ML18018B947: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:
| page count = 4
| page count = 4
}}
}}
See also: [[see also::IR 05000400/1985004]]


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ML Exhibit ll"aroima Power&L.icnt omoan>P.O.Box 101 New Hill, North Carolina 27562 April 11, 1985 Dr.3.Nelson Grace Jnited States Nuclear Regulatory
{{#Wiki_filter:ML Exhibit ll"aroima Power&L.icnt omoan>P.O.Box 101 New Hill, North Carolina 27562 April 11, 1985 Dr.3.Nelson Grace Jnited States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 131'.larietta Str et, Vorthw st (Suite 2900}.Atlanta, Georgia 30323 VRC-339  
Commission
 
Region II 131'.larietta
==Dear Dr.Crace:==
Str et, Vorthw st (Suite 2900}.Atlanta, Georgia 30323 VRC-339 Dear Dr.Crace: In reference to your letter of March 12, 1985, referring to Rll: GFM/RLP 50-000/85-04-02, the attached is Carolina Power 2 Light Company's reply to the violation identified
In reference to your letter of March 12, 1985, referring to Rll: GFM/RLP 50-000/85-04-02, the attached is Carolina Power 2 Light Company's reply to the violation identified in Enclosure l.It is considered that the corrective action taken/planned is satisfactory for resolution of the item.'hank you for your consideration in this matter.Yours very truly, R.M.Parsons Project General Manager Completion Assurance Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant RMP/sae Attachment cc: Messrs.G.Maxwell/R.
in Enclosure l.It is considered
that the corrective
action taken/planned
is satisfactory
for resolution
of the item.'hank you for your consideration
in this matter.Yours very truly, R.M.Parsons Project General Manager Completion
Assurance Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant RMP/sae Attachment
cc: Messrs.G.Maxwell/R.
Prevatte (NRC-SHNPP)
Prevatte (NRC-SHNPP)
Mr.B.C.Buckley (NRC)'eI'E X-se7/1-OS
Mr.B.C.Buckley (NRC)'eI'E X-se7/1-OS 5  
5  
 
Dr.3.'~elson Grac'I<<C-339 bcc: Mr.H.R.Banks~~~Mr.T.A.Baxter (Shaw, Pittman, Potts 4 Trowbridge)
Dr.3.'~elson Grac'I<<C-339 bcc: Mr.H.R.Banks~~~Mr.T.A.Baxter (Shaw, Pittman, Potts 4 Trowbridge)
Mr.C.S.Bohanan Mr.H.W.Bowles Mr.C.Carmichael
Mr.C.S.Bohanan Mr.H.W.Bowles Mr.C.Carmichael (2)Mr.N 3.Chiangi Mr.A.B.utter Dr.T.5, Elleman'.Is.S.F.F!yni 4lr.3.L.Harness'vlr.P.C.Hopkins Or.3.D.E.3effries Vlr.I.A.3ohnson Mr.L.I.Loflin Mr.R.E.Lumsden Mr.R.L.Mayton, 3r.Mr.S.McManus Mr.C.H.Moseley, 3r.Mr.D.L.Nordstrom (LIS)Mr.R.M.Parsons Mr.G.A.Sinders Mr.M.Shannon (Westinghouse)
(2)Mr.N 3.Chiangi Mr.A.B.utter Dr.T.5, Elleman'.Is.S.F.F!yni 4lr.3.L.Harness'vlr.P.C.Hopkins Or.3.D.E.3effries Vlr.I.A.3ohnson Mr.L.I.Loflin Mr.R.E.Lumsden Mr.R.L.Mayton, 3r.Mr.S.McManus Mr.C.H.Moseley, 3r.Mr.D.L.Nordstrom (LIS)Mr.R.M.Parsons Mr.G.A.Sinders Mr.M.Shannon (Westinghouse)
Mr.Sheldon D.Smith Mr.M.F.Thompson Mr.A.C.Tollison Mr.E.3.Wagner Mr.R.A.Watson Mr.3.L.Willis File: HI/A-2D File: H-X-0500 se7/2 Attachment to CPRL Letter of Response to NRC Report RII: GFM/RLP 50-000/85-00-02 Re rted Violation:
Mr.Sheldon D.Smith Mr.M.F.Thompson Mr.A.C.Tollison Mr.E.3.Wagner Mr.R.A.Watson Mr.3.L.Willis File: HI/A-2D File: H-X-0500 se7/2  
10 CFR 50.55(f)(1) requires CPRL tc implement the quality assurance program described or referenced in the Preliminary Safety Analysis Report.Section 1.8.5.3 of the PSAR (versus the Quality Assurance Program, as stated in the Notice of Violation) requires that measures be established and implemented for the selection and review for suitability of application of materials, parts, and equipment that are essential to the safety-relaxed functions.
Attachment
Contrary to the above, on 3anuary 28, l985, the Inspector identified an undersized electrical c ble in DC panei D.-IASA.This cable (No.10$21A-SA)'vas a xwo-condo-x r (/IO AWG that has a maximum ampere rating of 20 amps.It was protected by a 100-ampere circuit breaker and supplied power to Auxiliary Transfer Panel lA-SA which had a loading of approximately 100 amps.This cable had been installed and inspected in accordance with approved design documents and this unsatisfactory condition had not been identified.
to CPRL Letter of Response to NRC Report RII: GFM/RLP 50-000/85-00-02
This is a Severity Level Y violation (Supplement II).Denial or Admission and Reason for the Violation:
Re rted Violation:
The violation is correct as stated.As complete information on load was unknown, an arbitrary size was chosen by HPES Electrical and was input into the cable routing system in order to assure an adequate route was available for the subject cable.The cable card was inadvertently released xo the field prior to final verification.
10 CFR 50.55(f)(1)
Corrective Ste Taken and Results Achieved: The subject/710 AWG conductor was replaced with a/72 AWG conductor per Field Change Request (F CR-E-0052).
requires CPRL tc implement the quality assurance program described or referenced
Corrective Ste s Taken to Avoid Further Noncom liance: Administrative instructions have been issued to HPES Electrical personnel to ensure closer monitoring and control of cable sized by HPES.In addition, a formal guideline procedure to place adequate control and verification requirements on cable sized by HPES is scheduled for issuance by April 30, 1985.Date Vhen Full Com liance Vill Be Achieved: It is currently projected that full compliance will be achieved by April 30, 1985.se7/3}}
in the Preliminary
Safety Analysis Report.Section 1.8.5.3 of the PSAR (versus the Quality Assurance Program, as stated in the Notice of Violation)
requires that measures be established
and implemented
for the selection and review for suitability
of application
of materials, parts, and equipment that are essential to the safety-relaxed
functions.
Contrary to the above, on 3anuary 28, l985, the Inspector identified
an undersized
electrical
c ble in DC panei D.-IASA.This cable (No.10$21A-SA)'vas a xwo-condo-x
r (/IO AWG that has a maximum ampere rating of 20 amps.It was protected by a 100-ampere circuit breaker and supplied power to Auxiliary Transfer Panel lA-SA which had a loading of approximately
100 amps.This cable had been installed and inspected in accordance
with approved design documents and this unsatisfactory
condition had not been identified.
This is a Severity Level Y violation (Supplement
II).Denial or Admission and Reason for the Violation:
The violation is correct as stated.As complete information
on load was unknown, an arbitrary size was chosen by HPES Electrical
and was input into the cable routing system in order to assure an adequate route was available for the subject cable.The cable card was inadvertently
released xo the field prior to final verification.
Corrective
Ste Taken and Results Achieved: The subject/710 AWG conductor was replaced with a/72 AWG conductor per Field Change Request (F CR-E-0052).
Corrective
Ste s Taken to Avoid Further Noncom liance: Administrative
instructions
have been issued to HPES Electrical
personnel to ensure closer monitoring
and control of cable sized by HPES.In addition, a formal guideline procedure to place adequate control and verification
requirements
on cable sized by HPES is scheduled for issuance by April 30, 1985.Date Vhen Full Com liance Vill Be Achieved: It is currently projected that full compliance
will be achieved by April 30, 1985.se7/3
}}

Revision as of 04:59, 17 August 2019

Responds to NRC 850312 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-400/85-04.Corrective actions:10 Awg Conductor Replaced Per Field Change Request FCR-E-4052
ML18018B947
Person / Time
Site: Harris Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/11/1985
From: Parsons R
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: Grace J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML18018B945 List:
References
CON-NRC-339 NUDOCS 8505210502
Download: ML18018B947 (4)
v • d • e


Text

ML Exhibit ll"aroima Power&L.icnt omoan>P.O.Box 101 New Hill, North Carolina 27562 April 11, 1985 Dr.3.Nelson Grace Jnited States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 131'.larietta Str et, Vorthw st (Suite 2900}.Atlanta, Georgia 30323 VRC-339

Dear Dr.Crace:

In reference to your letter of March 12, 1985, referring to Rll: GFM/RLP 50-000/85-04-02, the attached is Carolina Power 2 Light Company's reply to the violation identified in Enclosure l.It is considered that the corrective action taken/planned is satisfactory for resolution of the item.'hank you for your consideration in this matter.Yours very truly, R.M.Parsons Project General Manager Completion Assurance Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant RMP/sae Attachment cc: Messrs.G.Maxwell/R.

Prevatte (NRC-SHNPP)

Mr.B.C.Buckley (NRC)'eI'E X-se7/1-OS 5

Dr.3.'~elson Grac'I<<C-339 bcc: Mr.H.R.Banks~~~Mr.T.A.Baxter (Shaw, Pittman, Potts 4 Trowbridge)

Mr.C.S.Bohanan Mr.H.W.Bowles Mr.C.Carmichael (2)Mr.N 3.Chiangi Mr.A.B.utter Dr.T.5, Elleman'.Is.S.F.F!yni 4lr.3.L.Harness'vlr.P.C.Hopkins Or.3.D.E.3effries Vlr.I.A.3ohnson Mr.L.I.Loflin Mr.R.E.Lumsden Mr.R.L.Mayton, 3r.Mr.S.McManus Mr.C.H.Moseley, 3r.Mr.D.L.Nordstrom (LIS)Mr.R.M.Parsons Mr.G.A.Sinders Mr.M.Shannon (Westinghouse)

Mr.Sheldon D.Smith Mr.M.F.Thompson Mr.A.C.Tollison Mr.E.3.Wagner Mr.R.A.Watson Mr.3.L.Willis File: HI/A-2D File: H-X-0500 se7/2 Attachment to CPRL Letter of Response to NRC Report RII: GFM/RLP 50-000/85-00-02 Re rted Violation:

10 CFR 50.55(f)(1) requires CPRL tc implement the quality assurance program described or referenced in the Preliminary Safety Analysis Report.Section 1.8.5.3 of the PSAR (versus the Quality Assurance Program, as stated in the Notice of Violation) requires that measures be established and implemented for the selection and review for suitability of application of materials, parts, and equipment that are essential to the safety-relaxed functions.

Contrary to the above, on 3anuary 28, l985, the Inspector identified an undersized electrical c ble in DC panei D.-IASA.This cable (No.10$21A-SA)'vas a xwo-condo-x r (/IO AWG that has a maximum ampere rating of 20 amps.It was protected by a 100-ampere circuit breaker and supplied power to Auxiliary Transfer Panel lA-SA which had a loading of approximately 100 amps.This cable had been installed and inspected in accordance with approved design documents and this unsatisfactory condition had not been identified.

This is a Severity Level Y violation (Supplement II).Denial or Admission and Reason for the Violation:

The violation is correct as stated.As complete information on load was unknown, an arbitrary size was chosen by HPES Electrical and was input into the cable routing system in order to assure an adequate route was available for the subject cable.The cable card was inadvertently released xo the field prior to final verification.

Corrective Ste Taken and Results Achieved: The subject/710 AWG conductor was replaced with a/72 AWG conductor per Field Change Request (F CR-E-0052).

Corrective Ste s Taken to Avoid Further Noncom liance: Administrative instructions have been issued to HPES Electrical personnel to ensure closer monitoring and control of cable sized by HPES.In addition, a formal guideline procedure to place adequate control and verification requirements on cable sized by HPES is scheduled for issuance by April 30, 1985.Date Vhen Full Com liance Vill Be Achieved: It is currently projected that full compliance will be achieved by April 30, 1985.se7/3

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18018B947&oldid=1877239"