IR 05000321/1980010
| ML19323B341 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch  |
| Issue date: | 03/17/1980 |
| From: | Dance H, Rogers R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19323B336 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-321-80-10, 50-366-80-10, NUDOCS 8005120260 | |
| Download: ML19323B341 (3) | |
Text
,
80 OM 2 OgD
'o,,
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g
,,
y, a
REGION 11
'
101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., fiJITE 3100 Y
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 4, * * * * * o m/
Report Nos. 50-321/80-10 and 50-366/80-10 Licensee:
Georgia Power Company 270 Peachtree Street, N. W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Facility Name: Hatch I and 2 Docket Nos. 50-321 and 50-366 License Nos. DPR-57 and NPF-5 Inspector:_
d./%/- jy 5 - /7-69 R. F. Rogers' ~
j Date Signed Approved by:
-h
' lt t %u-3 -/ 7 - 76 H.' C. Dance, Section Chief, RONS Branch Dat+f Signed SUMMARY Inspection on January 5 - February 2, 1980 Areare Inspected This inspection involved 90 inspector-hours on site of technical specification compliance, reportable occurrences, housekeeping, operator performance, overall plant operations, quality assurance practices, station and corporate management practices, corrective and preventative maintenance activities, site security procedures, radiation control activities, surveillance activities, and followup of previous inspection findings.
Results Of the twelve areas inspected, no apparent items of noncompliance or deviations
.
were identified.
.
l
,
&
'
_., _. _
_..,. - _ _ _. _. _ _ _ - _. _ _ - - -
.. - - _ -
- - -
i
..._.....:.--..
-
- -. -
.
.
,
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- M. Manry, Plant Manager
- T. Moore, Assistant Plant Manager j-
- T."Greene, Assistant Plant Manager S. Baxley, Superintendent of Operations R. Nix, Superintendent of Maintenance C. Coggins, Superintendent of Engineering Services W. Rogers, Health Physicist / Radiochemist
i C. Bellflower, QA Site Supervisor Other licensee employees contacted included technicians, operators, mechanics, security force members, and office personnel.
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on January 11 and February 1, 1980, with persons indicated in Paragraph I above.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Plant Operations Review (Unit I and 2)
.
The inspector periodically during the inspection interval reviewed shift
'
logs and operation records, including data sheets,' instrument traces, and records of equipment malfunctions. This review included control room logs, auxiliary logs, operating orders, standing orders, jumper logs and equipment tagout records. The inspector routinely observed operator alertness and demeator during plant tours. During abnormal events, operator performance and response actions were observed and evaluated. The inspector conducted random off-hours inspections during the reporting interval to assure that operations and security remained at an seceptable level. Shift turnovers were observed to verify that they were conducted in accordance with approved licensee procedures.
-.,
~
~
..- -.
w
.
-
........ : -
-u.
.
.
-2-s l
6.
Plant Tours (Unit 1 and 2)
The inspector conducted plant tours periodically during the inspection interval to verify that monitoring equipment was recording as required, equipment was properly tagged, operations personnel were aware of plant conditions, and plant housekeeping efforts were adequate. The inspector also determined that appropriate radiation controls were properly estab-
lished, critical clean areas were being controlled in accordance with procedures, excess equipment or material is stored properly and combustible
+
f material and debris were disposed of expeditiously.
During tours the inspector looked for the existence of unusual fluid leaks, piping vibra-tions, pipe hanger and seismic restraint settings, various valve and breaker positions, equipment caution and danger tags and component positions, adequacy of fire fighting equipment, and instrument calibration dates.
Some tours were conducted on backshifts and weekends.
.
7.
Technical Specification Compliance (Unit I and 2)
During ti.is reporting interval, the inspector verified compliance with selected limiting conditions for operation (LCO's) and results of selected surveillance tests.
These verifications were accomplished by direct observation of monitoring instrumentation, valve positions, switch positions, and review of completed logs and records. The licensee's compliance with i
selected LCO action statements were reviewed on selected occurrences as they happened.
,
8.
.
l The inspector verified by observation and interview during the reporting interval that measures taken to assure the physical protection of the
'
facility met current requirements. Areas inspected included the organi-
zation of the security force, the establishment and maintenance of gates, doors and isolation zones in the proper condition, that access control and badging was proper, that search practices were appropriate, and that escorting and communications procedures were followed.
k
,
I i
h
+
i
-
.
,
e.e
,
+
f
-
-
--
..
.
...
. - -.. -,
-.,