IR 05000321/1980047
| ML19345F729 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch  |
| Issue date: | 12/24/1980 |
| From: | Dance H, Rogers R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19345F727 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-321-80-47, 50-366-80-47, NUDOCS 8102190131 | |
| Download: ML19345F729 (3) | |
Text
.
/pa aEGg 'o, UNITED STATES
- Oi"
... :$
'
~uc'e^a aeou'^Toav co==issio"
,
$.-
REGION 11 o,
[
101 MARlETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100 5 ' %,,r /
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
- ...*
Report Nos. 50-321/80-47 and 50-366/80-47 Licensee:
Georgia Power Company 270 Peachtree Street, N. W.
Atlanta, GA 30303 Facility Name: Hatch I and 2 Docket Nos. 50-321 and 50-366 License Nos. DPR-57 and NPF-5 Inspection at Hatch near Baxley, Georgia
Inspector:
d. IcauAe L
/2-ZY"80 11. F -. Rogers (
/
Date Signed
"
..
Approved by:
H. C. Dance, Section Chief, RONS Branch Date Signed SUMMARY Inspection on November 15-25, 1980 Areas Inspected
,
This inspection involved 40 inspector-hours on site in the areas of technical specification compliance, reportable occurrences, housekeeping, operator perfor-mance, overall plant operations, quality assurance practices, station and corporate management practices, corrective and preventative maintenance activities, site security procedures, radiation control activities and surveillance activities.
Results Of the eleven areas inspected, no apparent violations or deviations were identified.
8102 so/S,
<
_
....
_ __
-..
. -
.
.
..
.
.
-
.
.- -
_ _ _ _ -
__.
-
.. _ _ _ _ -
-
_ _ _
.- _
_ _
__._._
_
.
!
e'
!
DETAILS
1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
,
- M. Manry, Plant Manager
- T. Moore, Assistant Plant Manager
- T. Greene, Assistant Plant Manager
,
S. Baxley, Superintendent of Operations R. Nix, Superintendent of Maintenance
'
C. Coggins, Superintendent of Engineering Services W. Rogers, Health Physicist C. Belflower, QA Site Supervise
.
]
Other licensee employees contacted included technicians, operators, mechanics, security force members, and office personnel.
- Attended exit interview f
2.
Exit Interview
.
!
The inspection scope and findings were summarized on November 21 and November 25, i
1980 with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.
!
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings
i Not inspected.
l 4.
Unresolved Items i
i Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
}
5.
Plant Operations Review (Units 1 and 2)
i i
The inspector periodically during the inspection interval reviewed shift-logs and operations records, including data sheets, instrument traces, and records of equipment malfunctions. This review included control room logs, i
l auxiliary logs, operating ' orders standing orders, jumper logs and equipment i
tagout records. The inspector routinely observed operator alertness and
demeanor during plant tours. During abnormal events, operator performance
,
and response actions were observed and evaluated. The inspector conducted i
random off-hours inspections during the reporting interval to assure that operations and security remained at an acceptable level. Shift turnovers were observed to verify that they were conducted in accordance with approved
'
licensee procedures.
.
---i-i-w
,-
-*%..wi,
.
.
o-2-Within the areas inspected no violation or deviations were identified.
6.
Plant Tours (Units 1 and 2)
The inspector conducted plant tours periodically during the inspection interval to verify that monitoring equipment was recording as required, equipment was properly tagged, operations personnel were aware of plant conditions, and plant housekeeping ef forts were adequate.
The inspector also determined that appropriate radiation controls were properly established, critical clean areas were being controlled in accordance with procedures, l
I excess equipment or material is stored properly and combustible material
!
and debris were disposed of expeditiously.
buring tours the inspector looked for the existence of unusual fluid leaks, piping vibrations, pipe hanger and seismic restraint settings, various valve and breaker positions, equipment caution and danger tags and component positions, adequacy of fire fightinst ecuipment and instrument calibration dates. Some tours were conducted onlaekshifts.
Within the areas inspected no violation or deviations were identified.
7.
Technical Specification Compliance (Units 1 and 2)
During this reporting interval, the inspector verified compliance with selected limiting conditions for operations (LOC's) and results of selected surveillance tests. These verifications were accomplished by direct obser-valion of monitoring instrumentation, valve positions, switch positions, and review of completed logs and records.
The licensee's compliance with selected LOC action statements were reviewed on selected occurrences as l
they happened.
Within the areas in:,pected no violations or deviations were identified.
8.
Physical Protectior (Units 1 and 2)
The inspector verified by observation and interviews during the reporting l
interval that measures taken to assure the physical protection of the j
facility met current requirements. Areas inspected included the organiza-l tion of the security force, the establishment and maintenance of gates, l
doors and isolation zones in the proper condition, that access control and badging was proper, procedures were followed.
'
Within the areas inpected no violations or deviations were identified.