ML17325B085: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 7
| page count = 7
}}
}}
See also: [[followed by::IR 05000315/1988024]]


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:'.CCELKRATED
{{#Wiki_filter:'.CCELKRATED 91FI'KBUTJON DEMONSTRA.T10Yi SYSTEM REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)ESSION NBR:8901130235 DOC.DATE: 89/01/04 NOTARIZED:
91FI'KBUTJON
NO FACIL:50-315 Donald C.Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Indiana&50-316 Donald C.Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2, Indiana&AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION ALEXICH,M.P.
DEMONSTRA.T10Yi
Indiana Michigan Power Co.(formerly Indiana&Michigan Ele RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)
SYSTEM REGULATORY
 
INFORMATION
==SUBJECT:==
DISTRIBUTION
Responds to 881201 ltr re violations noted in Insp Repts 50-315/88-24
SYSTEM (RIDS)ESSION NBR:8901130235
DOC.DATE: 89/01/04 NOTARIZED:
NO FACIL:50-315
Donald C.Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Indiana&50-316 Donald C.Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2, Indiana&AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION
ALEXICH,M.P.
Indiana Michigan Power Co.(formerly Indiana&Michigan Ele RECIP.NAME
RECIPIENT AFFILIATION
Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)SUBJECT: Responds to 881201 ltr re violations
noted in Insp Repts 50-315/88-24
&50-316/88-28.
&50-316/88-28.
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION CODE: IEOID COPIES RECEIVED:LTR I ENCL Q SIZE: TITLE: General (50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of Vi&o ation Response NOTES'ECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD3-1 PD INTERNAL: AEOD DEDRO NRR/DEST DIR NRR/DLPQ/QAB 10 NRR/DREP/EPB 10 NRR/DRIS DIR 9A NUDOCS-ABSTRACT OGC/HDS1 RGN3 FILE 01 EXTERNAL: LPDR NSIC COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME STANG,J AEOD/DEIIB NRR SHANKMAN,S NRR/DLPQ/PEB ll NRR/DOEA DIR 11 NRR/DREP/RPB 10 NRR/PMAS/ILRB12 OE LIEBERMAN,J
CODE: IEOID COPIES RECEIVED:LTR
~TED~02 NRC PDR RESL MARTIN,D COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 NOTE IO ALL"RZre" RECIPrWrS~PLEASE HELP US'IO REDUCE WASTE!CXWI'ACT'IHE DOCVMEhZ CXNIROL DESK, RDQM Pl-37 (EXT.20079)%0 EXZKOXR YOUR NAME PKH DIPX1UBUTIGN LISTS KE KGCBKNIS YOU DCNPT NEED)D S TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 24 ENCL 24 I Indiana ISchigan Power Company P.O.Box 16631 Columbus, OH>32'6 INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER AEP:NRC:1060M Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos.50-315 and 50-316 License Nos.DPR-58 and DPR-74 INSPECTION REPORTS 50-315/88024 (DRP)AND 50-316/88028 (DRP);RESPONSE TO VIOLATION U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Conunission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.20555 Attn: A.B.Davis January 4, 1989  
I ENCL Q SIZE: TITLE: General (50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice
 
of Vi&o ation Response NOTES'ECIPIENT
==Dear Mr.Davis:==
ID CODE/NAME PD3-1 PD INTERNAL: AEOD DEDRO NRR/DEST DIR NRR/DLPQ/QAB
This letter is in response to Mr.W.L.Axelson's letter of December 1, 1988, that forwarded the report on the routine safety inspection conducted on September 22 through November 16, 1988, on activities at the Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2~The Notice of Violation attached to Mr.Axelson's letter identified one violation, which is addressed in the attachment to this letter.This document has been prepared following Corporate procedures that incorporate a reasonable set of controls to ensure its accuracy and completeness prior to signature by the undersigned.
10 NRR/DREP/EPB
Sincerely, M.P.Alexich Vice President ldp Attachment cc: D.H.Williams, Jr.W.G.Smith, Jr.-Bridgman R.C.Callen G.Charnoff NRC Resident Inspector-Bridgman G.Bruchmann 8901 13023~(~~90104 PDR ADGCK 050003/~Q PDC 45 ATTACHMENT TO AEP:NRC:1060M RESPONSE TO VIOLATION  
10 NRR/DRIS DIR 9A NUDOCS-ABSTRACT
 
OGC/HDS1 RGN3 FILE 01 EXTERNAL: LPDR NSIC COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME STANG,J AEOD/DEIIB
Attachment to AEP:NRC:1060M Page 1 Violation"Unit 2 Technical Specification 6.8.1.f requires procedures to be implemented covering the Fire Protection Program.Safety Procedure SP-03.00,"Hot Work Permits" is such a procedure.
NRR SHANKMAN,S
It requires that fire watches shall be present, with a fire extinguisher in their possession, during and for 30 minutes'fter any hot work for which the Permit specifies a fire watch.Contrary to the above, at approximately 11:00 a.m.on October 28, 1988, no fire watch was present covering welding of a Unistrut attachment on steam generator No.21, under Hot.Work Permit No.1247, even though the Permit specified a fire watch.This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I)." 1.0 Res onse to Violation The failure to post a fire watch cited in the NRC Notice of Violation occurred during the performance of welding as part of the Steam Generator Repair Project (SGRP)at Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 2.The SGRP involved various hot work activities requiring fire watch personnel.
NRR/DLPQ/PEB
Our SGRP contractor, MK-Ferguson, is responsible for the actual performance of this work under the supervision of MK-Ferguson's safety supervisor who has the responsibility to ensure that the work is performed in accordance with MK-Ferguson's Safety Procedure SP-03.00,"Hot Work Permits'~" SGRP fire watch personnel are assigned to MK-Ferguson to provide the required fire watches and to respond to potential fire situations.
ll NRR/DOEA DIR 11 NRR/DREP/RPB
Before performance of hot work, the MK-Ferguson safety supervisor completes the hot work permit required by procedure SP-03.00 and notifies the SGRP fire watch supervisor if a fire watch is necessary in order to have fire watch personnel assigned to the job.In the case of the cited violation, the need for a fire watch was properly communicated to the SGRP fire watch supervisor by the MK-Ferguson safety supervisor and a fire watch was assigned.However the fire watch left his assigned station before completion of the hot work.This was in violation of Safety Procedure SP-03.00.2.0 Corrective Action Taken and Results Achieved Prior to the October 28, 1988 violation, actions were in progress to reemphasize to fire watch personnel their responsibilities while performing fire watches, including the requirements for the operability and use of fire extinguishers
10 NRR/PMAS/ILRB12
~In addition, as part of these ongoing Attachment to AEP:NRC:1060M Page 2 actions, a second SGRP fire watch supervisor was added to each shift to further ensure that SGRP fire watch personnel properly fulfill their responsibilities in monitoring hot work activities.
OE LIEBERMAN,J
The Cook Nuclear Plant Fire Protection Coordinator, MK-Ferguson safety supervisors, SGRP fire watch supervisors and SGRP fire watches also met jointly to review hot work procedural requirements and the importance of maintaining attentiveness to assigned fire watch activities.
~TED~02 NRC PDR RESL MARTIN,D COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 NOTE IO ALL"RZre" RECIPrWrS~PLEASE HELP US'IO REDUCE WASTE!CXWI'ACT'IHE DOCVMEhZ CXNIROL DESK, RDQM Pl-37 (EXT.20079)%0 EXZKOXR YOUR NAME PKH DIPX1UBUTIGN
Increased monitoring performed since October 28 by SGRP fire watch supervision, MK-Ferguson safety supervisors and the Cook Nuclear Plant Fire Protection Coordinator has found proper fire watch coverage for all hot work activities observed at the SGRP.3.0 Corrective Action to Avoid Further Violations To avoid further violations in this area, the following additional administrative controls have been initiated for the SGRP: 1.Shift meetings with MK-Ferguson safety supervisors and fire watch supervisors to discuss hot work activities and manpower requirements to ensure proper hot work coverage."2.Shift meetings with fire watch supervisors and fire watch personnel to review fire watch responsibilities and attentiveness to fire watch assignments and equipment.
LISTS KE KGCBKNIS YOU DCNPT NEED)D S TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 24 ENCL 24 I  
3.Tours by the plant Fire Protection Coordinator to ensure proper manning and equipment exists at the site of hot work performance.
Indiana ISchigan Power Company P.O.Box 16631 Columbus, OH>32'6 INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER AEP:NRC:1060M
4.0 Date When Full Com liance Will Be Achieved The corrective actions discussed in Section 2.0 were completed November 16, 1988.Actions discussed in Section 3.0 will continue through the remaining period of performance of the SGRP.}}
Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos.50-315 and 50-316 License Nos.DPR-58 and DPR-74 INSPECTION
REPORTS 50-315/88024 (DRP)AND 50-316/88028 (DRP);RESPONSE TO VIOLATION U.S.Nuclear Regulatory
Conunission
Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.20555 Attn: A.B.Davis January 4, 1989 Dear Mr.Davis: This letter is in response to Mr.W.L.Axelson's letter of December 1, 1988, that forwarded the report on the routine safety inspection
conducted on September 22 through November 16, 1988, on activities
at the Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2~The Notice of Violation attached to Mr.Axelson's letter identified
one violation, which is addressed in the attachment
to this letter.This document has been prepared following Corporate procedures
that incorporate
a reasonable
set of controls to ensure its accuracy and completeness
prior to signature by the undersigned.
Sincerely, M.P.Alexich Vice President ldp Attachment
cc: D.H.Williams, Jr.W.G.Smith, Jr.-Bridgman R.C.Callen G.Charnoff NRC Resident Inspector-Bridgman G.Bruchmann 8901 13023~(~~90104 PDR ADGCK 050003/~Q PDC  
45  
ATTACHMENT
TO AEP:NRC:1060M
RESPONSE TO VIOLATION  
Attachment
to AEP:NRC:1060M
Page 1 Violation"Unit 2 Technical Specification
6.8.1.f requires procedures
to be implemented
covering the Fire Protection
Program.Safety Procedure SP-03.00,"Hot Work Permits" is such a procedure.
It requires that fire watches shall be present, with a fire extinguisher
in their possession, during and for 30 minutes'fter
any hot work for which the Permit specifies a fire watch.Contrary to the above, at approximately
11:00 a.m.on October 28, 1988, no fire watch was present covering welding of a Unistrut attachment
on steam generator No.21, under Hot.Work Permit No.1247, even though the Permit specified a fire watch.This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement
I)." 1.0 Res onse to Violation The failure to post a fire watch cited in the NRC Notice of Violation occurred during the performance
of welding as part of the Steam Generator Repair Project (SGRP)at Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 2.The SGRP involved various hot work activities
requiring fire watch personnel.
Our SGRP contractor, MK-Ferguson, is responsible
for the actual performance
of this work under the supervision
of MK-Ferguson's
safety supervisor
who has the responsibility
to ensure that the work is performed in accordance
with MK-Ferguson's
Safety Procedure SP-03.00,"Hot Work Permits'~" SGRP fire watch personnel are assigned to MK-Ferguson
to provide the required fire watches and to respond to potential fire situations.
Before performance
of hot work, the MK-Ferguson
safety supervisor
completes the hot work permit required by procedure SP-03.00 and notifies the SGRP fire watch supervisor
if a fire watch is necessary in order to have fire watch personnel assigned to the job.In the case of the cited violation, the need for a fire watch was properly communicated
to the SGRP fire watch supervisor
by the MK-Ferguson
safety supervisor
and a fire watch was assigned.However the fire watch left his assigned station before completion
of the hot work.This was in violation of Safety Procedure SP-03.00.2.0 Corrective
Action Taken and Results Achieved Prior to the October 28, 1988 violation, actions were in progress to reemphasize
to fire watch personnel their responsibilities
while performing
fire watches, including the requirements
for the operability
and use of fire extinguishers
~In addition, as part of these ongoing  
Attachment
to AEP:NRC:1060M
Page 2 actions, a second SGRP fire watch supervisor
was added to each shift to further ensure that SGRP fire watch personnel properly fulfill their responsibilities
in monitoring
hot work activities.
The Cook Nuclear Plant Fire Protection
Coordinator, MK-Ferguson
safety supervisors, SGRP fire watch supervisors
and SGRP fire watches also met jointly to review hot work procedural
requirements
and the importance
of maintaining
attentiveness
to assigned fire watch activities.
Increased monitoring
performed since October 28 by SGRP fire watch supervision, MK-Ferguson
safety supervisors
and the Cook Nuclear Plant Fire Protection
Coordinator
has found proper fire watch coverage for all hot work activities
observed at the SGRP.3.0 Corrective
Action to Avoid Further Violations
To avoid further violations
in this area, the following additional
administrative
controls have been initiated for the SGRP: 1.Shift meetings with MK-Ferguson
safety supervisors
and fire watch supervisors
to discuss hot work activities
and manpower requirements
to ensure proper hot work coverage."2.Shift meetings with fire watch supervisors
and fire watch personnel to review fire watch responsibilities
and attentiveness
to fire watch assignments
and equipment.
3.Tours by the plant Fire Protection
Coordinator
to ensure proper manning and equipment exists at the site of hot work performance.
4.0 Date When Full Com liance Will Be Achieved The corrective
actions discussed in Section 2.0 were completed November 16, 1988.Actions discussed in Section 3.0 will continue through the remaining period of performance
of the SGRP.
}}

Revision as of 09:37, 17 August 2019

Responds to NRC 881201 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-315/88-24 & 50-316/88-28.Corrective Actions:Actions in Progress to Reemphasize Fire Watch Personnel Responsibilities While Performing Fire Watches
ML17325B085
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 01/04/1989
From: Alexich M
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
To: Davis A
NRC, NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
References
AEP:NRC:1060M, NUDOCS 8901130235
Download: ML17325B085 (7)
v • d • e


Text

'.CCELKRATED 91FI'KBUTJON DEMONSTRA.T10Yi SYSTEM REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)ESSION NBR:8901130235 DOC.DATE: 89/01/04 NOTARIZED:

NO FACIL:50-315 Donald C.Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Indiana&50-316 Donald C.Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2, Indiana&AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION ALEXICH,M.P.

Indiana Michigan Power Co.(formerly Indiana&Michigan Ele RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)

SUBJECT:

Responds to 881201 ltr re violations noted in Insp Repts 50-315/88-24

&50-316/88-28.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: IEOID COPIES RECEIVED:LTR I ENCL Q SIZE: TITLE: General (50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of Vi&o ation Response NOTES'ECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD3-1 PD INTERNAL: AEOD DEDRO NRR/DEST DIR NRR/DLPQ/QAB 10 NRR/DREP/EPB 10 NRR/DRIS DIR 9A NUDOCS-ABSTRACT OGC/HDS1 RGN3 FILE 01 EXTERNAL: LPDR NSIC COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME STANG,J AEOD/DEIIB NRR SHANKMAN,S NRR/DLPQ/PEB ll NRR/DOEA DIR 11 NRR/DREP/RPB 10 NRR/PMAS/ILRB12 OE LIEBERMAN,J

~TED~02 NRC PDR RESL MARTIN,D COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 NOTE IO ALL"RZre" RECIPrWrS~PLEASE HELP US'IO REDUCE WASTE!CXWI'ACT'IHE DOCVMEhZ CXNIROL DESK, RDQM Pl-37 (EXT.20079)%0 EXZKOXR YOUR NAME PKH DIPX1UBUTIGN LISTS KE KGCBKNIS YOU DCNPT NEED)D S TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 24 ENCL 24 I Indiana ISchigan Power Company P.O.Box 16631 Columbus, OH>32'6 INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER AEP:NRC:1060M Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos.50-315 and 50-316 License Nos.DPR-58 and DPR-74 INSPECTION REPORTS 50-315/88024 (DRP)AND 50-316/88028 (DRP);RESPONSE TO VIOLATION U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Conunission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.20555 Attn: A.B.Davis January 4, 1989

Dear Mr.Davis:

This letter is in response to Mr.W.L.Axelson's letter of December 1, 1988, that forwarded the report on the routine safety inspection conducted on September 22 through November 16, 1988, on activities at the Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2~The Notice of Violation attached to Mr.Axelson's letter identified one violation, which is addressed in the attachment to this letter.This document has been prepared following Corporate procedures that incorporate a reasonable set of controls to ensure its accuracy and completeness prior to signature by the undersigned.

Sincerely, M.P.Alexich Vice President ldp Attachment cc: D.H.Williams, Jr.W.G.Smith, Jr.-Bridgman R.C.Callen G.Charnoff NRC Resident Inspector-Bridgman G.Bruchmann 8901 13023~(~~90104 PDR ADGCK 050003/~Q PDC 45 ATTACHMENT TO AEP:NRC:1060M RESPONSE TO VIOLATION

Attachment to AEP:NRC:1060M Page 1 Violation"Unit 2 Technical Specification 6.8.1.f requires procedures to be implemented covering the Fire Protection Program.Safety Procedure SP-03.00,"Hot Work Permits" is such a procedure.

It requires that fire watches shall be present, with a fire extinguisher in their possession, during and for 30 minutes'fter any hot work for which the Permit specifies a fire watch.Contrary to the above, at approximately 11:00 a.m.on October 28, 1988, no fire watch was present covering welding of a Unistrut attachment on steam generator No.21, under Hot.Work Permit No.1247, even though the Permit specified a fire watch.This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I)." 1.0 Res onse to Violation The failure to post a fire watch cited in the NRC Notice of Violation occurred during the performance of welding as part of the Steam Generator Repair Project (SGRP)at Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 2.The SGRP involved various hot work activities requiring fire watch personnel.

Our SGRP contractor, MK-Ferguson, is responsible for the actual performance of this work under the supervision of MK-Ferguson's safety supervisor who has the responsibility to ensure that the work is performed in accordance with MK-Ferguson's Safety Procedure SP-03.00,"Hot Work Permits'~" SGRP fire watch personnel are assigned to MK-Ferguson to provide the required fire watches and to respond to potential fire situations.

Before performance of hot work, the MK-Ferguson safety supervisor completes the hot work permit required by procedure SP-03.00 and notifies the SGRP fire watch supervisor if a fire watch is necessary in order to have fire watch personnel assigned to the job.In the case of the cited violation, the need for a fire watch was properly communicated to the SGRP fire watch supervisor by the MK-Ferguson safety supervisor and a fire watch was assigned.However the fire watch left his assigned station before completion of the hot work.This was in violation of Safety Procedure SP-03.00.2.0 Corrective Action Taken and Results Achieved Prior to the October 28, 1988 violation, actions were in progress to reemphasize to fire watch personnel their responsibilities while performing fire watches, including the requirements for the operability and use of fire extinguishers

~In addition, as part of these ongoing Attachment to AEP:NRC:1060M Page 2 actions, a second SGRP fire watch supervisor was added to each shift to further ensure that SGRP fire watch personnel properly fulfill their responsibilities in monitoring hot work activities.

The Cook Nuclear Plant Fire Protection Coordinator, MK-Ferguson safety supervisors, SGRP fire watch supervisors and SGRP fire watches also met jointly to review hot work procedural requirements and the importance of maintaining attentiveness to assigned fire watch activities.

Increased monitoring performed since October 28 by SGRP fire watch supervision, MK-Ferguson safety supervisors and the Cook Nuclear Plant Fire Protection Coordinator has found proper fire watch coverage for all hot work activities observed at the SGRP.3.0 Corrective Action to Avoid Further Violations To avoid further violations in this area, the following additional administrative controls have been initiated for the SGRP: 1.Shift meetings with MK-Ferguson safety supervisors and fire watch supervisors to discuss hot work activities and manpower requirements to ensure proper hot work coverage."2.Shift meetings with fire watch supervisors and fire watch personnel to review fire watch responsibilities and attentiveness to fire watch assignments and equipment.

3.Tours by the plant Fire Protection Coordinator to ensure proper manning and equipment exists at the site of hot work performance.

4.0 Date When Full Com liance Will Be Achieved The corrective actions discussed in Section 2.0 were completed November 16, 1988.Actions discussed in Section 3.0 will continue through the remaining period of performance of the SGRP.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17325B085&oldid=1877906"