BECO-88-024, Forwards Response to Proposed Isap Ii,Per Generic Ltr 88-02. Util Declines to Participate in Program at Present Time

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Response to Proposed Isap Ii,Per Generic Ltr 88-02. Util Declines to Participate in Program at Present Time
ML20149M750
Person / Time
Site: Pilgrim
Issue date: 02/19/1988
From: Bird R
BOSTON EDISON CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
References
BECO-88-024, BECO-88-24, GL-88-02, GL-88-2, NUDOCS 8802290044
Download: ML20149M750 (2)


Text

a >

Osama Pilgrim Nuclear Power station Rocky Hill Road Plymouth, Massachusetts 02360 Ralph G. Bird senior Vice President - Nuclear 8ECo 88-024 February 19, 1988 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Hashington, DC 20555 License DPR-35 Docket 50-293 GENERIC LETTER 88-02: INTEGRATED SAFETY ASSESSHENT PROGRAM II - SURVEY RESPONSE

Dear Sir:

4 He have reviewed the proposed Integrated Safety Assessment Program II discussed in Generic Letter 88-02 and enclosed our response to the ISAP survey. At this time, Boston Edison Company does not wish to participate in ISAP II.

$s' v 2.____.-

.G. rd HGL/b1 Enclosure cc: Mr. D.G. Mcdonald, Project Manager Division of Reactor Projects I/II Office of Nuclear Reac6r Regulation i Hail Stop: 1401 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1 White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, ND 20852 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 NRC Senior Resident Inspector Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station 8802290044 080219 PDR ADOCK 05000293 p PDR

.y ,.

)

Integrated Safety Assessment Precram (ISAF) II Response Fomat to Generic Letter 88-02 Facility Name: PILGRIM STATION Utility: BOSTON EDISON COMPANY Individual Contact Name: J.E. HOWARD, V.P.

.- Phone Number: (617) 849-8900 An expression on the part of of interest the utility.will not be considered a connitment te participate 1.

Would frame?

you be interested in participating in ISAP II? If so, in what time No 2.

Do you believe that an industry /NRC seminar consisting of a brief discussion by NRC followed by a question and answer period would be beneficial prior to making a decision?

No '

k

3. ~Would you be-interesteo in a one-on-one meeting with the f:PC to discuss your particular facility or facilities? '

No

4. If you remain urdecided regarding participation, what additienal inferr.ation do you need in order to make a decision?

Not applicable

5. Do you have any potential concerns about participating in !!AP !!?

Yes, we are performing an Independent Plant Evaluation and will submit it to the NRC if required by a generic letter.

6. Do you have any suggestier.s for progran improvenents or char.ges?

No suggestions t