IR 05000321/1980045
| ML19350A415 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch  |
| Issue date: | 02/09/1981 |
| From: | Dance H, Rogers R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19350A413 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-321-80-45, 50-366-80-45, NUDOCS 8103160107 | |
| Download: ML19350A415 (3) | |
Text
.
'[)d o
UNITED STATES
'
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
.,,
g g.
,_ r REGION 11
e 101 MARIETTA sT., N.W., SulTE 3100 k
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 o
+....
Report Nos. 50-321/80-45 and 50-366/80-45 Licensee: Georgia Power Company 270 Peachtree Street, N. W.
Atlanta, GA 30303 Facility Name:
!!atch 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-321 and 50-366 License Nos. DPR-57 and NPF-5 Inspection at Hatch near Baxley, Georgia Inspector:
d.
A. L 2.-7-PI R. F.
oger f~#
Date Signed Approved by:
SM V 7-f-[/
H. C. Dance, Section Chief, RONS Branch Date Signed SUMMARY Inspection on October 14 - November 14, 1980 Areas Inspected This inspection involved 52 inspector-hours on site in the areas of technical specification empliance, reportable occurrences, housekeeping, operator perfor-mance, overall plant operations, quality assurance practices, station and corporate management practices, corrective and preventative maintenance activities, site security procedures, radiation control activities and surveillance activities.
Results Of the eleven areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
810syggjoy
-
-
_-
_ _ _ _ _ _
___. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ ___________ ___ ____
_ _ _
.
.'
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- M. Hanry, Plant Manager
- T. Moore, Assistant Plant Manager
- T.
Greene, Assistant Plant Manager S. Baxley, Superintendent of Operations R. Nix, Superintendent of Maintenance C. Coggins, Seperintendent of Engineering Services W. Rogers, Health Physicist C. Belflower, QA Site Supervisor
'
Other licensee employees contacted included technicians, operators, mechanics, security force members, and office personnel.
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on October 29, and November 18, 1980 with those persons indicated in paragraph I above.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not Inspected.
,
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Plant Operations Review (Units 1 and 2)
The inspector periodically during the inspection interval reviewed shif t logs and operations records, including data sheets, instrument traces, and l
records of equipment malfunctions. This review included control room logs, l
auxiliary logs, operating order standing orders, jumper logs, and equipment tagout records. The inspector routinely observed operator alertness and
'
demeanor during plant tours. During abnormal events, operator performance and response actions were observed and evaluated. The inspector conducted random off-hours inspections during the reporting interval to assure that operations and security remained at an acceptable level. Lhift turnovers were observed to verify that they were conducted in accordance with approved licensee procedures.
Within the areas inspected no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
_
_
.
,?
-2-6.
Plant Tours (Units 1 and 2)
The inspector conducted plant tours periodically during the inspection inte rval to verify that monitoring equipment was recording as required, equipment was properly tagged, operations personnel were aware of plant conditions, and plant housekeeping efferts were adequate. The inspector also determined that appropriate radiation controls were properly established, critical clean areas were being controlled in accordance with procedures, excess equipment or material is stored properly and combustible material and debris were disposed of expeditiously.
During tours the inspector looked for the existence of unusual fluid leaks, piping vibrations, pipe hanger and seismic restraint settings, various valve and breaker positions, equipment caution and danger tags and component positions, adequacy of fire fighting equipment, and instrument calibration dates.
Some tours were conducted on backshif ts.
Within the areas inspected no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
7.
Technical Specification Compliance (Units 1 and 2)
During this reporting interval, the inspector verified compliance with selected surveillance tests.
These verifications were accomplished by direct observation of monitoring instrumentation, valve positions, switch positions, and review of completed logs and records. The licensee's compli-ance with selected LCO action statements were reviewed on selected occurrences as they happened.
Within the areas inspected no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
8.
Physical Protection (Units 1 and 2)
The inspector verified by observation and interviews during the reporting
interval that measures taken to assure the physical protection of the l
facility met current requirements. Areas inspected included the organiza-
'
tion of. the security force, the estabilshment.and maintenance ' of gates, l
doors and isolation zones in the proper condition, that access control and l
badging was proper, that search practices were appropriate, and that escorting and communications procedures were followed.
Within the areas inspected no items of noncompliance or deviation were identified.
I