ML18018B948: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 04/10/1985
| issue date = 04/10/1985
| title = Responds to NRC 850312 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-400/85-04.Corrective Actions:Conduit 16101V-SA Reinspected for Separation Violations & Inspector Counseled
| title = Responds to NRC 850312 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-400/85-04.Corrective Actions:Conduit 16101V-SA Reinspected for Separation Violations & Inspector Counseled
| author name = PARSONS R M
| author name = Parsons R
| author affiliation = CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
| author affiliation = CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
| addressee name = GRACE J N
| addressee name = Grace J
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
| docket = 05000400
| docket = 05000400
Line 16: Line 16:
| page count = 3
| page count = 3
}}
}}
See also: [[followed by::IR 05000400/1985004]]


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Exhibit 3 P.O.Box IOI New Hill, North Carolina 27562 April l0, l985 Dr.3.Nelson Grace Jnited States Nuclear Regulatory
{{#Wiki_filter:Exhibit   3 P. O. Box IOI New Hill, North Carolina 27562 April l0, l985 Dr. 3. Nelson Grace                                                                   NRC-347 Jnited States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 ."Aarietta Street, Northwest (Suite 2900)
Commission
Atlanta, Georgia 30323
Region II 101."Aarietta
 
Street, Northwest (Suite 2900)Atlanta, Georgia 30323 NRC-347 Dear Dr.Grace: ln reference to your letter of March 12, l985, r ferring to RII: GFM,'RLP 50-000/85-0v-OI, the attached is arolina Power 2 LightŽompany's reply to the violation identified
==Dear Dr. Grace:==
in Enclosure l.It is considered
 
that the corrective
ln reference to your letter of March 12, l985, r ferring to RII: GFM,'RLP 50-000/85-0v-OI, the attached is arolina Power 2 Light 'ompany's reply to the violation identified in Enclosure l.
action taken is satisfactory
It is considered that the corrective action taken is satisfactory for resolution of the item.
for resolution
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
of the item.Thank you for your consideration
                                            +~7         W~
in this matter.Yours very truly,+~7 W~R.M.Parsons Project General Manager Completion
Yours very truly, R. M. Parsons Project General Manager Completion Assurance Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant RMP:sae A ttachment cc:   Messrs. G. Maxwell/R. Prevatte (NRC-SHNPP)
Assurance Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant RMP:sae A ttachment cc: Messrs.G.Maxwell/R.
Mr. B. C. Buckley (NRC)
Prevatte (NRC-SHNPP)
XE X-se7/ I-OS5
Mr.B.C.Buckley (NRC)XE X-se7/I-OS5  
 
Dr.3.Velson Grace 2 VR-3<7 bcc:.'v1r.H.R.Banks Mr.T.A.Baxter (Shaw, Pittman, Potts 2 Trowbridge)
Dr. 3. Velson Grace                           2           VR -3<7 bcc: .'v1r. H. R. Banks Mr. T. A. Baxter (Shaw, Pittman, Potts 2 Trowbridge)
Mr.C.S.Bohanan Mr.H.W.Bowles Mr.C.Carmichael
Mr. C. S. Bohanan Mr. H. W. Bowles Mr. C. Carmichael (2)
(2)Mr.V 3.Chiangi Mr.A.B.Cutter Dr.T.S.Elleman Ms.S.F.Flynn Mr.G.L.Forehand Mr.3.F.Garibaldi CZbasco)Vlr.3.L.Harness Mr.P.C.Hopkins Dr.3.D.E.3effries Mr.I.A.3ohnson Mr.L.I.~oflin Mr.R.E.Lumsden Mr.R.L.Mayton, 3r.Mr.S.McManus Mr.C.H.Moseley, 3r.Mr.D.L.iVordstrom (LIS)Mr.R.M.Parsons Mr.G.A.Sinders Mr.M.Shannon (Westinghouse)
Mr. V 3. Chiangi Mr. A. B. Cutter Dr. T. S. Elleman Ms. S. F. Flynn Mr. G. L. Forehand Mr. 3. F. Garibaldi CZbasco)
Mr.Sheldon D.Smith Vlr.M.F.Thompson Mr.A.C.Tollison Mr.E.3.Wagner Mr.R.A.Watson Mr.3.L.Willis File: HI/A-2D File: H-X-0500 se7/2  
Vlr. 3. L. Harness Mr. P. C. Hopkins Dr. 3. D. E. 3effries Mr. I. A. 3ohnson Mr. L. I. oflin
Attachment
                    ~
to CPM.Letter of Response to NRC Report RII: GFM/RL Re rted Violation:
Mr. R. E. Lumsden Mr. R. L. Mayton, 3r.
10 CFR 50.55(f)(l)
Mr. S. McManus Mr. C. H. Moseley, 3r.
requires CPRL to implement the quality assurance program described or referenced
Mr. D. L. iVordstrom (LIS)
in the Preliminary
Mr. R. M. Parsons Mr. G. A. Sinders Mr. M. Shannon (Westinghouse)
Safety Analysis Report.Section 1.8.5.10 of the PSAR (versus the Quality Assurance Program, as stated in the Votice of Violation)
Mr. Sheldon D. Smith Vlr. M. F. Thompson Mr. A. C. Tollison Mr. E. 3. Wagner Mr. R. A. Watson Mr. 3. L. Willis File: HI/A-2D File: H-X-0500 se7/2
requires that measures be established
 
to ensure that inspections
Attachment to CPM. Letter of Response to NRC Report RII: GFM/RL Re   rted Violation:
are conducted in accordance
10 CFR 50.55(f)(l) requires CPRL to implement the quality assurance program described or referenced in the Preliminary Safety Analysis Report. Section 1.8.5.10 of the PSAR (versus the Quality Assurance Program, as stated in the Votice of Violation) requires that measures be established to ensure that inspections are conducted in accordance with documented instructions, procedures and drawings.
with documented
ontrary to the above, on 3anuary 24, 1985, the inspector identified an electrical separation problem between electrical safety-related conduit 16101V-SA and non-safety electrical cable trays X1700 and X1701 at plan points 3002 and 3004 in the reactor auxiliary building at elevation 286'. The installation had been previously inspected and accepted by Construction Inspection personnel and the separation problem had not been identified. Construction inspection procedure T?-02, paragraph 3.5.0 specifically requir s that this attribute be inspected and documented.
instructions, procedures
This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement II).
and drawings.ontrary to the above, on 3anuary 24, 1985, the inspector identified
Denial or Admission and Reason for the Violation:
an electrical
The violation is correct as stated.
separation
,The raceway inspector inadvertently failed to recognize the separation violation between Conduit 16101V-SA and Non-Safety Trays XI700 and X1701 (plan points 3002 to 3000).
problem between electrical
Corrective Ste   s Taken and Results Achieved; Conduit 16101V-SA has been reinspected for separation violations and the card now documents that there is a separation violation. A supervisory review'f the inspectors qualifications and work performance was conducted. Based on this review, the violation is considered to be an isolated case.
safety-related
Corrective Ste   s Taken to Avoid Further Noncom liance:
conduit 16101V-SA and non-safety
The inspector was counseled about this occurrence and   it was determined that he was fully cognizant of the separation requirements at the time of the subject inspection. The inspector admits that in this case, he inadvertently overlooked the separation violation.
electrical
The separation requirements were reiterated to the inspector during this counseling. In addition, the importance of thorough inspections for required electrical separation has been re-emphasized to the electrical raceway Construction Inspectors.
cable trays X1700 and X1701 at plan points 3002 and 3004 in the reactor auxiliary building at elevation 286'.The installation
Date When Full Com liance %as Achieved:
had been previously
Full compliance was achieved on April 10, 1985.
inspected and accepted by Construction
se7/3}}
Inspection
personnel and the separation
problem had not been identified.
Construction
inspection
procedure T?-02, paragraph 3.5.0 specifically
requir s that this attribute be inspected and documented.
This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement
II).Denial or Admission and Reason for the Violation:
The violation is correct as stated.,The raceway inspector inadvertently
failed to recognize the separation
violation between Conduit 16101V-SA and Non-Safety
Trays XI700 and X1701 (plan points 3002 to 3000).Corrective
Ste s Taken and Results Achieved;Conduit 16101V-SA has been reinspected
for separation
violations
and the card now documents that there is a separation
violation.
A supervisory
review'f the inspectors
qualifications
and work performance
was conducted.
Based on this review, the violation is considered
to be an isolated case.Corrective
Ste s Taken to Avoid Further Noncom liance: The inspector was counseled about this occurrence
and it was determined
that he was fully cognizant of the separation
requirements
at the time of the subject inspection.
The inspector admits that in this case, he inadvertently
overlooked
the separation
violation.
The separation
requirements
were reiterated
to the inspector during this counseling.
In addition, the importance
of thorough inspections
for required electrical
separation
has been re-emphasized
to the electrical
raceway Construction
Inspectors.
Date When Full Com liance%as Achieved: Full compliance
was achieved on April 10, 1985.se7/3
}}

Latest revision as of 04:14, 22 October 2019

Responds to NRC 850312 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-400/85-04.Corrective Actions:Conduit 16101V-SA Reinspected for Separation Violations & Inspector Counseled
ML18018B948
Person / Time
Site: Harris Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/10/1985
From: Parsons R
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: Grace J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML18018B945 List:
References
CON-NRC-347 NUDOCS 8505210508
Download: ML18018B948 (3)
v • d • e


Text

Exhibit 3 P. O. Box IOI New Hill, North Carolina 27562 April l0, l985 Dr. 3. Nelson Grace NRC-347 Jnited States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 ."Aarietta Street, Northwest (Suite 2900)

Atlanta, Georgia 30323

Dear Dr. Grace:

ln reference to your letter of March 12, l985, r ferring to RII: GFM,'RLP 50-000/85-0v-OI, the attached is arolina Power 2 Light 'ompany's reply to the violation identified in Enclosure l.

It is considered that the corrective action taken is satisfactory for resolution of the item.

Thank you for your consideration in this matter.

+~7 W~

Yours very truly, R. M. Parsons Project General Manager Completion Assurance Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant RMP:sae A ttachment cc: Messrs. G. Maxwell/R. Prevatte (NRC-SHNPP)

Mr. B. C. Buckley (NRC)

XE X-se7/ I-OS5

Dr. 3. Velson Grace 2 VR -3<7 bcc: .'v1r. H. R. Banks Mr. T. A. Baxter (Shaw, Pittman, Potts 2 Trowbridge)

Mr. C. S. Bohanan Mr. H. W. Bowles Mr. C. Carmichael (2)

Mr. V 3. Chiangi Mr. A. B. Cutter Dr. T. S. Elleman Ms. S. F. Flynn Mr. G. L. Forehand Mr. 3. F. Garibaldi CZbasco)

Vlr. 3. L. Harness Mr. P. C. Hopkins Dr. 3. D. E. 3effries Mr. I. A. 3ohnson Mr. L. I. oflin

~

Mr. R. E. Lumsden Mr. R. L. Mayton, 3r.

Mr. S. McManus Mr. C. H. Moseley, 3r.

Mr. D. L. iVordstrom (LIS)

Mr. R. M. Parsons Mr. G. A. Sinders Mr. M. Shannon (Westinghouse)

Mr. Sheldon D. Smith Vlr. M. F. Thompson Mr. A. C. Tollison Mr. E. 3. Wagner Mr. R. A. Watson Mr. 3. L. Willis File: HI/A-2D File: H-X-0500 se7/2

Attachment to CPM. Letter of Response to NRC Report RII: GFM/RL Re rted Violation:

10 CFR 50.55(f)(l) requires CPRL to implement the quality assurance program described or referenced in the Preliminary Safety Analysis Report. Section 1.8.5.10 of the PSAR (versus the Quality Assurance Program, as stated in the Votice of Violation) requires that measures be established to ensure that inspections are conducted in accordance with documented instructions, procedures and drawings.

ontrary to the above, on 3anuary 24, 1985, the inspector identified an electrical separation problem between electrical safety-related conduit 16101V-SA and non-safety electrical cable trays X1700 and X1701 at plan points 3002 and 3004 in the reactor auxiliary building at elevation 286'. The installation had been previously inspected and accepted by Construction Inspection personnel and the separation problem had not been identified. Construction inspection procedure T?-02, paragraph 3.5.0 specifically requir s that this attribute be inspected and documented.

This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement II).

Denial or Admission and Reason for the Violation:

The violation is correct as stated.

,The raceway inspector inadvertently failed to recognize the separation violation between Conduit 16101V-SA and Non-Safety Trays XI700 and X1701 (plan points 3002 to 3000).

Corrective Ste s Taken and Results Achieved; Conduit 16101V-SA has been reinspected for separation violations and the card now documents that there is a separation violation. A supervisory review'f the inspectors qualifications and work performance was conducted. Based on this review, the violation is considered to be an isolated case.

Corrective Ste s Taken to Avoid Further Noncom liance:

The inspector was counseled about this occurrence and it was determined that he was fully cognizant of the separation requirements at the time of the subject inspection. The inspector admits that in this case, he inadvertently overlooked the separation violation.

The separation requirements were reiterated to the inspector during this counseling. In addition, the importance of thorough inspections for required electrical separation has been re-emphasized to the electrical raceway Construction Inspectors.

Date When Full Com liance %as Achieved:

Full compliance was achieved on April 10, 1985.

se7/3

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18018B948&oldid=1957695"