. Bohanan Mr. H. W. Bowles Mr. C. Carmichael (2)
Mr. N 3. Chiangi Mr. A. B. utter Dr. T. 5, Elleman
      '.Is. S. F. F! yni 4lr. 3. L. Harness
      'vlr. P. C. Hopkins Or. 3. D. E. 3effries Vlr. I. A. 3ohnson Mr. L. I. Loflin Mr. R. E. Lumsden Mr. R. L. Mayton, 3r.
Mr. S. McManus Mr. C. H. Moseley, 3r.
Mr. D. L. Nordstrom (LIS)
Mr. R. M. Parsons Mr. G. A. Sinders Mr. M. Shannon (Westinghouse)
Mr. Sheldon D. Smith Mr. M. F. Thompson Mr. A. C. Tollison Mr. E. 3. Wagner Mr. R. A. Watson Mr. 3. L. Willis File: HI/A-2D File: H-X-0500 se7/2
 
Attachment to CPRL Letter of Response to NRC Report RII: GFM/RLP 50-000/85-00-02 Re   rted Violation:
10 CFR 50.55(f)(1) requires CPRL tc implement the quality assurance program described or referenced in the Preliminary Safety Analysis Report. Section 1.8.5.3 of the PSAR (versus the Quality Assurance Program, as stated in the Notice of Violation) requires that measures be established and implemented for the selection and review for suitability of application of materials, parts, and equipment that are essential to the safety-relaxed functions.
Contrary to the above, on 3anuary 28, l985, the Inspector identified an undersized electrical c ble in DC panei D. -IASA. This cable (No. 10$ 21A-SA) 'vas a xwo-condo-x r
(/IO AWG that has a maximum ampere rating of 20 amps. It was protected by a 100-ampere circuit breaker and supplied power to Auxiliary Transfer Panel lA-SA which had a loading of approximately 100 amps.         This cable had been installed and inspected in accordance with approved design documents and this unsatisfactory condition had not been identified.
This is a Severity Level Y violation (Supplement II).
Denial or Admission and Reason for the Violation:
The violation is correct as stated.
As complete information on load was unknown, an arbitrary size was chosen by HPES Electrical and was input into the cable routing system in order to assure an adequate route was available for the subject cable. The cable card was inadvertently released xo the field prior to final verification.
Corrective Ste     Taken and Results Achieved:
The subject /710 AWG conductor was replaced with a /72 AWG conductor per Field Change Request (F CR-E-0052).
Corrective Ste   s Taken to Avoid Further Noncom liance:
Administrative instructions have been issued to HPES Electrical personnel to ensure closer monitoring and control of cable sized by HPES. In addition, a formal guideline procedure to place adequate control and verification requirements on cable sized by HPES is scheduled for issuance by April 30, 1985.
Date Vhen Full Com liance     Vill Be Achieved:
It is currently projected that full compliance will be achieved by April 30, 1985.
se7/3}}

Latest revision as of 04:14, 22 October 2019

Responds to NRC 850312 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-400/85-04.Corrective actions:10 Awg Conductor Replaced Per Field Change Request FCR-E-4052
ML18018B947
Person / Time
Site: Harris Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/11/1985
From: Parsons R
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: Grace J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML18018B945 List:
References
CON-NRC-339 NUDOCS 8505210502
Download: ML18018B947 (4)
v • d • e


Text

ML Exhibit ll "aroima Power & L.icnt omoan>

P. O. Box 101 New Hill, North Carolina 27562 April 11, 1985 Dr. 3. Nelson Grace VRC-339 Jnited States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 131 '.larietta Str et, Vorthw st (Suite 2900}

.Atlanta, Georgia 30323

Dear Dr. Crace:

In reference to your letter of March 12, 1985, referring to Rll: GFM/RLP 50-000/85-04-02, the attached is Carolina Power 2 Light Company's reply to the violation identified in Enclosure l.

It is considered that the corrective action taken/planned is satisfactory for resolution of the item.

'hank you for your consideration in this matter.

Yours very truly, R. M. Parsons Project General Manager Completion Assurance Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant RMP/sae Attachment cc: Messrs. G. Maxwell/R. Prevatte (NRC-SHNPP)

Mr. B. C. Buckley (NRC)

'eI'E X-se7/1-OS 5

Dr. 3. '~elson Grac 'I <<C-339 bcc: Mr. H. R.~ Banks

~ ~

Mr. T. A. Baxter (Shaw, Pittman, Potts 4 Trowbridge)

Mr. C. S. Bohanan Mr. H. W. Bowles Mr. C. Carmichael (2)

Mr. N 3. Chiangi Mr. A. B. utter Dr. T. 5, Elleman

'.Is. S. F. F! yni 4lr. 3. L. Harness

'vlr. P. C. Hopkins Or. 3. D. E. 3effries Vlr. I. A. 3ohnson Mr. L. I. Loflin Mr. R. E. Lumsden Mr. R. L. Mayton, 3r.

Mr. S. McManus Mr. C. H. Moseley, 3r.

Mr. D. L. Nordstrom (LIS)

Mr. R. M. Parsons Mr. G. A. Sinders Mr. M. Shannon (Westinghouse)

Mr. Sheldon D. Smith Mr. M. F. Thompson Mr. A. C. Tollison Mr. E. 3. Wagner Mr. R. A. Watson Mr. 3. L. Willis File: HI/A-2D File: H-X-0500 se7/2

Attachment to CPRL Letter of Response to NRC Report RII: GFM/RLP 50-000/85-00-02 Re rted Violation:

10 CFR 50.55(f)(1) requires CPRL tc implement the quality assurance program described or referenced in the Preliminary Safety Analysis Report. Section 1.8.5.3 of the PSAR (versus the Quality Assurance Program, as stated in the Notice of Violation) requires that measures be established and implemented for the selection and review for suitability of application of materials, parts, and equipment that are essential to the safety-relaxed functions.

Contrary to the above, on 3anuary 28, l985, the Inspector identified an undersized electrical c ble in DC panei D. -IASA. This cable (No. 10$ 21A-SA) 'vas a xwo-condo-x r

(/IO AWG that has a maximum ampere rating of 20 amps. It was protected by a 100-ampere circuit breaker and supplied power to Auxiliary Transfer Panel lA-SA which had a loading of approximately 100 amps. This cable had been installed and inspected in accordance with approved design documents and this unsatisfactory condition had not been identified.

This is a Severity Level Y violation (Supplement II).

Denial or Admission and Reason for the Violation:

The violation is correct as stated.

As complete information on load was unknown, an arbitrary size was chosen by HPES Electrical and was input into the cable routing system in order to assure an adequate route was available for the subject cable. The cable card was inadvertently released xo the field prior to final verification.

Corrective Ste Taken and Results Achieved:

The subject /710 AWG conductor was replaced with a /72 AWG conductor per Field Change Request (F CR-E-0052).

Corrective Ste s Taken to Avoid Further Noncom liance:

Administrative instructions have been issued to HPES Electrical personnel to ensure closer monitoring and control of cable sized by HPES. In addition, a formal guideline procedure to place adequate control and verification requirements on cable sized by HPES is scheduled for issuance by April 30, 1985.

Date Vhen Full Com liance Vill Be Achieved:

It is currently projected that full compliance will be achieved by April 30, 1985.

se7/3

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18018B947&oldid=1957696"