IR 05000321/1980046
| ML19343C740 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch  |
| Issue date: | 01/19/1981 |
| From: | Crowley B, Herdt A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19343C727 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-321-80-46, 50-366-80-46, NUDOCS 8103250154 | |
| Download: ML19343C740 (7) | |
Text
.
a c r tou e- [s o
UNITED STATES
~,t NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION C4 E
REGION ll
o,
[
101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100 o@
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
+*.+
JAN 2 91981 Report Nos. 50-321/80-46 and 50-366/80-46 Licensee: Georgia Power Company 270 Peachtree Street Atlanta, GA 30303 Facility: Hatch Docket Nos. 50-321 and 50-366 License Nos. DPR-57 and NPF-5 Inspection at Hatch site near Baxley, Georgia f
h/
Inspector:
%
/
Date Signed B. R. Crowle
'!tNid
/!/f!8/
Approved by:
A. R. Herdt, Section Chief, RC&ES Branch Dhte' Signed SUMMARY Inspection on December 3-5, 1980 Areas Inspected This routine, announced inspection involved 21 inspector-hours on site in the areas of inservice inspection (ISI) (Unit 2), licensee actions on previous findings (Units 1 and 2).
i Results
-
Of the two areas inspected, no violations or-deviations were identified in one area; one violation was found in one area (Violation - Failure to approve ISI plan, paragraph 3).
0s250 \\N
,
-
-.
,.
,
_.
--
. -.
_
&
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees M. Manry, Plant Manager
- T. V. Green, Assistant Plant Manager
- D. A. McCusker, QC Supervisor D. R. Glueck, Junior Plant-Engineer Other licensee employees contacted included technicians, security force members, and office ;:ersonnel.
Other Organizations Southwest Research Institute (SWRI)
- J. M. Agold, Project Manager - ISI R. H. Fine, Team Supervisor
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were sumarized on December 5,1980 with those persons indicated in Paragraph 1 above.
The violation of
'
paragraoh 3 was discussed and the licensee had no dissenting comments.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Closed) Unresolved Item 321/80-40-01, Lack of documented evidence for approval of Unit 1 ISI plan. As noted in IE:RII report 321/80-40, the licensee agreed -to locate documentation approval of the of Unit 1 ISI project plan. Approval of the project plan for ISI during the " Spring 79 Maintenance Outage" could not be. located.
Therefore, this item is in noncompliance with paragraph F of revision 1 to Hatch Plant Procedure HNP-904, which requires review and approval of the project plan, and is upgraded to a violation.
The matter is considered to be in violation of Criterion F of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50, as implemented by paragraph
.D.9.5 of the Hatch 1 FSAR and is identified as item number 321/80-46-01, Failure to Approve ISI Plan.
(Closed) Unresolved Item 366/80-13-03, Review of licensee's final dis-position of linear indication.
The indication was inspected during this outage and has not changed from the previous outage.
The weld
'
.
p
adjacent to the indication is included in the inspection plan for liquid penetrant (PT)
inspection every outage as an augmented inspection.
This will insure inspection of the defect area during future outages. This item is considered resolved.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Inservice Inspection - Review of Program (Unit 2)
The inspector reviewed the licensee's inservice inspection (ISI)
program in the ar as indicated below.
The program was reviewed only for changes made since the last outage (See IE:RII report 50-366/80-13).
The requirements for ISI are specified in the Hatch 2 FSAR, paragraph 5.2.8.
In accordance with these requirements, the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI,1974 Edition and addenda through the sumer of 1975 is being used fer the ISI.
a.
The inspector reviewed the ISI program for the current outage to determine whether the program had been approved by the licensee.
b.
The inspector reviewed changes made since the last outage to the following Georgia Power Company and SWRI documents relative to the ISI. program:
SwRL " Project Plan for the Fall 1980 Inservice Examination of Edwin I; Hatch Nuclear Plant, Unit 2" SwRI Nuclear Operating Procedure (NPOP) X-FE-101-1, "0nsite NDE Records Control"
,
SwRI NPOP XVII-AG-101-0, " Data Storage and Retrieval" SwRI NPOP IX-FE-105-0, " Recording Data from Direct Visual, Liquid Penetrant, and Magnetic Particle Examination of Welds" SwRI NPOP IX-FE-104-2,
" Measuring and Recording Search Unit Location and Maximum Signal Amplitude Data During Ultrasonic Weld Examination" SwRI Nuclear Quality Assurance Procedure (NQAP) 2-1, Revision 1,
" Organization" SwRI NQAP 3-1, Revision 1, " Procedures, Instructions and Drawings"
_
SwRI NQAP 9-1, Revision 1. " Document Control" SwRI NQAP 10-1, Revision 1, " Test and Inspection Equipment Control" SwRI NQAP 11-1, Revision 1, "Special Process Control"
.
_.
..-
.
.
SwRI NQAP 13-1, Revision 1, " Deviation and :;onconformance Control"
'
SwRI NQAP 14-1, " Corrective Action Control" SwRI NQAP 15-1, Revision 1, " Audits" SwRI NQAP 15-2, Revision 1, " Qualification and Certification of Quality Assurance Auditors" HNP QA-01-05, Revision 4, " Job Functions and Responsibilities /QA Field Representative Office" HNP QA-05-14, Revision 1, " Quality Assurance Field Representative" HNP QA-03-02, Revision 6, " Training and Personnel Qualification" HNP " Tentative Audit Schedule for 1980" HNP "In-service Inspection Program Audit Checklist" dated 3/1J/80 HNP HNP-6, Revision 7,
" Plant Review Board Administrative Procedures"
HNP HNP-9, Revision 11. " Procedure Writing and Control" HNP HNP-818, Revision 11, " Temporary Procedure Changes" HNP HNP-904, Revision 1, " Inservice Inspection Program" These documents were reviewed to assure that procedures and plans had been established (written, reviewed, approved, and issued) to control
.
and accomplish the following activities:
(1) Organizational structure including qualifications, training, responsibilities, and duties of personnel responsible for ISI i
(2) Audits including procedures, frequency, and qualification of personnel
(3) Gene:al QA requirements including examination reports, deviat;ons from previously established program,. material certifications and identification of components to be covered l
(4) Work and inspection procedures t
l (5) Control of processes including suitably cont olled work l
conditions, special methods, and use of qualified personnel (6) _ Corrective action l
(7)
Document. control
!
!
'
.
.
(8)
Control of examination equipment (9) Quality records including documentation of indications and NDE findings, review of documentation, provisions to assure legibility and retrievability, and corrective action (10) Scope of the inspection including description of areas to be examined, examination category, method of inspection, extent of examination and justification for any exceptions (11)
Definition of inspection interval and extent of examinations.
(12) Qualification of NDE personnel (13) Controls for generation, approval, custody, storage and maintenance of NDE records Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
6.
Inservice Inspection - Review of Procedures (Unit 2)
The inspector reviewed the ISI procedures indicated below to determine whether the procedures were consistent with regulatory requirements and licensee comitments.
See paragraph 5 above for the applicable code.
.
a.
The following procedures were reviewed in the areas of procedure approval and requirements for qualification of NDE personnel:
(1) SwRI NDT-300-1-18, " Dry Powder Magnetic Particle Examination" (2) SwRI NDT-600-15-42, " Manual Ultrasonic Examination of Pressure
,
,
'
Vessel Welds" (3)
SwRI NDT-200-1-47,
" Liquid Penetrant Examination, Color Contrast Method"
,
(4)
SwRI NDT-600-3-55, " Manual Ultrasonic Examination of Pressu*e Piping Welds" l
(5)
SwRI NDT-600-11-30, " Manual Ultrasonic Examinatica of Vessel i
to Nozzle Inter-radius Sections" b.
Changes made to procedure NDT-600-3-55 since the last outage (See IE:RII report 50-366/80-13) were reviewed.
The procedure was l
reviewed in the areas of compilation of required records and l
procedur! technical content relative to:
type of apparatus, l
extent of coverage including beam angles and scanning techniques, calibrat he requirements, search units, DAC curves, transfer requirements, reference level for monitoring discontinuities, method of demonstrating penetration, levels for evaluation and recording indications, and acceptance standards.
l l
L
.
y
c.
Procedure NDT-200-1-47 was reviewed for changes made since the last outage (See IE:RII report 50-366/80-13).
The procedure was reviewed in the areas of compilation of required records and procedure technical content relative to:
method consistent with ASME code, specification of brand names of penetrant materials, specification of limits for sulfur and total halogens for materials, pre-examination surface preparation, minimum drying time following surface cleaning, penetrant application and penetration time, temperature requirements, solvent removal, method of surface drying, type of developer and method of application, examination technique for evaluation, acceptance standards, uad requalifica-tion requirements.
d.
Procedure NDT-300-1-18 was reviewed for changes made since the last outage (See IE:RII report 50-366/80-13).
The procedure was reviewed in the areas of procedure technical content relative to:
examination method, surface preparation, use of color contrast particles, examination directions and overlap, pole spacing, and acceptance criteria.
.
Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified 7.
Inserv'ce Inspection - Observation of Work and Work Activities (Unit 2)
The it.ector observed the ISI activities described below to determine whethei these activities were being performed in accordance with regulatory requirements and licensee procedures. See paragraph 5 above for the-applicable code.
Personnel qualification records for two Level I, and four Level II a.
examiners were reviewed.
.
b.
The inspector reviewed the SwRI " Project Plan for the Fall 1980 Inservice Examination of Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Unit 2" in the areas of number of items to be inspected, methods of examination, l
and extent of examination.
This plan was compared with the l
requirements of:
(1)
"Long Term Inservice Examination Plan for Class 1 components at Edwin I. Hat:h Nuclear Plant, Unit 2" t
(2)
"Long Tenn Inservice Examination Plan for classes 2 and 3
l components at Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Unit 2" l
l_
(3) ASME Section XI, 74 E'dition, S75 addenda..
I Tn addition, site procedure HNP-907, revision 0,
" Inservice l
Inspection Visual Examination Surveillance Procedure for Class I, 2, and 3 Pipe Supports" was reviewed and compared with the above 3 l
documents.
l
!
.
t
'
-
.
.
.
c.
In-process Ultrasonic (UT) inspection, including calibration was observed for the following welds:
'
Line Weld Ext.mination 2E11-2RHR-20C-D
45 degree Angle Bee..
45 degree Angle Beam The inspection was compared with applicable procedures in the following areas:
(1) Availability of and compliance with approved NDE procedures (2) Use of knowledgeable NDE personnel (3) Use of NDE personnel qualified to the proper level (4) Recording of inspection results (5) Type of apparatus used (6) Extent of coverage of weldment (7)
Calibratio, requirements (8) Search units (9)
Beam angles (10) DAC curves (11) Refererce level for monitoring discontinuities (12) Methods for demonstrating penetration i
(13) Limits for evaluating and recording indications (14) Recording significant indications
.(15) Acceptance limits d.
In-process magnetic particle (MT) examination was observed for l
reactor vessel closure nuts 2 NUT-7 and 2 NUT-8. The inspection was l-compared with the applicable procedure in the following areas:
(1) Availability of and compliance with approved NDE procedures '
-
2) Use of knowledgeable NDE personnel 3) Use cf Nn{ pgpgonng] gyg]jfjed to proper level 4)
Recording of inspection results (5)
Examination-method (6) Surface preparation (7)
Suspension medium and viewing conditions for wet florescent particles l
(8)
Examination directions and overlap (9) Pole spacing and yoke lifting power (10) Acceptance criteria Within the areas inspected. -no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
!
t i
,
L